Maidstone (1970) Poster

(1970)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Maidstone sinks like one, fast.
st-shot4 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Maidstone is another flight of insufferable ego from Norman Mailer in which the "great man" plays radical filmmaker and presidential timber Norman Kingsley. Shot in color and the wide open spaces of East Hampton on a bigger budget it is a marked departure from Mailer's two earlier claustrophobic bores but it still suffers from the same disjointed improvised stuttering about by clueless characters attempting to interact with Mailer's badgering.

It's all moribund living theatre as Mailer/Kingsley and camera roam grand East Hampton estates and get in the face of a bevy of false eye lash candidates explaining obliquely what the role entails which from the looks of the footage a substantial amount of it calls for making out with the sybaritic Norman. There are some pallid attempts to shock with some crass soft porn as well as address social issues with disenfranchised minorities along with heavy doses of Mailer pontificating in a couple of accents. Meanwhile he hacks at the editing with a machete turning everything into a sound bite.

Later under a shady tree Norman summarizes to cast and crew what he was attempting to get at with his seesaw reality/fiction production likening it to a battle and attack, something it seems actor Rip Torn takes to heart when he attacks Norman with a hammer since fictional Kingsley is target for assassination. Mailer is taking a beating before wife Betty Bentley and the kids step in to save Norm. But the camera keeps rolling as the winded, bleeding and incredulous writer stumbles off (along with his traumatized family), a victim of his pretentious hyperbole but not before recording the most powerful and absorbing scene of the whole film in which Mr. Torn must be given writing credit. Despite this happy ending it remains an arrogant mess of smarmy guerrilla theatre filled with the fatuous musings of a guy desperate for attention willing to say anything to do just that.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
truly one of the weirdest movies that you'll ever see
lee_eisenberg29 December 2020
I first learned of Norman Mailer from the documentary "When We Were Kings", about Muhammad Ali's Rumble in the Jungle. I later read about him in a book of famous people from 1981, and saw a picture that Annie Leibovitz took of him in 1974.

So now I've seen a movie that Mailer directed. What a strange one. The idea of a celebrity president seemed far-fetched half a century ago, but now we've had both Reagan and Trump. "Maidstone" is done mockumentary-style, even more so than Christopher Guest's movies; this almost looks as if Mailer got a bunch of friends together to party.

What I concluded is that Mailer was a 14-year-old boy trapped in a grown man's body; the depiction of gender relations certainly implies that. I wouldn't go so far as to call it a terrible movie - anyone who's seen Woody Allen's "Everyone Says I Love You" knows the definition of a TRULY terrible movie - but not anything that I would recommend.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not the most wretched movie ever made, but close
wjfickling11 March 2002
This film can be considered significant only as a tribute to Norman Mailer's monumental ego. It is a total bore, and there is hardly anything memorable about it. The only thing that is memorable is a scene in which Rip Torn unexpectedly bites Mailer on the ear, hard enough to draw blood. This causes Mailer and Torn to come out of character and have a real confrontation, in which Beverly Bentley, Mailer's wife at the time, inserts herself. Other than that, completely forgettable.
30 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mailer's finest
JasparLamarCrabb9 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
It's just as incohesive as his other directorial efforts, but as a sociological study of late 1960s America, Norman Mailer's MAIDSTONE is a masterpiece. Shot in 1969 in the Hamptons, Mailer assembles a large cast of ne'er do wells, freaks, family members, hippies, black radicals and at least one professional actor for this epic look at the massive egomania that goes into creating a work of "art." Mailer himself plays a film director and possible presidential candidate shooting a remake of Luis Buñuel's BELLE DE JOUR...of course, this being a Mailer production, the whores are all men and the clients are all sexy women. Rip Torn is the nominal star, but the supporting cast, including Ultra Violet, Joy Bang, and Hervé Villechaize (in a cameo, playing piano) is really something. Mailer gives each player a shot at a close-up. He also manages to insert himself into basically every scene. The finale, featuring Torn & Mailer in a brutal fistfight, has become legendary.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Misunderstood, flawed, masterpiece
jeanblanche4 March 2009
I recently saw Maidstone in a French DVD and have to say this movie is nowhere as bad as its reputation would have you believe. In fact, in light of the now pervasive presence of 'reality' based TV, the kind which thrives on humiliation, preying on our secret blood lust for murder, Maidstone, like the best of Mailer's literary work, is outright prophetic. Mailer's ambition may not be as long as his reach, but flawed as it is, Maidstone still works like a cinematic Cassandra machine. Not only is it a fascinating dissembling of Mailer and his infamous ego, but it captures the apocalyptic delirium of that terrible year of 1968 better than numerous documentaries made around that time. A significant, tragically under-appreciated, work of the underground cinema that is ripe for rediscovery and re-evaluation!
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Once seen never forgotten...and in a good way
I first saw this at the London Film Festival (I think it was called that) at the Roundhouse with a pre-screening interview with a fairly sozzled Mailer, and a packed house of mainly hippies/freaks/students/literary folk. The general opinion was WTF was that ??? I think I've seen it since - late night on BBC2 I'd guess. But this really ought to be re-shown - because as I remember it, confessedly dimly, Mailer played a Trump-like egomaniac media star (film director in those days) so it definitely foretold the chaos we would be in (and not in a good way!). Someone, please smarten this film up and re-release it - my guess would be that today's audience reaction might be along the lines of, Mailer warned us but we didn't believe it!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed