The Prom (1982) Poster

(1982)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
creepy
owi200130 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Like all Ulrich Seidl films it's not exactly easy to watch this one. But I found this early effort extremely uncomfortable to watch. It rather had me longing for the weird and sometimes disgusting characters of his other films, where the people at least were alive. In Der Ball the absence of any form of revolt or individuality among the youngsters and the officials alike made me shiver inside: This ball/prom is very important for us all. I can dance with many girls. I can talk to people. That's about everything what everybody says over and over again for nearly 50 minutes. The few other voices which sometimes appear (about the pressure of the group vs. the individual) drown among this overwhelming mainstream drivel.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Seidl walking the fine line again, and sadly crossing it at times
Horst_In_Translation18 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"Der Ball" or "The Prom" is an Austrian live action film from 1982, so this one has its 35th anniversary already this year and this is actually an early career work by Ulrich Seidl, considered one of Austria's finest these days. He was only around the age of 30 when he made this one, maybe slightly under even. It only runs for 50 minutes, so it is probably his shortest full feature film (by IMDb standards). By the way, the title here does not refer to the round sports object, but "Ball" is also the German word for a dance event, not a wild party, something more distinguished. I think prom says it pretty well. But the topic here is so specific that I don't believe anybody outside the people in this video (and maybe their relatives) have an interest in checking this one out. Of course, the key is making these people look like normal people and they sure do, but there is absolutely nothing interesting or deep to them and eventually the entire film suffers from it. I know Seidl keeps walking the line with his films in terms of mixing documentary aspects with fictional aspects and this is true here as well. So I guess this is 100% documentary looking at how the one cast member we see in here is not portraying a character apparently, but it's still not entirely clear. What is clear to me, however, is that Seidl in the early 80s was still far from his peak, i.e. the really convincing quality of his Paradise trilogy for example. I give this one a thumbs-down and I am actually glad it only runs for under an hour. If there is one reason to see this one, then it is probably the music as it includes some fairly nice songs. That's enough though to make up for everything else. Don't watch.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed