Pikovaya dama (TV Movie 1982) Poster

(1982 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Success in spades
hte-trasme21 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
It's hard to think of two more different writers than Arthur Conan Doyle and Aleksandr Pushkin, but this adaptation of Pushkin's short story "The Queen of Spades" couldn't help but remind me slightly of the Sherlock Holmes films that were also excellently and delicately directed by Igor Maslennikov. With them this film shared not only the presence of Vitali "Watson" Solomin in a good role, but also a close attention to lush but not overstated visual detail, and some wonderful location work that confidently recreates the nineteenth century.

Often film adaptations have the problem that long, detailed novels have to be condensed or heavily cut in order to fit the running time of a feature. Here, that is decidedly not the case, as Pushkin's original story is very short indeed. Instead Maslennikov attempts that thing which is often mentioned but rarely actually tried -- an actual literal adaption. That is to say, he maintains fidelity to Pushkin's text very closely, and introduces a narrator to read the narrations.

It's a strange format for a film, but Maslennikov wisely decides that a narrator with that much of a presence must have a physical presence -- so we have Alla Demidova addressing us directly -- in different places and outfits, moving or standing still, and sometimes in the scene itself. She reads well, expressively, and commandingly -- and including such a very present narrator is a gamble that pays off.

The film looks gorgeous, is well-timed, and bends the conventions of film to its advantage while maintaining respectful adherence to its source. At the end, Innokentiy Smoktunovskiy puts in another excellent and totally committed performance.

Sometimes I got the sense that something was narrated that I would have liked to have seen acted out, but on the whole it felt like such a deliberate step that it didn't bother me and became integral. It's a confident artistic choice, and one that works out.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Really? Like watching someone reading a book
bigbundy6926 February 2016
About 60% of the movie is read by the narrator & the other 40% are actors who use the exact words from the book. Now don't get me wrong, I love the story but when you make a movie you have to add some actors, make them play, show feelings, create a motion picture!!! Here we see mostly the narrator & in between there are short scenes with very mediocre performance. The whole movie is very similar in style to what you'll see in any other USSR movie of that time, so all in all, go read the story, it'll take you about the same amount of time & i'm confident that your imagination will be way more productive in picturing this story then imagining a narrator reading it!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
charming
Vincentiu12 February 2013
honest. full of nuances from Pushkin lines. the secret - at first sigh - a good director. and presence of Alla Demidova, excellent guide on the halls of work. but, in same time, precious atmosphere, the sparkles of details and respect for story. in same measure, the experience of Soviet cinema who saves pieces of a literary text to build a delicate jewel like a delightful fresco. warm colors, precise characters. and delicate drawing. Smoktunovsky in a brilliant role, Viktor Proskurin as realistic Hermann, Elena Glagoleva - impressive as countess Anna and the town as scene, actor and shadow of drama. an old piece of literature in new clothes. must see it ! for the charming seductive Russian precise art.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed