The Mind Snatchers (1972) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
A young Christopher Walken is the reason to watch this
Red-Barracuda3 February 2014
This low key drama is about medical experiments in the American military where a form of mind control is being developed which involves brain washing of violent individuals to make them 'good'. An unruly young soldier is sent to the facility where these techniques are being developed for conditioning.

The most significant thing about The Mind Snatchers is that it features a young Christopher Walken in an early starring role. He is certainly the best thing about the film. His intensity is evident at this early stage and he carries the movie really. While the plot-line has some definite similarities to A Clockwork Orange, whose success I am sure led to this stage play being filmed, it is much less cinematic and pretty under-stated. It's a little too stage-bound for its own good to be honest and a little bit bland overall. It's a shame because there is certainly the basis of something quite good here but the uninspired direction means that it is not entirely successful. Its low budget probably restricts it in some ways but I have seen other similarly cheap sci-fi films from the 70's that engage the viewer more. Still, it's interesting enough for a watch and Walken is very good. It also features Ronny Cox from Deliverance as a sex offending inmate in line for corrective surgery.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
THE MIND SNATCHERS (Bernard Girard, 1972) **1/2
Bunuel197627 October 2007
Interesting but hardly original drama with sci-fi leanings – though not quite the "horror"/"chiller" described by the ads! – involving the brain-washing of violence-prone subjects by the system (which must have seemed particularly trenchant at the time of the Vietnam war).

At this juncture, however, the movie feels quite dated – if reasonably intelligent and compelling nonetheless. Being also relentlessly talky (not surprising, given its stage origins) and low-key in nature, there's a conspicuous lack of cinematic inventiveness – which doesn't really allow for a sensible comparison with Stanley Kubrick's stylized treatment of the same theme in A CLOCKWORK ORANGE (1971)! Still, it has some undeniably powerful moments – and the small cast is impressive: Christopher Walken (relatively inexperienced for this type of demanding role, but quite good in his Method approach to it); Joss Ackland (as the requisite mad scientist); Ralph Meeker (as the equally inevitable, and callous, military overseer); and Ronny Cox (as a fellow inmate of Walken's who, after much soul-searching, willingly submits to the dehumanizing experiment).

Incidentally, the play was filmed under its original title – THE HAPPINESS CAGE – but this got changed (in case it was mistaken for an ode to hippiedom) first to the sci-fi friendly and, in retrospect, more appropriate THE MIND SNATCHERS and eventually to the horror-oriented (and, consequently, wholly misleading) THE DEMON WITHIN!
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Stick a fork in it and see if it is done.
Bernie444429 December 2023
Based on a play "The Happiness Cage" by Dennis Reardon

A German scientist works on a way of quelling overly aggressive soldiers by developing implants that directly stimulate the pleasure centers of the brain.

Joss Ackland did an excellent portrait of Dr. Fredrick our German scientist. You may remember him as C. S. Lewis in "Shadow Lands" (1985).

The movie has a constantly annoying background musical theme that distracts from this movie that feels more like a play. There is even a long Ayn Rand type speech on the morality of electrodes.

Using subtitles can correct for occasional Mumbling.

The advantage of the DVD is that the picture is a lot clearer and brighter without those annoying dark spots that you have to guess what is happening.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"One flew over the cuckoo's nest" meets "A clockwork orange"
Sean8411 December 1999
I saw this movie under the "Demon Within" title. I believe the movie was based on a play and at times, it shows. The movie is slow in some parts, but overall is good. The character of Ronny Cox is often annoying. However, he does a good job in portraying the pity of a man losing his mind. Walken gives an non-typical performance of a comparatively straight-laced man who never really loses his mind but instead has it robbed from him. It is not really worth a long search. But if you do come across it, check it out.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An insane look at military medical control.
mark.waltz10 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The wild and crazy guys of the armed forces in Germany are threatened with something a bit more serious than just the presence of saltpeter in their water. Operations on their brain threaten to remove their libidos for good as doctors experiment with this idea among the most rowdy of the men in the military. It's a great early role for future Oscar winner Christopher Walken, joined by Ronny Cox as an even more sexually aggressive patient who at on me point uses his lustful descriptions towards women to basically grab Walken all over even though the script insists that all of the male patients are heterosexual.

These two patients are joined with excellent performances by two cast members. Joss Ackland is quietly manipulative as the head doctor, experimenting in a bizarre procedure with Cox that at first stimulates him sexually then creates great discomfort in one very intense scene. Bette Henritze as a compassionate, obviously lonely nurse is greatly hurt by Walken's rejection of her offer of friendship, later assaulted by Cox whom she seemed to have a close friendship with.

This is a unique entry in psychiatric futuristic science fiction, showing us a world that we hope never exists. It is majorly disturbing in many ways, yet thought provoking over a serious world where all freedoms seem to vanish thanks to the usage of experiments of questionable morality. The low budget helps this get its point across more than it would have on a big studio budget, and deserves a cult following for its unique themes.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A true curio for Christopher Walken fans.
Hey_Sweden3 May 2013
A young Christopher Walken brings his typically dynamic presence to this low key drama with a touch of sci-fi. He plays Private James Reese, an aggressive young soldier stationed in Germany who gets in trouble one too many times to suit his superiors. So they ship him off to a hospital in the country where Dr. Frederick (Joss Ackland), the man in charge, has come up with an experimental way to suppress hostile behaviour. Reese doesn't trust Frederick, and is suspicious of the whole set-up and location. The Army, represented by a Major (Ralph Meeker), is overseeing the whole thing and of course doesn't want anything jeopardizing their efforts.

Those new to this film, such as this viewer, may be caught a little off guard with the nature of this film, which the advertising tries to sell as a horror movie. Well, there's some scary stuff in this story (based on the play by Dennis Reardon), but this is definitely not a horror movie in the traditional sense. It's quite deliberate in its pacing, and is very talky, so it may test the patience of some audience members. Still, it's often amusing, and interesting. A lot of the running time is devoted to portraying the evolving relationship between Reese and his live wire fellow patient Boford Miles (an incredible, standout performance by Ronny Cox). Miles is a very troubled individual, as we see from the kinds of things that he gets up to. It's a saddening moment for the character when he finally relents to being subjected to the experimental procedure, and you feel quite bad for him.

Ultimately, the plight of these characters makes for fairly compelling material. The actors are all wonderful; Walkens' trademark personality shines through at some points, although he also gets a chance to do some really serious acting, in what was one of his earliest movie roles. Cox (who was also a relative newcomer to film, having made "Deliverance" previously) is excellent and he and Walken work well together. Ackland and Meeker are both solid as the well-meaning and not so well-meaning antagonists, character actor Marco St. John has a lively role as a jovial orderly, and Bette Henritze is touching as kindly nurse Anna Kraus.

This may not be anything truly special, necessarily, but it's still potent and involving entertainment and fans of Walken and Cox will almost certainly want to give it a look.

Seven out of 10.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worthwhile if flawed drama.
Scott-4225 January 2000
A bit talky, but certainly well acted and thought provoking.

Walken, looking all of 19, does his usual standout performance in this ethical drama. While not without it's drawbacks - the pace is a bit slow at times and the score is annoying, the questions raised about the ethics used by both the well-meaning Doctor and the frightening military will certainly cause future reflection.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mind Control is Real
myboigie22 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
"Mindsnatchers" is a really scary-film. Why? Because it is a fictional story of a scenario that was and is real. Beginning in the 1950s, with the CIA's successful MKULTRA program of hypno-assassins, we can assume that is has continued into-the-present. Why do it? Our political, economic and military leadership seemed to feel the answer was "why not?" America was unchallenged in power after WWII (the only man standing), an almost supreme force in the immediate aftermath of war. The situation is similar today, but with a few key-differences, mainly that we are a declining-power.

With our present "rendition" of suspected-terrorists in secret, illegal-prisons throughout the world, one has to wonder if any of these individuals are being brainwashed too. One also has to wonder if so-called "terrorism" has any direct-connection to mind-control programs that have backfired. The legendary Muslim heretic, Hassaan I Sabah, utilized drugs and a form of hypnosis in creating the world's first-known assassins ("Hashishins" being the root-word), and some historians note there were accounts that his reach extended as far as Paris. You could say he was the Osama Bin Laden of his time. But we do assassination too, to our shame. We are virtually alone in this practice, internationally.

From 1957-1961, the CIA conducted mind-control experiments at the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal, with the aid of the Canadian government (surely, noticed by David Cronenberg). We know all of this from the aftermath of Watergate, which caused the creation of the Church Committee (1975-1978). The Church committee investigated illegal-activities of the American intelligence community, which released a flood of formerly classified-documents. MKULTRA is indisputable, it happened, and bits of the story leaked-out before the Church committee (and the NSA, CIA & our press) could bury them. It should be noted that there was also intense-cooperation with the Pentagon, and this is where the story of Mindsnatchers takes-place.

It's a really engaging-film, and you really care about the characters, even when they do horrible things. Of course, this is Christopher Walken's film, he is both hilarious and believable as a non-conformist G.I. with a bad-temper. The comparison between the film and "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest", and "A Clockwork Orange" are apt, but the film stands-on-its-own as being very original and disturbing. It is not a copy of either movie, as "Cuckoo's Nest" came-out in 1975, and "A Clockwork Orange" and Mindsnatchers were definitely in-production simultaneously.

Also chewing-scenes in this film is a younger Ronny Cox (Robocop), who is excellent as a crazy redneck inmate of the secret facility in Germany. An interesting-twist is the film's connection with other experiments in free-will and obedience-to-authority (the Milgram experiment), and the applications of electroshock for-compliance.Yes, we have brain-implants, even ones that induce-pleasure in the test-subjects. To say these scenes are depraved and disturbing is an understatement, especially knowing that they happened. On top of this is the character of the controller/Doctor: he justifies his experiments as "voluntary", and "for the greater-good", so this is also a tale of medical and scientific-ethics. Interestingly, the Doctor also has a "controller" in the character of "the Major"--it appears the Major has lied-to the Doctor about how "voluntary" the program really is. So, this is also a tale of medical and scientific-ethics.

All-in-all, a very good film that is oddly-entertaining, while being absolutely unsettling. It is strangely informative, too. "Mindsnatchers" delivers, and-then-some. Image entertainment has a very-good DVD available, and it has some great extras too. The transfer is not perfect, but appears to be from the best available-sources, just not the original-negative. This was an extremely-cheap film, but it rises-above this fact by some really assured directing, acting, and writing. The score is a little cheesy at-times, but it has some excellent electronic-cues that are effective for the time. You could do-worse, like watching the Final Destination franchise, or Snakes on a Plane. Depraved.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
In Praise of Nonconformism
Thorsten_B9 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
At first sight a rather obscure entry in Christopher Walkens filmography, this 1972 picture turns out to be something like a hidden gem. It deals with a topic familiar from many films, but here it is treated with great seriousness. Christopher Walken plays a young American soldier stationed in Germany. He's basically a cynical, non-conformist and, natural combination, intelligent loner, and usually the army doesn't like people like that. So he is brought in a mental hospital disguised under the outer looks of a German castle for "cure" of his "mental problems". Problem is, the treatment of the patients (there are no more than three of them) is very "special"... The low budget forced the film into realism. It looks as it would if real life prevented such a horrific scenery. In the mid of this confrontation between individuality and it's destruction, the actor do their jobs very well (Ronny Cox has his first feature film role here - probably the one that brought him into "Deliverance"). A surprisingly good, yet provocative tale - on the other side about morality, on the other a praise of non-conformism.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very compelling but not the film I expected.
planktonrules17 April 2013
soldiers with facial hair? With a name like "The Mind Snatchers", I naturally assumed this was a film about space aliens abducting and scrambling the brains of folks. However, the film has absolutely nothing to do with this but is instead a slightly paranoid but thought-provoking film about psychiatric ethics.

The film begins with a VERY obnoxious and angry soldier, Pvt. Reese (Christopher Walken) bullying and mistreating everyone. He's soon arrested by the military police and incarcerated for psychiatric tests to determine what his issues are. They diagnose him with a personality disorder (no duh!) and schizophrenia--and, without his permission, they ship him off to a very strange hospital where there appear to be only three patients. One is SERIOUSLY disturbed and a total mess. Another (Ronny Cox) is a sex offender. And, the third is Reese. What is this all about? No one tells Reese and he's left to wonder. And, through the course of the film, it becomes more and more apparent that the military is planning on doing some sort of insidious mind-control experiment on them!

Despite a low budget and that the film is inexplicably set in Germany (I think this was due to funding), the movie has a very compelling script and has a lot of interesting things to say about abuses within psychiatry where, it seems, the end does justify the means. A very good and unusual film to say the least--and an interesting early Walken role. Well worth seeing, though I doubt if the average person would enjoy this. Me, with my background in psychology, I loved it and thought it brought up some very interesting concerns.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Intriguing Early Walken Vehicle
FilmFlaneur24 January 2002
Warning: Spoilers
CONTAINS SPOILERS

The best reason to see this is an early and characteristic performance by Christopher Walken. The film itself is a sombre, small scale piece, developed from a play. It betrays its origins through plenty of dialogue, some suspense, but little real action. This is one of those early seventies films revealing a fashionable anger against the industro-military complex, but which offers no radical agenda of its own.

Like the director's 'Name for Evil' made around the same time, ‘The Mind Snatchers' is about mental confusion, but here the emphasis is on deliberate manipulation of the brain rather disorientation. There is no inexplicable mental collapse on show here. Instead we are confronted with a state-sponsored ‘trip', a mind control experiment, undertaken in Germany on American soldiers conveniently designated ‘psychotic' by the powers who need subjects to operate on. As the alienated and violent James Reese, Walken breaks his arm in a dispute with the Military Police and instead of the cooler, soon finds himself in an enigmatic hospital, one of only three patients.

Outside of the opening scenes, showing Reese's fraught social interractions then arrest, and the last, showing him on display at a press conference, the film never leaves the institution's grounds. Shot atmospherically on location, the place is a large, empty echoing establishment, whose sanitorium-like atmosphere is at odds with the doom it threatens. It is a cold, efficient clinic, reminiscent of Cronenberg's world of white coated attrocities just starting on film at the same time. As a hospital it is as much understaffed as it is underpatiented (although barbed wire and dogs keep the few people in.) Besides Dr Frederick, the orderly Shannon, a nurse and red cross visitor, no one else is in evidence. For a supposed high priority government project this is disconcerting, to say the least. Like Reese we expect something more than this to rail against. He shares a room briefly with a third patient (whose unpredictable yells are a disturbing touch), then is left to interract with Miles, a sergeant with dangerous mood swings. A bond gradually forms between these two men - but not until Miles' health suddenly deteriorates and he has volunteered for the experiment, which has already killed the last patient.

The cool, dangerous and distanced persona of Reese is perfect for Walken. This was his third film (after ‘The Anderson Tapes') and as the incarcerated Private he inculcates exactly the right degree of repressed rage and wariness the role demands. Although the film is dialogue heavy, the central relationship, that between Reese and Miles works well. Miles' taunting sexuality, nervous anticipation and jittery humour contrasts well with Reese's objective assessment of his exploitation. We sense Reese's reserves of strength, which makes the end of the film all the more shocking. As Miles, Ronnie Cox is also a strong character, but we know that he probably does not have the survival instinct of our hero, and his fate justifies our suspicions. Together the two hold the screen for long minutes, making it a shame that Joss Ackland's stodgy Dr Frederick lowers the suspense and tension on each appearance. In fact, Frederick's ignorance and belated conscience struggle, after `23 year's research on one small part of the human brain', is one of the least convincing aspects of the plot. Bemused and lethargic, he seems to have strolled in from a far more gentele story, and his concerned crackpot character never really catches fire. The same might be said for the oily Major, played by the normally excellent Ralph Meeker who has little to do here save trigger the experimentation on Reese.

First however, it is Miles who is hooked up to the mind-snatching machine, which has an effect (albeit more sinister) similar to the ‘orgasmatron' familiar from Woody Allen's ‘Sleeper'. As a violence-inhibiter and psychosis-reducer, the effects of the self activated machine is certainly effective. It is described by Miles as like being in `a huge woollen glove', before he clutches his crotch in self-absorption. (`Get the bugs out and I'll be the first in line, Doctor' admits the grim Major with unconscious irony.) Reese has a greater sense of himself as an individual however, and initially refuses the treatment, saying `pain defines me – it makes me what I am'.

The final press conference is abrupt and chilling. Reese is caught in a freeze frame while the Major proclaims blithely that `The Military is always interested in the betterment of Mankind', and so on. In a way which might have reflected the disbelief on the face of a contemporary audience, Reese's fate has been the loss of individuality, of emotion and power. This is an ultimate fate familiar from many other movie distopias, and is perhaps where the film most clearly reveals its roots. These days we may prefer our messages less hammered home, but for those who enjoy their brain washing movies cold and without the trimmings, this can be recommended.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A mind is a terrible thing to waste
sol12185 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** A bit ahead of it's time in how the government uses it's people, like the GI's in the 1950's atomic bomb test in Utah & Nevada, in experimental tests to farther its both military and scientific knowledge. The bad thing about all this is that these tests are done without those people used in them knowing about them.

Pvt. James H. Reese has been having disciplinary and behavioral problems both on and off the army base that he's stationed at in Frankfurt Germany. Accused of assault by a woman at a party he attended Reese is taken into custody while staying at his girlfriends, Lisa, apartment by the army MP's. Ending up with his left arm broken Reese is, instead of being taken to the local military base's medical facility, taken to this out of the way German castle run by Army Intelligence.

It turned out to Pvt. Reese's surprise that beside himself there's only two other patients at the castle, now subbing for a mental institution, Sgt. Miles and Let. Rhodes. Depressed at being locked up Reese soon realized that he and his fellow GI's, Miles & Rhodes, are being used by the US military as guinea pigs in mind control experiments.

A cross between "One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest" and "The Ninth Configuration" the movie "The Happiness Cage" brings out things about how were used by our own government that at the time of its release, 1972, was a bit hard to take by the movie going public. Reese who at first was anything but interested in how the government operates becomes very in-tuned in it's methods in how it's trying to steal his as well as his fellow GI's minds.

These experiments are the brainchild of the kindly and understanding Dr. Fredrick, Joss Akland, who despite what he's doing in destroying peoples minds thinks that he's actually curing mental illness. It's not long that Reese, broken arm and all, makes a escape attempt from the castle grounds only to find out that's it's secured, by guards police dogs and barb wire, as tight as a minute man nuclear missile base!

Put under around the clock guard Reese soon sees that his fellow patient, Sgt. Miles, at the castle is going off his rocker in his not having had a woman in more then a year. Miles taking advantage of the Red Cross lady Anna Kraus who comes over to play checkers with him, a service provided by the US Military,attacks and rapes her while Reese is being examined by Dr. Fredrick and his assistant orderly Shannon .

Finding out what Miles did Reese despite his broken arm has it out with him only to find, after socking Miles, that he's slowly dying from terminal cancer. With Let. Rhodes, who seemed to be lobotomized, dying of a brain tumor Miles is then sent to Dr. Fredrick's laboratory in Rhodes' place for a mind control experiment. Ashamed and feeling very guilty for what he did, raped Anna Kraus, a Zombie-like Miles lets himself be hooked up with electrodes by Dr. Fredrick. Pushing the button himself, Dr. Fredrick insisted on that, Miles shocks himself to the point where he ends up brain dead. With only Reese left to experiment with he , despite being wired, refuses to push the button and end up together with both Rhodes and Miles; Dead or lobotomized.

****SPOILER ALERT****Just about having enough of Dr. Fredrick's, who refuses to push the button himself, concern for Reese the Major, who really runs the place, finally takes control of things. The Major sends a jolt of electricity through Reese's gray matter turning him into a docile and mindless slave who'll do or say anything that he's superiors, like the Major, tells him too. And so ends the movie with Reese, looking like he's here on earth in body with his brain is on another planet, answering questions from the news media with the Major and Dr. Fredrick looking on.

An almost teen-age looking, he was 29 at the time, Christopher Walken as Pvt. Reese is extremely effective as the mentally disturbed sociopath who, because of his stay at Dr. Fredrick's castle, becomes a feeling and sensitive human being. Joss Ackland as Dr. Fredrick put the usual mad scientist, in the part he played in the film, to rest with a sympathetic interpretation of the tortured doctor. Ronny Cox as the deranged Sgt. Miles was both funny and tragic in that he was losing control of his ability to remain normal.

It was without a doubt Ralph Meeker as the spic & span, as well as blood & guts, Major who in spite of his short time on the screen dominated every scene he was in. Meeker, as the Major, knew what his bosses, the army brass, wanted from him and did it, like a robot, without a second thought. It was the Major who in the end did what Dr. Fredrick & Co. failed to do. Turned the wild and uncontrollable pit bull-like Pvt. James H. Reese into a harmless and obedient laboratory rat. But the Major had to destroy and wipe clean Reese's mind in order to do it!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Too scattered but worth watching
danielmartinx28 March 2024
I wish they had cut a lot more of this dialogue. I've been imagining this on a stage in a theater and it would be wonderful. With all of this talking, they would create a world and it would have ups and downs and it would work.

That doesn't translate to film. You don't have to create a world or an atmosphere. The camera can photograph a huge empty room in a mental hospital and you don't have to tell us what it feels like. The starkness of the setting is already pretty overwhelming. They are trapped. This is horrifying.

I grew up in the 70s so I'm familiar with this weird weak neurotic snarky tone that everyone has. It was a pretty awful time to live. People were not nice. Negativity was coolness, and everybody just wanted to drop out and let go of everything.

I was really not liking Christopher Walken in the first few minutes but I relaxed and decided to go with it. And here he is an absolutely wonderful actor doing the best with this material. And a lot of his works that we all know about now as an actor show up here. It might be worth watching just to see Christopher walken.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
hidden treasure
jonathan-57718 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I had a "What the hell did I just watch?!" experience with this movie, and I mean that in a good way - a real buried treasure. This one is based on a play and as a result the early dialogue scenes make it seem like the previous 25 years of screen writing technique had not occurred - lots of snappy one-on-one character dialogue and hearty expositions. It's not as bad as it sounds though; it's actually pretty cool, and soon enough it goes over the edge, with subtext run amuck. This is an allegory about the colluding interests of the military and psychiatric establishments - a hardcore, polemical one. Christopher Walken, young like crazy, is the Angry Young Man in the Wild One/Jailhouse Rock tradition, except he gets sent to a military hospital where they f*ck around with monkeys and put electrodes in GIs heads to test fancy shock machines. The twist is that the psychiatrist refuses to operate without consent - so he goads consent out of the patients by the most devious, predatory means - and then gets THEM to push the button. At the end Walken is paraded before the media in a military uniform, standing on a stage with the doctor and the general, and he offers completely vacuous, completely familiar answers to the usual questions - but before each answer, they have to push the button. The TV was off for ten minutes before I realized - IT DOESN'T TELL US WHO'S PUSHING THE BUTTON. That about sums it up, doesn't it? Another coup: when the old-maid nurse is about to be raped by the hyperactive Ronny Cox, she startlingly yells, "You don't love me because I'm fat!!!" There's a lot of detail here. The soundtrack - by Phil Ramone, Billy Joel's producer and the guy the Ramones ripped their name off from - is completely insane, at times it sounds like a cross between Philip Glass and Captain Beefheart's Magic Band. My only question is, were any animals harmed during the making of this picture? Those are some stressed-out monkeys. Finally: be advised that Cox's self-buttoning scene is f*cking disturbing, even if it is justified rhetorically.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fetch My Brain Drill...
azathothpwiggins31 January 2022
THE MIND SNATCHERS is about mind control, a government conspiracy, and an experiment gone wrong. In spite of these intriguing elements, this movie is painfully slow. This makes it feel days long instead of its actual 90 minute running time.

Watching it, it's clear that this would have made an excellent short film or anthology film segment. As it stands, it has a brain-scorching-ly padded midsection sandwiched between a decent beginning and a perfectly downbeat finale.

On the upside, Christopher Walken plays his character, Reese, with his soon-to-be signature, unforced quirkiness. In retrospect, it seems obvious that his future would include roles in THE DEER HUNTER and THE DEAD ZONE.

Unfortunately, he's the only bright spot in this movie. That is, unless you count a young Ronny Cox as Reese's unhinged hillbilly roommate...
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed