The Cannibals (1988) Poster

(1988)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
One of the great unseen films
oksar-324 January 2007
When this film was screened at the San Francisco International Film Festival, the Festival's Director spoke, practically begging the audience to "stay for the last 15 minutes. It will be worth it." In fact, the entire film is "worth it." From start to finish, it is an honest and well-crafted surrealist film, indeed in the tradition of Bunuel. It's tone and assault on bourgeois society is reminiscent of "The Exterminating Angel". But while "Angel" gets bleaker and bleaker as it progresses, "Os Canibais" becomes funnier and funnier, until, in the last reel, it explodes in a frenzy of absurdism that would make a devout Dadaist giggle.

Should it ever resurface, British and American viewers will easily understand that "Os Canibais" is a film 20 years ahead of its time. It is not the Thatcher/Reagan pull-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps world that "Os Canibais" is lampooning, but the obscene world of the New Rich as personified by those who shop for shoes while one of the world's great cities drowns.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
entertaining but eccentric movie from an unique filmmaker
Andy-2967 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Portuguese filmmaker Manoel de Oliveira has one of the most unusual careers in the history of cinema. Born in 1908, he made his first movie, a short, in the late 1920s, during the time of silent cinema. He made a few more shorts during the 1930s, but soon came the long Salazar dictatorship, and for decades he was unable to film but for a few movies for censorship reasons, so he retired to manage his family business. Only when democracy was restored in Portugal, in the late 70s, Oliveira was able to return to film-making, when he was around 70. After that, he has been making about a movie a year, seemingly trying to make up for the lost time. He still makes movies today, so unless fate struck, he may soon achieve the remarkable feat of being a 100 year old working filmmaker. Os Canibais, made when he was 80, is a very eccentric movie (no mean feat in Oliveira), being basically a very elegant filmed opera about jealous aristocrats who fight over a virginal bride, ending in an uproariously funny cannibalism act (the gross out element is more imagined that showed). Superficially, it might recall Buñuel, but Oliveira is less interested in being subversive than in exploring (or recalling) older art forms into cinema, like theater and opera, of course. The classical soundtrack is terrific, by the way.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Opera as perhaps Bunuel would have liked it...
Sorsimus14 April 2003
A film of two halves, Os Canibais starts as an opera and ends as a surreal opera. The story is about upper class love and marriage, lifestyle and prejudice, jealousy and revenge, suicide and cannibalism. And so on.

For the first hour or so director De Oliveira keeps the audience in a state of disbelief by showing us the empty life of the upper class in "their own art form": Os Canibais is a true opera- every line is sung, but rewards us in the end by going surreal. You'll know what I mean when you see it yourself.

Even though the last fifteen minutes of Os Canibais are great it doesn't remove the fact that the first hour is somewhat painful to watch. It might be different for people who understand and appreciate opera. The ending can be recommended for everyone who love the films of Bunuel, the works of surrealists or just enjoy good cinema with surprises.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No spoilers needed
miguel_levy200115 January 2008
This is a perfect example of what a «movie» or «film», call it what you wish, shouldn't be: as well as most of Manoel de Oliveira's, truth be told... One can't hide behind prizes in Venice or Cannes (by the juri, Cox, after all the man is older than us, so he must know better)... In terms of directing, he's nill, always has been, unless one considers cutting ppl's heads during the shooting, and not even filming them... I can't even say what is most unpleasant; the same actors he always used (apart from those who unfortunately demised before him), the ever-so bad sound editing, the BAD directing.... Not to say the absence of a plot... As in most of his movies. It's plainly dull, fake voices, stupid plot (if there is one), and I advise it to the same fans of Fellini, who admire him for the same reasons... Those alone... Be sure to watch the Oscars, for M. Oliveira will win , but this time it's a «Career» one.... Some deserved much better, as Ennio, who is a great composer... Not this one though...
9 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed