Automania 2000 (1963) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A dark vision with bright narration Warning: Spoilers
I guess Ed Bishop's narration kept "Automania 2000" from becoming too dark and serious as, after all, this is still an animated movie. And a fairly successful one at that as it was nominated for an Academy Award over 50 years ago, but lost to Mel Brooks' entry. "Automania 2000" is about the way people in the 1960s imagined industries and life in general and what they would look like when the new millennium starts. There were some witty moments in here, but I personally felt the comedy was not that great really. The animation wasn't exactly to my liking either, but the 60s were generally not too great in terms of style and there's even worse stuff out there. After all, it is all subjective if you like the style or not, so i will rule in the film's favor and give it a thumbs-up. Pretty awkward that this film is already about a time gone for 15 years looking at how long it was back then till the year 2000 would be reached. Watch it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Automania 2000
CinemaSerf19 February 2024
Electro-hydromagnetics has provided mankind with an inexhaustible supply of energy ergo an unending supply of disposable goods and some startling amounts of waste. All produced amidst a marketing hysteria designed to maximise the space left - a 40 foot long car in which folks could actually live. Indeed there was a car for just about every purpose known to man - even remote controlled prams! Needless to say, these things flew out of the factories so soon we live on a planet of roads, and more roads, nobody goes anywhere and we have nowhere left to cultivate our food! On the upside, though, this log-jamming did mean that any form of war was logistically impossible. Early drone distribution, well helicopters, ensured that tobacco is drip fed into it's addicts mouths, as is food and medicine. Finally, the ultimate in stupidity - a car that could give birth! Why even bother with people at all? It's a bit over the top this, but it's light-heartedness does deliver an enjoyably apocalyptic scenario that might well have looked plausible in 1963...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
AUTOMANIA 2000 {Short} (John Halas, 1964) ***1/2
Bunuel19763 January 2014
I am mainly familiar with the animation work of British husband-and-wife team John Halas and Joy Batchelor via their wonderful cartoon adaptation of George Orwell's political allegory ANIMAL FARM (1955); though this one-reeler got a favourable assessment in "Leslie Halliwell's Film Guide" and was nominated for an Oscar, I never had the opportunity to catch it until I decided to check its availability via "You Tube" on a whim! I still did not expect it to be this surreal, or so thoroughly effective – to say nothing of prophetic – as a satire on society's obsession with automobiles, something which I thankfully am not bothered with myself...as I do not even own a car, despite having acquired a driving licence years ago (and which is why I can never understand some people's adulation for anything equipped with an engine)!

Anyway, Science is content here to supply to the public demand for larger (the one point it did not get right, since things are actually becoming increasingly microscopic in size) and ever more sophisticated models (eventually being also able to reproduce themselves!). The result of this sees the whole planet engulfed by motor vehicles, so much so that their owners (and immediate families) are forced to take up residence inside them! The visualization of a massive pile-up of machines and helicopters flying above to provide the necessary sustenance and medical attention to the trapped occupants is delightful...but the solitary manufacturer himself, previously safe up in his proverbial ivory tower, is ultimately overwhelmed by his own creations.

The stylish film is colourful and great fun – and, at this stage, makes me wonder what other gems of its ilk (or, for that matter, Short Subjects in general) may have been eluding me all this time...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dated animation and an exaggerated point but it is an effective point that is more applicable today than it was then
bob the moo22 April 2005
The year 2000; in the past year science has made massive leaps – giving us seemingly unlimited power, the ability to harvest the sea and the ability to make inexhaustible food for all. The same principles have been applied to manufacturing which has sadly overwhelmed the streets with cars. In some areas, families now live in their cars and have been stationary for almost five years now. The film looks back at the development and marketing of the "need" for bigger and better cars that ultimately led them us to this sorry state.

Although the year 2000 is now the past rather than the future as seen from the early sixties this film still makes a valid point and indeed its warning about the roads of materialism and greed us more applicable today than it was then. The film uses an American voice, speaking in glowing "marketing" speak of the progress made, putting a positive spin on everything; this was perhaps an easy ploy but it works and only helps to highlight the danger of chasing the constant dream of material wealth. This is important as they film takes its point to extremes but by use of the narration, the relevance is still obvious and it still made me think. The animation is basic and dated (like a clunky Jetsons?) but it works, with the innocence of the style only adding to the sensation of science marching onwards with a blissful and cheerful lack of foresight.

Overall an interesting little animation that you may find doing the rounds at liberal film festivals as part of a throwback look at commercialism and materialism.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Stylish, surreal short cartoon
max-crack20 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Stylish and surreal early 1960s British cartoon, produced by Halas and Batchelor, depicting the unstoppable rise of the motor car.

Synopsis: Once there was a time when car owners actually drove their motors from A to B - on roads! Can you believe that? And it was even a pleasant experience! Now, though, in the year 2000, since the roads are so crowded, people cannot move anyplace so they live in their cars full time. Mother does the knitting; Father watches TV; the kiddies are tucked up in bed, all inside the family car. Cars are so plentiful that they are piled up on top of each other, reaching high into the sky. Eventually the ultimate vehicle is produced: a car that can reproduce itself, and that can eat other cars - not to mention the scientists who created it. Shame about the gridlock though.

With drawings very much in the style of the time (pointy heads; distorted perspective; bright angular backgrounds - remember those early Pink Panther cartoons?) this is an excellent period cartoon, and deservedly a multiple award-winner. Watch out for it at animation festivals.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Automania 2000 is a British look at future materialism gone amok
tavm4 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Automania 2000 is a British animated short from Halas and Batchelor that depicts a future that is overrun by cars as the result of public demand for bigger and better ones. The effect is that cars stack up so much space in the world that people start living in them without going outside much. And then cars start reproducing themselves which cause even more girdlock. Partly humorous in tone owing to the cheery narration but pretty eerie visually, Automania 2000 is a compelling look at the not-too-distant time beyond the present that should give us lots to think about. Well worth seeing for animation fans. I discovered this unique short on YouTube through Cartoon Brew.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Nice short told in a dry, wry and understated narration with a bit of the needle in its humor
llltdesq17 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This short by John Halas and Joy Batchelor was nominated for an Academy Award for Animated Short. There will be spoilers ahead:

The basic premise of this is that automobiles, having built up in numbers, size and purpose to an absurd degree, have ground to a halt through perpetual gridlock. Everyone now lives in stationary cars stacked in layers.

Naturally, people being people, there's still a striving by many to better their neighbors, which calls for MORE cars, which still don't go anywhere but up. Disaster is inevitable.

While cars are the ostensible target here, science and human nature are really what's being skewered here. The animation is rather dated and limited, but the short is more than worth watching.

This short can be found on a DVD with five other Halas and Batchelor shorts which is included in a book about the animators, titled Halas and Batchelor Cartoons, An Animated History, by their daughter Vivien Halas and Paul Wells. Halas and Batchelor are significant to animation in general and to animation in the UK. The book itself is very good and the shorts on the DVD are well done and all are worth watching. Automania 2000 is recommended.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Goofy Glance 45 Years Ago At Automobile Materialism
ccthemovieman-110 June 2008
Sometimes its interesting to see how people back a generation or two fantasized how crazy the world might get by the year 2000. Hey, I'm old enough myself to remember that the year "2000" sounded so far in the future that you couldn't imagine it. How time flies.

What's even goofier are the loons who would look at this cartoon in 2008 and think, "Wow, man, that is, like, such a profound statement on materialism and such." Puh-leeze. This cartoon, although fun to watch, was absurd when it was made and is even more so today. In today's world, we are building smaller and more efficient cars and other objects. You'll always have greed and materialistic people; that's just part of our sinful makeup. I do appreciate this animated writers for pointing that out, though, and I hope they keep poking fun at those who would accumulate more and more and more. Kudos to the several writers of this "cartoon" for the satire. By the way, the writers tell us quickly that the "soon, the whole world" is accumulating these gigantic cars. If you read the plot summary, it inaccurately and biasedly blames America for this. Obviously, it's some flaming Liberal with this typical prejudice. That's not what is said in this animated short.

This satire on scientists and progress gives us an absurd fantasy about how cars dominate people's lives by 2000. One has to remember how big cars became in the late '50s and then the '60s, with the huge tail fins, etc.

That's one of the premises here in this exaggerated goofy look into the future. In what starts out as just one family with one huge car, escalates into 40-foot cars, automobiles then overcrowding the streets to the point they ARE the street, piled one on top of the other to the point where people live in their cars. Helicopters have to then administer food, drink, medical supplies, etc., to all those car-dwellers down below. Hey, I told you it was silly....but it's fun, and it does have a point to be made.

I liked the artwork in here; very '60s-ish. This cartoon was done by the British husband-and-wife team of John Halas and Joy Batchelor. Goofy as it was with the story, it was still fun to watch.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Even for 1963, this was a lame cartoon
planktonrules14 February 2008
This little film is supposed to be set in the year 2000 and is all about the car. Apparently, it impressed the folks at the Oscar committee because it was nominated for an award in the category Best Cartoon Short.

While I do understand that the early 1960s were not a very good time period for quality cartoons due to reduced frame rates and simplistic animation in order to save money, this film is lame even by the standards of the day. The biggest problem is that the film is neither funny nor interesting nor particularly well made. It's a lot like a dull lecture--a lecture I could have done without.
1 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed