Nastik (1983) Poster

(1983)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Not the Big B's Best!
nmadhuk331 December 2006
Okay.If you are about to watch the movie you must be a Hindi movie buff or a Big B fan!In which case you can afford to watch it.All the others stay off it.

Big B does a few tricks in this movie that even Rajni Kant can learn from.Like how to propel oneself from the ground to the first floor with just a slight jerk of your shoulders and a ludicrous background squeal,and how to shoot goons while you are hung upside down. :-)! Hema Malini and Pran have seen better ages but still both of them are there.

If you know all this and still don't mind watching the movie,then it is fun.I knew it.I enjoyed it.But be warned!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Amitabh really hates God
gurdeepmann5922 June 2012
This film is OK for the first half where Amitabh meets Hema and Pran and all of them start robbing people but the second half where Amitabh's mother comes it just gets stupid

Amitabh plays the son of a priest whose father is killed by Amjad Khan Amitabh takes revenge by blinding him and then takes to crime Amitabh's hatred towards God

Pramod Chakravoty gave good direction but didn't handle a few scenes right such as Nalini Jaywant slapping Amitabh right in the face even though she cannot see and still had accuracy

Above all the cast Amitabh shows potential Hema Malini is funny Pran gives a decent performances Deven Varma is funny Amjad Khan is menacing as the villain Madan Puri is funny Nalini Jaywant is stupid
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well I have seen the film many times
humezaara23 July 2006
As watching Hindi movies this movies has a different outline but somehow lacks many essential things, we know Big B is always good but in this film he is not up to the mark. Pran saab is always at his best and to portray a sad father he gave his best performance. Amjad Khan the villain was also and his best performance. Hema during late 70s & 80s had put on weight and she looks fine but not up to the mark as she was in abhinatri. Her acting is charming but needed more to it. Sarika also had done the best but not that great. As far as film concerned its a film of person not believing in god so atheist. But Deven Verma's comedy was the good part, music was also fine not that fantastic. The climax as usual the hero of Hindi films wins and Villon loses so the climax was happy ending but somehow the things weren't that good in this film. Just before climax things sucked totally. This movie had different outline but sucks overall. The only thing to watch is Amjad khan's and Pran's acting, Deven Verma's comedy and enjoy good music, and overall movie sucks
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Good
TC-Batsy7 January 2011
Nastik is good film to watch but it's a repetition of most of Amitabh's performances where he is always the angry man whose family gets murdered in his early childhood, and later seek revenge once he finds the killer and sometimes reunites with his loved ones when we assume they're still dead! Nevertheless, I enjoy Amitabh's wonderful acting because his appeal is simply unique whether it's drama, action or comedy. As for Nastik, it talks about Shankar's journey as an atheist when he renounces his faith in the gods after the horrible deaths of his family by the evil slumlord Tiger. Blirin and Gori were the perfect companions for Shankar as they earn their living through stealing from the rich until they encounter Tiger and discover his heinous crimes against innocents so they fight him.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lost n found
silvan-desouza1 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
In 70s and 80s several films were made on lost and found theme NASTIK which released in 1983 is another of those.

The film also focuses on a religious theme, wherein the hero is an atheist due to injustice done to him in childhood

The movie suddenly changes gears to a light thief based movie where Amitabh, Pran and Hema con people and there is no sight of that angle for half the movie till Amitabh spots his mother he thought she was dead

Rest of the film follows the typical mundane twists till the predictable end

The film has several unbelievable stunts like Amitabh jumping from ground floor to top floor and also shooting though tied upside down.etc Also there is overdose of songs and action

Direction by pramod Chakravarthy is decent Music by Kalyanji Anandji is good especially Aaj ka yeh din(kishore) and Pyaare tere pyar mein(Amit Kumar, Asha)

Amongst actors Amitabh does his routine act but does it well, surprisingly in the same year he starred in PUKAR where he was against the krantikaris here he is against God, sort of similar thing but yet he does it very well as usual though the film released during his bad days just after his accident and his spate of not too successful films in 1983 he began to put on weight too Hema Malini(last film with Bachchan till baghban) looks thinner then Naseeb and does well for her role Pran plays the similar Zanjeer type chor act who has a heart of gold and does well Amjad Khan too is as usual the villain but does well though looks too fat this perhaps is Amit-Amjad's last film together Amongst rest the actress playing Amitabh's mother is terrible rest are okay Deven Verma and Madan Puri are funny
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Not Too Shiny Corner !
elshikh410 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
If you're accustomed to the age, then you'll get the idea pretty easy. (Amitabh Bachchan) is an angry young man, lost from his mom, has a revenge to fulfill, loves a girl and sings for her, beats - at least - 5 men bigger than him, winning at the end on all the levels. I love that. The thing is how much entertainment it has every time. Accordingly, the amount of fun in (Nastik) is not that great. However, it has some after all.

The cinematography is good. Everyone along with everything looks special and elegant. The set of the village's villa is so strangely dazzling (looking borrowed from another movie). The mom's simple cottage is a sight that vanished utterly from today's commercial movies of Bollywood. It's only the James Bond-esquire lair, with henchmen wearing uniform, that bothered me! The action is well done. (Pramod Chakravorty)'s directing proved some energy and capability. The dialogue got many talented and memorable lines: "And that's how we steal the imported goods / What an imported idea!", "I don't drink, I just get drunk by watching my friend drinks!", and "Money can buy the bed, but not the sleep".

All the cast were their known characters back then; (Amitabh Bachchan); the tough suffering hero, (Hema Malini); the street hustler naughty girl, (Pran); the chivalrous friend (as in Zanjeer, 10 years earlier, with the same introducing fight), and (Amjad Khan); the evil guy you love to hate. On one hand, there is certain strength in every one of them to add absolute credibility to their roles, despite how bad the movie lacks it. And on the other, what a nostalgic feel that we have out of watching them together. Speaking about nostalgia, the songs have such a glamorous touch that I seriously miss. With (Kishore Kumar)'s unique voice, I recall older time in my life, charming time. Look at the sweetness of "Main Hoon Tere Saamne Tu Hai Mere" or "Why Are You So Sad", from one angle; it may be the best of this movie!

While it's outwardly mild, inwardly it is extremely usual and near to flimsy. The story got all the icons of the masala, which had been done close to perfect in (Amar Akbar Anthony - 1977), but with less twists, efforts and persuasion.

The whole story is a small replica of that world; a lost and found theme, a revenge with carrying out the justice lawlessly, a powerful evilness, the importance of being a believer, etc. But many points were so hastily made. And the rest overflowed ruinously with coincidences; at one sequence, the protagonist is beaten while seeing his long-lost mother and sister by accident, then he gets help by his antagonist's sister; who appears suddenly - in the same time and place - by accident, then his own sister goes to the doctor at night to be seen, by accident, by the same antagonist who gets turned on to chase her while meeting, by accident, her brother's friend who his sister was raped by the same antagonist??!! At that point, I came to believe that the world doesn't have humans unless the movie's characters! So we move in our seats, say: "Naaa!", criticize with half a smile: "Com'on, so far!", to nearly forgive it later. Somewhere among the shown colors, stars, music, we hide these objections, trying to enjoy ourselves as long as the movie pays off. Unfortunately (Nastik) doesn't pay off much.

The script expressed the meaning of faith through someone who lost it. Yet the conciliation at the end was the most naive; he prayed to his god, hence his sister was cured, so what if she wasn't cured?! But you won't find sophisticated vision about god and belief, or sophisticated anything, in a Bollywood's lala land, because it's the land of escapism and simplicity, and thank God that it has a meaning anyway; one about the importance of having faith.

It lacked the comedy. Neither the friendship between (Bachchan) and (Pran), nor the competition with (Malini) was used to produce laughs. They relied on (Deven Verma) as idiot man, and his Hitler-like father-in-law to fill up that area, but the results were unfunny. (Nalini Jaywant) didn't convince me as the mother, and not for reasons related to being wont to (Nirupa Roy), the age's familiar mom of (Amitabh Bachchan). Despite the cute presence, she delivered pale performance.

Particularly, I loved the scene of (Bachchan) and (Khan) at the yard while practicing shooting. It's the famous *threat* scene in every melodrama. We had it in numerous Egyptian movies during the 1940s and the 1950s. It's where the protagonist meets the antagonist face-to-face, each one menaces the other yet in a covered way, they pelt one another with very condensed, intimidating and sometimes very wise lines, while having tons of confidence. This is forever cool.

(Nastik) is between average and maybe weak. Even for someone who watches it to evoke the lovely past, resorting to safer place in time, nothing denies lacking excellence. But it's the mood of life to have the big B acting in usual movies. Naturally it's a market where the star always needs to be in the sky for all the time, even if stood in not too shiny corners.

It has nice shadows from nicer originals. Plus watch how (Bachchan) pushes (Khan) from 2 floors high, to land - both - unharmed in the name of having a good time. For me, as a huge fan of Bollywood classics, I like this. The problem though is that (Nastik) doesn't have a lot to make us like all of it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great movie for Amitabh fans.
hammer_pants19 January 2000
Great movie, great acting, great songs. Amitabh is amazing as usual in his role as Shankar. Amjad Khan gives a fantastic performance as well as the villain Tiger. Pran is also great in his role as Amitabh's friend and a father in pain. The storyline is that of revenge (in an indian movie, nooo!). Amitabh plays the "Nastik", a man who shuns his religion because his faith could not save a loved one. Hema Malini also stars as the heroine. I give this movie an 8 out of 10.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed