The Cyclist (1989) Poster

(1989)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Re-inventing the Wheel..
nikhil717927 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
From its premise, Mohsen Makhmalbaf's The Cyclist sounds like a film from the Italian Neo-Realist Tradition of Vittorio De Sica ala The Bicycle Thief. The protagonists in both films represent the under-privileged working class - victims of socio-economic disparity who must endure a daily struggle just to make ends meet.

Although Makhmalbaf shows a great deal of compassion to the plight of the migrant, he is interested in exploring other avenues as well.

Not content with merely documenting the events that unfold, he quickly strays into the more subjective, stylized world, reminiscent of Federico Fellini, who as it happens, also "abandoned" his Neo-Realist roots.

The Cyclist resembles in part, one of the vignettes in Fellini's masterpiece La Dolce Vita – the Miracle at the Field, where two rural children claim to have sighted the Virgin Mary. The media circus and the carnival like atmosphere that ensues are similar in both films.

The grotesque, distorted portraiture of Fellini is employed liberally by Makhmalbaf. The skewed camera angles, the chiaroscuro compositions and wide-lenses all help in creating a surreal, phantasmagoric atmosphere.

Makhmalbaf's film occasionally even ventures into lurid melodrama – especially the scenes of Nasim's wife in the hospital - however these are more reminiscent of the silent expressionistic works of Murnau and Dreyer, rather than the lush, Technicolor dreamscapes of Douglas Sirk. Also, the melodrama is used more as a satirical device to exaggerate the absurdity of Nasim's situation, and of man's inhumanity against man, rather than as a ploy to evoke an emotional response from the viewer.

In only his third feature length film, Makhmalbaf is already brimming with confidence. He paints with broad strokes and is unafraid of using grand gestures.

Moharram Zaynalzadeh as Nasim is perfectly cast in the title role. His long, bearded face and stoic expression convey the lament and yearning of the cyclist. The shawl draped across his head gives him the appearance of a medieval monk. He becomes a Messianic figure – a holy martyr who through the course of the film bears the sins of others.

The cycling exhibition at times resembles a passion play where Nasim is continually crucified. It resembles the masochistic acts caused by religious fervor – pious acts of self-sacrifice, where catharsis is attained through extensive suffering.

The most potent symbol of the film is the wheel. It is a recurring motif that appears at various junctures in the film. It is a metaphor for the ritual of human existence and represents the cycle of life and death.

When Nasim watches an old man attempt suicide, it is under the wheels of a truck. When he dreams that his son is falling into a well, it is the large spinning wheel of the pulley that is once again the culprit.

Circularity in general is a very crucial element in Makhmalbaf's oeuvre. From the stunt motorcyclist in the spherical pit, the well that Nasim and his son dig, to the cycling exhibition – the film is rife with such imagery.

At the end of the film, Nasim fulfills his task and has completed 7 days of non-stop cycling. But now he is unable to stop. Despite repeated pleas from the crowd and his son, he continues circling the empty square.

The exercise has fully become a Dantean circle of hell – a never-ending vicious cycle for Nasim.

This striking image brings to mind the films of German auteur Werner Herzog, particularly Stroszek and Even Dwarfs started small. Both these films also end on a rather ambivalent note with a truck circling endlessly around an empty space. The protagonists in these films also happen to be outsiders; marginal characters that exist on the fringe of society - like Nasim.

The absurd ending also evokes the literary works of Albert Camus, where Sisyphus, a character from Greek Mythology, is doomed to roll a rock up a hill for all eternity, only to watch it tumble down as he reaches the top.

The Cyclist assumes the role of the Absurdist hero that Camus talks about in his essay The Myth of Sisyphus.

Although Nasim succeeds in achieving his goal, the ending of the film is a far cry from a "Triumph of the Human Spirit" movie that comes out of the dream factories of Hollywood.

Nasim's wife continues to battle for life in the hospital, so even though he has overcome this particular obstacle, his respite will be brief. He will have to resume his daily struggle if life is to go on. Makhmalbaf does not sugar coat this harsh reality for the viewer.

The vicious cycle keeps perpetuating itself over and over.

The wheel keeps on turning.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
desperate acts
veloc4 October 2001
A middle-aged Afghani man is alarmed when his wife falls very ill in Teheran. He has no money to pay the bill. He must look after his young son. To raise money to pay for his wife's care he undertakes an endurance contest. He attempts to ride a bicycle for 5 days without stopping.

He circles the same city square, surrounded by onlookers. This is a spectacle. He is a showman in a circus environment. The cyclist becomes the talk of the town. Will he make it? Bets are placed. Various gamblers try to sabotage his attempts, so they will win their bets. Various persons in the crowd cheer the cyclist on, making him their temporary hero.

Director Makhmalbaf has made a splendid film about an ordinary man, driven to desperate acts. Various scenes in the movie are elegantly shot. Performances are credible. This is one film where I really cared about what happened to the characters.

veloc
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One desperate father and husband as an Afghan refugee Everyman
crculver8 September 2018
In the aftermath of the Soviet invasion and civil war, hundreds of thousands of Afghans fled across the border with Iran. There they struggled to survive, offering themselves as day labourers at exploitive wages, harassed by officials and just ignored by the bulk of Iranian society. Mohsen Makhmalbaf's 1987 film BICYCLERAN ("The Cyclist") is an allegory for the Afghan refugee experience,

Nasim (Moharram Zaynalzadeh) must pay the hospital stay of his ailing wife and bring up his son Jomeh (Mohammad Reza Maleki), but even backbreaking labour as a well-digger doesn't pay the bills. When a local business learns that Nasim once rode a bicycle for three nonstop, he offers the desperate man the chance to save his family: ride a bicycle for a week in a makeshift circus ring.

Makhmalbaf communicates Nasim's lack of humanity by giving him very few lines. Most of the film consists of arguments among the gamblers and local politicians who stand to profit or lose from Nasim's act, as in the background he circles around and around and around. This film would already be heartrending if it were a straight-up tale, but Makhmalbaf makes it even more poignant with a light dusting of magic realism.

Though less elegant than some of his later films like NUN VA GULDOON (released internationally as "A Moment of Innocence"), this is a memorable film and it's easy to see how it established Makhmalbaf's reputation internationally. Iranian cinema holds many delights, and this is one of its triumphs.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sympathy
gavin694228 January 2014
The wife of Nasim, an Afghan immigrant in Iran, is gravely ill. He needs money to pay for her care, but his day labor digging wells does not pay enough. A friend connects Nasim to a two-bit promoter who sells tickets to watch Nasim ride a bicycle continuously for a week.

What strikes me most about this film is not even the film itself, which has many good qualities. It is the world that is being filmed. With the Middle East constantly in the news, the region is a common focus of American movies. But seeing the people through the eyes of a director who lives there... it is a completely different experience.

One scholar has analyzed the film as an allegory which parallels the exploitation that Afghan refugees suffer from in Iran and from which they are unable to escape. I do not know enough to comment on this, though it is interesting to note that Mohsen Makhmalbaf, although Iranian, does seem to have a preoccupation with the Afghan people.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very strong, realistic drama that catches your heart
janele2 February 2000
Even though you could narrate it as some strange curiosity like story the film is very strong and realistic drama and you are actually forced to feel all the heavy consequences which Nasim and his son are in the middle of. To rescue his wife´s life Nasim jeopardizes his own. And what other chance has he got? Absolutely alone, penniless fugitive... Makhmalbaf doesn´t make anything easier to his characters, he tells the story with all the roughness, which it really has, but at the same time he catches your heart.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good
Cosmoeticadotcom25 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Iranian film director Mohsen Makhmalbaf's 1987 film The Cyclist (Bicycleran) is one of those odd little films (a mere 78 minutes in length) that, technically, is not that impressive, but whose narrative makes it worth watching. Makhmalbaf wrote and directed the film, and also may have edited it. Its technical merits are few, save for the spare screenplay. There are, however, no greatly structured scenes, no effects of any note, and the most interesting shots are those of the lead character on his bicycle and another character riding a motorbike around and around in a pit.

The acting is nothing noteworthy, because all involved were likely amateurs. And, again, the camera-work by cinematographer Ali Reza Zarin Dast is nothing special; even the occasional quick cuts look more the works of error than planning. But, in just this first film of Makhmalbaf's that I've seen, one can discern that he's likely to be a more daring filmmaker than his main filmic rival in Iran, Abbas Kiarostami. That leads me to my final comparison of this film, and that's with some of the earlier film work of German filmmaker Werner Herzog. The ends of films like Even Dwarfs Started Small and Stroszek are certainly an influence, if not directly, than certainly in some collectively unconscious way. Yes, Herzog's two films are, overall, more polished, but especially Even Dwarfs Started Small shares a zeitgeist with this film. It is as if the films take on lives apart from their directors' wishes.

The DVD, put out by Image Entertainment, is of solid video quality, although the audio leaves much to be desired, in places. It has no English language dubbing, and only white subtitles (against the color background), for only 85% or so of the dialogue. Oftentimes this is the result of a bad job by the producers of the film, but, given the low budget feel of The Cyclist, it could just as well be that the translators found much of the banter between minor characters, and moments of byplay simply were not worth the time and effort, artistically nor financially. That's a shame, because some of the more revelatory moments in film come from the sotto voce moments between characters. There are no special features whatsoever. And, while I mentioned the audio quality being bad, that is something that may be the fault of the DVD company. What is the fault of Majid Entezami, who did the soundtrack, is the bizarre usage of musical interludes, often at inappropriate places, and often with music that is more Indian than Persian.

Yet, despite its flaws, The Cyclist is a film worth watching again. Sometimes the rawest of art forms can strike deeply into the percipient, not so much for the brilliance of its polish and skill, but just for the strength of its plunge, and the sharpness of its edge. This film is one of those films. It is not great cinema, technically nor purely, but it is a worthwhile piece of art that distills the pros and cons of humanity in a universal way, as well as specifically detailing the hues of those pros and cons to a specific place and time. Would more films and artworks do so, in a similar manner, both art and politics would benefit. As it is, only the audience of Mohsen Makhmalbaf's film benefits. Good for them, and better for Nasim, and all those like him, who rarely get to see films, much less be the stars of them.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A story of poverty, exploitation, and above all, love
deerouz16 December 2018
Cyclist is a strong movie, and similar to other early works of Makhmalbaf, intertwines several social messages: justice, exploitation of the poor, con men who try to turn every opportunity into gold, and complete disconnection of the rich and the powerful from the world of lower classes. Other reviewers have commented at length about the social justice aspects of this movie. But it seems what most people miss about this movie is that it is, above all, a love story.

Nasim, a former cyclist champion in Afghanistan is now working as a laborer in Iran. His wife is in hospital, and Nasim desperately needs money for her treatment. For that, he agrees to participate in a betting show in which Nasim would have to ride his bicycle for seven days and nights without sleeping.

It is interesting that Nasim as the protagonist, does not have any dialog in the movie. He only speaks with his face, and nothing in the movie is stronger than the pain and love on his face when he is looking at or thinking of his bed-stricken wife. This is the ultimate love story in which the knight goes to absolute extremes to save the woman he loves from death. How many of us can claim to have gone to such lengths for our loved ones?

At the same time, Makhmalbaf also develops a side story of an innocent love starting to take root: the young boy who accompanies Nasim falls in love with the young daughter of a gypsy. Ultimately they are forced to part ways without sharing anything more than an apple, but the strength of those scenes are significant. In this movie Makhmalbaf showed that his true talent was in depiction of love, not social justice announcements.

Nonetheless, given that this was Revolutionary Iran in 80s the social justice aspects of the movie remains strong, and eventually repetitive. In his early movies Makhmalbaf often fell into the habit of repeating his message too many times and too obviously, perhaps to win favors from revolutionary officials. However if we can put aside the social lens and watch the Cyclist as a love story, we may find it a truly emotional and influential movie.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Poverty and suffering among Afghanis in Iran
Red-12522 December 2016
The Iranian movie Bicycleran was shown in the U.S. with the title The Cyclist (1987). It was written and directed by Mohsen Makhmalbaf. (Makhmalbaf is the director of the highly acclaimed film Kandahar. He is also the director who is impersonated by the protagonist in the Kiarostami movie Close-Up.)

Moharram Zaynalzadeh plays Nasim, an Afghani refugee in Iran. His wife is near death from illness, and Nasim--although he is intelligent and eager to work--cannot afford to pay for her medical care.

In Afghanistan, Nasim was a serious bicyclist who once was able to ride his bike continually for three days. Now, in order to obtain money, he agrees to ride the bike for seven days straight.

There are multiple sub-plots involving gamblers who are pro- or anti-Nasim, but I found that aspect of the movie very confusing. The problem is that the real plot is Nasim's suffering as he continues to cycle around and around the circle. However, you can't have a movie showing nothing but a man riding a bicycle, so director Makhmalbaf had to find something to show us other than that. What he shows us offers a glimpse of society in Iran, and a harsh look at the oppression of the Afghans that have fled there.

I thought the movie would be in black, white, and gray. Absolutely incorrect--the Iranian urban scenes (at least in 1987) were a riot of noise and color. The film is filled with activity, both at the cycling site and the city around the site.

We saw the film on DVD, where it worked very well. Any film will work better in a theater than on a small screen, but The Cyclist didn't suffer much by the transfer to DVD.

As I write this review, The Cyclist has an IMDb rating of 7.4, which is good. I thought it was even better than that, and gave it a 9. However, it's not a movie for everyone. I don't know what audience The Cyclist had in Iran, but in the U.S. this film is definitely for people who like unusual foreign movies with sub-titles. We love unusual foreign movies with sub-titles, so we thought it was great.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
.
vahidn3 January 2020
I watched this becouse Sabzian mentioned this film in Close up 1990.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed