I'm Just Wild About Jerry (1965) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Crushingly disappointing...
The_Movie_Cat14 April 2006
... even as a small child I knew the difference between these later attempts at the Tom and Jerry format and the peak years of the Quimby productions.

The artwork is scratchier, less fluid, and there's a notable lack of kinetic flow to the violence. The best Tom and Jerry cartoons had them using objects around them to inflict greater and more surreal pain on one another... here the cartoon focuses on the objects themselves, such as a toy train, at the expense of some cat on mouse ultraviolence. Even when we do see the physical assaults the two lay on each other, it's tempered with a more realistic coding... Tom's extended tail lasting for several frames, for example, rather than being immediately shook off.

Most of it is just inexplicably mediocre, a substandard calibre of which you can't quite put your finger on. But a lot of it is to do with charm, and whereas the original series could sometimes get too self-consciously cute, this one tries to be post-modern, with Tom's gazes to the viewer a distraction.

Ultimately, there's no pace, flow or even soul to this one. It's just a series of uninvolving set-pieces, with an inexplicable ending that neither resolves the story adequately or amuses. Stick to stuff like Cue Ball Cat (1950)... you'll be glad you did.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This is yet another light-h-e-a-r-t-e-d masterpiece . . .
pixrox16 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
. . . from along-came-Jones, the Warner secret agent tasked with exacting revenge for the first documented case of intellectual property theft in American History. Back in the 1940's, Warner had crafted their next triumph in RHAPSODY RABBIT, but corporate roaches planted at Tinsel Town's communal film development lab liked the looks of the print, sent it first for screening at the notorious Tinsel Town "Poverty Row" film shack known as The House of the Groaning Fat Cat, who immediately assigned two hacks of scant skills, Joe & Bill, to doodle off an inferior shot-for-shot plagiarized Tom & Jerry episode and finally rigged the vote for the coveted gelded statuette to steal the kudos from RHAPSODY RABBIT, as they infamously did on a half dozen OTHER occasions, as well. So the actual message of I'M JUST WILD ABOUT JERRY is that the entire planet is sick and tired of Jerry, Tom, Joe, Bill and Leo.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Roadrunner: Variations on a Theme (Urban)
boblipton26 October 2002
There are people who consider the Wile E. Coyote/roadrunner shorts that Chuck Jones did for Warner Brothers to be his best series. Certainly, as a demonstration that silent cartoons still had some appeal, they do work.... but their inherent limitation as a variation on a simple theme bores me after a while.

In the middle 1960s, Chuck Jones did several Tom-and-Jerry cartoons and in this one, they play Wile E. Coyote (Tom) and the roadrunner (Jerry). The distinction here is that the setting is urban, rather than the southwestern desert that the roadrunner lives in -- a Krazy Kat sort of environment.

Most of this takes place in a department store, where the usual Acme products are available. The net result is mediocre.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
One of the weaker Tom and Jerry cartoons
TheLittleSongbird9 July 2010
I say this with a heavy heart, but I was very disappointed in this cartoon. I really wanted to like it, but a lot of it was severely lacking. The good things were seeing Tom and Jerry, who are still likable enough, and the soundtrack. Everything else didn't work. The animation lacks fluidity and is very scratchy and lacking in vibrancy. The story is predictable, while the ending is abrupt and doesn't resolve the story very well. The sight gags are not very funny either, not helped by the predictable story, while the cartoon is too short and too fast as well. So overall, a major disappointment, not Tom and Jerry's very worst but sorry I don't recommend it. 4/10 Bethany Cox
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I'm not wild about this T&J caper.
BA_Harrison29 May 2017
Tom is chasing Jerry, who leads the cat into a toy store where chaos ensues.

A toy shop: in the old days of T&J, this scenario would have offered lots of potential for hilarity, but this being a '60s Chuck Jones effort, the result is disappointing to say the least. Charmless animation, unimaginative gags, and an overall feeling of a wasted opportunity.

The repetitive joke where Tom is run over by a train is a recycled Wile.E.Coyote moment, and what kind of toy shop keeps a mallet display? Jones also seems to have no ability (here at least) to add a feeling of momentum to either his characters or the falling objects that inevitably land on Tom's head.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed