I first saw this film (under the title "Prodigal Boxer") decades ago along with 50 or 60 similar entries when the USA channel was still running "Kung Fu Theater" every Sunday morning. It stood out at the time because of the scene where the hero's mom makes him stand in a barrel full of herbs for several weeks to either heal up from the beating he took or else to make him invulnerable (I'm not sure which), because the hero gets pounded into pemmican at least twice before he finally wins, and because the acting and photography was pretty good.
I happened upon it again as as part of a "Marital Arts Classic Double Pack", and was happy to find that it still holds up pretty well. Of course, it follows most of the conventions of the Chop-Sockey classics, but it seems that the people involved in the production had a little extra time and effort to invest in it than the usual sausage product. The photography and scenery are good-to-spectacular. The screenplay has some nice touches here and there - I can't recall seeing anything similar to the point of view shots and the "nightmare sequence" in a typical Shaw Brother's production. There's some ambitious linking and transition edit tricks where the movie cuts back and forth between the son's "heroic rescue" fight and the father's "tragic death" fight that I don't recall seeing a lot of either. The woman who plays Feng Su Yi's mother has a lot of presence and a very expressive countenance. She adds a lot to the film, though she doesn't actually fight much in the last 2/3rds of the plot.
The guy playing the hero is pretty good; he's not Bruce or Jackie Chan (or even Gordon Liu), but he's got lots of springy energy, and a face that is perfectly suited for the grade school emotions of a revenge-oriented kung fu film...he just has a lot going for him as an actor and a martial artist. The English dubbing seems to have been mixed and voiced a little better than the norm for films from that era. And there's a different 'crowd' dynamic to the fight scenes, too. It's hard to describe, but it is there - for instance, the presence of a crowd prevents the two corrupt martial arts masters from killing the hero in the first fight, and they add a bit to the showdown at the end as well.
Even the final climactic showdown has a slightly different feel to it, as the hero doesn't actually directly kill the bad guys - they fall onto pointy sticks from broken furniture, have roofs collapse on them, etc. It's obvious that the filmmakers wanted to make a film a little different (though a person who isn't a fan of the genre might not notice the difference.)
What keeps "Death Punch/Prodigal Boxer" below a "7" (a very good film) for me, is the fight choreography. While it is pretty good and has some panache (having one of the bad guys be "Iron Punch" while the other is an "Iron Leg" is a great touch), it commits a sin of omission that us typical in a second rate kung fu film: it's missing the element of growth and change necessary for a great example of the genre. For instance, in "The Fearless Hyena", Jackie Chan's character is fighting in a strikingly different, much more exciting and dramatic style at the film's climactic battle than he is in the beginning. Again, this is also true of "Snake In Eagle's Shadow", where he picks up a "Cat's Claw" technique to supplement his fighting style. And the training sequences in these two movies are impressive and grueling. But in "Prodigal Boxer", Feng Si Yu fights in the exact same "Southen Movie Style" at the end of the film as he did in the beginning (with the exception of a weird pigtail/queue move that was never explicitly shown in the training sequences.) He isn't any crisper, stronger, or visibly faster in the later sequences - they could have been filmed in any order except for the ending flurries of punches - and you could argue that the real reason he beats the two corrupt masters at the end is because they attack him one at a time instead of together (as they did in the middle fight where they beat the stuffing out of him). That's kind of lame in a screenplay that is all about the hero growing and getting better until he can finally get his revenge. (It makes no difference in something like "Master of the Flying Guillotine, which about the hero using his considerable skill, wit and cunning to survive an incredibly dangerous adversary). ("MOTFG" gets a "7" in my book, BTW.)
So, not a classic, but a solid entry. I liked it, and was glad to get a chance to see it again after so many years.
3 out of 4 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink