No Way to Treat a Lady (1968) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
40 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Steiger Steiger Steiger--a tour de force shoehorned into a decent thriller comedy
secondtake25 August 2010
No Way to Treat a Lady (1968)

A showpiece for Rod Steiger. He's a great actor, and he takes on the role of an actor taking on a variety of roles, one by one, as a killer with a few issues to work out. The other two people have full fledged roles but they end up secondary: Lee Remick marginally overacting a ditzy but charming young woman and George Segal in what might be the performance of his life as a low key detective.

Called a comic thriller by some, it hovers undecided...it's not a goofy comedy with thriller trappings like the 1960s Pink Panther movies, and it's not a thriller with some humor giving it humanity like much of Alfred Hitchcock's. So we flipflop from some really funny, if somewhat predictable, lines between the detective and his mother (about Jewish clichés) and some really chilling murder scenes, hammy but gruesome, too.

If you can rise to the surface and enjoy all the pieces as they come together, maybe swallowing a little during the overdone last ten minutes, it's a pretty intensely enjoyable farce and psychodrama.
24 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
He stalks. He kills. His mother made him do it!
michaelRokeefe20 July 2004
Rod Steiger is excellent as Christopher Gill, a hammy theater manager and psychotic master of disguise. Gill stalks and kills various women all due to his love/hate relationship with his dead mother, who was a respected stage actress. He uses his talents of disguise as a plumber; a priest; and policeman to gain the confidence of his victims. He starts a cat-and-mouse game with a NYPD detective Morris Brummel(George Segal),who himself is quite the "mama's boy" still living with his mother. At every chance she tries to shame him for being a Jewish cop. Gill begins calling in tips of his crimes to Brummel, who is slowly putting together the clues to the serial killings; and on the back burner trying to figure out his feelings for his new girlfriend(Lee Remick). The Segal/Remick relationship seems no more than a silly teen-aged romance. Steiger is perfect for the role. Segal's character needs a backbone. Remick works effortlessly and is so easy to look at. In supporting roles are:Murray Hamilton and Eileen Heckart. Very interesting to say the least.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
NO WAY TO TREAT A LADY (Jack Smight, 1968) ***
Bunuel197628 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
As far as I know, this was only ever shown once on Italian TV; I had always wanted to watch it, due to Leonard Maltin's ***1/2 rating but also because I find the subject matter of a serial killer using a number of disguises fascinating, so when Paramount's bare-bones DVD (why, not even the theatrical trailer is included!) was on sale at "DVD Empire", I decided to order it - along with about 15 other titles from the same studio...

Though somewhat patchy and verbose, the plot (adapted by John Gay from a novel by William Goldman) is undeniably compelling and the performances of the entire cast - including George Segal, Lee Remick and Eileen Heckart - are faultless; still, Rod Steiger as the flamboyant murderer (this is no spoiler, since the killings start from the very first scene!) dominates the proceedings and obviously relishes the opportunity of sinking his teeth into such a juicy role: his disguises - including a priest, a plumber, a gay hairdresser, a police officer, a chef and, at one point, he even turns up in drag! - also incorporate various accents and imitations, among them that of W.C. Fields, whom Steiger would eventually play in a biopic of the great comic some years later! Diminutive actor Michael Dunn has a hilarious bit in which he shows up at Segal's police station and confesses to the crime spree.

While the film displays no particular evidence of technique (Jack Smight was, at best, a journeyman director), it emerges unequivocally as a product of the late Sixties with the added qualities of good location photography and an effective score by Stanley Myers (best known for composing the "Cavatina" theme utilized in THE DEER HUNTER [1978]); as a matter of fact, it reminded me of PRETTY POISON (1968), another black comedy I watched only recently for the very first time - but also of EXPERIMENT IN TERROR (1962), a classic black-and-white film noir I caught up with during the past few weeks which also features Remick as a potential victim of a formidable villain (who, like Steiger's character here, is not above adopting a female disguise in order to get what he wants!).

Among the film's most successful elements is the murderer's relationship with flustered Jewish cop Segal, whom he phones and teases prior to each killing. Also notable is the climax set in a theatre, where the fatally wounded Steiger goes into each one of his 'personalities' before expiring, as well as the subtle contrast the film creates between the two characters' mothers: Segal's is a typically nagging Jewish woman who always puts him down while praising her other businessman son, whereas Steiger's late mother (who is only shown in portraits) had been a great theatrical actress - whose talent for larger-than-life roles was adopted to its extremes by her unbalanced son!
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Predator And Prey
Lechuguilla19 November 2005
Watching serial killer Christopher Gill (Rod Steiger) trying to enlist the trust of his prospective victims is what makes this film really interesting. Once these babes in the Manhattan woods let down their guard, then ... pounce. And like some deep-sea predator that changes its color or its shape to suit the needs of its prey, Gill changes his disguise from Irish priest to plumber to eccentric hair stylist to waiter, to suit the needs and desires of his selected middle aged female targets.

Gill is a loner, but he still needs human contact. So, between killings, he engages in a phone dialogue with detective Morris Brummel (played well by George Segal). Gill also checks the newspapers frequently, to verify that his killings get noticed by the police and by society in general. The film is thus a character study of a fictional psychopath. But the characterization is consistent with expert profiling of the generalized needs and motivations of real life serial killers.

Indeed, some researchers have speculated that the infamous Zodiac killer "may" have studied this film. In some ways, Gill's modus operandi is similar to that of the Zodiac who was known to be a movie buff. Further, the killings in the San Francisco Bay Area premiered just a couple of years after this film came out.

Quite aside from its possible historical significance, the film is very well made. It conveys a well-written script, good cinematography, attention to detail in costumes and production design, effective pacing and editing. The background music at the film's beginning and end is beautifully haunting, and lends a tone of sadness, and therefore emotional depth, to the story. And, of course, Steiger's performance is so good that it alone makes the film worth watching. The only downside is Morris Brummel's nagging mother who quickly becomes grating and irritating.

That this film has been largely forgotten is unfortunate. But it is available on DVD, and therefore can be seen by anyone who appreciates good movies.
38 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Comic thriller was way ahead of its time...
Doylenf28 August 2006
ROD STEIGER has an actor's field day assuming many different disguises when he decides to play a cat-and-mouse game with detective GEORGE SEGAL who is hot on his trail to capture a serial killer. That about sums up the plot contrivances of NO WAY TO TREAT A LADY, which has Steiger donning various make-up disguises so that he can gain entry into unsuspecting female's apartments and promptly strangle them.

The dark humor is always on the surface of this comic showcase for actor Steiger, who dons each disguise with relish and gives a performance you're not likely to forget.

EILEEN HECKART is his overbearing (ultra so) Jewish mother who has unwittingly driven her son to the brink of madness. She's so good at "overbearing" that she almost drives the audience mad too, but LEE REMICK is rather wasted in a colorless role as a dame who's been around the block a few times and likes to spout smart talk. It's not a well developed role and Remick can do little with it but look good in plenty of make-up and mascara.

For pure titillation and subject matter, this is way ahead of its time, a comic thriller that is largely forgotten and deserves some attention, if only for Rod Steiger's tour de force role, all played in tongue-in-cheek manner.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A very stylish thriller
JasparLamarCrabb29 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
A very stylish thriller directed by Jack Smight from a novel by William Goldman. Rod Steiger (in many many guises) is a strangler preying on elderly women and taunting NYC cop George Segal. Though clearly no mama's boy, Segal lives with his mom (Eileen Heckart, who redefines gumption with her smothering Jewish mother routine) and is smitten with Lee Remick, an enigmatic witness and potential victim. Both Steiger & Segal are perfect. Steiger's performance is staggering as he plays, at various times, an Irish priest, a fop wig salesman, a German plumber (who actually uses the word wonderbar!) and a cop. Shockingly for Steiger he does not ham it up as he would in many future roles (Napoleon, Mussolini). Shot on location with great cinematography by Jack Priestley and exceptional art direction by George Jenkins (note Remick's "mod" apartment). The large supporting cast includes David Doyle, Murray Hamilton, Doris Roberts, Barbara Baxley, Ruth White, Val Bisoglio and Michael Dunn, who claims to be the strangler despite some very obvious limitations. The very effective music score is by Stanley Myers.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Uneasy mixture of crime drama and comedy
JohnSeal7 January 2000
This is an odd film. Rod Steiger plays a failed actor who tries to live up to the memory of his theatrical mother by 'performing' a series of stranglings in Manhattan. The murders, while hardly graphic, are nonetheless troubling to watch. Meanwhile, George Segal (the policeman in charge of the murder investigation) and Lee Remick are engaged in a frothy romance typical of 60s cinema. Taken as a whole, it's hard to say what this film is, or who it would appeal to. While a reasonable entertainment, it's uncertain balancing act between urban grit and uptown romance leaves one with a strange queasy feeling after the credits role.
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Steiger gives a bravura performance as a serial killer
bux17 August 1999
Coming hot off the heels of his Oscar winning role in 1967's "In the Heat of the Night" Steiger gives an acting tour-de-force in this tale of a demented serial killer tormenting a police officer. Steiger pulls out all the plugs as he slips into the persona of a Catholic priest, German plumber, simpering hair stylist...and all with great flare and comic over tones. Segal and Remick provide the love interest in a rather kooky way, and it all makes for great fun, in a serial killer movie!..Gotta see it!
30 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"I guess the strangler wanted to thank me".
classicsoncall20 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Rod Steiger makes for an effective serial killer in this late Sixties flick, described by a police detective later in the story as displaying a 'paranoiac exhibition of mother hate'. I thought Morris Brummel's (George Segal) sixth victim ruse was pretty clever in getting the maniac to go off his stride and set himself up for capture. However in the one scene at the bar in which the disguised-as-a-woman Gill (Steiger) was picked up by the buxom saloon gal - what was Brummel's rationale in following them to the apartment next door? There wasn't any logical reason to my mind why he should have suspected anything was up with those two, even after questioning the bartender. That one didn't make sense to me.

Though never mentioned by name, I thought the reference to Christopher Gill's Oedipus complex was cleverly referred to in the museum scene with the statue of Oedipus and Antigone. The story didn't delve into Gill's background very effectively otherwise, the fact that he had inherited the family theater business didn't add much to explaining his murderous tendencies. The cops did a better job of bringing him out with planted stories of his being a sexual pervert, and of course that sixth victim business.

Keeping an eye on the street scenes during the race to Kate Palmer's (Lee Remick) apartment, I caught two marquees displaying the titles "The Born Losers" and "Pink Pussy". The first picture was a Tom Laughlin/Billy Jack movie, but I was pretty sure I wouldn't get an IMDb hit for the second. But lo and behold, it turns out that it was a 1964 Venezuelan film with New York City scenes added a couple years later for an American release. So the timing in this movie worked I guess. If you take a quick look, there's even a single review for the picture, which is probably all you need, since getting a hold of the flick is probably impossible.

Anyway, this was an okay thriller that could only have gone one way in the resolution, so you had to get some entertainment value out of the handful of humorous scenes offered. The Kupperman (Michael Dunn) confession was a sketch, but the scene that just killed was when Kate Palmer met Brummel's Jewish mother and deadpanned her way through an entire critique of Mrs. Brummel's (Eileen Heckart) 'other son Morris' - "With a son like Franklin, you don't mind having this one so much"!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Odd but effective
preppy-33 June 2002
Rod Steiger plays a psycho who likes to strangle women to death. George Segal plays a Jewish cop after him. Lovely, young Lee Remick plays Segal's love interest. Unfortunately Steiger is interested in her too.

Very odd movie. The dialogue is crisp, sharp and handled expertly by the cast. It just sounds different--I mean this in a good way. Steiger chews the scenery again & again & again & AGAIN as the killer. Segal is just fine, but he (understandably) pales next to Steiger. Remick is astonishingly beautiful and having a whale of a time in her role. Also Eileen Heckart is a scream as Segal's very Jewish mother. The sequence between her and Remick is a definite highlight.

All in all, a strange, but enjoyable, mix of suspense, humor and romance. Not for everybody but worth a look.

Only debit--more than a few homophobic comments are thrown about as jokes. But then this was made in 1968.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well made
BandSAboutMovies31 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Jack Smight directed Rod Steiger in this film and in the incredibly dark The Illustrated Man, a movie that he bought the rights to film from Ray Bradbury. He'd also direct Airport 1975 and Damnation Alley.

George Segal, who is the hero of this film, told the Chicago Tribune, "It's Steiger's film. He runs around doing all sorts of different roles and I just stop by and watch him."

He isn't wrong.

Christopher Gill (Steiger) is obsessed with his late mother, a theater actress whose shadow still weighs on him long after her death. He hates her so much that he keeps killing versions of her again and again, using acting to win over the elder ladies before snuffing their lives out and leaving lipstick all over their faces.

Detective Morris Brummell (Segal) is the cop trying to find the killer, but he's beaten up by his mother constantly and falling for Lee Remick. Who can blame him?

This was originally a William Goldman novel. Plenty of films have been, including Magic, The Princess Bride and Heat. He also wrote the screenplays for Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, The Stepford Wives, Misery, Dreamcatcher and The General's Daughter.

This movie was playing in Vallejo, California in April 1969. That's when the Zodiac Killer was murdering his initial victims. It's believed that the Zodiac loved movies and that he may have been influenced by the way that the killer in this movie taunted the cops.

This is one of Becca's favorite movies, which is another of the many, many reasons why I love her so much.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Top film!
Marco_Trevisiol7 December 1998
There have been many serial killer films over the years but this was one of the earliest and one of the best. It manages to be witty, suspenseful, funny and shocking in separate portions. Rod Steiger is very good in a role made for him but George Segal takes the acting honours because it's a much harder role and he does it so well. Lee Remick is fine also.

The best scene is the opening pre-credit sequence. It may look rather mundane at first but.....
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Steiger's Chance To Shine
ccthemovieman-19 April 2006
This movie wound up being a vehicle for Rod Steiger to show off is acting talents, which were at their peak at this time. Now, he's a cartoon of himself with mostly overacted roles.

In this story, Steiger does his Boston Strangler imitation pretending he is different people to gain entrance into their homes and strangle them. Unlike the real-life strangler, Steiger's character disguises himself as different people (and kills half as many as the real life killer in Boston). He's interesting to watch through the entire story.

The other main characters weren't as fascinating. This was the beginning of the big change in Hollywood where morals went out the window. I was disappointed to hear Lee Remick announce how she was kicking out her live-in boyfriend of three years. Remick, someone I've always liked watching, was a major disappointment in this. She looked bad and her character was classless and trashy with stupid dialog. I had always seen Remick play classier roles, but then again the restrictions were now lifted.

Eileen Heckert also was annoying as the overly-doting Jewish mother. Her act grew tiresome in a hurry, but fortunately, she exited soon anyway.

George Segal, meanwhile, plays a good guy cop and is a lot more enjoyable to watch than the two ladies.

In all, an interesting film that really started showing how Hollywood was going to be changing in content.
20 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Cliche and overdone
stafsudd19 May 2004
With an excellent set of actors, this movie is neither a good mystery nor a funny comedy. Maybe it was considered better for its time, it now appears old and out-of-date. Dirty Harry does it better.

Steiger does a good job of showing us the various disguises of a serial killer; and Remick is lovely, beautiful, charming - as usual. Segal plays the good Jewish boy living with his henpecking Jewish mother. Why doesn't this play right?

Too bad. This is a loser. The story is so predictable. The good guys are "good", the police chief is a "bad hysteric", the Jewish mother is loud and irritating. What a waste of good acting. I guess I would blame it on the script. Don't take the time to watch it.
2 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Macabre, well-acted classy thriller
elwileycoyote26 July 2004
I turned this gem of a film on one afternoon having no idea what it was about. The opening scenes with Rod Steiger as an Irish priest calling on unsuspecting, soon-to-be victim Marline Bartlett was truly startling in its viciousness. Why have I never heard of this movie before and why has it been shelved all these years? This movie is definitely a cut above the rest in the genre of thrillers featuring serial killers. Rod Steiger is brilliant in a tour-de-force as he assumes various identities-- i.e., an Irish Priest, plumber and effeminate hair stylist--as a psycho on the loose who targets middle aged women and whose calling card is to draw a pair of lips in red lipstick on each victim's forehead. Steiger is pitted against underdog detective George Segal, who plays an overworked cop who gets no recognition for his work. Lee Remick plays the love interest who adds spice to the movie and supporting actress Eileen Heckart plays detective Segal's overbearing mother who bureates him for being a cop (and Jewish) every opportunity she gets. Heckart as the overbearing stereotypical Jewish mama is annoying, to say the least. Remick's character is a free spirit who gives museum tours and she is HIP! In fact, her dialogue suffers in part from an effort to be *too hip* and contemporary: in one scene she tells Segal, "I swinged, and I swang until I swung", in explaining a previous relationship. The most interesting victim plays a drag queen in a bar who is scorned by the other bar patrons and met with homophobic comments, but this was, after all 1968. All the acting is good, though the best scenes are those involving Steiger and his unsuspecting victims. One slight flaw is that the idea that the police department could control what the media prints and use it to manipulate the killer is a little too contrived, and the movie's ending is mediocre, doesn't satisfy and wraps it up too quickly. The scene involving Remick and Steiger is also contrived, and it's a little inconsistent with Remick's character that she would let a total stranger into her apartment, especially since she's dating a cop.

In spite of the mediocre ending, this is an excellent movie.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Conversations with a Killer
sol-14 July 2016
Taunted by phone calls from a serial killer who dons a different disguise every time he kills, a New York detective struggles to get an upper hand in this odd 'Boston Strangler' variant with comedic touches. As the murderer in question, Rod Steiger delivers a terrific performance, preying on the insecurities of his female victims whilst remaining completing in character until he has won their trust and has the opportunity to strike. George Segal is also fine as the baffled detective and the film gets very riveting in the final quarter as Segal finds ways himself to play mind games with Steiger and prod him into inadvertently revealing personal details. While solid as a thriller, the movie is uneven as a comedy. Eileen Heckart is irritatingly shrill as Segal's henpecking mother, and while there is something to be said for how her pestering is just as annoying for Segal as the killer's taunts, the exchanges between Heckart and Segal are generally unfunny and feel like a distraction from the Steiger main plot. Lee Remick only fares slightly better than Heckart as Segal's love interest and her subplot feels like a distraction too. The film consistently works though when Steiger is in focus with a lot of delicious dark comedy derived from how he manages to constantly con all his victims. His exchanges with Segal (each time affecting a different accent) sparkle too and he has one surefire memorable final scene. The title also has a curious double meaning here; Heckart says in disapproval of Segal inspecting female corpses, but it applies equally to Steiger's take on female companionship.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Unforgiven
sol121827 August 2013
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** Like its title "No Way to Treat a Lady" it's a film about how not to treat a lady. That with its star Rod Steiger as theater owner and half a** art food & wine connoisseur Christopher Gill going around New York City in a number of disguises murdering single elderly ladies by getting access to their apartments. What are the reason for Gill's strange and murderous behavior is soon discovered by NYPD Jewish cop Morris "Moe" Brummel, George Seagel, almost by accident. It's Moe's annoying and overly pesky Jewish mother Mrs. Brummel, Eileen Hacket, who's always on his case in Moe not making something of himself like his big brother, or my son the doctor as Moma calls him, who's making more money in one day that he's making in two months. Despite the film being about a serial killer on the loose the interaction between, which at times is hilarious, Moe & Moma is by far the most interesting and entertaining scenes in the entire movie.

Moe for his part gets involved with the neighbor of Gill's first victim Mrs. Mulley,Martine Bartlett, the pretty Kate Plamer, Lee Remick, who was the only witness to her murder. It the publicity hungry Gill who was greatly impressed with Det. Moe's description of him as being a master criminal who soon began contacting him about his latest or soon to be latest murder. With Gill's string of murders going up to five or possibly six, I'm not quite sure, victims he decides to change his MO, mode of operation,in targeting Kate . It's Kate who's now having a serious romance with lucky Moe who now became his #1 rival for Moe's attention. It's here where Gill screws himself up by coming out in the open and getting very personal with Det. Moe in trying to make his girlfriend Kate victim # 6 or #7.

****SPOILERS**** You an soon spot a very strange connection between both Det. Moe Brummel and serial murderer Christopher Gill and it has to do with their mom's who for the most part dominated and controlled their lives. And it was abused son Moe who didn't take his Moma's words, in what a failure he was, all that seriously who was able to lead a more or less normal life. But in Gill's case in not living up to his mother, who was a famous stage actress, high expectations of himself he completely freaked out. Not being able to take out his rage and frustration on his long deceased mom Gill took them out against the next best thing or persons. Those helpless and elderly ladies who reminded him of her whom he ended up murdering.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Psycho stalks and slays older women
helpless_dancer28 November 1999
Not nearly as good as Goldman's book, but still effective. Steiger played a psycho who had a love/hate relationship with his mother and after her death he began acting out his hatred of mother by killing older women. As nearly all serial killers are younger men than Steiger, I think his part should have gone to Segal instead. This film had a good story, performances, and was fast paced, making for a tense and suspense filled tale.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
No Way to Treat A Lady is A Treat to Moviegoers ***1/2
edwagreen2 March 2008
Rod Steiger was sensational in this 1968 film. His ability to disguise himself and play so many different parts as an insane killer was just fabulous to watch.

Yes, the film was definitely an eerie one but you never know what's coming next.

Eileen Heckart was just fabulous as the Jewish mother of her son-the police officer, played so well by George Segal.

You just wonder when Heckart, Segal and girlfriend, Lee Remick, will be drawn into the web of this serial killer who seems to strike without reason.

Who can ever forget his first venture into killing disguised as a priest?

Rod Steiger had a definite field day with this film. Dealing with the macabre, it was truly a memorable film.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Comparing the Film with the Musical Theater Version
3xHCCH5 March 2013
I just saw the musical theater production of "No Way to Treat a Lady" last week. When I found out that there was a 1968 film that preceded this musical version (with music, book and lyrics by Douglas J. Cohen) which debuted in 1987, I wanted to see and compare how the film and theater versions interpreted the story. Both movie and play were based on a well-reviewed 1968 novel by William Goldman (who also wrote "The Princess Bride").

The two versions had the same story of course. There was a failed actor named Kit Gill who had an oppressive relationship with his Broadway diva mother. Upon her death, his twisted mind turned to killing senior women who reminded him of his mother, wearing various disguises to gain their trust. On his tail was a NYC detective Mo Brummell, who was still tied to his overbearing mother's apron strings. There is a side plot of Mo meeting and falling in love with pretty museum hostess.

While the theater version was a musical and had a heftier amount of lighthearted comedy, this film was definitely a more serious telling, with the comedy so much darker in tone. I noted that the play echoed a lot of situations and lines from the film, especially those that involved the female characters. I felt the play actually told the story much better. The ending of the movie felt very contrived and relied too much on coincidence, unlike the play when the resolution was a lot more logical.

Rod Steiger really played Kit Gill very sinisterly. He was excellent in his various disguises, quite over the top, especially the plumber and wig-maker. George Segal does well as the mama's boy Jewish cop. He played it quite laid back. The stereotypical annoying Jewish mom was played with glee by Eileen Heckart. Mo's love interest in the film was named Kate Palmer (played by Lee Remick), while in the play the name was Sarah Stone. The musical version had an additional conceit that all the victims of the killer were all played by the one actress who also played the mother! This of course brings to fore that these victims reminded Kit of his mom.

Now I want to read the book!

By the way, as a bonus, this film version also features a young David Doyle (of the Charlie's Angels TV series) playing a cop! It was good to see him here.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Peculiar blend of zany humor and cold-blooded murder
drownsoda9019 December 2022
"No Way to Treat a Lady" focuses on a Manhattan theatre director (Rod Steiger) who moonlights as a serial killer, impersonating various made-up characters to entrust his victims, whom largely consist of middle-aged and elderly women. The killer taunts a local police officer (George Segal), and a witness (Lee Remick) who soon becomes the detective's girlfriend falls in his crosshairs.

Adapted from the thriller novel by William Goldman, this late-'60s effort from comedy director Jack Smight ("Airport 1975") stands as an unusual tongue-in-cheek mixture of fluffy humor and macabre psychology. A lot of the humor here derives from Steiger's eccentric performance and ever-changing costumes, which range from Irish priests to drag queens, as well as the lighter subplot involving Segal's character and his overbearing Jewish mother, who treats him as a failure for his lack of a college education and decision to join the NYPD.

While there are a lot of humorous moments throughout the film, they are undercut by the often harrowing scenarios in which Steiger's character infiltrates the homes of his impervious victims, like a true wolf in sheep's clothing. Sitting uncomfortably amidst the comedy is a sense of malevolence and danger, with Steiger at times coming across as a benevolent clown with a butcher knife behind his back. The vast majority of the murders here occur offscreen, but the aftermath provides a disturbing snapshot of the killers' crimes.

The romance subplot between Segal and Remick's character provides some humorous melodrama, and while Remick's performance is solid, the subplot pales in effectiveness when compared to the darker elements at work. The film is well-shot, showcasing a post-war, pre-sleaze New York City; many of the psychothrillers that followed in the subsequent decade and beyond showcased the city's grittier downslide (i.e. "Klute", "The Fan", "Cruising", and "Maniac"). Andrew Belling and Stanley Myers's musical score is also effective and occasionally haunting.

The film's finale attempts to clarify the killer's psychological motives in a rather hamfisted manner, and the film ends rather abruptly, but it still manages overall to be an effective and unusual work. If nothing else, it straddles the line between humor and horror in a way that is as peculiar as it is uncomfortable. 8/10.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Kaleidoscopic Comedy/Drama.
rmax30482322 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Serial killer Rod Steiger beans detective George Segal and knocks him out but not before Segal mortally wounds him with a single shot to the abdomen. With Segal flat on the floor, Steiger appears from the side of the stage -- this takes place in a Broadway theater -- clutching his bleeding belly. "UH-oh!", shouts the expiring Steiger, reeling from one prop to another, as if he's just had a jolt of bad news, as if he'd just been informed that he owed back taxes.

It's unintentionally hilarious. At least I THINK it was unintentional. With Steiger overacting so outrageously throughout, and with the director, Jack Smight, off snoozing in a corner somewhere, it's a little hard to tell.

I first saw it in a theater in Ketchikan, Alaska, enjoyed it immensely, and still do when it shows up on television. It's just as funny as Goldman's novel but much less venomous. In the novel, Segal's mother is even more irritating, demanding, and dominating, and when she suggests that one of Steiger's victims deserved to die, the protagonist leaps up and tries to strangle his mother, screaming, "JOIN HER!" Steiger isn't really that much good in his impersonations of Irish priests, German repairmen, W. C. Fields, and so on, but it's funny anyway because he's trying so hard that he sweats. Smight apparently lets him get away with too much in the way of improvisation and we're conscious of it. Lee Remick is a pretty woman and has some realistic lines -- the adaptation isn't at all bad -- but she overplays the role too and her make up, grooming, and wardrobe are overdone. I don't know where the director was when Segal is escorting Remick home after their first meeting and the two of them are giggling and laughing like two fifteen-year-olds who have just developed a crush on one another. It's not funny. It's a bit embarrassing.

There ARE two scenes that are excruciatingly funny. (I'm not sure either could pass the PC barrier today.) One involves the dwarf Michael Dunn, who visits Segal at the precinct and confesses to the murders. "Just watch it," he warns, "because there are some subjects I'm very sensitive about." Segal rejects the false confession politely and an enraged Dunn accuses him of bigotry. "Do you have any FRIENDS who are midgets? Would you let your SISTER marry one?" He throws a piece of chalk against the detective's forehead and scurries off, fuming. Both Dunn and Segal handle the scene expertly as the absurdity builds. Dunn was quite a good actor in both comic and dramatic roles.

In another antic scene, Steiger is a gay hairdresser who insinuates his way into the apartment of an intended victim, Barbara Baxley of the big eyes, as Belle Poppie. She's perfectly serious in her demeanor as she warns Steiger not to step on any of her many cats, as she introduces them one by one. "And that's Pickles in the fireplace," she points out. "Pickles in the fireplace," repeats Steiger, as if earnestly trying to memorize the names and locations of Baxley's cats. The scene is not only hilarious but the editing is snappy and full of the verve it deserves. "Get out of here, you homo!", another woman shouts. Steiger's immediate riposte: "That doesn't mean you're a bad person," and, bang, out the door.

Smight (or his cutter) chose a bad take of the gay Steiger's line, "The nerve of some people." Very careless. But they made no mistakes during Steiger's first, stunning, almost surrealistic killing. As the Irish priest -- at this point, we know nothing about his actual identity -- he begins tickling an old lady in her apartment, the way no priest would ever do, "Tickle, tickle, tickle," he chuckles as his fingers deftly flit over her ribs and other sensitive parts, and she lapses into spasms of uncontrollable laughter. Then -- out of nowhere -- his face turns into a horrible grimace, he raises it heavenward, and utters a shattering guttural scream of rage as he strangles her to death. The viewer's mouth drops open: the priest as murderous lunatic. Steiger handles the awkward scene splendidly.

Come to think of it, the movie is brimming over with problems relating to political correctness. Not just a dwarf and a gay guy and what we assume to be an Irish priest, but a stereotypical Jewish mother too -- played by Eileen Heckart, a shiksa from Ohio! She's quite good, but still....

Segal handles the part of the mild-mannered Jewish cop with considerable aplomb. He's likable, ingratiating. It's no wonder that Remick responds to his bumbling displays of affection. The scene in which Remick pits wits with Mother Heckart are nicely done. "Oh, what a beautiful apartment you have. It's so Jewish." You know what I do when Steiger's impersonations and improvisations become painful, or when Remick is allowed to act giddy instead of happy? I close my eyes and wait for the moments to pass so I can get a kick out of the suspense and comedy that surround those artless moments.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Smith! Dorian Smith!!!
s-woodier11 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The opening scene of this movie has a priest whistling to himself as he walks. Camera point of view shot from above as he walks under a bridge. Without editing, the camera turns and the priest is already on the bridge, walking towards the camera! This uneasy scene sets the audience up for the rest of the film. This man is a killer. A Mother obsessed killer. Rod Steiger enthralls the audience in a series of superb disguises intended to fool his victims into trusting him. George Segal plays the cop on his trail, and, in scenes reminiscent to "Rollercoaster",also a Segal movie,the lunatic calls him up and gloats about his accomplishments. A classic slice of dark, dark comedy.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The New York Strangler
kenjha29 December 2010
A strangler is on the loose in New York City, using disguises to get into apartments of unsuspecting women. This is similar to "The Boston Strangler," released the same year. Steiger rarely passed up a chance to ham it up and here he finds a role that is perfectly suited to his flamboyant acting style. Segal is quite good as the detective engaged in a cat-and-mouse game with the serial killer. Remick is charming as a witness that Segal becomes romantically involved with. Heckart is funny as Segal's nosy Jewish mother. Dunn has a hilarious bit as a midget who tries to convince Segal that he's the elusive killer. While it is entertaining for the most part, the wrap-up is disappointing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No way to treat a lady or a nice Jewish dirty harry
sl7lg2522 August 2005
This has got Rod Stieger playing a psycho mom obsessed killer in the big city and George Segal plays the young cop who is taken off the case and then put back on by request of the killer. He thinks Segal understands him. In one good part the killer rings an apartment dressed as a cop and you only hear his voice because he has his back to the camera but the voice is George Segal's not Rod Stieger's. When the camera comes around to him it's Rod Stieger. It would have been more interesting if the killer could actually mimic Segal's voice and have him do it while he's talking to Segal. But it was only thrown in to add to the suspense. The movie is pretty good, well written, well acted, but dated. Which to me is not a bad thing I would give it a 7.5 only because the ending was too quick and neatly packaged.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed