Paper Tiger (1975) Poster

(1975)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Niven lifts an all too familiar tale
RadicalTintin30 January 2003
By this time in his career, debonair British actor David Niven was making films purely for the money. This effort was strangely different from other entries under this guise. The story of a dreamer facing the consequences of his masculine boasts is entertaining, and draws on his performance in Separate Tables.

There is a certain sadness, watching Niven as one of life's losers trying to make amends with one last act of heroism, full of pathos and regret. The film itself is nothing spectacular, but Niven manages to rescue it from oblivion, and credit where credit's due, he almost succeeds.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Entertaining whilst on, soon forgotten afterwards.
barnabyrudge27 February 2004
Paper Tiger is a harmless adventure movie which tries to cater for juvenile and adult audiences. It is lifted slightly above its station by strong performances from David Niven and Toshiro Mifune. The central theme of what can go wrong if you live your life as one big lie is quite interesting too. It is neither a great movie nor a terrible one: merely a workmanlike, watchable time-filler.

Niven plays Major Bradbury, an English gentleman who has got a job in a troubled Far East country tutoring a young and impressionable Japanese boy about western history. He entertains the boy, Koichi (Ando), by spinning him tales of wartime heroism and derring-do. However, all of Bradbury's tales are fanciful lies in which he presents himself as some kind of all-action hero. Koichi and Bradbury are kidnapped by guerillas, and Bradbury soon realises that he must try to live up the heroic stature he has invented for himself in order to help the boy to survive.

Toshiro Mifune as the boy's father, a Japenese ambassador, gives a strong, moving and convincing performance. Niven also has his moments, especially when he looks into the mirror and is appalled by the "nothing" of a man he sees staring guiltily back at him near the film's climax. The story itself is interesting, but the handling isn't all that special. The film satisfies itself with being a straight-forward kidnap thriller fit for kids and adults alike, but the themes of real and imagined identity could actually have been explored much more closely and maturely if the target audience was just adults. Still, a family film is what the makers decided to make, and a family film is what they've given us. On that level, this will do quite nicely for a rainy Saturday afternoon - even if you'll have probably forgotten it by Sunday!
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Intriguing, forgotten thriller
Leofwine_draca4 January 2016
PAPER TIGER is an intriguing little comedy thriller with an unusual storyline. The film as a whole has a number of diverse ingredients which gel together quite well and lead up to a satisfying whole. It's entirely forgotten these days, despite the starring roles and the presence of Hollywood director Ken Annakin (SWISS FAMILY ROBINSON), which is a bit of a shame.

David Niven nails his character just right in playing a Walter Mitty type who regales his associates with stories of derring-do in the war (the flashback scenes are very funny). He travels to a made-up Far Eastern country to become English tutor to a Japanese ambassador, and the film chronicles their friendship. Ando, the child actor, stars in his only screen role and is very endearing, but all eyes are on the excellent Toshiro Mifune playing his father. I noted that Mifune nearly got his son kidnapped in Kurosawa's HIGH & LOW, well it really does happen here!

The film has a fairly slow first half although the second half picks up with all manner of terrorist activities and some choppy action. The latter scenes with Niven and Ando are very well handled and the film narrowly avoids being overly sentimental, remaining funny instead. The Malaysian locations standing in for the made-up country are fun and Hardy Kruger is great as a reporter. Overall, PAPER TIGER is a fun, warming little thriller with Niven on top form.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Strange story, though quite entertaining
foz-39 March 2000
You would be forgiven at first into thinking that this was an old Walt Disney children's film. The humour is family orientated and typically weak - this type of film always has an annoying American character in holiday mode who pops up every so often. However the story is quite clever, albeit moralistic - the moral is don't pretend to be something you ain't.

The main problem with this film is that you are unsure what kind of viewers it is actually aimed at. In between the "sweet" scenes of David Niven and his young cheeky Asian charge there are shootings,terrorist bombings and assassination attempts - hardly Walt Disney.

However, the story is quite good with nice appearances from familiar faces and, apart from the rather insipid and soppy vocal version of the theme tune, is wrapped up fairly well. A good Saturday-afternoon-with-nothing-to-do sort-of-film
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Campy Malaysian Mess - Somehow Enjoyable
nedhorton200219 October 2020
Average production values at best. Still somehow entertaining despite many drawbacks. Toshiro Mifune and David Nathan's charisma keeping this afloat. But truly the star of the show is the young actor, Kazuhito Ando, Mifune's son. For some reason watching this kept reminding me of "Space Mountain". For people of a certain age accomplished in suspension of disbelief this is sure to entertain. ( In other words, I enjoyed it).
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very dated but still a nice Sunday Matinee for all the family
comps-784-3826510 February 2023
Having seen this film as a child in the 1970s I have fond memories of this film.

Watching it now it is very dated.

However, unlike the mass of mediocrity from Hollywood today, it does have a charming story and Niven and Mifune admirably carry the film by their presence.

What I liked

It's a charming film with a lovely story, and is wathable for all the family

David Niven and Toshiro Mifune are both high calibre actors and genuine veterans of WWII as was Hardy Kruger, each for their respective countries.

What I didn't like

Made in the 1970s it's very dated, special effects and 'dubbed' voices into English, all jarring to the modern viewer used to CGI etc

I think this film is a solid 6/10 bearing in mind its age. I've given it a 7 but part of that was for nostalgia.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
So-so movie about a little boy and his tutor kidnapped by terrorists , regularly directed by Ken Annakin
ma-cortes17 June 2019
A formal , prim and somewhat serious English gentleman called Bradbury (David Niven) , an ex-army Major , has got a job in a troubled Far East country tutoring a young boy . As Niven is contacted as the tutor to the child of the Japanese Ambassador (Toshro Mifune) . He teaches the little boy, Koichi (Ando), and amuses him by spinning him tales of WWII battles , derring-do , feats and allegedly acts of heroism . Their lives change when he and the boy are abducted by terrorists for political objectives . They all saw him as a hero ... but could he live up to it?

In the film there is a feeling relationship between tutor and pupil , but also there are pursuits , fights , kidnapping , violence , crossfire ,terrorist bombings and assassination attempts . The events and characters depicted in this photoplay are fictitious , though the thunderous deeds can be happened in whatever far country from East World . The film relies heavily on the honeyed as well as sweet relationship betwen David Niven and his young cheeky Asian at charge . David Niven gives a sober but fine acting as an English gentleman with dark past , providing a certain bitterness and sadness to his role . His peculiar and colorful role just about saves this movie from oblivion and the complete disdain by critics . Support cast is pretty good , including nice appearances from familiar faces , such as : Hardy Kruger , Ivan Desny , Miiko Taka , Jeff Corey, Patricia Donahue , Ronald Fraser , Irene Tsu , Kurt Christain and the always great Toshiro Mifune .

It contains an atmospheric cinematography by John Cavacas . Shot on location in Bavaria, Germany , Malacca, Genting Highlands, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and Twickenham Film Studios, St Margarets, Twickenham, Middlesex, England, UK And evocative musical score by Roy Budd in the seventies style , including the usual lyrics by Sammy Cahn . This some boring film produced in medium budget by Euan Lloyd was middlingly directed by Ken Annakin , though being sporadically fun and entertaining . In the 1960s he was one of several British directors along with Guy Green, John Guillermin who specialized in turning out all-star, splashy, big-budget European/American co-productions, shot on the Continent. He was one of the directors of the epic World War II spectacle The longest day (1962) and went solo on Battle of the Bulge (1965), both of which were financial--if not exactly critical--successes. Ken was an expert on Adventure genre as ¨The new adventures of Pippi Longstockings¨, ¨Pirate movie¨ , ¨Paper tiger¨, ¨The fifth Musketeer¨ , ¨Call of wild¨, ¨The Swiss family Robinson¨, ¨Land of fury¨, ¨The Sword and the Rose¨, ¨The story of Robin Hood and his Merry Men¨, ¨Third man on the mountain¨ and Wartime genre as ¨Battle of the Bulge¨, and ¨The Longest day¨. Rating . 5/10 . Average .
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The major returns
bkoganbing30 December 2016
David Niven of course reached the high point of his career with his Best Actor Oscar for Separate Tables, where he played a blowhard "major' who was a permanent guest at Wendy Hiller's establishment. 18 years later he kind of revives that character when he takes a job as a tutor for Toshiro Mifune's little boy Ando in Paper Tiger.

Like in Separate Tables Niven puts on a great front about his great war exploits which is all a front to hide a deeply flawed man. Here he's doing the same thing for Ando. Mifune is the Japanese ambassador to some Asian island country, not named but I'm guessing Sri Lanka because there is a reference to a Tamil minority that is a rebel faction.

Anyway these rebels or at least this cell of them led by Irene Tsu decide to kidnap the Japanese Ambassador's son to call attention to their prisoners. As we've seen many times, mostly in the Middle East, they'll kill the kid and Niven who was with him at the time unless their comrades are released from prison.

Niven who also appropriates the rank of major in this film as well is actually forced to become the hero he's told Ando he was. He never got that chance in Separate Tables.

I think this might have been aimed at the kiddie market, but it's way too bloody and violent for that. Niven already did that with Please Don't Eat The Daisies and he would do a couple of films for Disney Studios which were certainly better suited than Paper Tiger.

Still it's decently entertaining, but not for the little ones.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A good idea badly executed and saved only by Niven's charisma
trevorwomble9 June 2018
And that pretty much sums it up for me. This should have been a great little family film, even if it is surprisingly violent for a PG. An interesting story of a child and his teacher being kidnapped is let down by some woeful dubbing and the child lead has a very thick accent that is hard to understand. The direction is very average and the great supporting cast of Toshiro Mifune, Hardy Kruger and Ronald Fraser is given very little to do (Fraser and Kruger also turn up in Euan Lloyds next feature, 1978s 'The WIld Geese' where they have far more substantial parts).

Niven saves the film with a performance of charm personified and is surprisingly effective playing a reluctant hero who lies his way into a decent job and then spins glorified untruthful tales of his previous heroism to impress his young charge. Of course the lies come back to haunt him but his colourful character just about saves this film from oblivion. It is a shame in some ways as with a little more care this could have been a better film than it is but something went wrong . Clumsy dialogue, badly explained politics, some comic book baddied and pedestrian directing coupled with obvious voice dubbing for some of the cast really let a good idea down here. Bit of a shame really.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
As simple as a paper animal, but as warm as any living one
edmund-marlowe27 January 2013
The story is admittedly very simple: elderly British "Major" Walter Bradbury (David Niven) is engaged by the Japanese ambassador to an unnamed Southeast Asian country, Kagoyama (Toshirô Mifune) as tutor to his enchanting 11-year-old son Koichi (Kazuhito Ando). "Mister Bladbelly" soon wins the reverence of the ever-trusting and perfectly-mannered Koichi by spinning yarns about his heroic wartime exploits that could hardly be further removed from his quiet nonentitous life, but is unexpectedly and severely put to the test when they are both kidnapped by guerrillas.

However simple though, the story is still a good one and it is fantastically well and charmingly acted by all three of the main characters. Anybody who has known a paper tiger, especially the more amiable types who, like Niven, have twinkles in their eyes gently hinting at their harmless fraud, will surely warm to his authentic depiction of one.

Paper Tiger is a gripping story, alternately funny, tense and moving, but above all it is a thoroughly warm-hearted and tenderly told tale of redemption.

Edmund Marlowe, author of Alexander's Choice, a novel of Eton, www.amazon.com/dp/1481222112
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good harmless entertainment
davidmantle10 June 2017
Simple premise of don't pretend to be what you are not. Safe family action film that is quite well acted and with decent cine-photographic shots of the far east ( think might be Hong Kong area ). Well acted with a safe plot. Motto of the story being not to pretend you are something you are not cause it could bite you in the arse..
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of David Niven's finest performances
HotToastyRag22 February 2018
David Niven's first autobiography The Moon's a Balloon was a fantastic bestselling success in 1972; when you watch Paper Tiger, you can't help but wonder if it was written for the star after someone read his memoir. In the book, Niven shares countless, incredibly detailed stories from his time in the service, and in the movie, he shares just as many entertaining war anecdotes. It was an absolutely perfect role for that time in his career.

In Paper Tiger, David Niven, an English WW2 veteran whose war injury requires a cane, is hired by the Japanese ambassador, Toshiro Mifune, to tutor his young son. Immediately, The Niv and Ando, a most adorable little boy in his first and only film, bond as Niv talks about his time in the war. Ando puts Niv up on a very high pedestal, and he enjoys imagining fantasy war games starring the brave teacher. Sounds cute enough, but where's the conflict?

Enter Hardy Kruger, a nosy (and gorgeous) reporter, who's suspicious of everyone and starts pestering The Niv. An American tourist, Jeff Corey, talks to Hardy about some conversations he's had with Niv, and immediately, Niv says, "I wouldn't pay attention to anything he said. . ." Is he hiding something, and will Hardy figure it out? As if that's not enough of an obstacle, a terrorist organization kidnaps both the boy and his tutor and holds them hostage, in hopes that the ambassador will cave to their demands. What will the old war hero do?

David Niven gives a wonderful, touching performance, and Ando is such a natural. Their chemistry is very realistic; it's really cute when Niven starts to describe a battle story and then Ando's imagination takes over, giving the audience a combination of a flashback and a fantasy to watch. I absolutely loved this movie, and I highly recommend you rent it during your next family movie night. It's family friendly, and has laughs, dramatic tension, action, very nice music, great acting, and a story that just might require you to bring your Kleenexes. If you've read my reviews on Hot Toasty Rag, you know how much I love The Niv. I've read all his books, and he even earned enough nominations to join the Hall of Fame. While I look forward to watching The Bishop's Wife every Christmas, and I bawl my way through Enchantment, Paper Tiger is my favorite David Niven movie. It's sweet, sad, and never fails to make me smile. I was so happy to cast my vote for the role that finally won him a Rag Award!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Worth watching, forget modern cgi and unneeded deaths to fill 80 minutes of a 110 film to make you forget acting and script was mediocre
moribundabug6 January 2022
I will not repeat the other comments , on content of film just delve into what Biggest problem with people watching this film now might be and that is where and when it was set, for the time directing ,acting and script was very good. But modern audiences have seen scripts similar, rip offs, done with modern effects, more money and more violence so the film comes across as old and tired ? At the time David niven was a Oscar winner had multiple awards and considering this was in his twilight years he played the part wonderfully, nowadays a 65 year old man has cosmetic surgery, does weights, trained in fighting etc if this is his type of role, he was 65 playing 65 frail man. Pretending to be a war hero, which he was in real life, and he goes above and beyond to save his ward. Just watch it , do not be clouded by today's standards and cgi etc films, sit back and enjoy the scenery, the cities and villages that no longer exist, with no prejudices and you will find you will have watched a film that may find you looking up his other films and prove you do not need a death count in the hundreds to enjoy a film.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed