One Shocking Moment (1965) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
A gripping tale of morals from that auteur Ted V. Mikels
madsagittarian28 October 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Now that I have your attention...

(spoiler in final paragraph)

This curious nudie film is an early pre-ASTRO ZOMBIES item from schlock king Ted Mikels, which surprisingly enough, is a rather sober film compared to the wild Grade Z crud like CORPSE GRINDERS. This tale of disintegrating suburban mores concerns the exploits of Cliff and Mindy, who have moved to another city due to his big promotion. Before long, they fall prey to the debaucherous goings-on of two swinging gals who work down at the local peeler bar (one of them conveniently lives across the hall).

The film opens titillatingly enough (well, as tantalizing as this flick gets, anyway) with Cliff getting it on with some as yet unknown woman, only to be interrupted by a spiked heel crushing his sweaty hand. Before you can draw allusions to Kenneth Anger and Fassbinder, this tale takes you back to the past to witness this couple's downward slide.

Even though this film was made solely for the raincoat crowd (with ample cut-in's of anonymous breast grabbing to keep people interested), this sordid picture indirectly succeeds in capturing the suburban ennui of the high-rolling crowd circa 1965. How much one buys the calculated characterizations is strictly a matter of personal taste, but pre-Women's Lib, this picture nonetheless possesses a disturbing reminder of how women were regarded as property or playthings. Cliff, for instance, makes remarks about his neighbour's attractiveness... right in front of his wife! And later, after Mindy is "liberated" by the bisexual neighbour, her drunken striptease at a party, in order to get back at her philandering husband -while being far from innocent herself- is equal parts embarrassing and sad.

Despite the typically crude mise en scene (many moments are embarrassingly underlit), and the canned sound which captures all the heavy breathing (sometimes this rather innocuous nudie picture thinks it's a roughie), this picture succeeds despite itself in painting a bitter portrait of executive life. The characters seem to operate in one long lonely alcoholic fog which makes them susceptible to the ways of the flesh to relieve their boredom.

Finally, the film creaks along to the scene which opened, in which Cliff's interrupted tryst finally makes the characters realize the immorality to which they have descended. But rather than end the movie on a silly wrap-up moment in which the characters become goody-goody, the makers give us a GLEN OR GLENDA montage, with plenty of underexposed freeway scenes, as the tired narrator talks about how this picture should serve as a lesson about people escaping their ill repute, but ends with, "maybe some people won't want to". A bizarre touch to a turgid, but not uninteresting movie.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Pretty Bad
derek-duerden18 January 2021
I'd got used to the relatively high quality of the Nicolas Winding Refn updates of "classic" trash films - so it was quite disappointing to find that the sound on this was all over the place... almost inaudible dialogue in some places, and lots of hiss and crackle in others. Also, some of the dialogue and acting in this one is definitely in the "so bad it's bad" category.

There is a fairly decent plot, and some of the acting is OK - so it is watchable for all its faults, but I can't really see myself recommending it to anyone else.

PS The sexual politics in this are of course from a different age - so it's perhaps invidious to criticise just for reflecting that - but I did feel that the "cautionary tale with lesson learned" finale might just mean that he would pull back from full pervert to being an "ordinary misogynist", rather than any more fundamental reform?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rare example of high class sexploitation
jivers0113 April 2013
One usually thinks of writer/director Ted V. Mikels as the creator of grade-Z schlock. Boring, artless trash like "The Astro-Zombies", "The Corpse Grinders", et al. Incredibly, this crisply produced little sexploitation drama shows a sense of style and professionalism wholly absent from his later hack work. Where did it all go?

Newlyweds Cliff and Mindy move to decadent Los Angeles and are instantly sucked into a vortex of sin and depravity. Cliff ogles their sex-pot neighbor Joanie (nude model Maureen Gaffney) who works at a swinging club with belly dancers. They befriend the club's owner, Tanya, a tough, man-hating lesbian who takes a shine to Mindy. Tanya (well played by Verne Martine) is the most interesting character. She tosses a drunk guy out of the club, bitch-slaps her lesbian lover Joanie for a lapse in obedience, and moonlights as a dominatrix. In an especially memorable scene she beats the crap out of a submissive male client with a bull whip.

While Tanya and Joanie make the moves on Mindy, Cliff starts fooling around with a secretary from work. Everything comes to a head at a wild party at Tanya's. This simple story is well told, beautifully filmed, and the nude scenes are surprisingly restrained. All in all, an interesting curio that falls somewhere in between the roughie and nudie-cutie subgenres.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The "Citizen Kane" of "Nudie Cuties" Warning: Spoilers
In one aspect this movie is way ahead of its time. When it came out, showing full frontal nudity, implied lesbianism, and dominatrix was groundbreaking. But for a sixties-era "Nudie Cutie", or as I like to call, "Porn Without Penetration", this is quite tame, and unlike many of those films, in which a lean "plot" involves getting a man and woman together in a room, there is a story which, once underway, is quite intoxicating.

A married couple who aren't that innocent to begin with - apish hubby Gary Kent (using the pseudonym Philip Brady) flirts with every woman alive (going a step further with the office bimbo) and wifey Lee Anna dresses like a hooker - find themselves entwined in sexual taboo after frequenting a nightclub owned by an assertive lesbian, played by scene-stealer Verne Martine, who has her sights on the wife and eventually teaches the cheating Kent something about submission.

Beautiful B&W cinematography by Lazlo Kovacks, a tempestuous bongo-driven score, and way more than one shocking moment makes this doozy a real treat, and then some.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sexploitation with a Plot
Michael_Elliott4 January 2013
One Shocking Moment (1965)

** (out of 4)

Ted V. Mikels produced, wrote and directed this film about Cliff (Gary Kent), a husband who moves himself and wife Mindy (Lee Anna) from Grand Rapids, MI to Los Angeles, CA where soon afterwards their marriage starts to fall apart because he starts to see the wild side of the city. ONE SHOCKING MOMENT certainly isn't going to shock people today but at the time you can see why it probably drew in some audiences. At the same time, you can't help but think that some of the raincoat crowds were disappointed because this really isn't like most of the sexploitation pictures from this era because Mikels actually wrote a decent screenplay and there's a lot more character driven stuff than just your typical non-stop nudity. Don't get me wrong as there's quite a bit of nudity from start to finish but this here is never the main focus of the film. I was really surprised to see how much plot was here and even more shocking is the fact that the film remains entertaining for the most part. I found the performances to be better than you normally see in this type of film and especially by Kent who would go onto appear in some pretty big drive-in pictures. As with a lot of these films, this one here can't fully hold its 71-minute running time so the final fifteen-minutes or so really drag. Still, fans of the genre or the director will still want to check it out.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of Ted V. Mikels' better movies
Woodyanders8 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Hunky, lecherous businessman Cliff (handsome Gary Kent) and his sweet, lovely wife Mindy (the adorable Lee Anna) move from Grand Rapids, Michigan to Los Angeles, California. They take up residence in an apartment complex where several alluring young ladies also live. Pretty soon Cliff is having an affair with the boss' secretary while poor neglected Mindy becomes involved with exotic and predatory nightclub owner and bisexual dominatrix Tanya (enticing brunette firecracker Verne Martine). This enjoyably tawdry melodrama rates as one of infamous Do-It-Yourself indie schlock cinema auteur Ted V. Mikels' better films: The competent direction, Gregory Sandor's fairly polished cinematography, the steady pace, Icaras De Docaras' groovy bongo drums-driven score, solid acting from an attractive cast (slinky dish Maureen Gaffney makes an especially favorable impression as the uninhibited Joanie), some kinky stuff like bondage and sadomasochism, the racy script, a nice smattering of female nudity, and a smidgen of mild soft-core sex all ensure that this picture hits the sizzling salacious spot. A nifty and satisfying little walk on the swingin' 60's wild side.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed