Warlords of the Deep (1978) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
57 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Entertaining rubbish
neil-47631 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Some blokes arrive in the sunken land of Atlantis, partly by accident, partly by design, and encounter despots and monsters. Shenanigans ensue.

Coming out of the spasm of activity whereby Doug McClure was the action-man protagonist in a number of similar British fantasy movies, this is not vastly different to the others. An adequate plot serves as a satisfactory row of hooks on which to hang a series of action sequences involving "special effects" of a type which was all we had at the time. And like the other films, the monsters are men in monster costumes, filmed in slow motion on miniature sets, which was a bit lame even then. There is one bit where a monster eats someone, and it is quite clear the considerable effort everyone has to go to in order to get out of the way and almost help the fellow into the monster's jaws. Nitrogen narcosis doesn't exist in journeying to and from this undersea realm, and octopuses have menacing roars. That sort of thing.

For all that, it is good natured and barrels along amiably enough. And Cyd Charisse, aged 57, shows that she still has a pretty good pair of pins.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fantastic and spectacular adventures full of monsters in the lost continent of Atlantis
ma-cortes24 July 2009
Searching for treasures , a scientific , his son (Peter Gilmore) and Greg Collinson (Doug McClure) are double-crossed by their crew (John Ratzenberger : Cheers , among others) . Then , they're into a diving bell when are attacked by a sea monster and the sailors are dragged by a giant octopus . Later on , the ship-wrecked crew find inhabitants of the lost world of Atlantis , the lost continent written by Platon . It's governed by an alien race (Michael Gothard , Daniel Massey and Cyd Charisse) from Mars which wish to rule the human beings and the creation a totalitarian state . An incredible tale of terror and suspense...above and below the sea. From the depth of space they came to vanish beneath the sea...

This fantasy picture packs thrills , action , weird monsters , lively pace and fantastic scenarios . The monsters are the real stars of this production and its chief attribute . The tale is silly and laughable but the effects and action are quite well . Among the most spectacular of its visuals there are deeply shrouded caverns filled with monsters roaring menacingly towards the camera , the attack of a giant lizard on a fortress , and the futuristic backgrounds of Atlantis . Some illogical parts in the plot are more than compensated for the excitement provided by Roger Dicken's monsters , though sometimes result to be a little bit cheesy . Filmed in glimmer and colorful cinematography by expert cameraman Alan Hume on location in Malta and Pinewood studios , England . Evocative and stirring musical score by Vickers . This is the fourth collaboration between producer John Dark and director Kevin Connor who also made in similar style : ¨The land that time forgot (1975)¨, ¨All the Earth's core (1976)¨, ¨The people that time forgot (1977)¨, mostly starred by Doug McClure and with the craftsman Roger Dicken as the monster-maker . The film will appeal to kiddies who swallow whole and sit convulsed in their armchair.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining Despite The Flaws
Theo Robertson31 May 2005
!!!!! MILD SPOILERS !!!!! In my review of AT THE EARTH'S core I said that the best of these Doug McClure gets attacked by rubber monsters in a 1970s British movie was THE LAND THAT TIME FORGOT . If this holds true - And it's been years since I saw that movie - then WARLORDS OF ATLANTIS is certainly the second best in the genre Written by former DOCTOR WHO script writer Brian Hayles the story has some imagination even though no one is going to confuse it with a documentary . An eclectic ship's crew is abducted by a giant octopus and taken to the ancient city of Atlantis which is ruled by an alien civilisation which is engaged in a war of attrition against giant rubber monsters . One of the abductees Professor Aitken is wanted by the aliens for his superior intellect while the others will be used as slaves . It also turns out the abductees must be converted into gill breathers within a few days if they are to survive their new environment . Naturally upon hearing this the ships crew don't want to stay in their new home An entertaining enough story and unlike AT THE EARTHS CORE the production values are fairly good since location filming involving oceans and caves are used . There is the old bug bear of actors standing in front of obvious back projection trying to look scared at a rubber glove pocket but that's not enough to ruin the movie , in fact that adds some charm and the script has the temerity to point out that mankind's greatest achievements have come out of fighting one another in terrible wars . There are one or two plot holes like why do the aliens consider Professor Aitken a man of superior intellect since he would have no understanding of space travel or Einstiens theory of relativity , in other words he's a cave man compared to the aliens . You also can't help but notice that when the characters escape Atlantis Delphine the female lead has been rather superfluous to the plot But these minor flaws are never enough to totally ruin the movie for a discerning audience and I have noticed how many comments on this page centre around " I saw this when I was a kid and I'd love to see it again so please bring it out on DVD " It's probably nowhere as good as you remember it from 20 years ago but it still remains a fairly entertaining movie
12 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It Starts So Well...
StuOz15 September 2016
Altantis is found.

This movie begins so well in the first 30 minutes or so (the diving bell under attack, the octopus attacks the ship) but once we get to Atlantis the film becomes less pleasing.

The diving bell footage will bring back memories or Irwin Allen's Voyage to the Botttom of the Sea series and the full-scale octopus all over the ship would have to go down as one of the best filmed moments of 1970s sci-fi cinema.

On top of the first 30 minutes, is a rich and lavish music score that brings the whole thing to life.

But as I said above, the quality is not maintained and you almost get the feeling that another less experienced director took over the flick once they all get to Atlantis. Too bad.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It's still terrible, but at least now possesses a quaint charm.
BA_Harrison7 November 2015
I first saw director Kevin Connor's silly monster movie Warlords of Atlantis at the cinema in 1978, and although I was only 10 at the time, I still came away very disappointed; the problem was that I, along with most of the rest of the world, had not long witnessed the cinematic marvel that was Star Wars, which had set a new standard for special effects driven adventures, and Connor's brand of fantasy film-making now seemed very primitive by comparison.

The narrative structure to Warlords is almost virtually identical to Connor's previous three fantasy adventures, The Land that Time Forgot, The People That Time Forgot and At The Earth's Core: a scientific expedition discovers a lost civilisation (in this case, Atlantis) and encounters a variety of badly realised rubber monsters, after which the adventurers barely escape with their lives. It's also very similar in terms of production values and technical prowess: the performances are hammy, the script makes very little sense, and the special effects are diabolical.

These days, however, it's those very qualities that make this kind of flick so much more fun to watch now than back in the day. The camp nature of the script, Doug McClure's paunch, the unconvincing hand puppet creatures, the giant plastic octopus with uncontrollable tentacles, the awful Atlantean fashion, flying piranhas launched clumsily at the actors by crew members off-screen: what I found embarrassingly bad as a child I now find rather charming in its ineptitude.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cheese with your monster sandwich Mr Connor?
hitchcockthelegend17 September 2009
In 1973, British director Kevin Connor made the tidy and undervalued horror film, From Beyond the Grave with Peter Cushing. But it was the film that he made in 1975 that would signal the start of four Z grade creature features that would make him known to the discerning creature feature fan. That film was The Land That Time Forgot, where he was paired with American beefcake actor Doug McClure, and the marker that culminated with Warlords of Atlantis in 1978 was well and truly set.

Here with this, in terms of fun arguably the second best film of the four after At The Earths Core, Connor and screenplay writer Brian Hayles send McClure, Peter Gilmore and a few rough neck sailor types under the ocean, to where the lost cities of Atlantis be. All of which is a plot perfectly designed to create monster mayhem and meetings with an unknown race that speak perfect English! Into the fray comes giant octopus, various reptilian sea monsters, The Mogdaan, Zaargs and an attack by flying piranha critters. Sure the effects are up and down, even shoddy and befitting the Z grade budget, but oh what fun it is.

The cast also contains John Ratzenberger, who would go on to be a household name playing Cliff Clavin in the long running show, Cheers. Another notable name on the cast list is Cyd Charisse who earlier in her career had appeared in Singing In The Rain and Brigadoon. But it's McClure who is always the main attraction in these pictures. Obviously brought in to keep the American audience in mind, it's somewhat inspiring watching Dougie manfully work thru the movie as if it's a masterpiece of the genre. That none of the Connor/McClure collaborations are genre high points is irrelevant, no amount of dopey effects and string assisted creatures can detract from the fact that ridiculous can sometimes be hugely entertaining. And that is exactly what Warlords Of Atlantis is. Now, where did I put my jar of pickles ? 7/10
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A film I liked as a kid
natnce31 May 2005
"Harrihausen stop-motion animation in all its choppy glory". Where? I didn't see any, it all looked like sock puppets, guys in rubber suits and wood and canvass models to me, standard Amicus/Rice-Boroughs effects. If they had have used stop-motion the effects would have been a lot better, take the Empire Strikes Back made three years later or the Golden Voyage of Sinbad made four years earlier. Please, please don't say the effects were good for the Seventies, because in all fairness King Kong which was made 45 years earlier has better effects and there currently appears to be a trend to excuse anything made before the advent of CGI as "Good effects for their day". As if Spielberg would have used guys in suits a la Godzilla to make Jurassic Park if CGI hadn't have been around in 1992! It's a fun film, however, and very enjoyable, I liked it as a kid and like all the Amicus/Rice-Boroughs films I try to see them when they're on.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Special EFX
onsitewelding_20033 September 2008
OK a lot of folks complain about this film. It is a great storyline with great SFX for the time. Its like comparing a 08 Cadillac XLR with a 59 Coupe DeVille. Ya see back in the day...movies relied on good acting. Instead of mind candy SFX. This is a good buy and a joy to watch. I saw this movie as a kid at the Whalom drive-in Leominster Massachusetts. I remember it vividly! Dinosaurs and wicked cool sea beasts make a kids imagination come alive. A classic take of betrayal and good guy beats bad guys and wins girl. Anyone who complains about this would be the same person complaining about the guy in the rubber godzilla suit. Its about the story and the acting. 1978 guys! Star wars came out about the same time ya know!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Gore Mongral's Movie Review: Warlords of Atlantis
ChiefGoreMongral6 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
"Warlords" tells the tale of 2 scientist's (father and son), a captain, a crew of questionable deck hands, a young boy and our hero Greg, aka Doug McClure who are out to discover the lost city of Atlantis with a revolutionary diving device Greg has created that is bottomless. Along the way however some things go bad and the crew are attacked by several creatures including a giant octopus as well as the occupants of Atlantis. The Atlantians capture them and an escape attempt is made by our crew to get out of Atlantis before they are "altered" to live there forever.

If you are a fan of rubber suits and puppets as oppose to the modern day CGI you are in for a treat as this film deliveries many different beasties made of the Godzilla style persuasion. After saying that if you are not one to be into that kind of effects then you will not really like what this movie has in store for you. For me I liked them and thought it added a certain charm that you cannot get with a movie made nowadays.

The story is basic and there is really nothing here that is awe inspiring or revolutionary but as far as a PG rated adventure goes (the first I've actually entered a review on I believe) this one is a nice little ride. If you have little ones they will more than likely be entertained by all the monsters and more than likely your inner child will enjoy them as well.

No gore here, nothing horrific just a nice little escape along the lines of a descent Fantasy or Sci-Fi film. People looking for anything else than a 70's style low budget adventure film need not apply all others I would encourage you to give it a look. My score for "Warlords of Atlantis" is: 5/10: Average, a nice little escape nothing huge here, just a nice change of pace film to show off to the kids that will not make you want to rip out your eyes.

This movie has not yet received a Stateside release however for a little "pound" you can get this one from England, courtesy of the DVD company Cinema Club. It is a 16:9 Animorphic transfer with an English Mono only audio.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another Doug McClure gem
neil-douglas201030 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
A fine example of a film that's greater than it's parts, it's got it's exciting moments and pieces of padding but the main thing is the two lead actors. Doug McClure and Peter Gilmore are excellent as the two intrepid explorers on the Texas Rose ship captained by Shane Rimmer as Captain Daniels. Greg (McClure) has invented a ship to go under the sea, and he and Charles (Gilmore) explore the ocean in it. The ship is attacked and the crew plus Greg and Charles find themselves in Atlantis. It's not a paradise though, it's ruled by a group of leaders and their spear weaponed Guardians. They have to escape but Charles has been taken because of his superior intellect. Helped by the native Delphine (Lea Brodie) they rescue Charles and escape back home, but they learn that the crew, including the captain, plan to steal the treasure from Atlantis. Nevertheless a creature arrives from beneath the sea, takes back the treasure and destroys the ship. Luckily Greg, Charles and the other survivors from the ship get in a boat and flee the scene.

Perfect viewing for a Sunday afternoon with enough to keep anyone happy.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Has not aged well.
alsation726 November 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Let me get this straight ... a group of Atlantean Elites control the Earth from an underwater kingdom and have powers we cannot possibly fathom, yet to repel giant man-eating beasts that threaten their very civilization the best they can do is throw rocks at them from above?

The Atlantean Ruling class keep their civilization going by abducting human sailors passing through the Bermuda Triangle.

This was enjoyable enough as a simple adventure story but you definitely have to turn your brain off at the door.

Actually the animatronics are impeccable, I was left believing these creatures were real ... NOT. The puppetry is laughable for the late seventies, its good for a laugh.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Classic fantasy.
G.Spider13 June 1999
I don't know what people have against this movie. Okay, so some of the special effects aren't great, but to be honest I prefer films like this which have interesting plots, solid characters and imaginative scenery to the kind of effects-dependent trash Hollywood is currently churning out without care or interest.

The story involves scientists intending to explore under the ocean with the use of a diving-bell. However, after they find a gold statue they, together with most of the crew of their ship, are abducted by a giant octopus and taken to the lost undersea world of Atlantis.

This is a classic and highly entertaining film with good performances from the cast and atmospheric settings with appropriately haunting music.
47 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Typical Kevin Connor 70's fantasy: it has it's style but not a lot
Al_Truist8028 October 2000
Warning: Spoilers
One of director Connor and Producer John Darks' better efforts, but that's hardly a recommendation. On the plus side: some good location shooting at Malta Gozo, coupled with a few middling to poor studio sets and matte backdrops. This has a bigger-budget look to it than some of Connor's previous efforts (At The Earth's Core). The music is excellent and deserved better than this, it really gives the film added pace and an other-worldly air. Some of the effects are okay. What's missing: just about everything that's crucial in the making of a ‘good' film is absent here: adequate script, good acting, cohesive and workable plot , and crucial to any fantasy, convincing special effects. (BIG SPOILER) A hunk of rock from Mars has broken off (I think) and with it's inhabitants intact, crashes into the Atlantic Ocean whereby the Atlanteans, as they come to be known, rebuild their civilisation with themselves as the ruling class and ship-wrecked humans as the underclass, both struggling to survive against the erosion of time and the mutant creatures who also originated from Mars. Scene: some time in the future (1896) an English professor & his son are looking for the lost cit(ies) of Atlantis & it's supposed treasures at the Bermuda triangle. They don't tell this to the engineer Collinson (Doug McClure) who has prepared a diving-bell for them, the ship captain, or the three shipmates (proper pirate-types) who think this is just a marine reptile analysing expedition. They do find marine life, but one such specimen, an over-sized octopus, attacks the ship after an Atlantean statue is discovered by the bell. The four mariners and the bell (containing Collinson and the professors' son) are dragged under by the beast to Atlantis. After arriving, perfectly healthy, in a huge cavern, they are promptly captured by Atmir (an atlantean featuring typical atlantean well-groomed locks) and made to cross a mutant-infested swamp to get to their cities. Here our explorers are imprisoned by these evil gilled people, destined for the front line as replacements for the troops fighting the constantly attacking mutants. This is except for Peter Gilmore whose ‘superior British intelligence' is needed to fly the Atlanteans back from whence they came –but not before (gasp) they have conquered the Earth Nazi-style. They place this device on his head and he begins to see future visions of war and scientific advances (commence old stock footage of the Nazis and 20th century technology projected onto the walls) With his help they can build neutron bombs and become supreme rulers of Earth! So, he is also required to ‘INVENT' space travel to fly them back to Mars. Quite ambitious you think. But instead of trying to explain exactly HOW this man's intelligence will help them build rockets, the writer had evidently run out of ideas at this point and decided on the `let's just get out of here' routine that works in so many cheap adventure movies. After a mutant smashes the cell in –their cell is on the outer city walls closest to the monsters– the prisoners attempt to rescue their friend who is coming under the Atlanteans trance and soon to be given gills (how?) so he will never be allowed to leave. They aren't underwater, why the gills? Escape isn't tricky because most of the guards are busy fighting mutants. Atraxon (one of the Atlantean leaders mesmerising Gilmore) seems incapable of physically stopping them. They make their way out of the city and back across the swamps, pausing momentarily to evade obligatory mutants and dodge plastic piranhas thrown by the film crew. Back at the diving bell, they are ambushed by Atmir & pals (female guide: `they must have used the underground canals!' You ARE underground!), and despite being tossed around by Atmir's screaming water spell (you have to watch it) they escape in the bell. After some silly mutinous antics, the ship is sunk by the octopus who wants the statue back, and the remainder escape on a spare boat. The end? Another pressing detail unexplained: they're miles from anywhere with no rations, how will they survive? The acting is pretty lazy considering the talent, but they're only acting out the poor roles provided by the script. For example, to emphasise Doug McClure's stupidity, we have him, 1/3 of the way through, realising that this is not your average fishing foray. Daniel Massey and Cyd Charisse, possibly the most well-known to star, only stand around pretending to look authoritative and indomitable, barking out the occasional order. A waste of their talents, but why did they want to do this? The only really lively part is played by the Irish guy, but this stereotype is monster fodder. After he goes, Hal Galili and John Ratzenburger are left to fight amongst themselves as the bad duo. Which leaves me to discuss the effects. For the late seventies the effects are, to say the least, disappointing. Okay some monster set pieces / stop-motion photography were good when not climbing up miniature city walls and abusing gravity, but on the whole they are cheap-looking. The eel-thing near the start was a rubber outfit dangled by elastic in a fish tank. The octopus was okay, before it became clay and wire. The swamp mutants were either men in rubber suits or bad stop-motion , but they weren't ground-breaking in any department (but effectively scary for kids). Warlords is a diverting boys-own yarn clearly aimed at a younger audience. This is a shame because it could have been so much better after such a promising opening, but it only degenerates into well worn seventies cliche's, a climax of silly special effects and bad acting.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
mediocre mad max meets sinbad meets cable TV tripe
r-c-s22 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
one word to describe this movie: mediocre. sort of mad max (see the prisoners and the atlantean first cities ) meets sinbad (SFX would still be poor if dated 20 years earlier ) meets cable TV tripe, like those "lost/treasure island" short telepictures from the 1960-70s for a young audience. Acting is mediocre-to-poor. When gummy faced Mcclure plays the hot dud to impress the mad max belle, well...how corny can anything get? A superior race of martians defends itself using XIX century rifles and cannons? Do me a favor...lock the screenplay writer in a padded cell. They also try to add the victorian element, so well done and fitting in the earlier Dracula movies, yet with poor results here. All in all, rather than a real movie (yes, low budget and all ), it looked like an extended episode from some cable TV "adventure" series. They even try to add plot twists, but it gets even more laughable. Pathetic main actors; even ridiculous supporting cast. Perhaps Lea Brodie is the less pathetic one. Yes, you get monsters, but the Japanese ones decades older were much better. This tripe makes Harryhausen's SFX - a craftsman in his own right albeit very dated - look better than Matrix, Terminator II and Jurassic Park stitched together. Gummy faced Mcclure makes Arnold look like Laurence Olivier, and Gilmore makes Keanu Reeves better than Al Pacino, go figure.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Switch off your brain and enjoy...
Elle Jay22 February 2002
This is the first time I've commented on a movie, and it's fairly appropriate to be writing about this one as this was the first movie my dad ever bought for our shiny new video recorder. Well, I must take after my dad in my movie taste, as I though this was (and still is) a very entertaining and enjoyable film. I don't really care if the acting is wooden (what else would you expect from good ol' Doug??), the premise was sound and the special effects were alright for the time. In all, this was generally quite a good film - don't let the snobs put you off it.
25 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"You cannot escape the world of Atlantis"
lost-in-limbo5 November 2012
These types of fantasy adventure films are what I grew up watching, however this one did pass me by. After just watching it, I guess not seeing it wasn't too much of a bad thing. "Warlords of Atlantis" was the fourth feature in the cycle of director Kevin Connor and actor Doug McClure's partnership and probably my least favourite of the lot. Quite a dry and leaden experience with only small moments of excitement amongst its prehistoric backdrop of a diving expedition discovering the underwater city of Atlantis, which is guarded by rubber monsters. Looking like a low-budget, the adventure shows in its small-scale and its attention went towards to the tame special effects (though the large octopus design is decently done… so are its attack sequences) and low-rent set decors. A stalwart cast with the likes of Doug McClure, Peter Gilmore, Shane Rimmer, Lea Brodie and Michael Gothard are tolerable in their stock parts. The concept is imaginative, but the execution of it falls away with its systematic strokes, murkily uninteresting motivations and a script that's plodding in its details. Sure it's pure old-fashion escapism at heart, but it never lives up to the fun of it.

"Do not waste your energy on anger. Soon you will come to think of Atlantis as your only home."
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The martians of Atlantis
Chase_Witherspoon9 May 2011
The crew of the 'Texas Rose' sail into an area notorious for the disappearance of a number of ships to trial a deep sea chamber, ostensibly in search of rare antiquities. McClure and Gilmore pilot the underwater vessel, while learned professor Donald Bisset remains above at the mercy of the crooked crew, helmed by the concerned Shane Rimmer, looking to capitalise on any valuable discoveries. But when a giant octopus grabs the crew and descends into a deep sea ravine, they soon find themselves in the mythical land of Atlantis, where the hosts are into mind control and slavery to preserve the sinking cities. With the help of a grizzled old captive (Brown) and his hot daughter (Brodie), they attempt a bold escape from the clutches of the warlords, and to return to the surface of the earth.

Reasonable action sci-fi adventure features a capable (and eclectic cast) in which the affable McClure and introverted Gilmore combat the likes of Michael Gothard (who played a key villain in "For Your Eyes Only"), Daniel Massey, and in a surprise piece of casting, the eternally beautiful Cyd Charisse as a sorceress who tries to persuade Gilmore to join their race as a means to harness his superior intellect. Future "Cheers" star Ratzenberger also has a prominent supporting role.

Great sets, music and monsters conceived by genre veteran Brian Hayles who wrote many "Doctor Who" novels, there's even an unexpected dual climax and twist ending guaranteed to entertain. Made at a time when the "Atlantis" theme was being revisited (e.g. "Man from Atlantis", "Island of the Fishmen"), it's suitable for almost all ages and while not likely to qualify as a companion in the sci-fi order, "Warlords" remains an entertaining edition of its ilk.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A perilous, nautical tale of mutiny, murder, hidden treasure, giant sea monsters and lost worlds, in a creature feature beyond comparison.
mwilson197613 January 2020
A good old fashioned monster movie in the tradition of the old Harryhausen films, this was the fourth successful collaboration (and the 15th most popular at the UK box office in 1978) from producer John Dark and director Kevin Connor. The film was originally known as '7 Cities to Atlantis' while it was being shot, but changed to Warlords of Atlantis for the UK release. Doug McClure leads the cast as Greg Collinson, part of a scientific expedition searching for the lost world of Atlantis. Along with Prof. Aitken, and his son Charles, they are betrayed by the crew of their expedition's ship, attracted by the fabulous treasures of Atlantis. The diving bell used for underwater studies is destroyed when a deep sea monster attacks the boat and they are all dragged to the bottom of the sea where they meet the inhabitants and creatures of the lost continent. It was filmed at Pinewood Studios and on location in Gozo, an island off the coast of Malta, In the States it was known as Warlords of the Deep, and a novelisation of the film by Paul Victor, based on Brian Hayles screenplay was also released due to the success of the film. It may be small beer compared with today's CGI monster movies, but this is still a decent romp with plenty of cheesy charm thanks to some decent puppets posing as beasties.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This was actually released _after_ Star Wars
dsewizzrd-19 October 2018
An expedition at the end of the nineteenth century drops an improbable bathysphere into the Carribean to look for treasure. The crew mutiny and the scientists end up under the sea. Where is this ? they say, it's Atlantis (Malta actually). Taken by guards to the third city, whose helmets are in the sci-fi tradition, completely unfunctional, one of them meets the Atlantans, who are space travellers with special powers but use mediaeval cannons against giant lizards, and lose. Released a year after Star Wars, indeed.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Memorable Octopus, Forgettable Aliens
jfgibson739 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
If I had seen this movie when I came out, or when I was young, I'm sure I would think of it fondly. Going in cold as an adult in the summer of 2009, I wasn't really entertained much.

The arguments for this movie seem to be that 1) It is just an entertaining fantasy not to be taken seriously; 2) The creatures were done before CGI and are therefore more more soulful 3) Anyone who doesn't enjoy the visuals should appreciate this movie for its well-written characters and interesting plot that has so much more to offer than the trash coming out of Hollywood today. I could dispute each of these, but the bottom line is that I DID enjoy several moments in this movie, and it kept me mostly interested all the way through. I just didn't care much about it overall.

I would describe the quality of the story as being on par with some of the weaker episodes of the original Star Trek series. My favorite part was the giant octopus, but it was a little underwhelming after having seen what Gore Verbinski was able to do with the Kraken in the second POTC movie. Sorry, but sometimes technical advancements can make a better film, in the right hands. I prefer a CGI creature that movies with economy over a puppet monster that just stands in one place and roars.

But that isn't a reason not to watch this movie. I'm sure many fans of b-movie sci-fi and adventure would find this perfectly enjoyable. For me, it isn't any one specific thing, I just was unsatisfied with the movie as a whole.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Brings back a surge of childhood nostalgia...
Leofwine_draca30 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This kind of cheesy adventure yarn was a staple of my youth - and every time I see one of these films, it brings a tide of nostalgia pouring through me. WARLORDS OF ATLANTIS is a film which just wouldn't stand up to a modern audience's viewing - it's not politically correct, the acting is poor, and the special effects not particularly effective. But to a child, the film becomes a wonderful story of monsters, aliens, and plenty of protracted fight scenes. The film starts off well with an excellently animated octopus attacking a boat and dragging the survivors to a new world. This octopus attack is really quite splendid, okay so it's not original but the model effects really do look good. After there things can only go downhill, but there are still plenty of laughs and fun to be had as our heroes enter a weird society of primitive gill-men and alien rulers.

The chief nasty bloke in this case is Michael Gothard, a man who lent his unique persona to such schlock as SCREAM AND SCREAM AGAIN and the respectable JACK THE RIPPER before committing suicide in the early '90s. He always reminded me of a British Klaus Kinski. Gothard is at his sneering best here as the evil alien commander, although sadly he is given far too little screen time and not much to do apart from stand around and bark orders. Opposing him as the face of good is a solid Doug McClure, whose shirt gets torn off yet again and who pushes his way through the film with his own brand of wooden acting. He might have his critics (and many of them), but for me, McClure will always be a hero. Much like modern action stars, he's a man who never gets injured, who always wins out in the end. and who gets to fight loads of baddies and monsters single-handedly.

Which brings me on to the monsters, which look a lot like dinosaurs. Sadly these are of the back-projected variety (the cost of the octopus must have eaten the budget), and even if they look quite nice, the projection does look awful, much like in AT THE EARTH'S CORE. You can almost smell the rubber on some of these monsters. The film reaches new depths with an attack of flying fish (a truly unbelievable scene), but I quite liked a toothy snake thing which came out of a swamp to grab somebody's leg. If your idea of fun is a cheesy and amusing film, then this one is for you. Packed with effects and action scenes which seem to go on forever, any child would love it. I would rate it as better than AT THE EARTH'S CORE, but not quite as good as that all-time favourite, THE LAND THAT TIME FORGOT.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Men In Rubber Suits
malcolmgsw13 February 2014
This is really the cheesiest sci fi film that I have seen in a long time.It is a cross between Jules Verne and Ray Harryhausen but doesn't manage to be either.Instead of stop motion animation it uses men in rubber suits who are totally unconvincing.There is a giant octopus that beats the vessel with a gold statue and is probably the best of the mirth inducing moments that constantly occur throughout this film.It is one of those films that is so consistently bad that it is almost good in a way.Everything about the film is second rate from the acting through to the effects down to the scripts.Not worth a second look once was enough.Atrocious model work
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Doug McClure Gem!
phil-62616 March 2005
What a great film! When ever I watch this movie, I sit with a big grin on my face. This was one of the first movies I saw at the cinema as a kid. This film didn't win any Oscars, but if there had been a category for FUN it would have won hands down. I don't thing this film was ever meant to be taken too seriously. Like many of Doug McClures movies, "At The Earths Core" and "The land that time forgot", made with a hint of tongue in cheek. Made before the onset of cgi effects, this film has an innocent, non-cynical feel. It has Monsters, the lost city of atlantis, guns, fight scenes and more monsters, what more can you ask for in a low budget sci-fi. Films like this are often belittled by people who cannot see beyond their De Niro's and Oscar nominations. The quality of a film, at the end of the day, is about it's entertainment value, hence 10 out of 10.
31 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's so bad that it's good
adamchurchill27 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I saw it in the cinema when I was 9 I saw it on TV in the early 1980s when I was about 12 I vaguely remember seeing it again, probably when I worked on split shifts in a hotel in England and almost ANY film made a welcome change from watching kid's programmes in the afternoon.

I'm watching it again this afternoon on the Legend channel - Sky 148.

I remember most of it, but like every film I always always spot details that I missed whenever I watched it in the past - top of the list, I never realised that John Ratzenberger - aka - Cliff from Cheers was in it until I looked at the cast list.

It's a typical low budget 1970s "Monster Movie", just a piece of fun escapism - and typical of the late, and IMHO great Doug McClure films - it's so bad that it's good.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
WARLORDS OF ATLANTIS (Kevin Connor, 1978) **
Bunuel19765 May 2006
This was the fourth - and last - fantasy adventure for the actor-director team of Doug McClure and Kevin Connor after THE LAND THAT TIME FORGOT (1974; undeniably the best of the bunch), AT THE EARTH'S CORE (1976) and THE PEOPLE THAT TIME FORGOT (1977).

The result - silly and terminally juvenile - is a disappointment: besides wasting a good cast (Daniel Massey, Michael Gothard and Cyd Charisse), the sci-fi trappings of the plot are ill-suited to the material; the hokey monster effects, then, seal the fate of this low-budget venture. In fact, the location shooting (in Malta, no less, and the smaller neighboring island of Gozo) is among the film's few assets!
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed