Burnt Offerings (1976) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
186 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A great "evil house" story
AlsExGal8 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was so bizarre, but it held my attention to the very end. I loved the home - it was gorgeous, especially after it kept regenerating itself. I loved Eileen Heckart and Burgess Meredith. They were so delightfully charming, eccentric, yet creepy at the same time. I found the premise of the movie very interesting: A house slowly steals someone's vitality, causing that person to become at the very least injured and at the most, it makes them weak enough that they die.

I loved how Karen Black's character became slowly obsessed and consumed by the old Victorian home. Her descent into obsession was so subtle and only really became obvious when she started dressing like a Victorian woman and flipped out about the idea of someone being in Mrs. Allardyce's sitting room. I rather guessed her eventual fate. The scene that tipped me off was when she was seen eating the food she had brought up for the old woman that was in the bedroom.

Oliver Reed's character was very interesting. He was the reasonable one who instinctively knew something was "off" about the house. His scene with his son Danny in the pool was very scary. At first I was confused why Bette Davis seemed so upset with his horseplay with Danny until he started holding his head down under the water. I didn't really get what was up with the car and the creepy chauffeur, only that it seemed to be some traumatic childhood memory Reed's character had. That chauffeur would give anyone nightmares though. Then poor Reed's fate at the end of the film... Wow! How gruesome. I did not expect it at all. And his poor son.

I loved Bette Davis' character. Even though she was a minor character, she imbued her part with such panache. She would be a fun aunt to have. Then my god, what the makeup department did to her when she was having the life sucked from her body.

This was a great film with a very surprising and gruesome ending. I can't help but feel that this film would make a great double feature with the 1975 version of The Stepford Wives. If you think that this film has much in common with "The Shining", be aware that Stephen King was inspired by the original novel before he wrote his own.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Burnt Offerings" -- is it about fertility rites/ renewal via death?
Error_PC_LOAD_LETTER13 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This comment may contain a spoiler or two -- it is for those who have seen the movie and are baffled.

I have not read the novel, and have only seen the 'edited for T.V. version (about four times). But from reading other posters' comments and reviews, it seems that many people are baffled by what the title 'burnt offerings' means and what the heck is going on in the movie. From what little I have seen on television, the theme seems to be that the house injures and even kills its resident occupants in order to renew itself. Sort of a fertility rite, where death was enacted to bring about the Springtime, or renewal. Whenever someone gets hurt, or killed, the house renews a part of itself. Minor injuries may only repair a simple light bulb, or bring a few dead potted plants back to life or restore a cracked mirror. But look what happens at the end !!

The old lady upstairs, Mrs. Allardyce (?sp) is supposedly an eighty-five year old woman'. Isn't that the approx. age of the house (in 1976? Wouldn't you say the Dunsmuir house looks about that old, built in 1891, perhaps?) When the professor / renter asks the owners of the house what 'the catch' is (why it's so inexpensive to rent), the response from one of the owners (who are insulted at the idea that it's a 'catch' -- their response is, 'it's our mother.' -- is that intended as the 'catch? that the house is their mother? (then the conversation shifts to that she is an eighty five year old woman, and that she stays in the upstairs room). I think there may be some symbolism here of the death-and-renewal, earth-goddess sort.

And, by the way, this is NOT a 'haunted house' but what might be described as a slightly different genre' -- a 'living house.' Not haunted, as on the changeling or The Haunting, nor 'demon possessed' as on the Amityville Horror, but a 'living house' -- this one with an appetite and a penchant to renew itself. Lots of old houses, to me, seem to have a soul and thoughts and demeanor of their own. Enjoy the renewal rites.
36 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Shining part 0
Maciste_Brother28 October 2007
Well made little horror film. Nothing earth shattering or outstanding but quite effective in some spots and original. What's really remarkable about BURNT OFFERINGS is how much it looks like THE SHINING. Stephen King admits that he was inspired by the Robert Marasco novel (and definitely the movie) when he wrote The Shining and it's quite obvious. It's an almost exact copy. A couple with one kid rent a big mansion for the summer. They bring along the husband's aunt and the 4 start experiencing changes in character. The husband is violent towards the boy. The mother is angry towards the aunt, etc. Everyone starts changing after staying at the house for a while. The house itself is seemingly alive and it takes over the family. The last shot in BURNT OFFERINGS, the one with the photos, is identical to the one in Stanley Kubrick's THE SHINING. Truly shocking. Did the author of the novel sue? Anyway, the movie is a creepy little movie in some parts and somewhat dull in other parts. Watching Bette Davis dying was, eh, a bit unsettling. She really looked like she was dying, the poor old woman. Good but not great. I really love the idea of the house "shedding" its skin. If you've seen THE SHINING and not this film, watch it, you'll be more shock about the similarities than the movie itself.
64 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Truly Creepy.
rjacob6718 December 2006
I enjoyed this movie immensely. The creepy score, the precarious atmosphere, and the Erie flashbacks of the chauffeur with that huge grin. It was a great ghost story. Some say a bit slow paced, but It just added to the tension. Ben was played well by Reed. A man with many problems, compounded by this house from hell. And Karen Blacks performance from loving wife and mother, to the caretaker of the "old lady". Betty Davis comes off a bit aloof, but that also work well in the story. And the scene with the house "shedding", very creepy. Now for the ending. One of the best I have ever seen. I would even put it up against the original "Wicker Man".
36 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
STILL CREEPY 44 years out! :O
midnitepantera10 December 2020
I'm a kid of the 70's before all the CGI special FX. And this is still an old school fav of mine. I love spooky Karen Black. I always had an affinity for large creepy houses, especially when they become one of the characters in the movie. This is another 70's slow burn in the haunted house genre that more than likely helped fuel my NIGHT TERRORS and SLEEP WALKING issues. Still holds up decent for it's age, but if your looking for a GORE FEST, move on, cause this won't fill your cup. If you like psychological Gothic style horror then check it out.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Atmospheric chiller
moonspinner5520 July 2006
Talky, but unusual and creepy haunted house movie concerns an ordinary family from the city who rent a country estate for the summer--at a suspiciously low price! A bit confusing at first, but whenever something bad happens (like the father cutting his thumb on the champagne bottle) something good immediately takes its place (the kid switching on what was previously a dead light bulb). The house absorbs the good (the sacrificial new family's spirit and energy) while its inhabitants wither away, physically or mentally. Bette Davis' Aunt Elizabeth ages suddenly (with frighteningly effective make-up), and Anthony James as the chauffeur who haunts Oliver Reed's head is a scary, freaky presence. Karen Black is even odder than usual: I'm not certain whether her not-quite-there expression is what was intended for the role of Marion, but she does something very gutsy for an actress, making herself into a gargoyle (only in her final scene does she overdo it). Superior to the source novel by Robert Marasco, "Burnt Offerings" (the title taken from a biblical reference) is a well-directed slice of the macabre. *** from ****
43 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Different Take On Your Average Haunted House Movie.
drownsoda9023 April 2006
I had never heard about this film before, I saw it once at a video store once but hesitated to rent it. While at the store around Halloweentime, I happened to see it, and it was on sale for 10 bucks so I decided to give it a chance. And I actually enjoyed it, it was a fairly good movie.

"Burnt Offerings" is pretty much a typical haunted house story, but with a bit of a spin to it. It's about Marian and Ben Ralf (played by Karen Black and Oliver Reed) and their son, who move into a summerhouse in the country that is owned by a very strange brother and sister. The price is a steal, the only catch is that they would have to supply minimal food and care to the sibling's grandmother, who lives in an upstairs bedroom. Marian takes on this duty, and the family begins to prepare themselves to have a relaxing summer out at the old manor. Ben's Aunt, played by the legendary Bette Davis, also is staying with them at the summerhouse. After staying there for awhile, strange things begin to happen, and Marian becomes very secretive of the grandmother in the upstairs room. In fact, nobody in the entire house besides her have even seen the old woman. As tension mounts between Ben and Marian, strange events plague the family, including apparitions, strange sounds, etc.

The ending of this film was pretty different, it may be a bit confusing, but it's still good. Apparently the film is based on a book, which I may personally like to read myself. There are some parallels to "The Shining" too, even though this was released 4 years before that. But, Mr. Stephen King himself noted the novel as one of his favorite horror stories, so it leads me to believe he may have taken some inspiration from this story for "The Shining". Karen Black and Bette Davis give great performances, they are the most remarkable in the film. Oliver Reed was also great, and the kid, while a little whiny and unconvincing, was good enough for his role.

Overall, "Burnt Offerings" has a pretty good story, good acting and a well known cast (primarily Black and Davis). One of the better classic haunted house tales, with a different twist on it that makes it stand out a little in my mind. 7/10.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great 70's horror.
tony515015 July 2005
My 10 out of 10 vote for this movie really stems from the first time I'd seen it. I was an 8 year old at the drive-in with my parents. The assumption was I would watch the first movie of this double bill and fall asleep before the scary movie started. I cannot remember the first movie but I can tell you I will never forget this one. I played like I was sleeping in the back seat but watched the whole movie without my parents knowing. I had nightmares for months to come. Images of the creepy Chauffeur driver and the foggy lighting and lens effects really stuck with me. And the last scene was terrifying. I'm much older now but when revisiting this horror classic I'm reminded of that night in the backseat of my parents car...I still get chills. I also had the same experiences with "Seizure" "From Beyond the Grave" and "The Sentinel".
105 out of 112 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the scariest movies that I have ever seen.
mk_china1 June 2002
Without a doubt, one of the scariest movies that I have ever seen. The scene with the undertaker and coffin coming up the stairs still gives me nightmares. The final scene in the attic throws you out of your seat; a scene that I have never forgotten.
37 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Now I know why they don't do haunted house pictures much anymore.
muertos18 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
My experience with Burnt Offerings mirrors that of a lot of people on this site with numerous old horror films: they remember a scary movie that frightened them as a child, and then decades later get to re-experience it on the miracle of DVD. The reality of the movie seldom turns out to live up to your memories of it. Such was the case with Burnt Offerings.

The plot hangs on the slimmest of reeds: dimple-cheeked suburban family moves into a spooky house for the summer while the owners are on vacation. There's just one catch: there's an invalid old lady who lives in the attic, and they have to take care of her. Say WHAT? This doesn't strike anybody as odd? Or even an insurance risk? As soon as you realize the movie refuses to show you the old lady you already know what the gag is going to be, and when Karen Black finally makes good on it, it's about as surprising as the revelation that there are cowboys in Texas. Before we get to that point we have to go through the usual spooky-house machinations: creepy noises, a cursed swimming pool, and uncommonly bipolar behavior from the various other cast members, most notably Oliver Reed, who to his credit at least does the best he can with the thinness and contradictions in his role.

Bette Davis's makeup co-stars (as Bette Davis), and does a frighteningly realistic imitation of a weird Kabuki mask. Karen Black, prematurely aged and wrapped in Victorian-era laces, looks like she's going to break into monologues from "The Belle of Amherst" at any moment. Burgess Meredith obviously had a wonderful time wheezing and hacking through his role (which was probably shot in one or maybe just a few days), but you can tell he thinks the script is utter pap. In the plus column, the scene where Oliver Reed tries to drown his son in the pool--and especially his grief afterward--is pretty believable, and the special effects of the house reconstituting itself isn't bad for 1976 technology. There are still some unintentional laugh-out-loud moments, especially the schtick involving the chauffeur. The chauffeur in particular scared the heck out of my sister and I when we were kids, but seeing this movie again today, it's just silly when it should be creepy.

Haunted house movies are tough to do. Writers and directors who resist the temptation to go in the blood-and-guts, straight-horror direction have a challenging time paying homage to the creepy old thrillers (both literary and cinematic) without it coming off as hokey. This is an amusing film, but if you're expecting to be scared, good luck.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
BIG FAN
amylil30 August 2004
I've been a big fan of this movie for years, ever since I was about 12. And I've watched as time and time again people have complained about this movie, and I just didn't get it. Now I'm grown up and I see the flaws, but I still don't care. I love Oliver Reed and Karen Black and don't think it could have been acted better. Watching her grow more an more attached to the house is very interesting. The best part I thought was when she surprises her son who drops a crystal bowl that smashes on the floor, and she kneels there, holding the fragments in her hands, sobbing hysterically, almost like a child had died. The boy, Lee Montgomery, I've never had a problem with. The kid from the Shining, now HE was annoying. hehe. And above all, I LOVE how the movie ends. Although it's predictable, it was VERY welcome. Movies with sad, creepy endings that leave you with a shiver always work for me.
93 out of 101 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Original Storyline
claudio_carvalho6 August 2017
Ben Rolf (Oliver Reed), his wife Marian (Karen Black) and their son David (Lee Montgomery) visit a country manor for renting to spend summer vacation. They are welcomed by the weird siblings Roz Allardyce (Eileen Heckart) and Arnold Allardyce (Burgess Meredith) that offer the mansion for nine hundred-dollar only for the whole summer. The only condition is to feed their mother Ms. Allardyce that lives recluse in the attic three times a day. They move to the house with Ben's Aunt Elizabeth (Bette Davis) and soon Marian becomes obsessed for Ms. Allardyce and the house. Meanwhile evil things happen to the Rolf family and Ben feels that the house is absorbing their life forces. After the death of Ms. Allardyce, Ben decides to live the manor but he realizes they are trapped in the real estate. What is happening to the family?

"Burnt Offerings" is a horror film with an original storyline of haunted house. Instead of ghosts, the house is an evil force that drains human life to renew. There are curiosities on the Brazilian DVD, such as Bette Davis hatted Oliver Reed; or the director's daughter had used PCP (angel dust) and jumped off the highest LA building to fly a couple of days before the shooting of the last scene. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "A Mansão Macabra" ("The Macabre Manor")
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
While it has some scary moments, it crawls along at a snail's pace.
planktonrules14 October 2009
The film is about a family who comes to live at a creepy mansion for two months. However, throughout the film, there is tons of foreboding music and you know SOMETHING bad is going to happen as the personalities of everyone (but the boy) seems to change the longer they live in the house. Unfortunately, it only really heats up in the last half hour of the movie.

I usually like long movies and can't complain if a film merits a three hour running time or longer. However, at the same time, I hate films that go on too long given that the story is actually very, very simple and just doesn't merit the lengthy running time--like this film. BURNT OFFERINGS is only about two hours long, though it seems like a three hour film because it moves at a snail's pace. At least 45 minutes could have been edited out and the film would have improved as a result of tightening up the script--especially if they'd taken it from the first 2/3 of the movie. For so much of the film, nothing particularly scary or important happens and the tension doesn't exactly build--it slogs along. Now I understand that some of this slower pacing is good for a horror film--you need some build-up--but not THIS much! This was especially bad because the ending was almost exactly what I'd expected about 15 minutes into the film (though the level of blood did surprise me a bit).

Oliver Reed and Karen Black play husband and wife and this casting just seemed odd. Why the English Reed with Ms. Black--especially when their chemistry seemed, at best, awkward? And why did much of Reed's performance (especially late in the film) consist of him shaking convulsively and looking very red-faced (like he was really constipated)? And, why would they include Bette Davis in this film when her role was really rather bland and unimportant? In other words, why is such a great actress given a role that could have been as easily played by any supporting actress or perhaps even a parrot?! As for Lee Montgomery as the boy, he was probably the best in this film. While I hated this child actor in films such as BEN (yuck!!!), here he was decent--and the most credible member of this family--mostly because he didn't seem stupid like his parents!

Overall, this film is creepy and atmospheric but too much emphasis was placed on this. The "bang" at the end just didn't provide enough thrills to merit sitting through the previous 90 minutes of bland "action". Worth seeing as a time-passer or if you must see everything Miss Davis ever did (even her poorer films of the 1970s), otherwise this one is easy to skip.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Effectively creepy
Leofwine_draca28 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
An effectively creepy haunted house flick from DARK SHADOWS pioneer Dan Curtis, BURNT OFFERINGS has much in common with THE SHINING and I personally believe that Stephen King watched this before writing his novel; the similarities are too close. It's nowhere near close to the level of Kubrick's towering achievement but it is still a decent movie, a real slow-burner with interesting themes (who'd have thought that materialism would play such a big part in it?) and a focus on character psychology which works throughout. Although this is more about atmosphere than incident, there are some stand-out moments (the swimming pool, Bette Davis) and an incredible climax which has to be seen to be believed. Karen Black is pretty kooky from the outset but Oliver Reed does a good job handling his character's mental disintegration.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Definitely not a bedtime story.
mark.waltz16 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Does your house need a face-lift? Then, take a little tip from brother and sister Burgess Meredith and Eileen Heckart. Rent it out for the summer to a nice married couple with a small child and just let the house take over. That's exactly what happens here, and boy, no plastic surgeon has the ability to do what this house does. Karen Black and Oliver Reed, two cult favorites of the 1970's, have done some weird films in their time, but other than a T.V. movie where Black is chased by a little African doll with a knife, they don't rank anywhere near as frightening as this. Sure, Reed scared the bajeebers out of kids being mean to Oliver Twist and Black had us frantic when she announced that there was nobody flying the plane, but now, she's got something serious to want to desperately fly out of.

Literally, the house comes alive, as do several ghosts, with one of the most frightening swimming pools ever in the movies. Bette Davis adds a touch of class, not camp here, as Black's kindly aunt who comes for a visit and finds more than she bargained for on a holiday. The spirit of a deadly chauffeur haunts both her and her great grand-nephew (Lee Montgomery) while Reed and Black slowly go batty on their own as the evil spirits surrounding the house literally take over. This is severe horror at its scariest, a "Poltergeist" way before that horror classic came out and one that will tingle your spine in ways its never been tingled before. Anthony James may not be a household name, but the chauffeur he plays is as spooky a character to ever appear in a horror film and may haunt your dreams if you watch this right before going to bed. This is a great horror follow-up to the original "Dark Shadows" and its movies for director Dan Curtis.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A creepy and effective offering
rooee30 September 2016
It may sound like a round of toast gone wrong but it's actually a religious term: a "burnt offering" occurs when an animal is incinerated on an altar as a sacrifice. The consumption is absolute – soul and all – which may give a clue as to where this 1976 gem, written and directed by horror veteran Dan Curtis, will ultimately go.

Marian (Karen Black) and Ben (Oliver Reed), along with their son Davey (Lee H. Montgomery) and Aunt Elizabeth (Bette Davis) move to a rundown California mansion for the summer. The landlords are creepy siblings whose reclusive mother, Mrs Allardyce, is locked in an upstairs room. For a knock-down rent, the incoming family need only take care of the building and leave a tray of food each day for the mad woman in the attic.

The tenants move in and initially enjoy the peace and majesty of the great old house. But tempers quickly flare. Ben becomes uncommonly angry; Marian increasingly obsesses about the unseen Mrs Allardyce; and Elizabeth falls prey to a terrible manic illness. Is Mrs Allardyce the cause of all these tensions? Or could it be the house itself, which seems to bloom into life as its inhabitants succumb to mutually assured destruction?

For fans of The Haunting (the Robert Wise version, obviously) and The Shining, this is a must-see psychological horror which has been relatively "overlooked" (Shining joke). In a way, Burnt Offerings is a relic from a time where scares were more understated whilst, paradoxically, performances were more melodramatic. It doesn't parody these genre aspects in the way that Kubrick's monolithic milestone would do four years later, but instead plays everything straight. Which is why it seems such an oddity, coming at a mid-70s moment after the dawn of the new allegorical horror of Romero, Hooper, and Craven and before the seedy/gory horror heyday of the 1980s. It's more like The Exorcist, pagan style.

The film relies principally on atmosphere and gradually growing sense of menace and madness. For the first two thirds it's impossible to tell where the insanity lies. Is it in Marian, with her discomforting interest in Mrs Allardyce? Or Ben, whose visions of his mother's hearse are pushing him to hysteria, manifesting as rage? The dynamics work not only thanks to strong lead performances, but because Curtis takes time and care to portray a functioning family, comfortable with each other's foibles; so when the fractures appear, it's genuinely disturbing. When the playful, protective Ben starts wrestling his son in the pool to the point of drowning, it's not only intense but feels terribly wrong. Moreover, the dialogue throughout is well written, so when the silliness kicks in we take it seriously.

Support-wise, Anthony James – a know-his-face actor who played many a memorable creep – rocks up occasionally to smile sinisterly, and there's a supremely creepy cameo from Burgess "Penguin" Meredith, playing Mrs Allardyce's son, who watches Davey playing from the window whilst practically dribbling.

The framing, lighting, and production design is top-notch, and the editing is meaningful. This is a work of poise and control; and these qualities are consistent all the way to the final Hitchcockian scene, which is scary in spite of being, by that point, predictable. Burnt Offerings is a slow, stately, dense psychological horror, low on gore and obvious shocks – and all the more impactful for it.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An ordinary family rents a creepy old house for the summer, and later learns that the place has supernatural forces.
verna5514 September 2000
Actress Karen Black and director Dan Curtis reteamed for this spooky ghost story following their great success the year before with the TV thriller TRILOGY OF TERROR. This theatrical release isn't completely up to that triumph, but all in all it's a pretty good chiller, with a terrific cast doing marvellous work. Though she is given surprisingly little to do, Bette Davis does wonders with her role as the tormented aunt. At any rate, this film is a classic compared to THE AMITYVILLE HORROR which came along three years later.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An underrated and mostly forgotten horror gem
DrPhibes196422 July 2021
I saw Burnt Offerings at a local last run theatre in '76 when I was about 12 and it scared the hell out of me. It is a film that proves you don't need gallons of gore and cheap jump scares to be an effective horror film.

It's been a long time since I've seen it but I will never forget several key moments in the story that left a lingering effect after leaving the theatre,namely the creepy chauffeur with his dark sunglasses and a demented smile fixed on his face. Every time he appeared on screen my spine just stiffened. He speaks not a line of dialogue (at least to the best of my memory) but he is as nightmarish as any mask-wearing mad slasher. The reaction of Oliver Reed perfectly captured my own sitting that theatre. For a PG-rated film it is quite scary. It's a slow burn, building gradually as the family slowly succumbs to the evil of the house. It is never explicitly stated what the source of the evil is and is really about how it is working on each family member,especially the Oliver Reed character. There is one particular scene (I will not spoil it here) involving Reed, his mother played by Bette Davis, and the chauffeur that had me clutching the arm rest of my chair. It is a film that should be rediscovered by horror fans. It might lack all the tropes of modern horror films but it is all for the better. Be patient and let the story unfold and adjust to the pace....it is worth the effort.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Proves there's more ways than loud noises to scare you
jtindahouse4 March 2009
A lot of horror movies rely simply on sudden jolts of sound to make you jump. I recently watched Friday the Thirteenth (2009) and it was literally all it had. Which is fine, no one can deny it gets the job done. The problem with it is that the movies become inseparable and which one is scarier can only be judged really on which made you jump the most.

Burnt Offerings instead creates an atmosphere. It creates it masterfully through character decisions and great use of music. There was a stage early on when I realized nothing eventful had even happened as yet and despite this my heart was pounding. Sure enough a moment later some frightening action took place and I realized for the first time in a long time a horror movie had alerted my sub-conscience and not my mind. These days in horror movies it's far too easy to predict when the event is coming (it's generally when the filmmaker is trying to make you think NOTHING is coming).

Burnt Offerings is more than watchable in this day and age. The lines are nowhere near as cheesy sounding as a lot of other pre-1980 films make them sound today and the acting, whilst not perfect, is anything but bad. The suspense will have your heart pounding and it's all building up to something so terrifying it deserves far more recognition among horror buffs. Not to be missed.
33 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Death by ?
DavidsGuy4 July 2022
What, exactly, was the cause of Aunt Elizabeth's death? Was it death by moaning and groaning? Some of the sounds coming out of Bette Davis were unintentionally comical. The swimming pool scene where Ben finds the eyeglasses would have been much more interesting if Oliver Reed had been nude. He always did nude so well.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Well it was scary when I was 10...
paj2820 September 2003
I remember seeing this movie on cable when I was a kid and being completely terrified. I rented it tonight with a friend who had not seen it (I'm now 36, by the way), and found it quite disappointing. There were a few eerie scenes and disturbing moments, but otherwise it was pretty slow-paced and a few things weren't explained or didn't make sense.

I was hoping that it would at least be campy or atrocious enough to entertain on that level, but sadly I was disappointed there also. Come to think of it, I probably found Scooby Doo kind of scary when I was 10 too!
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Creepy and mesmerizing!
martian-815 July 2001
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of the few horror films that I can still sit back and enjoy. It scared me pretty badly as a kid. I still feel all the haunting vibes and chills as an adult.

It may not be action packed (although the scene with Reed trying to kill his soon in the pool was terrifying--and ultra-realistic), but it certainly gets under your skin. This film is about mood, and it is both beautifully entrancing and ominously mesmerizing. I actually found the acting quite good. Reed was wonderful. I loved the two weird siblings, Roz and Brother (Burgess Meredith, wonderful actor). Their adoration of the house sends chills up my spine.

The true stars of the movie are the music (Bob Cobert's amazing Music Box Theme) and the house (Dunsmuir House & Gardens, in Oakland, California). For true horror buffs out there, this movie inspired the creators of PHANTASM to drive up to Oakland and use this same mansion as the infamous Morningside Mortuary. Which is probably, when the opening moments of PHANTASM rolled in 1979, I already had such fear upon seeing the mansion again on screen!

I have to wonder if other elements of BURNT OFFERINGS inspired PHANTASM as well. Note the creepy old lady upstairs at the end. Reminds one of PHANTASM's eerie fortuneteller. How about B.O.'s terrifying hearse chauffeur? He's kind of like a forerunner of the Tall Man!

BURNT OFFERINGS is well worth the viewing. Don't expect any real jolts or screams. But turn off the lights and let it really sink in. It's well worth a viewing. There are many moments (such as the house renewing itself during the rainstorm) that are bizarre and horribly fascinating. I haven't seen this good a haunted house movie in years.

And definitely visit Dunsmuir in real life. This place is spectacular. You'll fall in love with it, just like Karen Black! I certainly did. I spent awhile helping out as tour guide and volunteer at the estate while attending college in the Bay Area.
62 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Utterly predictable yet undeniably effective
kevinolzak22 March 2023
1976's "Burnt Offerings" may not be accepted fare for dismissive critics like Roger Ebert, yet viewers who saw it at the time were essentially traumatized for life by its undeniably effective mood. Robert Marasco's 1973 novel was the result of an unproduced screenplay (the only novel he ever wrote), and director Dan Curtis was not enamored of the inconclusive ending, yet accepted the challenge of doing a rare foray into theatrical films using much the same personnel that he worked with on the infamous "Trilogy of Terror," in particular leading lady Karen Black, beefing up an impressive cast with burly Oliver Reed, screen legend Bette Davis, and brief appearances from Burgess Meredith, Eileen Heckart, and Dub Taylor. The accursed Dunsmuir mansion was located in Oakland, California, built in 1899 for $350,000 as a wedding gift for his bride by Alexander Dunsmuir; unfortunately, he himself died on their honeymoon while the widow only lived another 18 months before cancer claimed her young life (this locale would later be seen in "Phantasm" and "A View to a Kill"). Ben Rolf (Reed), wife Marian (Black), son David (Lee H. Montgomery), and elderly Aunt Elizabeth (Davis), accept an offer to rent a rundown estate for the summer at a measly $900, so long as they look after the grounds and provide regular meals for an invalid on the top floor (the owners curiously vanish before they arrive, but leave the kitchen fully stocked). Ben cleans out and refills the pool, but a friendly swim with his son turns deadly when he inexplicably holds the boy beneath the water, the lad fighting back by striking his father's bloodied nose. The alert and cheerful Elizabeth begins losing her vitality, David almost dies from a gas leaking heater in his locked bedroom, and Marian's increasing avoidance of family (and bedroom) obligations puts her husband on the defensive. The son is just as much a cipher on screen as he was on the printed page, and Karen Black's subpar, one note performance assures an utterly predictable climax, so it's up to Oliver Reed and Bette Davis to shoulder the acting burdens and neither disappoints, allowing for some degree of audience empathy (Anthony James as a grinning hearse driver offers additional chills). There's little intrinsically scary about the house itself, but its ability to 'shed' shingles to renew itself is certainly an interesting touch, helping it stand out from similar fare such as "The Legend of Hell House" (the hidden cemetery is one intriguing subplot that sadly goes nowhere). Like its downbeat source material, the picture can accurately be described as a 'slow burn' best recommended for patient viewers, its underwhelming box office assuring that Dan Curtis would confine himself to television for the remainder of his career.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Terrified me...
Cee_H19 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this film when I was about 13 or so on video and to this day remember how much it scared the life out of me but I couldn't recall the title...until searching on here.

Stand out moments (from what I remember) included those photos in the locked room with the staring eyeballs, soft focus of Karen Black going slowly bananas and Oliver Reeds head smashing through the windscreen.

There's a distinct purity to 70's/early 80's horror flicks - I'm not sure if its due to the fact that I was more impressionable as a youngster or simply of a different generation which can view that time frame as magical and mysterious - films such as Don't Look Now, Clockwork Orange et al have a honesty which transfers the impression of threat and fear with unflinching skill. Compared to latter day stuff such as What Lies Beneath (random pick by the way) for example are watered down so much, bogged down by cynical corporate money spinning, they leave me cold.

Burnt Offering left a lasting impression on me but I've never been able to hunt it down, now I'm on a mission to find it for another viewing - maybe exorcise some demons at the same time (pun intended). NICE ONE IMDb
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed