The Magic Garden of Stanley Sweetheart (1970) User Reviews

A drug and sex-crazed trip down hippie-lane...

[ftiller2 · 7/10 · 8 September 2001]

Freak-out anything-goes flick from 1970, does a great job of capturing east-coast hippie scene. Some of the scenes from this movie must have been very shocking to the few who saw it upon its initial release, as it pulls no punches in its depiction of nudity and sex and sex and nudity. More or less, this movie seems to have been made to reflect the emerging sexual openness and promiscuity of the time. Not much of a story line, but entertaining to watch, i would recommend it for those looking for a fix of late '60's/early '70's underground culture. A definite drug movie. Do not watch while operating heavy machinery...

Egocentric mechanisms...

[moonspinner55 · 5/10 · 21 August 2021]

Robert T. Westbrook adapted his own acclaimed, semi-autobiographical novel about a Columbia University student in his third year who drops out (a fashionable way of expressing yourself in 1970). The protagonist, Stanley Sweetheart (hailed by literary critics at the time as a successor to Holden Caulfield), is played in the film by a young, high-voiced Don Johnson, whose performance failed to impress Village Voice critic Molly Haskell (she remarked, "The only thing that stands out about Don Johnson is the black roots of his blond hair."). Self-assured, sex-obsessed Stanley lives off-campus in his own apartment: he makes 16mm films; he hates the noise of construction-ridden New York City; he swats at bugs on the carpet; he disgustedly wads up a letter from his woebegone mother, who wonders if he'll ever have a productive life. So far, so good (except for the Michel Legrand/Alan and Marilyn Bergman-composed opening song--some woozy thing that asks if a tree falls in a forest...). There's a lot of talk about pot smoking, decadent materialism, "being free to really be free", masturbation, getting laid, also an attempted homosexual pickup (which freaks our hero out). Westbrook and director Robert Horn want their movie to connect with the kids but not in a direct way (that might be too square). Instead, Horn and his editor give us a somewhat fragmented look at a young man's life in 1970; however, Stanley's day-to-day non-routine doesn't really require this kind of jagged treatment (for instance: when Stanley deflowers the pretty girl in his linguistics class, the moment is extra tender, followed by a bubblegum-music montage of boy-girl coupling with 'cute' nudity). It isn't much of a picture--and one that MGM apparently had no invested interest in--but Johnson is a definite presence (especially in his scenes with Holly Near as his girlfriend's roommate and Michael Greer as a former student at Juilliard). The milieu, now dated, is interesting as a time capsule (including a cameo by Candy Darling at a drug orgy); but "Magic Garden" isn't a magical character study--it's stunted by its overall narrow view of life. When kids try to act like grown-ups but realize they're really just dumb kids, the audience is apt to respond, "What else is new?" ** from ****

Step into the late 60's world of ANDY WARHOL!!!!

[crawford · 29 July 2002]

This could be the definitive film of Andy Warhol's New York sub-culture...and a rare one to find at that! It captures the decadence, the confusion, the drugs, the music and the 'boredom' of this underground world, and it all revolves around the character of Stanley Sweetheart. Don Johnson, in his first film role, plays this character brilliantly, capturing all of this insatiable desire for sensation in this beautifully androgynous performance. There also seems to be an underlying text of hidden homosexual desires, which Stanley continually suppresses, although he seems drawn to Danny character. It's a fascinating work of decadence and decay, and you can just feel Andy Warhol overlooking the whole world of Stanley's decline.

Title more interesting than movie.

[gcanfield-29727 · 4/10 · 5 February 2020]

A hard-to-find movie which may not be worth the trouble of searching for. One interesting fact: two actresses in this film also appeared on All in the Family. Dianne Hull was Archie's niece. Holly Near (full nudity here) was Gloria's friend. Don Johnson is very young here, but not very charasmatic. The film is about his sexual adventures. The story is notably disengaging. Best thing about movie is Victoria Racimo. Very cute and sexy.

Extremely rare and often peculiar sleeper.

[jlabine · 10/10 · 14 August 2000]

The extremely rare and often peculiar film "The Magic Garden Of Stanley Sweetheart" succeeds greatly as a cult film. It has all the ingredients for the perfect midnight movie. Based on the semi-autobiographical 60's drug n' love counterculture book by Robert T. Westbrook, it remains quite faithful to story and context. The story concerns a boy Stanley (a very young Don Johnson in his debut acting role) in his early 20's who goes to college in New York to become a film maker. He spends his time usually lost in daydreams and masturbation until he begins a relationship with classmate Cathy (well acted by Dianne Hull) who brings slight contentment and romance to his insecure life. Though through the relationship, Stanley soon finds boredom and begins an affair with her plump roommate and best friend Fran (Holly Near) while still carrying on with Cathy. The scene where he's trying to film Fran for one of his independent short films (apropriately titled "Masturbation") is at times funny, awkward, and clumsily executed. Stanley also occasionally meets up with friends Danny (well acted by Michael Greer who interestingly replaced Joe Dallesandro in the role, after Joe was fired from the set on one day of shooting!), Barbara (Linda Gillen) and Andrea (exotic Victoria Racimo) who he'll sometimes get high with. One night while Stanley and Cathy are sleeping, the uninvited three friends stop by to get Stanley and Cathy loaded. During the stoned experience you find Danny picking up on Cathy and Stanley becoming increasingly jealous. Soon however, Cathy will leave Stanley to pursue her new crush, while Stanley is left all alone to his daydreams. The "Magic Garden" refers to the place in his mind that he somehow finds solace and peace through his imagination and daydreams. The book will make this point clearer, than in the movie. At this point Stanley will fall into a hallucinagenic menage a trois with the two girlfriends Barbara and Andrea, only changing the direction of the film from light comedic romance to drug addict casualty. But these scenes are fantastic. Where else (but in the 60's) can you find such images as group sex, body painting, drugs galore, and psychedelic light shows all wrapped up with the most sugary bubblegum pop song in the world? (the song in question being "The Gingerbread Man"!) These scenes for counter culture freaks are absolutely priceless! What's really interesting is how downbeat the endings of movies were in the late 60's or early 70's. Why must every film from that era always be a casualty tale or sort? Also, another interesting aspect of the film is the hints of homosexuality in the script. Danny's leering at Don Johnson's bare chest suggests something that is never fully developed until the surprise ending which in itself has also got homosexual undertones (the sparing of the rabbits life signifying sensitivity, and the barrel of the gun signifying the phallus???). It's fitting that an actor like Joe Dallesandro (from Andy Warhol Factory and Paul Morrissey film fame) would have played the role of Danny. Because at times the film resembles some of Paul Morrissey's films in the depiction of New Yorker drop outs. Don Johnson at the time was a popular actor amongst gays, due to the exposure he received from the play "Fortune In Men's Eyes" a gay prison story directed by Sal Mineo. And one time TV show director Leonard Horn does every shot in an exploitative manner. You'll see numerous shots of Don bare chested, bare butt, or just plain nude. Also the obligatory gay pick up scene (ie: "Midnight Cowboy") in a cafe (which seems slightly out of place), where actor Brandon Maggart tries to pay Stanley for sexual services. All these scenes make for an awkwardness that the film either suffers or benefits from. (depending on your tastes?) I found myself slightly unsure of the director's intention with some of the material, which satisfied the thinking side of me, to make me want to see the film again. Was this a coming of age, sexual awareness film? A romantic comedy or drama? A drug counter culture film? I found it to be all these things. The film is by no means perfect (the acting is slightly shoddy at times), but I do think it's a tad underrated. I kept seeing these really horrible reviews of the film, but it wasn't too bad at all. It's always entertaining and interesting, and never dull. It's got a great soundtrack, (especially "Magic Mountain" by Eric Burdon and War) the clothes look great, and some of the filming is quite imaginable. It's a story that probably a lot of younger guys could and would relate to. Check out the scene when Stanley's short film called "Headless" is played for Cathy, it's a pretty funny and far out. Watch it late at night, if you can find it. It's definitely got cult movie appeal. I quite dug it myself!!!

A little gem.

[bechamel · 9/10 · 28 May 2003]

At university I was part-time apsirant film-maker, part-time aspirant womaniser, and full-time aimless waster. Unsurprisingly this film struck a huge chord with me, when I stumbled across it during those bewildering days!

A great little film, lots of fun, just don't expect any niceties like, erm, a recognisable plot or a meaningful ending. The film-within-a-film - Stanley's outrageously bad student short "Headless" - is a real hoot and worth the price on its own!

Oh and if you like this, check out student rebellion in "The Strawberry Statement" and more of the young Don Johnson in "A boy and his dog", both recommended.

A surprise.

[BlackJack_B · 4 October 2001]

A lot of big name actors have started their careers in some risque material (Sylvester Stallone, Ellen Burnstyn, Shannon Elizabeth), but I was surprised to see Don Johnson's name. I thought The Harrad Experiment (1973) was the furthest he got, but this one is more adult than that one. Don is Stanley Sweethart, a Columbia student, and the movie is about his lovelife in the "Free Love era" of the 60's. When not making love to the various women he charms or two-times, he makes a career of filming Russ Meyeresque epics. The acting is a hell of a lot better than an Andy Warhol production; Don still had that distinctive voice coming out of his mouth even then, but there are some pointless scenes. Yes, there's a lot of skin, Don included, but at the time, he didn't know he'd make it big. A curiosity piece, probably impossible to rent on video, but it should be shown on Canadian T.V. on occasion.

A pop-bubble gum of a movie

[JubBely · 8/10 · 19 May 1999]

This is an interesting movie with an early Don Johnson, pre-dating A Boy And His Dog by a couple of years. He is a drop-out schoolkid/junky who lives on his own, but is mad about a girl at his college. He chases her/gets her/goes mad on drugs and then drops out. A great fun movie. Stanley Sweetheart is an excellent character with lots of quotable lines for you and your friends. He makes his own (hilarious) movies. Most recommended when bored late at night

a definite time capsule

[A-No.1 · 8/10 · 8 September 2001]

This movie is undeservedly obscure and it's title alone should warrant a re-discovery.It's undeniably dated and the directing is self-consciously arty at times but it is a fascinating reflection of a certain time and place (univesity life in the late 1960's). This is a youth movie that offers more insight into a cultural movement (or lack thereof) than any of the generic Freddie Prince Jr., type crap that Hollywood is cranking out at a weekly rate these days. All the performers in this film are great, though Don Johnson's the only one I've heard of. This is the kind of counterculture film that fits in perfectly with the likes of Hi Mom!, Greetings, Getting Straight, The Strawberry Statement, R.P.M., End of the Road, Rabbit Run and Joanna: the kind of films that, while not always great, at least documented their times in an interesting and unique way.

first impression

[darost · 3 February 2004]

I saw this movie in 1970 in Philadelphia when it was first released as the second part of a double feature, following Fellini Satyricon. The comment I made when I left the theater (I had graduated from high school only a few days earlier) was, "They co-opted the revolution." If that sentence makes sense to you then you'll understand my reaction. If it doesn't, I can't explain.

Peace! David

It may have been a huge flop in its time, but it's fascinating now!

[mark.waltz · 10/10 · 8 April 2022]

It's Columbia University Vice has Don Johnson takes on his first role and is a complete charmer in this look back at what life was like for young people and the late 60's, early 70's. He's a college student going through basically what every red-blooded teenager went through after leaving home, and it's historically funny yet often touching. His unseen mother writes him a very neurotic letter, indicating what to do if she should happen to die in a plane crash or just die on the plane. He tells off a cab driver who is rude to him for getting in a car facing downtown while he wants to go uptown to Columbia. It's ironic to see the original World Trade Centers as they were being built, especially the construction pit as it would look 32 years later after they went down.

Johnson finds romance with the virginal Dianne Hull but trouble ensues when he's seduced by her best griebd, Linda Gilen. 70's counterculture icons Holly Near and Michael Greer have supporting parts, with Victoria Racimo very sexy as a young woman who gets Johnson into a threesome. There's also a very cute early 70's style song "Sweet Gingerbread Man" that has me wishing I could go back to this era (briefly) as a young man. Films seem to paint New York City in this era as overrun with hippies or peace loving rebels with little to no ambition, and of course, that's an overstatement but it's fun to see that aspect of life when it's done so pleasantly. I've seen other films that were not so pleasant about it, but you can't expect its atmosphere and "Hair" to represent complete reality. Any film that has me smiling from start to finish with the exception of the sad parts will get a high mark in my rating system.