Fantasm Comes Again (1977) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Actually better than the first Fantasm
augustian2 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
After the success of Fantasm, it was surely logical that a sequel was produced but this did not garner the rave reviews and audiences of the first film. Perhaps this type of film was already passed its sell-by date. Written by Ross Dimsey and directed by Colin Eggleston, this film follows the same formula as the first but the ten vignettes are linked by agony aunt columnists Libby and Harry under the title, Dear Collette. As in the first film, the stories range from the comedic to lesbians to group sex to the non-PC rape-but-I-like-it type story.

Some of the cast of the first film were used in this such as John Holmes, Candy Samples, Uschi Digart and Serena. Late actress Cheryl Rainbeaux Smith appears in the drive-in movie scene. The library scene is probably the most amusing with the gymnasium massage being the most erotic. Which is the most non-PC? Probably a toss-up between the drive-in and the confessional. To me, this film is better written and directed than the first but it has had its day.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not Much to Recommend Here
lazarillo20 December 2006
If you ever wanted to see a bunch of talent-free 70's porno actors and actresses in non-porno (OK, make that softcore porno) roles, well here's your chance. If you ever wanted to see a movie with more male frontal nudity than female, it's your lucky day. And if you haven't stopped reading yet,it's an Australian movie to boot (despite the plethora of American porn "actors"). This is actually the Australian portmanteau sequel to an equally stupid Australian portmanteau movie "Fantasm". The only real difference is that the wrap-around story this time involves two sex advice columnists pouring over various letters (the male Australian actor looks just like, but isn't, John Vernon, and the female Australian actress never takes off her clothes even though she is far more attractive than most of the American porno types that do). The rest of the movie, like "Fantasm", is a bunch of vignettes that are not funny, not entertaining, and fall uncomfortably between softcore and hardcore porn (with lots of flaccid male frontal nudity).

There isn't a lot to recommend in this movie I'm afraid. If you actually have a fondness for 70's porn and porn stars and want to see people like Bill Margold in non-porno action, you might enjoy it. The mammoth-mammaried Uschi Digardt does appear again for more sapphic frolicking, but she was in a lot better movies than this. Ditto with Cheryl "Rainbeaux" Smith who appears in a very politically incorrect vignette about a prudish girl who gets raped by a slob in a van at the drive-in and ends up enjoying it. Sad to say her brief appearance is the highlight of the movie and it alone makes this a slight improvement over "Fantasm". But if you're not a Smith or Digart fan, this isn't much more than a curio from the long-gone polyester decade.
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
An pitiful attempt to cash-in on the first
movieman_kev30 September 2005
Harry, an old school cranky newspaper reporter helps a new girl reporter answer some sex letters for the "Dear Collete" advice column that she's taking over from him. She reads letters involving sex in the library, school locker room, drive-in rape, an elevator threesome lesbian action in the barn, and sex in church among others. This sequel to "Fantasm" lacks the charisma, originality, and fun of the first one. It's a dreary mess to sit through and it was very obvious that it was made simply to cash-in on the first movie and nothing more.

My Grade: D-

DVD Extras: Commentary with Producer Antony Ginnane; and Theatrical Trailer
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
In some ways, even better than the first film.
ajji-27 July 2007
I was led to believe that this sequel to Fantasm was inferior, but i was pleasantly surprised to see that it is better than the first film in many ways. The sex scenes are a lot more erotic in this film, and there is less 'forced' comedy this time around (though there are still humorous bits, especially Serena's segment). And once again there is a swimming pool scene with John Holmes that borders on hardcore, while the girl-girl scene with Uschi is far too mild even for soft-core. The highlight of the film has to be the 'gym massage', which is by far the most arousing vignette of the lot.

Gone is the goofy professor that narrated & hosted the first film, replaced by a middle-aged guy and a young blonde reading aloud 'dear Collette' letters and answering them. Remarkably, the girl looks a lot like the currently active porn- star Jeanie Rivers. Overall, this is decent soft-core erotica.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed