I Wonder Who's Killing Her Now? (1975) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Not All That Funny
Rainey-Dawn26 October 2015
Good cast and kinda of a cute film but really doesn't have to many laughs for me. I love zany comedies generally speaking but this one isn't as funny as I was hoping it would be. It's not a bad comedy film but it's lacking something I can't quite put my finger on.

Generally speaking I like the Mel Brooks films and similar types of comedies... 'I Wonder Who's Killing Her Now' is in the same category but just somehow falls a little flat. I feel some of the jokes are a bit worn out and thin. There are a handful of giggles but just not bust-a-gut laughs one looks for in a comedy film of this nature.

The film is OK for watching when there is nothing else better on to watch. I acquired this film in the Drive-in 50-pack collection.

2/10
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Needs editing - lots of editing!
JohnHowardReid23 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I guess I'm midway between the few people who liked the film and the multitude who hated it. With a bit of astute editing, it could be rendered mildly amusing in a bizarre sort of way. But as it is, it way out- stays its welcome. The plot starts off with a reasonably amusing situation, but just gets so utterly bizarre and so sillier and sillier the more it progresses that you feel like leaving the theater. But you hang on to see to what depths it can plummet when the even more dopey characters join the cast. It would seem that the director exercised no control over his players at all, but just let them do whatever they liked. And we all know what actors like to do. No matter how large or small, significant or insignificant, important or unimportant their roles, every single one of them will strive to attract the greatest attention to their characterizations - and nuts to everyone else in the scene! But directors should be a wake-up to the aspirations of bit players. So in this case, put the blame for this debacle on the director first and the players a long way second.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A 70's comic oddity
Red-Barracuda2 June 2015
Oliver is a man in desperate need of money so he decides to have his rich wife killed off. To this end, he hires a man to assassinate her only to later have a change of heart. It turns out, though, that the murder has been sub-contracted downwards via a chain of men, with the price getting cheaper and cheaper. Oliver, therefore, amasses an ever increasing gang of oddballs and eccentrics in his mission to stop the murder he instigated.

This silly screwball comedy stars a man with an impressively silly name, the (surely) one and only Bob Dishy. This is possibly the actual funniest aspect connected to this film though, as despite being a relentless farce, it isn't especially amusing. Its plot ensures that it is quite episodic in nature and this means that it's fairly fast paced which certainly helps a bit. While it isn't exactly a successful comedy, it is strange enough to be worth a viewing. It's sort of like a poor man's Mel Brooks, even if some of Mel Brooks' actual films sometimes seem like poor man's Mel Brooks films themselves. But the sheer daftness on display here is sort of endearing to a certain extent and, on the whole, I sort of didn't mind it all that much.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Lack Of Intelligence A Determining Factor Here.
rsoonsa29 December 2004
Apparently meant to be zany, this incredibly stupid film relates the predicament of "Oliver" (Bob Dishy) who, after being caught pilfering a quarter of a million from his employer, is given a chance, because his father founded the firm, to recompense that amount within 30 days in order to have charges dropped; however, when his wealthy wife, played by Joanna Barnes, informs him of her intention to obtain a divorce, thereby cutting off his income, Oliver arranges for a two-week, million dollar life insurance policy for his spouse with him as sole beneficiary, intending therefore to have her murdered, in this fashion solving his felonious fiscal problem. He then openly asks virtually anyone whom he sees if a payment of $25000 will purchase the murder of his wife, and finally locates a character named Bobo (Bill Dana) who agrees to take on the assignment, but when Oliver changes his mind he finds that Bobo has sub-contracted the hit to another who does the same and so on and on ad nauseum, while a flock of sub-contractors, in this poorly filmed, edited and acted affair, chase about in search of the final $6.95 assassin at the bottom of the barrel, where belongs this weakly episodic movie that is primarily composed of one-liners and gauche physical comedy that rarely is comic.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
There's a mystery about this comedy
gimhoff15 March 2007
The mystery is how it could be so bad. The cast is a great collection of comic character actors of the 1970's. The writer has a top-notch resume filled with wonderful comic scripts, including his collaborations with Woody Allen (the early movies, when Woody Allen movies were funny), and the director isn't incompetent. There are even some good lines in the script. (One attempt on Joanna Barnes' life is introduced by a shot of a shark in a swimming pool, with a sign by the pool reading, "Acme Shark Rentals." Bob Dishy's psychiatrist is confined to a straight-jacket; Dishy asks him why, and the psychiatrist replies, "We can't all be fashion-plates.") But the result is a mess. The actors and the director seem to have responded to what they knew was a failing movie with desperation -- "maybe if we play this broader, louder, quirkier, more over-the-top, we can make it funny." They can't, and they don't.

So what went wrong? The temptation, this having been a product of Hollywood in the 1970's, is to wonder who was on what drugs. If that isn't the explanation, I'd love to hear what was.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Half-Decent, But Far From A Comedy Classic
abbazabakyleman-9883422 October 2019
This movie is most famous for Peter Sellers' original involvement with the production, but due to a heart condition, he bowed out and the producers replaced him with Bob Dishy, a comic actor who made many one-shot appearances on various TV sitcoms. Dishy does give it his best with a middling script provided by Mickey Rose, a frequent Woody Allen collaborator and wrote and directed the original slasher spoof Student Bodies. The supporting cast of Bill Dana, Vito Scotti, Richard Libertini, and a pre-Mr. Miyagi Pat Morita make it watchable, though the movie is not really laugh-out-loud funny.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Is there an actor is the house
nogodnomasters28 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Jordon Oliver (Bob Dishy) has been fired from his job for embezzling. His wife Clarice (Joanna Barnes) wants a divorce and Jordon does a lousy Bogart impersonation. He plans on taking out a million dollar policy on her and then bump her off. But first he must have a doctor examine her...without her knowing it. Enter a young Pat Morita. Jordon contracts Bill Dana to do the job, but then changes his mind when he discovers the doctor is a fraud and he doesn't have a policy. Unfortunately Bill Dana has subcontracted the work to someone who has subcontracted the work and so on. Jordan and his entourage run around acting zany as if this was an early 1960's film.

The film has many second tier comedians of the era. Unfortunately the comedy it tried to create, didn't make it. It spoofs mafia films, but not too well. Available on a 50 DVD pack of the Swinging Seventies.

Guide: No swearing, sex, or nudity
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Why Rent A Shark When It Doesn't Have Lasers In Its Head?
boblipton18 April 2024
Bob Dishy's father wants back the money Dishy has stolen from the company. Dishy's wealthy wife, Joanna Barnes, wants a divorce. Dishy's response is to take out a million-dollar insurance policy on her, and then hire Bill Dana for $25,000 to kill her. When it turns out that the doctor who examined her is not a doctor, Dana finds Dana to call it off. Dana, however, has hired Jack DeLeon for $20,000 to kill her. When they track him down.... well, you get how this is going.

It's all shtick all the time from insane characters, as I realized when they got down to Richard Libertini. Insane characters can be fun, but the audience needs someone to hold onto, some one to react to the insanity, which you don't get until Libertini and Vito Scotti are riffing off each other in. Italian. That wasn't anywhere near enough to keep my interest, and the writers seem to have agreed, since they didn't bother writing an ending.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wife slaying farce that will slay you!
richcam123 December 1999
This is one funny flick. It's about the dead-beat husband of a rich woman who, after finding out she's going to divorce him, takes out a life insurance policy on her and hires a hit man (Bill Dana aka Jose Jimenez) to do the dirty work. When he finds out that the insurance policy is invalid, thanks to the incompetant doctor (Pat Morita) who performed the most discreet physical in medical "hystery"! The husband then tries to stop the hit, only to find that it has been sub-contracted about a dozen times! The round up of the (insane, whacky and unlikely) hit men is so funny that my sides hurt when the film finally ended.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worst ever...
smirre443 November 2003
This movie needs to be on the #100 worst movie list.

I watched it at the ages 12-13, and not even then could I like it.

Low budget, low quality acting job. Stay as far away as possible from this one!
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Way Too Silly to be Considered Funny
rwint20 July 2001
Abysmal farce about a man who hires a hit man to kill his wife, but when he wants to call it off he can't because it's been sub-contracted to too many different 'wacky' characters. Similar in style to THE BIG BUS and AIRPLANE, but much more sillier. In fact it gets so silly that it becomes dumb, embarrassing, and even more lame than a kiddie flick. The running gag of a faceless killer (we only see his shoes) repeated attempts at killing the wife are poorly executed and photographed. Making them annoying instead of clever or funny. Out of ninety minutes there are really only three that are even half way amusing. Of the few minor highlights: a cuckoo clock in a psychiatrists office, a mexican waiter in a chinese restaurant, and a out of work actor who agrees to do the killing for $6.95. Funny character actors Darden and Libertini play several different roles.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed