Dolls (1986) Poster

(1986)

User Reviews

Review this title
158 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Terror movie with awful murders by a malevolent creatures attacking unsuspecting people
ma-cortes30 July 2009
A motley group formed by six people (Patrick Williams,, Cassie Stuart, Carolyn Purdy, Lorraine among others) are stranded during a fierce storm and drawn to mysterious place located in an old mansion. In the shelter meet a kindly old doll-maker (Guy Rolfe) and his spouse (Hilary Mason), owners of the creepy ancient house. One by one they are attacked by hundred of stalking living dolls. The obnoxious and antique little dolls in elegant outfits have killing instincts.

The picture packs suspenseful horror, thrills, chills, graphic violence tongue-in cheek and grisly killings. The real stars are the dolls that are magnificently made by John Carl Buechler as supervisor on Mechanical and Make up Imageries and the master Dave Allen as expert on Stop-motion. Frightening and moving musical score by Richard Band. Produced by Charles Band and Brian Yuzna for their production company called ¨Empire¨ that was posteriorly locked and creating a new called ¨Full Moon¨. Later on, Full moon produced a same type of film, though a little tamer, the ¨Puppetmaster¨ series a ¨ Dolls¨-lookalike . The motion picture is professionally directed by Stuart Gordon who also made the successful ¨Reanimator¨and ¨From Beyond¨. Recommended for gore buffs and terror lovers, though isn't for the squeamish.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If you want to see a really short horror movie that is rather good this could be it.
Aaron137513 February 2004
It isn't super great mind you, but it is rather interesting from what I remember. A group of people stranded in a rain storm come upon a house and seek refuge there. Like many other movies that have this premise, things are a bit odd, as the house is the home of a man and his wife who are very avid doll makers. You can see where this is going, this is a killer doll story sort of like "The Puppet Master" and "Demonic Toys" only this one is better than those. Though it still has humor in it like those two as well. Still though it is an okay horror movie and it does have one memorable scene that was rather funny...the one where the little girl imagines her stuffed bear getting big and killing her step parents (I don't remember if either parent was her natural one). Also stuck in the house some guy and a couple of hitchhikers (at least I think there was two). As you can tell it has been awhile since I saw it. I do remember it ended okay. Like I said nothing to great, but worth checking out.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Generally entertaining
gridoon25 December 2001
This movie is too minor and too short (runs only 75 minutes) to escape the two-star rating category, but it's still recommended to any casual horror fan. Entertaining, well-made and well-written (especially regarding the ultimate fate of all the victims), it's filled with characters that are (intentionally) so dislikable you can't wait to see them killed, and yet the dolls are so vicious that you won't be rooting for them, either. Only problem is that the stop-motion animation is a little clumsy at times, and the dolls' movements aren't always as smooth as they should've been.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining Little Horror
Big Movie Fan17 May 2002
The Dolls was truly an enjoyable little horror film which never got the recognition it deserved unlike the evil Chucky from the Childs Play movies. The Dolls were around before Chucky!

It's an entertaining horror film which I won't give many details about because it will spoil it. There's certainly a few little twists in the story and nothing is quite what it seems.

The dolls themselves were quite creepy. Being a male, I've never had a doll obviously but after watching this film I have to wonder how women could ever keep dolls when they were kids. Dolls are so evil looking (some of them anyway).

This was a great film. I won't spoil the ending but wait till you see what fate befalls one of the main characters.
32 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Short but sweet
jellopuke18 May 2020
It's barely 70 minutes with a wafer thin story but there are some genuinely creepy moments, a bit of good gore, and a kind of fairly tale weirdness to it that all work well. Simple but effective.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Longest Night in the World
claudio_carvalho28 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
While driving in a stormy night, the car of Rosemary Bower (Carolyn Purdy-Gordon), her husband David Bower (Ian Patrick Williams) and his seven year-old daughter Judy (Carrie Lorraine) get stuck in the mud in the middle of nowhere. The family is traveling on vacation and Judy, who lives in Boston with her mother, daydreams many times irritating her stepmother. They break in an old house and the owner, the toy maker Gabriel Hartwicke (Guy Rolfe) and his wife Hilary (Hilary Mason), welcome the invaders. While they are having soup, the driver Ralph Morris (Stephen Lee) and the hitchhikers Isabel (Bunty Bailey) and Enid (Cassie Stuart) also get stuck and come to the house.

The old couple invites the guests to spend the night in the house. Isabel decides to steal the couple and Judy sees Leprechauns taking her to the attic. She tries to tell to her father, but he believes that she is daydreaming. Ralph, who has the heart of a kid, is the only adult that gives attention to the little girl. Along the longest night in the world, the toys get rid off those that are evil persons and only those with pure heart will survive.

"Dolls" is a highly entertaining horror movie directed by Stuart Gordon. The story alternates creepy and funny moments with witty dialogs, such as when the little girl explains that she is not afraid of the dark, but what is in the dark. The special effects with stop motion animation are great and the sets with the dolls and toys that change positions and faces are scary. This movie is better and better than the recent "Annabelle". My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Dolls"
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Moderate horror film.
poolandrews10 November 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I dug my old VHS tape released by Vestron Video (anyone remember them!?) out last night and decided to give it a watch. David and Rosemary Bower (Ian Patrick Williams and Carolyn Purdy-Gordon) and his daughter from a previous marriage Judy (Carrie Lorraine) are on holiday. Traveling along what looks like a dirt track their car becomes stuck in the mud. The sky clouds over, thunder starts to rumble and lightening starts to strike. Through the trees in the distance they notice a large mansion, they decide to seek shelter there. The house is owned by a creepy elderly couple, Gabriel and Hilary Hartwicke (Guy Rolfe and Hilary Mason) who appear to spend their time fashioning beautiful dolls of every type. After David convinces them they aren't burglars, Gabriel and Hilary invite the family to stay for the night. As they eat some hot broth the kitchen door bursts open and two slutty hitchhikers who look like rejects from a rock concert called Enid (Cassie Stuart) and Isabel (Bunty Bailey) burst in soaking wet, plus a kind hearted guy named Ralph (Stephen Lee) who stopped to give them a lift, but it turns out his car became stuck in the mud too, and they also decided to seek shelter from the now raging thunderstorm outside in the Hartwicke's mansion. They are all invited to stay the night. However strange unexplained things begin to happen, and people start to disappear. Could it possibly be the 'little people' Judy keeps talking about? Or is it just her imagination? As the night draws on the visitors begin to realise that these are no ordinary dolls, something in the house is alive and it's not human!

Directed by Stuart Gordon for Charles and Albert Bands Empire pictures, before they set up Full Moon productions that itself went on to produce the puppet master films, as well as numerous other killer toy films. I still thought it was a good horror film, just not brilliant. The dolls them selves are brought to life via a mix of puppetry and stop motion animation, the effects team does a reasonable job. The special make up effects are better with a couple of impressive gore scenes here and there, and Ian Patrick Williams transformation at the end is well done and becomes a little unnerving and freaky. The script by Ed Naha could have used a little more work, nothing is really explained properly, who are Gabriel and Hilary? How can they turn people into dolls? Why does Rosemary throw herself out of a window? All she needs to do is jump over the dolls and run away, I don't understand why she jumps over them and out the nearest window to her death! And that ending feels very rushed and comes across as rather ludicrous. But there are some great ideas in there too, I loved Judy's dream sequence in which Rosemary her mean stepmother throws her teddy bear into a bush, a giant teddy then emerges and transforms into a vicious monster, sharp claws and razor teeth ripping through teddy's soft exterior. It then goes on to bite Rosemary's arm off and kill her dad, afterwards it turns to Judy and opens its arms as if to try and cuddle her, Judy looks at it and says "oh teddy!". Another great sequence is where Isabel is confronted by toy soldiers. One of the soldiers starts to play the bugle and another starts a drum roll, while the rest raise their guns towards Isabel. Once the music stops the soldiers shoot Isabel, an extremely memorable sequence. The acting is variable, Carrie Lorraine as Judy isn't anywhere nears as annoying as a lot of child actors, Cassie Stuart and Bunty Bailey as the hitchhikers are terrible, those accents are awful, where are they supposed to be from? Everyone else is OK. I should also mention the score by Richard Band, it's wonderful. Really atmospheric and creepy and I love the opening theme music, fantastic eerie undertones. At 76 odd minutes it's short, and too be fair needs to be. A decent time waster, but I much prefer the puppet master films, the dolls themselves while being a bit creepy aren't scary or fun. Not bad, just not brilliant either, OK if you've got nothing else to watch and can find a copy to rent, or if it's showing on TV.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
for the young at heart
ksmacy-214 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Horror movies about dolls are alluring, because some dolls, especially antiquated looking ones like in this movie, are creepy; their quiet poise is unsettling. They are problematic, though, because they are so little that it would be extremely possible for someone to escape from them, even from a swarm of them. Most doll movies further remove the horror by making the little playthings real wisenheimers, cracking quips, or killing for fun ala CHILD'S PLAY and THE PUPPET MASTER. Stuart Gordon's DOLLS is probably the best of the genre, because the dolls are innocent; they kill because they are mad or threatened.

The film opens vibrantly with the little girl, Judy, hallucinating a real bear bursting from the seams of her teddy bear, and eating her father and wicked stepmother. The family gets stranded in the boonies and seeks refuge in an old house owned by dollmakers (the wife is Hilary Mason, the blind sister in DON'T LOOK NOW). They are joined by similarly stranded, lovable Ralph, and the punk-grrrl hitchhikers he picked up. The girls are so obnoxious, and Judy's abusive parents are so despicable, as they accuse Ralph of being a child molester, that the film gets boring as it focuses on the dolls picking them off one by one.

It becomes enjoyable again once the dolls almost kill Ralph, but then decide that he is "young at heart". Those who aren't so lucky are turned into dolls, and there are some fun human-doll effects. The single location is handled well, and doesn't feel as claustrophobic as spooky old house movies can. This isn't a great movie, but it is cute, almost like it is a horror movie for kids (inappropriate blood and molestation insinuations aside).
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Creepy Fairy Tale
spacemonkey_fg27 October 2005
Title: Dolls (1987)

Director: Stuart Gordon

Cast: Carolyne Purdy Gordon, Guy Rolfe, Hilary Mason, Stephen Lee and Carrie Lorraine

Review:

Stuart Gordon. The name is synonymous with gruesome acts of myrth, gore, violence and other on screen mayhem. Normally his films are loaded with buckets of blood and gore, yet somehow in the middle of all the gory mayhem he manages to maintain a nice level of drama and character development. Here he decided (along with writer Ed Naha) to go a different rout. Something more along the lines of a fairytale.

The story is about these two rich snobs who go on vacation with their daughter. Along the road they are encountered by a storm that makes their car sink in the mud. So they decide to try and see if they could stay for the night at a nearby old mansion that they see from the road. A few minutes later three other people wonder into the house, Ralph a man who is a child at heart and the two punk rock girls who he gave a lift to. Unbeknownst to them, this is a spooky old mansion that has dolls that come to life. And kill.

Dolls came out around the time in which killer doll movies were extremely hot. Dolls appeared in 1987, one whole year before Childs Play did in 1988. After that in 1989 the Puppet Master series from Full Moon began. Dolls is a worthy addition to this list of killer doll movies because even though it is a low budget production, it doesn't feel like it. Gordon somehow managed to make the film look more expensive then it really was. So kudos for that to Gordon.

Right off the bat this movie got some things right. First off we get a real nice setting, perfect for this sort of horror film. We get a nice storm that never stops. We get the thunder and the lightning through out 90% of the film and we get a huge mansion with dark hallways filled with antiques. To top all that we also get two kooky and weird old folks who are the owners of the mansion and also happen to be doll makers. So as you can see, we get a nice setting for a spooky old fashion film, which in my opinion Dolls is. An old fashion dark fairy tale.

Thats one of the things I liked about this movie. How it emphasized the fact that it was a fairy tale. At one point the old man starts talking about magical nights that go on forever and never stop. That whole conversation right there kind of like gets you in the mood. You know your in for a spooky old time. Since the movie is about toys that come to like and kill, well its only fitting that we see most of the film through the eyes of Judy, the little girl. And since its told from her point of view, its only fitting that the movie is told in the fairy tale atmosphere that I've been talking about.

What we have here is a nice movie to get your little brothers, cousins, nephews etc. all scared with. Id put in the same category as films like Monster Squad, Invaders from Mars, Troll and The Gate. You know, kiddie horror. And that doesn't lessen to the coolness of the movie for me. Since it does manage to be a creepy flick in spite of its child like atmosphere. In fact the movie does manage to squeeze in a gory scene or two in there, just so you don't forget that this is a Stuart Gordon film you are watching.

The special effects are pretty good. Its a mixture between stop motion animation (like the one seen on the Puppet Master movies) and the use of puppets. I think it was very well achieved for a low budget horror flick. The dolls end up looking really creepy, specially in one scene where they all suddenly come to life and turn their heads. That scene was priceless for me.

All in all, this isn't the type of film you'd normally expect from Gordon since it does have a certain innocent charm to it. Its sort of a big departure from his previous films like Re-animator and From Beyond. Those films were drenched in blood and gore. Dolls is not as gory or violent but its creepiness still makes it quite effective. Good thing it is finally out on DVD with a couple of cool extras like a commentary with Stuart Gordon and storyboard to film comparisons. Now if they only released Stuart Gordons other lost film From Beyond (wich I hear MGM is getting ready to release) I could die happy.

Rating: 4 out of 5
39 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Dolls... or the Dolls.
logicproreviews28 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I can remember looking at the VHS tape of this way back in the early nineties when I was nine or ten years old. The reverse cover which displayed rows of dolls looked pretty creepy. Watching it now as a 37 year old in 2020, well, that image isn't as effective. Yet, this title holds up.

Never once was I bored. Dolls uses old horror vibes such as the old-castle-with-creaky-floorboards vibe (if there's such a thing). We start off with a family trio who get stuck in the mud during a storm. Quite conveniently, they see a house with lights on just over yonder. It just so happens that said house "houses" an old couple that in my opinion seemed off from the start.

They were already crazy, the warning signs were there, so the sudden sinister turn didn't land. I mean, after this family break into their seemingly empty house, they actually invite them in to stay the night. Even more ludicrous is the fact that another trio break in a while later (two hitchhikers and the driver that picked them up) - practically inviting themselves in.

In a way the characters here deserve the fate that befalls them all. And yes, they get turned into dolls, save for the little girl in the family who earns the trust and respect of the dolls by befriending a Punch doll (yes Judy's squeeze). The girl and the driver escape and live happily ever after.

The old couple in the house picked their victims the second they saw them and let the innocents walk free. Maybe this is a warning for B&E... burglars be forewarned!

6/10 for a decent, atmospheric flick that has aged well enough. Bonus kudos for the final scene which sees a couple who are stranded after their car breaks down almost in the exact same spot as the family before. Sequel bait anyone?
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Mediocre Filmaking with not much going for it.
Dellamorte_Dellamore0721 August 2005
I wanted to like this movie because I am a huge fan of the Stuart Gordan and Brian Yuzna and watch this back to back with the rare gem "Dagon". After the brief interesting introduction the film begin to lose it's grasp and bores us with predictability and nerve testing characters. The plot consists of a family of three, two trashy punk thieves, and an over weight 30 year old kid type guy get stranded in a isolated mansion with an odd elderly couple while it storms. There's also psycho living dolls running around with various stabbing objects just waiting to hack our candidates to bits.

That's where I'll begin, is with the characters. Besdies the little girl as the lead (Such a cutie) I had a hard time finding any comic relier or interest in the supporting victims, or characters take your pick. The bickering, abusive parents weren't funny or even attractive. I just wanted to see them die after hearing them bicker in the car. The most despicable characters to grace a screen in the eighties also exist in the movie (Yes, I'm talking about the two "Madonna wannabes") If you want to get super annoyed..just check out those two's acting. Example when they are in the room listening to music...excruciating. The old couple weren't annoying just really boring, the movie doesn't really give them much to do except talk as if they were in a fairy tale. I guess they served their parts well, none the less. The fat guy was also boring and most of his antics failed.

the movie at least is graceful enough to start killing the majority of these people off quickly, but the gore is very poor and not done all that well, kind of is a let down. COME ON...THIS IS A GORDON FILM. The direction is moody and competent all the way through, but the tension is non existent and the pace lags at time. Even though still the movie is only an hour and ten minutes..it still dragged on at times.

The dialog was inept and I found my self reading a book here and there.

This movie is weaker then Puppet Master by far, due to the fact PM gave it's little killers personality. The special effects are decent in this though, for it's time. There's just something likable about it at times, it suited the movie.

Only see this movie for a cheap and (QUICK) little thrill, it will happen so fast you won't really remember much about it. Except for the "killer" teddy bear bit at the beginning.

Stuart Gordon isn't a bad film maker because of this either. Obviously.

*1/2 out of ****
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Good fun!
Jugurtha1128 November 2003
Wow, I remember watching this movie as a kid...it has to be one of my all time favorites. If you're looking for a great scary-doll movie, before the whole "Chucky" thing came about, this is for you. It's fun with great effects (for the time mind you) and blends together the right amount of gore and laughs...a must see in my book!
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
clever, pretty good scary flick
wolfson-071411 December 2006
the whole situation/plot is ludicrous. the acting is also bad but the magical/killer doll theme is funny. recommended for a slight scare and a laugh or two. it is worse than child's play 1 and 2 but in no means a copy. it is better than child's play 3 and the remainder of the series. this interested me because of the killer doll picture on the cover which always freaks me out. you will like this a lot if you are accepting the bad parts and you like killer doll flicks.

in the story a bunch of different people become stranded and stay in a mansion that is owned by two seniors that are doll makers. but they hold a secret about the dolls. the victims serve surprisingly different fates. its like a haunted fairy tale.

Rated R for Horror Violence and Some Language
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Eyeballs and dolls and punkers!
BandSAboutMovies25 September 2017
Six people are stranded at a mansion in the English countryside — David Bower and Rosemary Bower (Carolyn Purdy-Gordon, wife of Stuart Gordon), two totally selfish and uncaring parents, and their daughter Judy. Plus, we have nice guy Ralph and two British punk rock hitchhikers, Isabel (played by Bunty Bailey, who starred in two landmark music videos for the band A-Ha) and Enid.

The mansion is owned by Gabriel and Hilary Hartwicke (Hilary Mason, the blind psychic from Don't Look Now), toy makers who fill their home with their creations. As Judy had to give up her old teddy bear by her evil stepmother, they give her a new doll, Mr. Punch.

We soon discover that the dolls are alive and love to destroy humans — the eviler the better. The two girls try to steal antiques and get their faces smashed in and shot by toy soldiers before becoming dolls themselves. Rosemary is attacked by the dolls, then leaps out a window to her death. Her body is brought back to the house, leading David to believe Ralph is a killer.

Meanwhile, Judy reveals to Ralph that the dolls are alive and talks them into saving his life. David attacks, knocking out his daughter and the man he blames for his wife's death, but the dolls save them. Mr. Punch battles David but is destroyed.

The old owners of the house reveal themselves and explain that the house tests people. Either they pass — like Ralph and Judy. Or they fail, like everyone else, and are turned into dolls. It just depends on who believes in the power of childhood. David now becomes Judy's new doll, Judy picks Ralph to be her new dad and she leaves for home.

Meanwhile, we see all the evil folks as dolls on the shelf as new people get stuck outside the house and the cycle begins again.

Dolls is a Stuart Gordon (Re-Animator, Honey, I Shrunk the Kids, Castle Freak) film and feels like a test run for the Demonic Toys movies. There are some moments of great invention, like the giant evil teddy bear and the eyeballs popping out of the punk girl. It was a theatrical release that actually didn't do well, but found new life on video — where a young version of my wife found it and rented it just about every day.

Read more at https://bandsaboutmovies.com/2017/09/25/dolls-1987/
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better than Chucky or Puppetmaster
eric-1449 April 1999
I first saw this as a kid and it was instantly one of my favorite movies. even to this day it is still very good. The acting direction and script is very good, not to mention the score. The scenes with the dolls attacking are top notch. My only problem with the film years later is it is too short. And you would think they would have made a sequel to it by now. they made a million puppetmasters. Dolls was 10 times far better then puppetmaster you would have thought they'd make a sequel. I give it a 10 out of 10. Recommended.
30 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Silly, but enjoyable horror fairytale
The_Void13 June 2006
Stuart Gordon must have been bored with HP Lovecraft films by 1987, and so he directed this bizarre little film. Dolls is kind of like a modern fairytale, as we have a house full of wonders, a young kid at the centre and, of course, a wicked stepmother. Gordon manages to keep the tale firmly within the bounds of horror thanks to some nice gore and plenty of actually quite frightening scenes, but the film has the distinct backbone of a kids' film, and that is what gives Dolls its unique edge. My favourite aspect of the movie is the way that Gordon uses his location, as the house at the centre of tale is every bit as important as the maniacal dolls themselves and Gordon ensures that the atmosphere is always fitting to the action. The plot follows a young girl named Judy, her dad and her stepmother after they are forced to stop at a strange old house, inhabited by a couple of strange old people, during a storm. They are joined by an amiable man and two hitchhikers that he has picked up, and all the guests find that they are in for a night of mayhem as the dolls that the old man makes are alive!

The special effects are one of the standout elements of this movie, and the way that the dolls move gives the film it's most creepy edge. A film about killer dolls really shouldn't work; but it does, and that's mostly thanks to the special effects department. The film has a very short running time, and it's not surprising given the amount of time and effort it must have took to get those dolls to move! The fact that the central plot idea is never really explained loses the film credibility, as a really good idea could have been implanted there; making the whole piece better. The central theme of the movie - that of 'not losing your inner child' - is well used, but more than a little bit silly; and the ending especially piles the sentiment on too much for my liking. Furthermore, I don't think it's a particularly credible idea. There is some good humour, however, and Gordon does well in creating a sense of urgency; which almost offsets the sentiment at the end. Overall, I can't say that this film is entirely successful; but it's a unique movie and Stuart Gordon should be praised for having the balls to take it on. Besides, the transformation scene towards the end is worth the admission alone!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A weird little picture
afkeegan16 June 2011
I was very entertained by this film but keep in mind that I watch very strange cult and horror flicks almost exclusively. That said, Dolls did leave me pondering exactly what audience this film was intended for. Far too gory and suggestive for kids, the story is curiously fairy-tale like and full of the kinds of characters and "humor" one would expect from a Nickelodeon special. It really has the odd ball effect of coming off like a children's movie intent on causing permanent psychological trauma for the kiddies. In other words, kinda awesome for certain kinds of adults. Apart from the paradoxical tone and content of the film, the visuals are a treat! Creepy doll heads galore! Porcelain that turns to flesh, wet glass eyes that dart about in their heads, animated by forces unknown! Oh, the teddy bear scene at the beginning! I don't want to spoil it but that teddy bear scene is something else! Worth checking out!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Another Tale Of Brooding Horror From Stuart Gordon
boblipton16 May 2020
A father, a daughter, a stepmother -- three components of a classic fairy tale -- stop at a creepy house where an old dollmaker and his wife offer them shelter. Certainly you and I, experienced film watchers, would run screaming into the night. The principals in this movie, apparently, have never seen a horror movie, and so they stay, and of course the dolls are haunted.

Guy Rolfe is the dollmaker, and he plays it like a genial Peter Cushing; Hillary Mason, as his wife, doesn't have much to do, but does it very well. There's little in this movie that is particularly novel, but it's all carried out competently vy director Stuart Gordon, a specialist in Lovecraftian horror. It relies more on growing terror than the usual jump scares.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Once Upon A Time..."
cchase16 November 2000
If Sam Raimi had channeled the Brothers Grimm to write a story about dolls in the present day, this is about what they would've come up with. By turns charming, eerie and cringe-inducing, it allowed director Stuart Gordon to rein in the outrageousness he got to indulge in with "Re-Animator" and "From Beyond". There are shocks, there is gore and there is that pitch-black sense of humor, but everything is tempered by the wonderfully pleasant presences of Carrie Lorraine and Stephen Lee, as the only two decent souls in the midst of one of the most unpleasant casts of rotters I've seen in my recent if faulty memory; all of whom come to equally unpleasant, if not deserving ends. Just like in fairy tales...

The Bands and Gordon must've been avid fans of the old William Castle spooker "Mr. Sardonicus," because they find casting perfection in Guy Rolfe as the kindly old dollmaker, who sort of extends the role (and his career) in the "Puppet Master" series. Distinguished character actor Hilary Mason plays off him well, and the two have a wonderfully morbid benevolence about them; like Gomez and Morticia Adams in their twilight years.

Working the other end of the spectrum are Ian Patrick Williams and the always excellent Carolyn Purdy-Gordon as the little girl's abusive and shallow father and "wicked" stepmother. Rounding it off are Bunty Bailey and Cassie Stuart as the brassy, blowsy punkettes who learn all about the virtues of etiquette...the hard way.

Anybody who thinks Chucky is state-of-the-art when it comes to walking, talking, murderous toys needs to check out the effects created by Giancarlo Del Brocco and John and Vivian Brunner. A lot of stop-motion combined with mechanics, (courtesy of the legendary David Allen) but you gotta appreciate the subtleties. Got creeps? Less is definitely more.

A nifty little rental if you can get hold of it.
27 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Film that Knows Exactly What it is.
dopefishie10 December 2021
A Film that Knows Exactly What it is.

There is a wonderful simplicity to this film. It's short & sweet. Feels kind of like an episode of the outer limits or twilight zone with some added slasher flourishes for good measure. It feels a bit like a fairy tale with the moral being: don't be a dick to kids. Def worth checking out if you like this kind of thing.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
not nearly as good as the comments suggest
skinyard22 October 2007
well, let me put it this way...i would recommend this movie for two groups of people: for those die hard horror fans (such like me) or for people who got scared while watching the crow (you wouldn't believe it, but my former German teacher claimed, the crow was a horror movie).

the beginning is good, i thought its gonna be, if not creepy, at least gory ( i had in mind that this was an 80 s flick)...well, i was pretty surprised,not in a good way. no gore, no scares...all in all, i wouldn't recommend it, believe me...you can find something better to do with your 75 minutes.

well, at least it wasn't the worst movie i have ever seen, so ill just give it a 4 out of 10.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Under-appreciated gem
fertilecelluloid5 December 2005
Under-appreciated gem from director Stuart Gordon and screenwriter Ed Naha, who in a previous incarnation wrote film review books such as 'Horrors - From Screen To Scream'. Ed may have learned a thing or two from the turkeys he encountered in his reviewing days because his script for "Dolls" is rich in homage and character. The film borrows its structure from "The Old Dark House" and realizes its ambitions with a cast and crew of highly talented individuals.

Gordon, who directed the entertaining "Re-animator" and perverse "From Beyond" brings a deliciously eerie and playful tone to this novel story of a group of adults who are sentenced to death for losing the child-like aspects of their personalities. The "dolls" of the title are the executioners and they love their bloody work, which is depicted in fine, crimson detail.

The special effects sequences featuring the dolls are realized with stop motion animation and puppetry. For the most part, they are extraordinarily convincing. A scene in which various doll characters huddle together to discreetly discuss the fate of a human character is priceless.

Mac Ahlberg's cinematography is moody and beautiful, perfectly capturing a toyland ambiance within a house of horror; and Lee Percy, who cut the Americanization of the "Baby Cart" films, "Shogun Assassin", delivers another tight, intuitive piece of work here.

Hats must come off to Gordon for the casting of Mr. Sardonicus himself, Guy Rolfe, as Gabriel Hartwicke, the eccentric, twisted toymaker and owner of the film's pivotal location where the nasty events transpire.

Producer Charles Band has made dozens of horror films, but none are as classy as the three above that he made with the talented Stuart Gordon.
26 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Worthy horror film for those who don't watch them
mykungfuistrong13 July 2007
I find many horror films to emphasize young, hot "actors" and gore more than any real story or talent. Even though this is an older, cheesy movie with some dated effects, it's still enjoyable. Most of the actors range from bad to mediocre, except for the kindly old couple, but it's got charm to it, and a message: don't let life turn you into a wicked adult, keep in touch with the childlike part of yourself or you'll reap what you sow. Unlike another review here, I thought the methodology of the story and the "magic" was sufficiently explained, they just didn't hold your hand to reach the conclusion. I like that. All in all, worth watching if you're into some 80s camp.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Great deaths--little else
preppy-317 January 2005
A bunch of people are stranded in a remote house in England during a rainstorm. They are bitchy Rosemary (Carolyn Purdy-Gordon), her husband (Ian Patrick Williams) and their annoying little girl Judy (Carrie Lorraine). There's also a slightly overweight guy (Stephen Lee- who's supposed to be funny) and two female punk rockers. The house they're stranded in belongs to an elderly couple (Guly Rolfe, Hilary Mason) and has TONS of dolls in it. Thing is the dolls are alive...and have very nasty tempers...

I thought I might enjoy this--director Stuart Gordon had made "Re-Animator" and "From Beyond" right before this--two GREAT horror films. This isn't even half as good as them. It has a creepy setting but lame dialogue (and humor), clumsy exposition and takes forever to get to the horror. But the last half hour has some VERY gory deaths (the R rating is well deserved) and some truly astounding stop-motion animation to show the dolls moving...and killing. Those sequences are definite highlights--but they're only a small portion of the film--a VERY small portion. Some pretty good acting helps the slower spots--Purdy-Gordon is excellent in her role and Rolfe and Mason wisely underplay their roles. Unfortunately Lorraine has got to be one of the most annoying little actresses out there--mo wonder this was her last movie. But, more often than not, I was bored...until the last half hour.

This barely got issued in 1987 and was a total bomb. It really is easy to see why. I give it a 5.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A little horror gem
ladymidath24 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I saw Dolls many years ago when movies were still on VHS tapes rather than DVD. Dolls was fun from the get-go, it had the perfect atmosphere, a creepy elderly couple that live in a spooky old mansion. Then there are the unwary travelers, some people that get stuck and seek shelter from a thunderstorm. The storm lends even more atmosphere to the spooky old house where our intrepid group ended up. But as good as the actors were, the real scares came from the dolls themselves. The scenes where the dolls actually start coming to life are really quite frightening. There are a couple of very intense scenes, especially one with a teddy bear. This would be a great film to watch late at night with the lights turned low. It is a pity that they don't make these kind of films anymore, scary and fun to watch with good solid acting and storyline. There have been an effort to make film with a similar theme such as Chucky, Dolly Dearest, Puppet Master and Dead Silence but films such as Saw and Hostel seem to be the more popular in the horror genre today.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed