The Sorcerers (1967) Poster

(1967)

User Reviews

Review this title
66 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Wicked Old Lady
claudio_carvalho22 March 2016
In London, the merchant Mike Roscoe (Ian Ogilvy) and his girlfriend Nicole (Elizabeth Ercy) go to a nightclub to dance. When they meet their friend Alan (Victor Henry), he dances with Nicole while Mike goes to a nearby bar. Meanwhile, the hypnotist Prof. Marcus Monserrat (Boris Karloff) has developed a piece of equipment for controlling minds and decides to seek out a guinea pig on the streets to test the device. He meets Mike in the bar and invites him home, where he introduces his wife Estelle Monserrat (Catherine Lacey) to the youngster. They test the system on Mike, controlling his mind and sharing his feelings. However the wicked Estelle enjoys the sensation and decides to use Mike in evil acts, and Marcus is incapable to control his wife. What will Estelle do with Mike and will Marcus succeed in stopping his deranged wife?

"The Sorcerers" is an atmospheric horror movie with an original story. Catherine Lacey has an impressive performance in the role of a wicked old lady that becomes addicted in sensations of the youth and transgressions. Susan George has a minor part in the beginning of her successful career. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Sob o Poder da Maldade" ("Under the Power of the Malevolence")
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fair Cult piece
BJJ-28 January 2005
A decent low-budget horror-thriller given extra class by the presence of Boris Karloff and Catherine Lacey.Future Saint actor Ian Ogilvy is hypnotised and brainwashed by the above elderly couple into committing increasingly violent acts,as Miss Lacey gradually succumbs to megalomania and madness,while a gentle,stable-minded Boris is left helpless in stopping his wife's crazy actions.

Some of the pop music and the labyrinth Night-Club is interesting,as is the appearance of a young Susan George,whose grisly fate was to repeated in subsequent roles through her film career.Notable also for Victor Henry,a young actor whose promising future was tragically cut short several years later by injuries he suffered in a road accident.He spent the rest of his life in a coma before dying in 1985.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Atmospheric and entertaining, don't let the first ten minutes deceive you
TheLittleSongbird12 October 2013
There will be inevitable comparisons to The Sorcerers and Witchfinder General(from the same director), from personal opinion Witchfinder General is the better film, technically and dramatically but The Sorcerers is the more entertaining one, Witchfinder is very shocking even now(easy to see why it was banned at the time) and while both have great atmosphere The Sorcerers a little more so. The Sorcerers is not the perfect film, but you don't really expect that, the first 10 minutes did come across as gaudy and trashy which will put put anybody off, while Estelle's descent into madness could have taken longer to develop and been less abrupt and the script-while mostly solid- can have a tendency to be turgid and overly silly. The Sorcerers is decently shot and the evocation of the 60s hippie era is effective and accurate. There is a great soundtrack, and the atmosphere is both fun and creepy. The story can have some dull spots but has a good sense of terror, suspense and thrills. Michael Reeves, who died tragically far too early, directs assuredly, while the acting is good by all. Ian Ogilvy, Victor Henry and Susan George hardly disgrace themselves in support, but they are outshone by both Boris Karloff and especially Catherine Lacey. Karloff is very dignified, menacing and adroit, even when not as active and towards the end of his career he still has what made him a good actor in the first place. Lacey overdoes it a tad at times but that doesn't matter at all when she is such fun to watch and is as scary as she is. In conclusion, atmospheric and entertaining, the first 10 minutes are a turn-off but if you stay with it you'll find a film, even with its imperfections, that is much better than it's given credit for. 7/10 Bethany Cox
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A dark and interesting low budget thriller.
Infofreak21 October 2003
I was really impressed with Michael Reeves' third (and final, he overdosed shortly thereafter, still only in his mid-20s) film 'Witchfinder-General' so I was really curious to see his previous effort 'The Sorcerers'. It was made on a considerable smaller budget, but it has an interesting concept, good acting and is pretty dark in tone. Horror legend Karloff plays an elderly scientist who has invented a technique which enables his wife (Catherine Lacey) and himself to experience the thoughts and emotions of a young man (Reeves regular Ian Ogilvy). Ogilivy doesn't know they are doing this and eventually loses control of his mind and body after there is a battle of wills between the old couple who are vicariously living through him. The three leads all put in strong performances, and there is a cool swinging 60s background which makes this one a real rough diamond. And keep an eye out for an early appearance by 70s sex symbol Susan George ('Straw Dogs', 'Dirty Mary Crazy Larry'). Recommended to all fans of 60s horror.
18 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
And next, the world!
Popey-63 November 2002
There's something that suggests world domination in Boris Karloff's first description of his technique to hypnotize young people but this is soon dispelled by a surprising performance in a rather average film. Interestinglyly pieced together, the director tries hard to portray the idea of control which only sometimes works, but nevertheless does get better as the film nears a climax. Predictable in plot but still violent enough to present a challenge to those expect a little more from their Karloff movies. Great just to see Karloff in an argument in a newsagents at the very beginning - not a usual scene from your run-of-the-mill fantasy thrillers!
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Atmospheric and effective little British low budget horror production, starring Boris Karloff.
Boba_Fett113831 August 2007
The movie had a notable low budget but in this case that really works in its advantage. It helps to keep the movie focused on what matters the most and there are no distracting chases, monsters, make-up or other horror elements present. It gives the movie plenty of room to let its atmosphere become the most haunting and effective aspect of the movie. The low budget gives the movie a certain sense of realism, which helps to make this movie feel as an uneasy one. So its really not a scary movie but more of an uneasy one to watch, mainly due to the atmosphere and simplistic story of the movie.

The movie relies on just one simple concept and uses this throughout the entire movie. 'The great hypnotist Professor Montserrat has developed a technique for controlling the minds, and sharing the sensations, of his subjects. He and his wife Estelle test the technique on Mike Roscoe, and enjoy 'being' the younger man. But Estelle soon grows to love the power of controlling Roscoe, and the vicarious pleasures that provides. How far will she go, and can the Professor restrain her in time?'. This rather simplistic sort of story and concept works out well in the movie and makes this one of the better 'typicaly' low budget British horror movies from the '60's.

It's basically a big plus that Boris Karloff is in this movie. It doesn't make it any better, more professional or uplifts it but its just a welcome addition to the movie, that also helps to of course make this movie a bit more special. Also remember that he already was 80 years old at the time of this movie. You have got to respect that. The large majority of people of course only know him for his "Frankenstein" role but those who've seen him in other horror movies also know that Boris Karloff actually was a pretty good actor for his time. He could very well play demanding roles, with obviously also more lines to it. He once more shows in this movie he was a capable actor, though the script is a bit too dodgy in parts to really allow him to shine to his best capabilities. He played in a lot of movies like this in the '60's, at the end of his career, before his death in 1969, 2 years after this movie.

Catherine Lacey doesn't really begin good in the movie but as the movie starts to progress and her character develops she gets really good in her role, that also becomes a big part in the movie its uneasy and realistic atmosphere. I've also liked Ian Ogilvy. He has got the right 'arrogant' kind of look and also knew how to act. Too bad he never really broke through in Hollywood and he now mostly just makes small appearances in well known TV-series. Oh well, at least there is still this- and other movies to enjoy him in.

It's the sort of late '60's movie made in pre-'70's style. So some of the camera-work and compositions is quite experimental at times. Unfortunately the editing is not much good and it forms one of the weaker aspects of the movie. It feels sloppy at times and even kills the movie its flow at certain points.

A movie well worth searching out.

7/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Horror in Swinging London
JamesHitchcock10 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The director Michael Reeves, who died from a drug overdose in 1969 at the age of 25, is today probably best known for his last film, "Witchfinder-General", made in 1968. "The Sorcerers" dates from the previous year and is an attempt to combine a horror theme with the sort of "swinging London" milieu familiar from other films of this period such as John Schlesinger's "Darling" or Antonioni's "Blow-Up". Professor Marcus Montserrat was at one time a distinguished medical hypnotist, but was disgraced in some scandal, the exact nature of which we never discover, some thirty years earlier, and is now a lonely, embittered and impoverished old man. He has, however, continued with his scientific work and has perfected a hypnotic technique which will enable him not only to control the subject by, as it were, remote control but also to experience vicariously all the sensations that the subject is experiencing. Montserrat and his wife Estelle persuade a young man named Mike Roscoe to volunteer to act as their guinea-pig for their experiments with this technique.

It is significant that this film was made by a director in his early twenties during a period when the "generation gap" was a phrase on everyone's lips, because this is very much a film about crabbed age and youth. The contrasts between the old and the young are emphasised. Montserrat seems more like Mike's grandfather than his father; Boris Karloff was fifty-six years older than Ian Ogilvy. (Ogilvy was a close friend of the director and was also to star in "Witchfinder-General"). Mike lives in an airy, spacious apartment, decorated in a then-fashionable style, and spends his leisure time in discos, night-clubs and coffee bars. (Some of the pop music of the era, such as Cliff Richard's "Out in the Country", is incorporated into the soundtrack). Montserrat and Estelle, by contrast, live in a dingy flat of the sort familiar from the kitchen-sink realist films of the fifties. Their floral wallpaper is faded and their furniture shabby and outdated. They appear to have no leisure pursuits except perhaps those of regretting their lost youth and envying the young.

The film is not, however, preaching some simplistic message along the lines of "Don't trust anyone over thirty" (a popular phrase at the time). Mike is not portrayed simply as an innocent victim; he is a bored, selfish and amoral young man who neglects his pretty French girlfriend Nicole. He volunteers for Montserrat's experiments because he is bored with his seemingly comfortable life and hungry for new experiences; there is a suggestion that, at least at some subconscious level, he is happy to go along with whatever Montserrat and Estelle order him to do.

Montserrat's motives for developing this new mind-control technique appear to have been partly idealistic; he was hoping to use it to enable old people like himself to recapture some of the joys of their youth. About halfway through the film, however, a new conflict arises, that between Montserrat and Estelle. She discovers that she has a greater power to control Mike than does her husband and, drunk with power, forces him to commit ever more immoral acts, starting with stealing a fur coat and progressing to two murders. To his horror, Montserrat finds that he has lost control over Mike, who under Estelle's influence has become a monster. There is a contrast between Karloff, who plays Montserrat with a certain restraint and dignity, and Catherine Lacey who gives a splendidly over-the-top performance as Estelle is transformed from a little old lady into a raving maniac.

Although it is not an overtly political movie, the control which Montserrat and Estelle exercise over Mike may reflect the feeling of many young people that they were subject to the unwanted controlling influence of the older generation. This was, after all, the period when young men were being sent by elderly or middle-aged politicians to fight in Vietnam. There is a similarity with "Witchfinder-General" which also features a villain who exercises a controlling influence over the minds of others, although Hopkins does so by playing on superstitious beliefs rather than by hypnosis. One difference between the two films is that "Witchfinder-General" is, like "The Wicker Man", a rationalist horror film in which it is superstition, not the supernatural, which should frighten us. In "The Sorcerers", however, Estelle seems truly demonic; despite the bits of scientific-looking equipment we see, her level of control over Mike seems (as the title may indicate) like something supernatural rather than the result of any scientifically explicable phenomena.

Unlike some critics, I would not regard either of these two films as great masterpieces. Reeves, however, was clearly a highly promising director before his career was tragically cut short, and both "Witchfinder-General" and "The Sorcerers" are films which retain plenty of interest even today. 7/10
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Karloff in a film with a fresh and interesting plot is a miss?
AlsExGal14 September 2020
Let me explain. This begins with an interesting idea to build on, but it gets in it's own way and barely achieves average. Boris Karloff stars as a hypnotist who's worked a lifetime to achieve mind control of others, only sharing his secrets with his wife Catherine Lacey. I know you're thinking 'Karloff is up to his evil-science self again', but..he's not..well, not completely. Karloff envisions a method by which he can 'connect' with the mind of a young person, send them on a wonderful journey, and every thought and sensation about that trip will be 'known' and experienced by the elderly or ill who can't go themselves..good premise, eh?

Enter Ian Ogilvy, an 'Alfie' type, who's just bored with the whole mod scene and looking for new kicks. After being hooked up to wires in an odd little room full of phoney looking panels and lots of reel-to-reel recorders, Karloff and his Mrs. can, indeed, control his actions. Karloff is thrilled, but Lacey doesn't want to waste this chance..she's had it with years of poverty, so she 'controls' him into stealing a fur for her. The elderly couple 'feel' the fear/excitement/danger as Ogilvy evades a guard. This new 'rush' turns Lacey into a real thrill seeker, and she orders him to do increasingly dangerous, brutal things..including murder.

Karloff knows she's gone overboard, but can't stop her when she even turns on him in order to get her 'thrill fix' via the young man. A good idea, poorly executed..starting with the music. There are those 'a ha!' soap opera-ish organ swells, mixed in with 'electric noise', really bad club band music, and lilting harpsichord..it's like everything was pulled out of a studio grab bag. Karloff, of course, and Lacey are quite good, and Victor Henry (as Ogilvy's friend) is believable. Aside from a very short scene with Susan George, the actresses are pretty bad..Elizabeth Ercy's talent is playing with her hair and Sally Sheridan stiffly plays a singer, but can't remember to move her lips to the music. The photography is strange--in an argument sequence, it's continual one-shots..I doubt they were in the same room, and a car chase sequence is ruined by boring close-ups of different characters. What could've been quite a thriller ends up a sloppy mess.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Why do modern horror movies never attempt atmosphere?
dddionys7 March 2005
It is really astonishing to see how movies from the sixties could get to be very exciting in the horror genre, hardly using any special effects and relying exclusively on the acting of the cast. In this goo die, the old lady really scared me with her eager emotions and the well played desire to live a more dangerous life. Though not really exceptional in one way or the other, the movie creates a very realistic and horrid atmosphere, based upon the simple assumption of mind control. When compared to modern horror movies where bad acting seems to be a basic requirement, the attention is constantly drawn to the tits of the leading, utterly stupid actresses, and the only -supposed to be - scary effect is raised by some fast moving camera shots and horrid gore scenes, this film is a real gem. It furthermore charmed me as a documentary of the sixties, as in a no nonsense style the popular youth culture is shown as it must have been...
30 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Most Satisfying Experience
ferbs5426 April 2017
Just watched a Boris Karloff film that I'd not seen before, "The Sorcerers" (1967). In this one, Karloff plays a scientist and hypnotist who has come up with a gizmo that will enable him to control others telepathically, long distance, while at the same time feeling that person's emotions. He and his wife use the gizmo to take control over a mod swinging Londoner (Ian Ogilvy). The two coerce the lad to swim in a pool and speed on a motorcycle, and experience all those feelings in their apartment. But soon, the wife (Catherine Lacey) gets a little too intoxicated with the experiences, and forces Ian into even further deeds for her own pleasure: stealing a fur coat from a store, and even serial killing! This film is surprisingly well done, and features some interesting directorial touches from Michael "The Conqueror Worm" Reeve. It's a bit disconcerting to see Karloff in a film along with psychedelic images and groovy rock music, but he is excellent, as always, even at this late stage in his career. The film builds to a logical and downbeat conclusion, typical for Reeve, and is really a most satisfying experience. I was very pleased at how fine a film this one turned out to be....
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Creepy movie played by the veteran Karloff with screams and shocks
ma-cortes29 May 2006
The hypnotist professor Monserrat (Boris Karloff) has invented a device for controlling the minds people and sharing the sensations . His mean and wicker wife (Catherine Lacey) utilizes the technique on a man called Mike (Ian Ogilvy) , a young fond disco into swinging London . She controls the Mike's mind and the exciting pleasures that provides . Ominous and awful killings are happening and the police investigates certain unsolved murders have taken place , they suspect he could be the perpetrator as horrible acts .

This is an exciting and interesting film , though lack luster and cheap production values horror tale . In fact , the scene with exploding car, the fire apparently got so out of control and film crew had to get the shot and leave in a hurry , as they had not obtained any permission from anyone to shoot the scene . The movie has suspense , shocks , genuine chills and a little bit of blood . The film packs grisly terror , eerie atmosphere which converts pretty sinister toward the ending with its surprisingly finale . The picture is interpreted by the great Boris Karloff who was in frank decadence . Filming began January 1967 in London , Boris Karloff would next journey to Madrid to work on "Cauldron of Blood" by Santos Alcocer . Ian Ogilvy is habitual in all films directed by Michael Reeves and he starred various horror films (And now the screaming starts) and television series (The Saint) . Besides , it appears uncredited Susan George , previously her famous success , ¨Strawdogs¨ . The peculiar screenplay was written by actor Tom Baker . Motion picture was regularly directed by Reeves , he only directed four films , exclusively terror , : ¨Witchfinder general¨ ,¨Castle of living dead¨ and ¨Satan's sister¨ , but he committed suicide himself . The flick will appeal to Boris Karloff fans.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Ecstasy with no consequence.
hitchcockthelegend16 October 2012
The Sorcerers is directed by Michael Reeves who also co-writes the screenplay with Tom Baker from an original idea written by John Burke. It stars Boris Karloff, Ian Ogilvy, Catherine Lacey, Victor Henry and Elizabeth Ercy. Music is by Paul Ferris and cinematography by Stanley A. Long.

When aged scientist Marcus Monserrat (Karloff) tries a new hypnosis machine on bored young man Mike Roscoe (Ogilvy), he and his wife find they can control his actions and experience what he is experiencing. Initially this breakthrough is a rewarding one, but Marcus' wife Estelle (Lacey) wants more and soon things start to get decidedly amoral.

Michael Reeves sadly died of an accidental drug overdose aged just 25, this having crafted the Cruel Britannia brilliance that was Witchfinder General. Prior to that he helmed The Sorcerers, an equally great production, a sci-fi horror fusion that pulses with a pessimistic tone. There's no great budget for the talented young director to work with, but it barely matters, in fact it benefits the film greatly, as the two elders (Karloff wonderful, Lacey magnificent) live vicariously through Roscoe's (Ogilvy fresh faced and perfectly exuding a bored man after further thrills) misadventures. But the kicker here is that it is Karloff's scientist who recognises things are going out of control, and it is he who strives to stop his obsessed wife from committing heinous acts.

Set to the backdrop of swinging sixties London, with mini skirts, Brit pop music and Norton motorbikes firm period reminders, The Sorcerers captures the zeitgeist of the time. Blending psychedelia with sci-fi and amoral horror with wistful yearnings, film comes out as an original piece of work. Thematically, as has been noted by the critics who have afforded this under seen classic some time, it says youth is wasted on the young while also planting us the film viewer in the metaphor chair. If Reeves was being caustic we will never know, sadly, but it does bear thinking about in light of how horror films, and their blood thirsty fans, would evolve come the millennium. Michael Reeves a visionary?

From Lacey bringing one of horror's forgotten monsters to life, to a no cop out ending of pure bleakness, The Sorcerers never lets up on gnawing away at the senses. An original film made by an original director, and deserving of more widespread exposure. 8/10
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
THE SORCERERS (Michael Reeves, 1967) **1/2
Bunuel197614 June 2006
Interesting British horror with sci-fi overtones (the premise concerns hypnotism, which leads to a string of murders): basically, a belated follow-up to star Boris Karloff's myriad mad scientist roles of the 30s and 40s! Still, he apparently resisted this angle of the script and worked with writer-director Reeves to give his character greater sympathy!

Both he and co-star Catherine Lacey are wonderful - but while Karloff delivers a dignified and understated performance, she tends towards hamminess (being the more overtly villainous of the two) but still emerges as equally effective. Ian Ogilvy (star of all 3 films Reeves directed!) is a brooding and mod 'monster'; throughout the course of the film, he interacts with three attractive girls (two of whom eventually end up dead!) - leading lady Elizabeth Ercy, ex-flame Susan George and pop singer Dani Sheridan.

Despite the film's low-budget - and the soft, scratched print utilized for the transfer - its hip Swinging Sixties look provides some definite eye candy (and not just girls in mini-skirts!), particularly during the hallucinatory if low-key experiment in which Ogilvy is an unwitting guinea pig. Paul Ferris' score, including a couple of tunes (though the flat audio on the DVD doesn't really do them justice!), is pretty good. The climax - involving a chase scene in which Ogilvy is pursued by a police car (and featuring Ivor Dean as a vaguely nonplussed, pipe-smoking Inspector) - is terrific, if slightly confusing for, while it's been shown that Lacey has greater control over Ogilvy, suddenly the situation is reversed somehow and Karloff deliberately wills the boy - and the two 'sorcerers' with him - to a fiery death!
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Don't trust anyone under 30!
rose-29426 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Poor Boris Karloff - star of Universal's monster classics and the films like Bedlam, for Pete's sake! - and poor, poor Catherine Lacey! They play an old couple, an inventor and his wife, who control the mind of the young man and force him to do crimes. OLD people forcing YOUNG man to do crimes!? Yes, that's the plot. This dull-as-dishwater, visually drab and ugly - hello, it is filmed in 1960s! - film is totally destroyed by it's sordid, nasty "message": old people, especially women, are convenient scapegoats when you are caught in the midst of violence and filthy perversions! When a young woman is killed by a young man in leeringly photographed scissors-penetrating-a-body-scene, this sexual murder is not his fault. Hello, how many rapist grannies you know? Zero? Yup, me too. Worst film from grossly overrated Reeves.
6 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sadly forgotten, well worth a look
C. M. O'Brien18 August 2000
The aged Karloff stars as a disgraced hypnotist, eager to try out his new thought transferal device at the urge of his domineering wife (Lacey). Finding an ideal subject in a jaded youth (Ogilvy), the couple discover they can vicariously experience his every sensation while controlling his actions. Karloff wishes his invention to be used for the crippled and elderly to take a virtual vacation, while his wife revels in the thrill of committing various crimes through the young man. Her wishes increase from theft to murder. After she has successfully shattered Ogilvy's life and relationships, it boils down to a battle of wits between the two for control of the young man's psyche. It plays like an episode of the original Outer Limits series, with the couple's venture into realms man was not meant to explore, and tragic denouement although there is no Control Voice to lull us back to normality or offer a moral here.

Michael Reeves made one other film, the stunning Witchfinder General before taking his own life at the age of twenty-five. Who knows what the film's enfant terrible director might have accomplished had he lived? From subtle tricks of lighting, and the use of a story that fits the budget, to imaginative shots and an emphasis on action, it contains all the elements today's independent filmmakers should take note of. It is worth noting Ogilvy would later take on the role of mad scientist involved in mind control techniques in Fugitive Mind.

While dated in many aspects, it's a shame this film is all but forgotten, and unavailable commercially.
28 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining For The Wrong Reasons
Theo Robertson7 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Mike takes his girlfriend who is a a plank of wood from France called Nicole and his mate who looks old enough to be his dad to a disco . For reasons necessary for the plot he decides to disappear to a cafe where he's approached by a mad scientist and mayhem happens

THE SORCERERS is a ridiculous movie lacking any type of logic and is very silly . Look at the scene where Mike is approached in the cafe by Professor Boris Karloff . Chaps if a 70 year old man approached you and said he wanted to give you a new experience would you go back to his flat or would you call a policeman ? Yeah that's what I thought

It turns out the Prof has a device that allows him and his wife to see , hear and feel everything Mike does . You can see where this is heading , it's a voyuers dream come true , but strangely the professor and his wife don't tune in when Mike is having sex with Nicole possibly because they're scared of getting splinters . They can also control Mike's actions which leads to the professor's wife becoming a sadistic maniac making Mike go on a killing spree . That's the bit I don't understand ( Well one of the bits - This movie lacks logic ) if the mad couple experience everything the sweet faced angelic looking Mike does would they want to see him spend the rest of his life in prison with a couple of hardened cellmates called Vinnie and Winston ? of course since they experience what happens to Mike in a physical sense you just know there won't be a happy ending and there isn't

I wouldn't say THE SORCERERS is an awful film but it is incredibly silly and because of this there is some entertainment value for people who have a soft spot for corny Brit horror movies from the late 60s / early 70s
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Intriguing stuff
badlydrawnhamster30 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Warning: Mild spoilers below.

I was intrigued by the premise of this, as it's a fairly odd film, in which a professor and his wife have perfected a machine which allows them to hypnotise and then control someone. They lure Ian Ogilvy in to being their first test subject, and it allows them to control him even when he's not near them, and feel and see everything he experiences.

At first it's quite an interesting exploration of sixties life, with the elderly couple enjoying the thrill of living life through Ogilvy's eyes, but soon they become more and more obsessed with controlling him. At this point there's a nice bit of social commentary going on too (especially concerning the disenchantment of 'the youth' of the sixties, and how long such a golden age could possibly continue), but the second half becomes a disturbing horror flick as the wife suddenly becomes excited and obsessed by the ability to force Ogilvy to commit acts of violence. Her mind's stronger than her husband's it seems, and so he's unable to stop her - especially when she physically stops him from trying too.

The first half is a really quite enjoyable if slightly flimsy piece of cinema, but the second half is what makes it pretty unique, as it becomes much much more darker as the wife forces Ogilvy to kill time and time again. The interplay between Karloff and his wife is great, and the ending's fittingly neat too. Perhaps it's not quite the insight in to voyeurism / obsession that Michael Powell's Peeping Tom is, but it's certainly got a lot going for it with a sharp script, great acting (especially from Karloff) and some interesting imagery and choices of camera angles too.

So The Sorcerer's perhaps by no means a classic, but it's definitely an intriguing film, and it gets 7/10 from me.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Forget the horror -- this film is dead sexy
goblinhairedguy4 August 2015
Yes indeed, the Swinging Sixties were sexy, years before life-threatening STDs, political correctness and exploitative commercialism ruined it all. And pop music was great too, before it was compromised by self-indulgent overproduction and that same rampant commercialism.

Ian Ogilvy (much cooler than David Hemmings as a prematurely jaded hipster) and the luscious Euro-babe Elizabeth Ercy make appealing leads, and get to strip down to their undies for a furtive swim that is simultaneously erotic and innocent, like Weissmuller and O'Sullivan before them. She also gets to wear a knockout peekaboo mesh outfit later on. A teenage Susan George shows off her bedroom eyes and flashes her yellow panties to great effect in the film's most effective thrill scene. And pouty-lipped Sally Sheridan (mom of Nicolette) coolly lip-syncs to a great garage tune (actually sung by a wonderfully brassy Toni Daly), with the low-angle camera appreciating how she sports her clingy chiffon mini-dress. Check out all those turned-on necking couples in the background. (By the way, I think Karloff is in the film, too.) It all brings to mind Mimsy Farmer's outrageously provocative LSD-fuelled dance in "Riot on Sunset Strip", Jane Asher's sultry seductiveness in "Deep End", and all those whacked-out Sergio Martino giallos.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I didn't like it.
poolandrews31 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The Sorcerers is set in 1960's swinging London where one night Mike Roscoe (Ian Ogilvy) decides he is bored, it just so happens an old geezer named Professor Marcus Monserrat (an ancient looking Boris Karloff) interrupts Mike while he's trying to enjoy some chips & promises to give him a new kind of experience he'll never forget. Being a trusty kind of guy Mike accepts & follows the Prof. back to his house where he & his bitter wife Estelle (Catherine Lacey) plug Mike into some sort of electronic device which hypnotises him & lets both the Prof. & his wife feel what Mike feels & experience what he experiences as well as being able to control his mind. At first they enjoy the sensations Mike give them but Estelle's motives take a sinister turn as she makes Mike steal for her as well as commit murder just for kicks...

This British production was co-written, produced & directed by Michael Reeves & I personally thought it was pretty bad. The script by Reeves, John Burke & Tom Baker (no, not the Doctor Who one...) is actually rather dull, I thought the ancient looking Karloff & the elderly woman who played his wife were two of the worst, least sinister, least frightening, least intimidating & frankly rubbish villains ever put on film. They can barely move! To be honest The Sorcerers isn't really a straight forward horror, it's as much a psychological thriller as anything else & apart from a couple of lame & pointless murders at the end has very little horror in it. The character's are dull & I didn't like anyone, the dialogue unintentionally funny these days & I found it all rather lifeless & bland, even lasting less than 90 minutes I thought the film dragged & at the hour mark I started reading a newspaper & one I had already read earlier in the day, not a good sign... For those interested my Sun football 'DreamTeam' is doing pretty well!

Director Reeves gives the film a decent look, he seems to film most of it with hand-held cameras on location using lots of tight close-ups which gives it a gritty sort of feel. I thought the film was lacking any sort of proper horror film atmosphere being set in swinging 60's London which is far from scary & dates the film badly. I just didn't like it & couldn't get into it with a inappropriate setting & the single two worst least threatening horror film villains in history. The violence is tame, there's one splash of blood as someone is killed with a pair of scissors, someone is strangled & there's a couple of burnt corpses on show.

Technically the film is alright, it has a certain hand-held look to it which works reasonably well. Partly shot on location in London this documents & show's an era long gone. The acting is OK but on-ones going to win any Oscars & Karloff looks so frail & old it's untrue, he was 80 at the time he was in this just two years before his death & apparently he was paid £11,000 for appearing in The Sorcerers which ain't a bad amount even today! The only other name of note in the cast is Susan George who gets stabbed with a pair of scissors.

The Sorcerers isn't a film that I liked but judging by some of the other comments on the IMDb many do so perhaps I'm in the minority. To be honest I'm a leader rather than a follower so I don't really care who else likes it, I didn't & it's as simple & straight forward as that.
4 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Glory Hole!
christopher-underwood31 July 2017
I have always championed this film, partly because it was always so underrated and also because of the wonderful and poignant performance from Boris Karloff very near the end of his amazing career. Watching it again in crystal clear Blu-ray, it struck me it was a little too clear. I remember the film being bold and violent with daring suggestions as to what really excites people but I was surprised to find it quite so grubby this time around. Karloff is masterful, even if he has to spend half the movie on the floor (partly because of actual walking difficulty by this time). Ian Ogilvy is perfect as the young man who becomes the vehicle for the elderly couples violent fantasies. Well, those of the wife, anyway, played all too well by Catherine Lacey who is really scary here and possible candidate for scariest woman in a horror film? The grubbiness even extends to the naming of the antique shop, ostensibly run by Ogilvy, as The Glory Hole! Michael Reeves would make Witchfinder General the following year but this is just as good as the more famous film and even more uncomfortable to watch.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Sorcerer's Apprentice.
morrison-dylan-fan21 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Despite having heard about him for years,I for some reason have never got round to seeing a film from Michael Reeves. Whilst trying to find a Boris Karloff movie to watch for the October Challenge on IMDb's Horror board,I found out that the BBC were airing the title Karloff made with Reeves,which led to me conjuring up a spell.

The plot:

Studying hypnosis for years, Prof. Marcus Monserrat and his wife Estelle invent a machine which they believe will allow them to take control,and feel the experiences of a person under underlying hypnosis.Looking for a test case, Marcus goes to a disco and grabs the attention of Mike Roscoe.Going to the Monserrat's house, Roscoe is put under hypnosis.Quickly letting him leave,the Monserrat's are thrilled to find that they can feel everything he feels,as Roscoe opens up a vicious new sensation.

View on the film:

Splashing Roscoe's face with red and purple disco lights,co- writer/(along with Tom Baker and uncredited John Burke-who tried to sue for the credit) director Michael Reeves & cinematographer/future director Stanley Long set alight the raw violence from the decayed suburb with a quirky psychedelic atmosphere. Controlling Roscoe's every move,Reeves and Long dash into the blood shot eyes of the Monserrat as sparkling reds and greens rain down to Roscoe's murderous beat. Blacking out after each killing,Reeves wakes Roscoe up in a cruel Britain,trampled on with burning red blood and clamped,dusty holes which smash the false brightness from the disco lights.

For Roscoe's first meeting with the Monserrat's,the writers mask the horror with a social drama bringing in man about town Roscoe and his cute bit of arm candy,with sweet elderly couple the Monserrat,whose wry smiles over introducing Roscoe to a new experience,give the kitchen sink scenes a wonderfully sour taste. Sending Roscoe out as the puppet of the Monserrat's,the writers struggle to keep all the strings together due to making Roscoe and everyone he meets paper thin characters,which along with draining the level of threat which should be on offer,also stops Roscoe from being an enticing possessed soul. Joined by a cute Susan George as "It Girl" Audrey Woods, Ian Ogilvy gives a very good performance as Roscoe,whose black slate of rage Ogilvy keeps twitching away under Roscoe's "happening" image. Holding hands with a cackling Catherine Lacey, Boris Karloff gives a wonderful performance as Marcus,thanks to Karloff softening Marcus's eyes,as Roscoe becomes the sorcerer's apprentice.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Boris Karloff's worst film?
minamurray25 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Sorcerers, (1967) is overrated British horror movie directed and co-written by overrated Michael Reeves, director who died young. Old scientist (Boris Karloff) and his wife Estelle (Catherine Lacey) use device he has created to control young man (Ian Ogilvy) and enjoy life through him, but soon evil Estelle is forcing the poor young man to the path of crimes... or perhaps young man just explores his real desires of sexual violence? This is drab and dull movie, very cheap-looking, and it is possible to see slimy hypocrisy in the proceedings: Estelle's real crime is to be old and not sexually desirable in the sleazy pornographic world of leering young film-makers and squalid film critics.
3 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Boris Karloff plays a more sympathetic role in The Sorcerers
tavm29 October 2009
With The Sorcerers, Boris Karloff went back to his native country of England to make this for director Michael Reeves. He plays Professor Marcus Monserrat-a disgraced hypnotist who lives with his wife, Estelle (Catherine Lacey), in a drab apartment. They've created a new machine that allows them to experience and control the minds of anyone they manage to get tested on it. That someone would be Mike Roscoe (Ian Ogilvy), a young man who seems bored with the swinging '60s London lifestyle as evidenced by his nonchalant treatment of his girlfriend Nicole (Elizabeth Ercy) and their friend Alan (Victor Henry). Unfortunately, while Marcus wants to use it to help certain kinds of people, Estelle just wants some thrills...The plot seemed to be similar to Brainstorm, only more disturbing especially concerning the Estelle character. The mix of atmospheres is quite exciting and the shocks are genuinely frightening. Karloff is at his most sympathetic here as he feels truly overwhelmed by Ms. Lacey's aggressive power. And seeing Ogilvy truly trying to be a mix of emotions without overdoing it was compellingly played here. Also good was Sally "Dani" Sheridan (Nicollette's mother) as singer Laura Ladd and young Susan George as Audrey Woods, Mike's previous girlfriend. In summation, The Sorcerers comes highly recommend due to Karloff and the rest of the cast.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting and well-made cult chiller.
barnabyrudge16 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The Sorcerers offers horror icon Boris Karloff one of the last truly worthwhile roles of his career. It is one of only three films to be directed by young film-maker Michael Reeves. Film buffs are forever declaring what great things Reeves would have gone on to achieve had he lived longer. Whether these claims of unfulfilled greatness are accurate or not no-one will ever truly know. It is fair to say that his last film, the sublime Witchfinder General, is unquestionably a genre classic, indicating that this young director certainly possessed the potential to become a major force. His second film The Sorcerers is another rather interesting and well-made chiller which shows plenty of early promise. Combining elements of sci-fi and the serial-killer genre, The Sorcerers is an unusual and effective entry from Tigon. Although it has not dated as well as some films from its era, it remains fascinating for a number of reasons – its strong performances, disorientating camera angles and scoring, infrequent but savage violence, and its apparent suggestion that society's drink 'n' drug-fuelled hedonists are potential serial killers-in-waiting. In spite of occasional flaws, The Sorcerers is a film well worth checking out.

A former practitioner of medical hypnosis, Professor Marcus Monserrat (Karloff), now lives in disgrace in a grotty corner of London, sharing a shabby apartment with his wife Estelle (Catherine Lacey). They have built a machine which can induce powerful telepathic hypnosis upon anyone who uses it, giving the Monserrats the ability to control the hypnotised person's mind and, more remarkably, experience whatever sensations they are feeling as if they were their own. All they need now is a young guinea pig willing to submit himself to their mind control experiment. Enter Mike Roscoe (Ian Ogilvy), a handsome but bored youth who has grown dissatisfied with a life of disco, drink and dating hot chicks. He wants something new to inject excitement back into his life and Professor Monserrat's hypnosis machine looks just the ticket. Unfortunately, after Mike has been successfully brought under the control of the good professor and his wife, things begin to take a sinister turn. Drunk on power and unable to resist the intoxicating thrill of controlling someone else's actions, Estelle starts telepathically manoeuvring Mike into darkly dangerous situations, encouraging him to commit escalating crimes, ranging from burglary and assault… to murder.

The film cleverly de-romanticises the usual perception of London in the Swinging Sixties, showing a darker place where frustration and cruelty bubble beneath the surface. Karloff gives a solid performance as the frail, well-meaning professor who cannot see the potential for evil in his invention; Lacey is great too as his dangerously unhinged wife. It's often been said that Estelle's descent into psychotic madness is too sudden and complete to be a wholly convincing plot development - a criticism that carries much truth in all fairness - but nevertheless the actress gives a splendidly full-bodied performance as the film's main villain. The way Karloff's character is the more sympathetic and agreeable of the two acts as a nice little twist on expectations too. Overall, The Sorcerers is a solid cult chiller – skilfully-made, thought-provoking and entertaining fare from a young film-maker whose light went out too soon.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Overwrought, barely horror British thriller
kannibalcorpsegrinder28 July 2015
Perfecting a mind-control device, a doctor and his wife use it to live vicariously through a youth in mod London but when the results of the control bring about her dark side he attempts to regain control from her before it's too late.

Overall there wasn't a whole lot to really like with this one. Among the biggest problems with this was the fact that hardly any kind of horror occurred during the first hour of this one, as this is taken up with the two going over the process for the experiment and how they're going to gather him as a subject before turning to the early parts of their control by letting him go about town meeting up with his friends. Since these are all innocent endeavors, from going out to the club and swimming and then later driving along the freeway on a motorcycle at top-speed, none of these scenes are all that frightening or even designed to be which in turn makes these scenes simply use watching people do bland, boring things since we can't undergo the experiences featured here and the end result is simply bland, boring and just not a horror film at all. Likewise, the fact that he's undergoing these kinds of scenes yet no one thinks anything is strange with his behavior is also pretty troublesome, as all of his mentions of blackouts and unaccounted behavior tend to ring pretty troubling alarms in his friends about his behavior yet nothing is done and everything continues on as normal. It's not until bodies start piling up that they start to think something may be wrong, and even then the situation isn't handled all that well as there's hardly anything done about this nor is there any carryover about his previous statements regarding his influences, in the end really tending to make this a pretty troublesome effort. When it does become a horror film, this one isn't bad as the stalking scenes are quite good with there being some tension in the wait for him to coil and snap, despite the kills themselves being pretty bland and thrill-less being forced to use obscured knifings or strangling to do this but in the end all is somewhat forgiven with a great action-packed car-chase through the streets of London that is quite fun and enjoyable whipping around at those speeds to make for quite a great time here in the final half. It's just that so much of what happened before wasn't that interesting.

Today's Rating/PG-13: Violence, Language, sexual content and heavy smoking.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed