A Little Game (TV Movie 1971) Poster

(1971 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Nasty, loathsome … creepy little brat!
Coventry19 February 2017
For some bizarre reason, and ever since I was a young and irritating little kid myself, I've been most fascinated by horror movies/thrillers that deal with murderous, psychopathic children. The younger and crazier, the better! So, naturally you start with the classics in the genre, like "Children of the Corn", "The Bad Seed", and "Village of the Damned/Children of the Damned". When you get a little older and begin to dig a little deeper, you stumble upon the more peculiar titles (like "Who can kill a Child", "The Pit", "The Children of Ravensbeck" and "The Other") until - eventually – you fanatically seek out the most obscure and undiscovered gems ("Friday the 13: Orphan", "Cathy's Curse", "The Godsend", "Devil Times Five"). Then, just when you assume there isn't left to discover and you already accepted the fact that the newly released killer-children movies are vastly inferior, you come across this modest but very effective made-for-TV production and never knew it existed! It's small and insignificant triumphs like these that make life just a tad bit more fun!

"A Little Game" is slick and curious 70s TV-gem about a recently married couple who are nervously awaiting the homecoming of the wife's 13-year-old son Robert from boarding school. Robert's real father was his true God, but he died in a car accident that his mother caused and since then Robert has been very rejecting towards another male role model in his life. From the first moments that they meet, Robert behaves aggressive and rude against his stepfather, but his mother is convinced that he only needs time and extra affection in order to adapt to the new situation. When stepfather Frank begins to have good reasons to suspect that little Robert is, in fact, a genuine psychopath who may has killed a fellow student at his boarding school, the mother naturally doesn't believe him and tension mounts in their relationship.

This film, courtesy of Paul Wendkos who also served us "The Legend of Lizzie Borden", "Terror on the Beach" and "Haunts of the very Rich", is full of clichés and shortcomings, but I vastly enjoyed the tense and foreboding atmosphere. It owes most of its impact to the genuinely evil nature of the youthful protagonist and the adequate performances. You better don't contemplate too much about the one- dimensional characters, the dumb decisions they make and how badly they communicate with each other…

The four lead characters only have one particular characteristic, but each of them surely excels in extravagantly showcasing this characteristic! Robert is psychotic in every sense of the term! He talks and stares aggressively, dominates his supposedly best friend, terrorizes the maid, manipulates the mother, openly threatens to kill the father and actually aims loaded guns at them! Robert's alleged "best friend" Stuart – or Stu, as he prefers – is a weak and wimpy kid without backbone. He allows for Robert to reign over him, even though physically speaking he could easily beat him, and he covers up his weakness by talking endlessly. He can be manipulated by everyone; by Robert primarily, but also by the stepfather and even an insignificant wannabe Humphrey Bogart private detective. Then you have the stepfather, Frank, who's clearly supposed to be the normal person in the bunch, but he's seriously – by lack of a better description – stupid! He comes across as completely powerless when he gets threatened by a 13-year-old skinny kid and doesn't even succeed in persuading the mother that her son has some serious issues. I mean, at least try to record all the evil things that he says or do something! The mother is naive and almost single-handedly brings naivety to a whole new level! She's literally blind for the terror that goes on in her own house and defends her son without even listening to her husband's cry for help. She thinks it's totally normal for a young teenager to demand that she divorces and – as the ultimate icing on the cake – she considers an authentic hunting rifle is the ideal Christmas gift for a 13-year- old. Seriously, the highlight of the film was this piece of dialog: "Frank, honey, I know what you could buy Robert for Christmas. A rifle! Coming from you, it would be the perfect peace offer". That was pure genius! I know the situation is different in the United States compared to here in Europe, but come on… You don't give a lethal shotgun to a 13-year-old; let alone a borderline 13-year-old. It gets even funnier, because the stepfather initially refuses and then she just decides to buy the rifle herself. "Oh Frank, you should see how happy he is!" Awesome, awesome, awesome!
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Merely decent seventies TV movie
The_Void12 March 2007
A Little Game is decent enough for a TV movie, although it's a long way from being brilliant. The film takes obvious influence from the likes of The Bad Seed, in that it follows a young problem child with murder in mind. There were some really good seventies TV movies, so while this one is OK in its own right, it pales in comparison to some of its counterparts. The main problem with the film is that the problem child fails to be intimidating and comes off as being more pathetic than frightening. Mark Gruner was clearly the wrong kid for the central role - and that's a shame as the film really rests on his shoulders. Obviously, you can't expect great things from a film like this; but unfortunately this one does little more than merely tell a story, and the story itself doesn't have much more to it than just the central theme. I imagine that this may have been better when caught on TV in the seventies than it was for me watching it on DVD at home, but basically it hasn't aged well and there isn't much to it. I'm not saying it's not worth bothering with - but it's certainly not worth going out of your way for either.
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Creepy Gem
hillari14 June 2002
The kid in this movie is every adult's nightmare. The boy pulls one heinous trick after another, including murder, to get his way. As usual, another character suspects the kid of wrongdoing, but no one believes the little darling is capable of mayhem. One of the best creepy made for TV movies from the 1970's.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A bad seed without pigtails
mls41822 December 2021
This film was made 50 years ago when psychotic kids with guns was a rarity or nonexistent.

A typical TV movie for its time as far as quality. It might have been a thriller then but now it is pretty benign. I think it is worth a watch if only to see lovely Diane Baker after her film career was over.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I couldn't sleep all night after I watched this when I was a kid...
footere17 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This movie chilled me to the bone. After thirty five years it still haunts me. Mark Gruner deserved an Emmy for his performance on this one. That kid had an intensity that kept you on the edge of your seat -whatever drama he was in. Although Eric Shea is the brother everyone remembers, Christopher Shea puts in a great performance in this as well. Diane Baker played her part well although I would have loved to see Elizabeth Ashley in this role. Howard Duff was, as always, Howard Duff - a tough guy made for TV. In this day and age this movie would probably seem a bit tame, but for it's day, it was so cutting edge! I wish I could find a copy of this movie somewhere. I'd love to see it again from a grow-up's point of view. (but I'd bet I'd still sleep with one eye open!)
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This kid has the 'mother' of all Oedipal Complexes!!
planktonrules3 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"A Little Game" is a film about a terrible marriage and an even worse step-son. Elaine Hamilton (Diane Baker) married Paul (Ed Nelson) after her husband died but her son Stu is a real sociopath waiting to explode. But, since Robert is a smart little sociopath, he is extremely two-faced--and his mother only sees what she wants to see...even when the boy shows her small signs that he's seriously disturbed. The mother simply refuses to believe her child is anything other than an angel and even talks about wanting to buy her kid a gun! Obviously, this is one foolish and deluded woman! As for the step-dad, he sees the real side...an angry kid who has taken the Oedipal Complex to an extreme. And, after a while, Paul worries that Robert might even be willing to kill him! But Elaine refuses to listen...even when he has proof! However, that's not all...Robert has a young friend, Stu, who is more like a minion. Robert torments and manhandles this other kid...and you wonder what he has in mind for this 'friend'.

This is a film you can't help but watch and wonder why Paul even stays. I am not a huge proponent of divorce but only a rather crazy man would stay when this 'child' even tells him that he'll kill him sooner or later...or at least call the cops! This is a serious weakness in the film...though I suppose having Paul leave earlier in the movie would have taken away from all the suspense. But because of this the film loses much of its punch. There also is a serious problem late in the film. When Paul learns that Robert has even killed, he is hesitant to call the police!!! As a result, the ending is simply dumb. Entertaining, yes...but flawed as it could have been better after a small re-write.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Loved it as a kid
rossman11225 April 2005
This was such a great movie, I can still remember being 11 years old and watching it on Halloween. The thing that REALLY stuck with me is that the main character (a BAD little kid) was being portrayed by the kid who did the voice of LINUS in the original Charlie Brown shows. Until I saw this movie I had a somewhat romantic view of military school, but this crushed any notion of that. I sure wish I could see it one more time but since in 1971 there were no VCR's in peoples living rooms, that is pretty much an impossibility. Christopher Shea played the role of a youth from a dysfunctional family who seems to be getting away with murder at his military school by making them look like accidents. "One of our boys just fell off the quadrangle!" The picture had the most Hitchcockian feeling for a "made-for-TV" movie, a sleeper that would have done excellent at the box office for sure.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The children's hour has nothing on this monster.
mark.waltz12 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
There's no love lost for Mark Gruner, the 13 year old son of the widowed Diane Baker who has remarried, and Ed Nelson, the new stepson. Gruner's a creepy kid from military school home for a holiday and immediately causing problems for Baker and Nelson who keeps trying to bond but constantly fails. The stepson is a real bully, threatening friend Christopher Shea who has joined him and is completely manipulated by him.

Gruner reads the lines, but his monotone delivery, while appropriately unpleasant, only accelerates the reasons why he should be locked up in a rubber room. The writing for the adults isn't much better, with private detective Howard Duff a pointless character, mother Baker not worth the drama with her coddling of her son that is nothing but enabling, and Nelson a fool for sticking around even one night after Gruner's return. You'd think that housekeeper Katy Jurado would get out the strap he needs, but no one dares to put this kid in his place even when he threatens murder.

Certainly, melodramas about problem children can be intriguing, but this is just infuriating because there's no real buildup to the showdown between the two male leads. At least with Rhoda in "The Bad Seed" and Damian in "The One" (who shares a bit in common with this demon child but is much more subtle) we got a glimpse of their reasonings for their evils. This one's hard to take because the antagonist is 100% rotten without any redeeming qualities with even his love for his mother played completely disgusting. To set this at Christmas time is another disturbing element that made me ill.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Don't Be Silly! He's Only A Child!"...
azathothpwiggins21 September 2022
Within minutes of his return home from military school, we can tell that Robert (Mark Gruner) is no ordinary boy. Upon his arrival home with his mum (Diane Baker) and her new husband (Ed Nelson), we really get to know Robert. He's home for Christmas with his classmate, Stu (Christopher Shea), whom he treats as a subordinate.

Mum, blinded by her love for her son, can't see what the stepfather sees, that there's just something not quite right with Robert. Something strange. Possibly dangerous. Of course, we can see it too. Robert never puts on airs. He's insufferably mean, nasty, and obviously unbalanced. Bluntly said, this is one creepy, vicious kid!

From what Robert says and writes in his diary, we know that bad things have happened in the past, and will most likely happen again. Soon.

A LITTLE GAME is a magnificent made-for-TV, "killer kid" movie from the golden age of the tele-horror film. Gruner plays Robert up to be an unrepentant, malevolent force. In the annals of such movies, he's in the upper level. Nelson portrays one of the best characters of his career, and Howard Duff is the perfect private detective. Special mention for Ms. Baker, whose character must pretend -even to herself- to be oblivious to what she fears most.

When the title is explained, it all gets even more terrifying...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Little Different View
parkerr8630223 March 2009
Ugly, nasty, repellent film about sick kid who plots the murder of mom's new boyfriend. Even though the kid skulks around acting creepy all the time, mom (of course) refuses to believe there is anything wrong with her baby, which he uses to his advantage. Not as sleazy as SAILOR WHO FELL FROM GRACE WITH THE SEA which utilized some of the same ideas, but why would anyone want to watch garbage like this, except to see what poor Katy Jurado (HIGH NOON) had sunk to in her waning years, playing a servant? Only good thing is the brief running time; some reviews here claim they haven't seen it in years---if you really MUST see it (which I do not understand), there are bootlegs kicking around on the Net.
3 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed