Where Is the Friend's House? (1987) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
63 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
9/10
desperateliving2 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of the great works on youth, and Kiarostami wrings out as many ounces of emotional truth as he can. When a teacher punishes a student in front of the class and he cries, it has the potential to be cloying, but it's the more breathy, hiccupping type of crying as opposed to that doe-eyed variety that usually accompanies children in tears. The acting, as per usual with Kiarostami, is perfect, not at all showy or actorly. The film is told from the child's perspective, and we see how the adults view children as pestering annoyances, and how adults' duty-oriented simple-mindedness is so often not in tune to the rigid sense of morality that children sometimes have. The film is like an examination of children's moral code of righteousness -- the young hero here needs to return his friends' notebook so he can do his homework, but his parents fail to understand him and see it as more important for him to tend to his requirements outside of school. Meanwhile, his teacher tells the children that their schoolwork should come first. What is he to do? He's trying to do one right thing (that would help another) and getting quashed for not doing another right thing.

The film, which is addictively watchable, plays like a thriller in some ways (albeit a slow one): the notebook is its own character, and in jeopardy when another adult wants to write in it. The search for the friends' house (and the darkening of night indicating the loss of time for his friend to do his homework should he find him) is invigorating and thrilling. But more than that, the film has those little moments of pureness that Kiarostami blesses us with: The soft tenderness when one boy rubs water on another's knee after falling down outside; the wonderful images of children wandering in the slum-like houses and not at all worried about our immediate fears like violence or drugs; or the great scene where our hero sneaks away from his mother, who has forbade him from his mission, with the notebook tucked under his vest -- then realizing he's mistaken his own for his friends'. 9/10
47 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Mubi Selection
yusufpiskin6 June 2021
A magnificent and unforgettable film with prodigious moments where you really wonder how the director did shoot some moments in such an intimate way without being noticed or without making the presence of the camera a problem. It's a poem (to friendship, honesty, childhood, purity) more than a movie.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Lovely
lelia-agostinho12 December 2007
I'm sorry I've seen this movie doubled in Spanish and not subtitled in Portuguese but, even so, I found it lovely. It is all about how children live in the adult's world and how they perceive and deal with them. It is also about how children can understand each other and help each other to survive the power and rules of adults. It is filmed very closely to the children which means we see the adults, houses, streets and landscapes from their point of view. The story is very well written, playing very wisely with our expectations. It is an almost timeless and universal story but the where and when it happens is brilliant.
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Perfection of Simplicity and Innocence
cchaoss3 August 2011
Actually it's hard to find any more words to define this masterpiece than the ones in the title of this review. If you are looking for something that would make you feel like you're reading a classic short story rather than watching a film, then this one is right that film. When you watch a film you have the vision, the sound, the effects, the music; almost nothing's left to your imagination and you watch the film effortlessly. Eventually, the story is misted over. On the other hand, in Khane-ye doust kodjast?, Kiarostami with his fascinating simplicity, takes you deep into a world of childish innocence. Everything from acting to cameras, is full of that precious amateur feeling. You actually feel amazed when you see how well Kiarostami managed to get such natural acting from a cast of all non-professional actors. Each character, each scene is tailored with Kiarostami's masterful observations. The film is so purely simple that, for a second, I even wished we didn't even have the music that plays only in two scenes, though I loved it. I personally believe, it really is a piece of art than a film.
57 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Gorgeous film, magnificent message, a must-see!
pyotr-327 July 2003
This dear and simple story is the most wonderful film I have seen this year. The children are non-actors who bring a reality and wonder to this film that is sadly absent from American films, and you will be left in awe by their performances.

The story involves a little boy who must track down his friend to give him a notebook, or his friend may be kicked out of school. All along the way he is blocked from this quest to "do the right thing" but adults who are too stuck on their own silly business to listen to him and offer assistance. Instead of helping this sincere and good child, they do everything imaginable to block him. How very real this situation is, and how refreshing to see adults forced to examine the condescending way they communicate with children. The child Ahmed in this film is a refreshing hero for little boys... so much better than the smart-alleck and spoiled brats offered up in American films. It is a beautiful story, and it is a beautiful experience to sit and take in this magnificent film!
77 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A meditation on life's simplicity
isura-silva13 September 2015
A true masterpiece. When I watched it in 2015, 28 years after the movie was made, I am ashamed of my time wasted watching Hollywood movies, which had no substance. I watched movies when it was box office hits. This movie showed me what life is, what movie making is all about, how to tell a story. I felt human life to my bare bones. I feel I'm human again. The slow moving pace of the movie , is amazingly engaging, as I was absorbed in the child's journey as if it my own. I wish more parents, teachers and elders would watch it. In this age, we lack empathy, hence we lost touch with our human values. This movie is a masterpiece.
33 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A perfect introduction to Abbas Kiarostami's movies
vivard25 February 2008
This was my first Kiarostami's movie. There could not be a better one. Some trademarks of his movies are minimal dialogs, slow pace, purposeful and realistic acting. Many conversations happen during the ride on a car moving at gentle speed. A stark contrast of what we are used to. Yet, his movies touch you right in the heart. You get very involved with the characters. His movies never get overtly sentimental. He remarked in an interview that he doesn't like to cheat with the audiences.

"Where is the Friend's Home?" offers an insight into the simplistic and innocent world of childhood. Adults do not really see and appreciate that world. Watching this movie is a completely different experience. And writing a lot about this movie does not make a lot of sense. You can hardly wait to watch "And Life Goes on".

A must watch if you are into the art of beautiful cinema.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Deceptively Simple & Profoundly Moving
CinemaClown19 July 2021
A simple, sweet & soul-stirring account of a young boy's quest to do the right thing, Where Is the Friend's House is a gently crafted & sincerely narrated story about the inherent goodness in all of us and through the eyes of its 8-year old protagonist, it covers the themes of morality, conscience, righteousness, determination & everyday heroics while also shedding light on the hypocrisy & beliefs of the adults around him.

Written, directed & edited by Abbas Kiarostami, the film takes a very simple & straightforward premise and formulates an endlessly captivating narrative out of it through scenarios that not only seem credible but also make us all the more invested in the kid's journey & final outcome. Kiarostami keeps the drama as lifelike as possible, neither overstuffing it nor leaving it hollow, and makes sure every single scene is relevant to the plot.

Through the lens of childhood purity & innocence, we notice the indifference of adults as our young protagonist attempts to make them see reason to his dilemma and why it is important for him to right the wrong. And Babak Ahmadpour plays his character to absolute perfection. He gets every emotion, every nuance, every expression right without saying much, his face a landscape of moral conflict that explicitly tells all he's feeling in the moment.

Overall, Where is the Friend's House is a masterwork of simplicity & humanism that takes the smallest of observations to offer a powerfully resonant & profoundly moving statement about our own society. A fascinating slice of everyday life in rural Iran that's steered by Kiarostami's relaxed approach & first-rate craftsmanship and is further elevated by the young actor's top-notch performance, this Persian gem is a must for every film lover & is one of world cinema's finest offerings.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Robert Osbourne is a Liar
gavin694225 May 2016
An 8 year old boy must return his friend's notebook he took by mistake, lest his friend be punished by expulsion from school.

Iranian filmmaker Bahman Ghobadi said that "I always have this film in mind because of the director's profound perspective on filmmaking and its strange and distinct structure." Indeed, this film is quite good, and not surprisingly has found its way to a number of "top ten" lists.

If they don't already, colleges really need something like a "modern Iranian film" class. For most of my life, Iran has been seen as this terrible place. And it is films like these that show, regardless of whatever our governments may think, the people of Iran are a generally good people. We must not confuse the people of a country with the rhetoric of its leaders.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best films on child Psychology
vishal_wall3 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Ahmad's classmate has a bad rapport with teacher because he doesn't finish his homework and is given a 'last' warning. Ahmad by mistake take his notebook home as their notebooks look the same. Ahmad must return the notebook but unfortunately his friend lives a little far and he doesn't know his exact address.

It's a masterpiece. There is no doubt that the only other film, based on the psychology of children, which can be compared with this great film is 'Chilren of heaven'. Feel of the film is 'Bicycle thief' like which was again the main source behind 'Pather Panchali'. Story is very simple but it's amazingly complex. Its about the morality children have which elders are too grown up to own. While Ahmad has such compassion and concern for his friend, for rest of the world it's not even an issue. Ahmad gives a helping hand to his mother at home and so he has to really sneak out. Small details like Ahmad know his friend's father's occupation and so he tries to find people of that profession. In one scene he asks a lady if she knew about his friend and that lady asks him to stop for a while and comes down from her house and asks Ahmad to help him in some very weird work I don't remember. It's brilliant. Film is not made with a documentary touch; it's made with a fantastic film touch. It gives a fantastic view of roads and people in Iran. My favorite scene is when an elder uses the notebook for some scribbling and Ahmad watches it helplessly and disapprovingly. Classroom scenes are marvelous.

Acting wise it's unbelievable how an 8 years old boy has done such a terrific job. Abbas Kiarostami is definitely one of the top 5 directors of our times.10/10
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An interesting film
Jeremy_Urquhart2 July 2023
I think a good deal of it went over my head, but maybe that's on me for going in expecting something simple and potentially even family-friendly. I guess it is those two things, on the surface, because it's got a very low-key premise involving one student trying to find another, so he can give him back an exercise book that he might be expelled if he's found without. Nothing too intense or confronting happens, and while it doesn't scream "kid's movie" by any means, I guess it could be watched by anyone of any age, provided they're patient enough.

This is the first Abbas Kiarostami film I've watched in a while, and it did feel more accessible than I remember the others being. But skimming over other people's reviews, I don't think I fully got everything others have out of it. Yet what I did experience I still thought was good; it's very natural and grounded, and you do get invested in its super simple premise.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
All About Abbas Kiarostami
raul_xabialonso5 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This has become a bigger favourite of mine than even his best work 'Close-up'.

Kiarostami is one of my favourite filmmakers. He introduced a new form of cinema language and took Godard's 'direct cinema' concept to a new and better level.

The simplicity and purity is what will strike you first. The poise, the naturalistic acting and lighting are the trademarks of Kiarostami's films.

The iron doors metaphorically represent the children, that's why the school's doors are also the 'old' doors. The new doors which are replacing the old doors represent those people who are not concerned about the child's feelings or emotions, like for eg:- the nagging door maker. In the end, its an old door maker who gives Ahmed the flower and the story invariably depicts that adults do need to understand the children, their feelings and emotions and guide them to a better world. The solution is not beating them up every other fortnight, even if there is no reason. Certainly Kiarostami sheds light on the prevailing society pretty subtly.

The ending with the flower is a trademark Kiarostami ending. So subtle his style that minimalism is the triumphant element.

Some sequences are really worth remembering. Throughout the child's journey, there are many beautiful situations. Towards the end, the child's haunted face as darkness descends and wind blows strong is brilliant. The child actor is amazing. God knows why he doesn't act anymore. Stands out with one of the best child performances along with Ana Torrent in ' The Spirit of the Bee-hive'.

My favourite part is where Kiarostami chooses to focus on the old man instead of Ahmed as he runs away towards his home at the very end. Kiarostami follows the old man to his house as he walks up the stairs slowly, removes his dress and finally closes the window which first revealed him. This is terrific film making showing the end of a phase of a narration. Kiarostami could have chosen to follow Ahmed with the camera but he has done it throughout the film and he may prolong it unnecessarily, if he does so again. Then next cut shows Ahmed has reached his place and doing homework. The sense of 'completion' is brought out beautifully and certainly that's the poise that makes a master.

Salute
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
intro to rural life in contemporary Iran
jazzest3 June 2003
Somehow this film reminds me of Italian Neorealismo - early works of Visconti and De Sica. Probably socio-economic situation may be similar in Italy in 40s and in contemporary Iran. While the film may be seen as an adorable children tale domestically, it serves as an objectively described introduction to rural life in Iran internationally.
6 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Too simplistic.
Kdosda_Hegen2 May 2021
While the film shows that even the simplest of tasks can become some of the hardest, it's just so dull. Almost everyone in this film is beyond narrow-minded and most of the journey feels not adventurous but more tedious and annoying instead.
8 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Journey Through A Child's Eyes
His Girl Friday23 April 2001
Warning: Spoilers
WHERE IS MY FRIEND'S HOME is a bittersweet, subtle film about a simple mix-up. When young Ahmed discovers he has taken his best friend Nematzedeh's notebook, he's determined to get it back to him, as the young boy is dangerously close to expulsion and can no longer risk their teacher's wrath. He sets out for his friend's neighboring town only to discover finding him amongst the winding, steep streets is no easy task.

In line with Kiarostami's body of work, he never feels the need to spell out plot points, characters' feelings, or the atmosphere of a scene through heavy dialogue. For example, the moment when Ahmed realizes he has Nematzedeh's notebook, we only see him remove his notebook...and then a second identical one. His shock is enough, we don't need to HEAR it's his friend's notebook. We can see it register on his face immediately. Also characteristic of his style, WIMFH pays special attention to the feelings of children, and the injustice of the adult world. And as usual, Kiarostami pulls a wonderful, naturalistic performances from all his child actors.

The L.A. County Museum of Art is currently holding a retrospective of Kiarostami's work, and this film by far is one of my favorites of his work. The quiet climax of this film is so simple and joyous that there was an audible gasp in the theater, a gasp of refreshing delight. Kiarostami may be hard going for the average movie fan, but I believe the rewards of a film like this are too great to pass this by for cinefiles of foreign film.
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
intuitive morality
mcfloodhorse1 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
From the very first sequence in the film until the last, we're shown how the great chasm of misunderstanding existing between children and adults is a universally identifiable allegory.

Our miniature hero runs unheard and unseen through the labyrinthine streets of an old nearby village trying to return his classmate's homework notepad, which he accidentally took himself. The problem is, without it, his friend can't complete his homework and thus risks being expelled from school.

In his quest to find his friend, he encounters several unconcerned adults and a general lack of understanding of the profundity of his mission. The list is a long and winding psychological path mirroring the maze-like passages of the ancient villages...

-His mom seems unable to hear or understand his explanation of the problem -The residents in the nearby village he seeks are oblivious to the seriousness of his mission and of little help - His grandfather is callously concerned with instilling discipline by giving absurd orders instead of offering assistance in his time of need -The iron-door salesman rudely rips a page from the all-important notepad and nearly takes off with it himself -The amiable old blacksmith, though well-meaning, fails to understand the urgency of the boy's mission and out of politeness is placated at the expense of finding the friend's house.

When our little hero runs up the zig-zag hill for a second time to try and find his classmate, we're left in awe at the great lengths to which he's willing to right a wrong, no matter how trivial it is to the ignorant adult world. His sense of responsibility toward his fellow classmate is a small epiphany in a strict moral world of big "truths".

As night falls on the neighboring village, our hero returns home having failed in his quest to deliver the notepad, but not in his obligation to his friend. As the wind blows hard outside his home, he makes a choice to stay up and do the homework again.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Short, sweet and kinda brilliant...!
robbreslin1 June 2011
This is a very enjoyable, slow-paced, yet uniquely enthralling movie. The plot is simple; a young boy must return a school notebook, taken by accident, to his classmate so he can do his homework for the next day. If his friend doesn't get it done he may be expelled. Immediately you are drawn into this simple task, seeing this child's often futile efforts to be acknowledged by the adults around him, empathizing with his difficulties.

A strange sense of foreboding begins to prevail as you await the outcome of his efforts. Will he complete his task and get home before dusk? Why is it so hard to get a straight answer from any of these adults?

The music is often enchanting and contributes much to the atmosphere. Personally I love the old blacksmith he runs into in the neighboring village. An old friendly man with a deep passion for making windows and doors. The life of the village and its history could be seen through the eyes of this old gent, but truly, the boy, has simply got to return this notebook!

If you want to chill out and watch a wonderful tale unfold over just 80 short minutes then go watch this movie. You won't be disappointed.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Exactly the same feeling
arash_mnsb24 February 2006
I saw this movie when I was 15 and really enjoyed it at that time because I could find myself instead of the boy playing in the movie. I was older than him, but I felt there was something, let's say, close connection between us. That was the best movie I had ever seen. I learned many things about life and the world around me. Everyone could see simplicity and honesty in his eyes. After 10 years I saw the movie again when I was around 25; and the interesting thing was that I had the same feeling! I didn't know why? But when I look at that precisely I think the story of our life is so simple: When you do good, you feel good and when you do bad you feel bad! Kiarostami visualizes the whole story simply and memorably, it doesn't matter at what age you are watching the movie, just you can feel it, touch it and live it!
22 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Iranian kid tries to deliver homework to friend. Hearts melt.
tieman646 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Abbas Kiarostami's most mainstream film, "Where Is My Friend's Home?" watches as eight year old Ahmed sneaks away from home and embarks on a quest to return a tattered notebook to a classmate. The classmate, young Mohammed Nematzedah, lives in another village. Ahmed never finds Mohammed's home, and so completes his friend's homework so that Mohammed won't get punished at school. "Good boy," a teacher says the following day. She's referring to Mohammed and his homework. Kiarostami's patting Ahmed on the back.

It's a cute tale. Ahmed's our precious little adventurer, small and fragile, who braves unfamiliar locations and strange characters as he struggles to complete what seems to him to be a daunting task. Everyday objects and situations become scary in his eyes, but he doesn't give up. Kiarostami juxtaposes Ahmed's quiet perseverance with the various oblivious and distant adults who surround him. It's a morality play: "do unto others as you'd have them do unto you", whatever the costs.

Doors and doorways are a repeated motif throughout the film. The film's sustained opening shot is that of a classroom door, and similar references, images and conversations relating to entrances and doorways permeate the entire film. It's a film about openings, portals, possibilities, all of which clash with the seemingly locked down lives of the film's impoverished older characters, and the constraints imposed on them – particularly females – by Islamic society. One sequence features an elderly carpenter proudly showing Ahmed a wooden door that he built. Iron doors, he bemoans (recall the metal door which opens the film), are putting him out of business; the shutting down of portals and possibilities. But Ahmed quietly jumps these obstacles. Meanwhile, the film's adults, though they profess to be teachers and guardians, are all cold and twisted. It is up to Ahmed to forge his own path without them.

The film strongly resembles prior, seminal neorealist works ("The 400 Blows" - Truffaut is a big influence, also De Sica - "Bitter Rice", "Stromboli", "Bicycle Thieves", "Vidas Secas", "Umberto D", even later, slightly more self-conscious films like "Kes"), most of which sanctified the impoverished, focused on the poverty-stricken and wept over little children and their kind relationships with animals and beasts of burden.

Aesthetically the film is (deceptively) simple, minimalist, but consistently interesting. Kiarostami's camera work and shifting compositions are beautiful, tracking with Ahmed, picking up bits of conversation, pausing to eavesdrop on others and packed with blunt sight gags (eg- Ahmed goes up a narrow alley, a cow comes down the opposite way, blocking him). In terms of flaws, Kiarostami fawns over Ahmed too much, salivating over his blank expressions and exploiting his cute, wide-eyed fragility. It's the Walt Disney school of emotional manipulation. But of course this is largely why the film has quickly become a classic outside of Iran.

8.5/10 – Worth one viewing. For similar fare see the aforementioned films. Also see "Children of Heaven", "Summer at Grandpas", "The White Balloon" and the filmographies of Ozu and Tati. I don't quite trust these stripped down, cutesy, ultra-sentimental tales, but if that's what you're looking for, these represent the cream of the crop.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
worst-case Kiarostami
jvorndam21 December 2000
Everyone who's ever complained about Kiarostami's films being dull just might have their case in point with this early film of his. Though I've found "Close Up," "Taste of Cherry" and "The Wind Will Carry Us" fascinating, this film contained limited rewards, offering little of the philosophical subtext Kiarostami is renowned for.
9 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Where is The friend's Home ?
aakash-karkare23 October 2010
Abbas Kiarostami is a director from Iran. His movies are not shown in his native country. But elsewhere in the world he is a critically acclaimed director. His output in the 90's has been tremendously acclaimed and he is called the best or the most important director of the 90's.However before that came the beautiful " Where is the friend's home?" in 1987.

This movie is one of the most human movies I have ever seen. The story is quite simple. A little boy keeps forgetting to do his homework in the book and finally he is threatened with dire consequences. His friend has the book and must return it.

But the story has so much warmth and is shown with so much beauty that it is impossible not to like the film. The characters that we see throughout the movie are very nicely drawn out. Ahmed's interactions with the old man at the end are so beautiful and filled with emotion that I am brimming with joy just recalling those moments.

Akira Kurosawa said of his films, " When Satyajit Ray dies I was sad. But Abbas has taken his place"
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Stuning cinematigrahy, splendid acting
TheKing26 July 2021
The cinematography, colours, textuters, depth and camera handling is outerwordly as are the actors where it is impossible to tell who are the professionals and who are not. The story is compelling but this slow pace does not help the story go forward. It is tedious to watch and I rather've seen more stuning landscape and city scenes.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A brilliant movie by a brilliant director!
Red-12525 February 2020
The Iranian movie Khane-ye doust kodjast? (1987) was shown in the U.S. with the translated title, Where is the Friend's Home? It was written and directed by Abbas Kiraostami.

The movie is set in the rural Iranian village of Kokar. Babek Ahmedpour portrays Ahmed, a young schoolboy who inadvertently takes home his friend's notebook. That would normally just be annoying. However, in this case, it's truly serious. Their teacher has told them that if his friend again doesn't bring his homework to school, he'll be expelled.

Ahmed starts out on an odyssey to a neighboring village in order to bring the assignment book to his friend. Along the way he meets an unusual set of characters. Some are friendly, some are not, although no one is hostile. They just don't know where the friend lives.

Kiraostami isn't a Hollywood director. There are an infinite number of ways to begin this movie, but the way Kiraostami begins it is unique. We see an old, battered door. Behind that door we hear children's voices. OK--let's get inside and see what's happening.

That's not what Kiraostami does. He shows us the door. Then he keeps showing us the door. We don't want to see the door, we want to see the kids. For Kiraostami, that's our problem, not his.

Finally, when the teacher arrives, he opens and closes the door. However, the door swings open. By this time, the door is playing a supporting role in the movie. You can call this strange, or you can call this brilliance. I go with the latter.

Young Babek Ahmedpour is a great child actor. We agonize with him while he gets caught up in a high-pressure salesman trying to sell iron windows, and the old man who made the wood windows that may be replaced. Time is running short, and the old man wants to help, but he's too old to walk quickly. When you're eight, this is a nightmare.

Where is the Friend's Home is a wonderful movie, which works well on the small screen. It's the film that brought Kiraostami to the notice of the world. It has a very high IMDb rating of 8.1. I think it's even better than that.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
9.29.2023
EasonVonn29 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
An educational movie that is quite educational and practical. The universality of most families and teachers is very well captured, and the director's excellent camera work and audio-visual logic make this movie interesting without too many embellishments. There are some scenes that you can't get out of your head even after walking through them twice. Especially the tree on the hill.

The best part of the movie is the part where the boy and the old man are walking at night, a conversation between a child and an old man. It seems that this also symbolizes a span of time.

Very great Iranic films.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A Cute but Tedious Film
benjaminhedley10 February 2013
I've not seen an Iranian film before so i thought I would start with one by iconic director Abbas Kiarostami.

The film reminds me of a recurring dream I sometimes have of trying to get somewhere but being distracted and slowed down by laborious people and tasks. Watching this film was like reliving one of those dreams. The young Ahmed cannot seem to get a break as he navigates the quaint streets of an Iranian village trying to return his school chum's workbook. All the time being held up by tiresome adults who seem hell bent on slowing his progress as they subject the poor boy to banal conversation.

If the story line is tiresome the cinematography is not. The composition of the camera work is quite stunning as we follow Ahmed on his quest, it captures the essence of the village perfectly. A pleasant soundtrack accompanies the film too. Still, these pleasing aspects fail to improve on what is a very tiresome and tedious film. I suggest avoiding at all costs.
7 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed