Though made in the wake of the worldwide success of "Hercules," this modest but vigorous Italian production plays less like a "sword-and-sandal" and more like a "Robin Hood." Much of the action takes place in the villain's medieval castle but the action, perhaps because of a limited budget, rarely results in the hoped-for excitement. The cast, however, is a notch above average, led by Cameron Mitchell in the good-guy role and Edmund Purdom as the Sheriff-of-Nottingham-like villain. Mitchell's hair has been unconvincingly bleached blond but he manages to get through the proceedings with dignity largely intact. Purdom, however, is another story. He played the title role in 20th Century Fox's most expensive production of 1954, "The Egyptian" and in 1955 he played the leading man to Lana Turner in MGM's most expensive production of that season, "The Prodigal." This one-two punch should have made him a star but he soon wound up back in Europe slumming in B-movies such as this one. Here he plays a mincing, giggling villain who scampers about like a campy Richard III, his eyes darting nervously here and there and his hands, when they're not being wrung, clasped prissily across his chest. It's a "fun" performance but, oh, how the mighty have fallen. Perhaps the film's most memorable moment comes when Mitchell rescues his brother (George Ardisson) from a cell in Purdom's castle. The brother's palms have been nailed to an X-shaped cross and Mitchell has to pull the spikes out, mostly by hand. Fans of beefcake-bondage, laced with blood and sweat, take note.
7 Reviews
Fairly elaborate Viking adventure movie packing thrills, action, drama, romance and overwhelming battles
ma-cortes4 November 2020
Epic costumer about two Viking brothers, Harald : Cameron Mitchell, and, Guntar: George Ardisson, are back after 10-year journey, to Norway and find out their father was assassinated and usurped the throne by a nasty tyrant usurper, Sveno : Edmund Purdom. Both brothers attempt to take vengeance on Sveno, but things go wrong when Guntar is imprisoned and really tortured, as Harold designs a plan to free him. Roaming in from the Sea!! Brawling! Boisterous! Barbaric!
Well-done in comic-book level costume adventure, concerning Vikings battling for power and glory in the 9th Century, but without historical perspective . Nice Viking Epic with noisy action, moving drama , violent fights, swordplay and impressive battles . Although full of stupid historical mistakes and unbelievable events, the picture results to be entertaining enough. Stars two tarnished Hollywood actors as Cameron Mitchell and Edmund Purdom. Cameron Mitchell is fine as the Viking He Man posing himself as a Danish Ambassador and undercover entering at the impregnable enemy fortress. While here stands out Edmund Purdom delivering a histrionic acting by imitating Laurence Olivier's Richard III. Furthermore, regular famliar faces from Spaghetti, Peplum and other Italian subgenres such as : George Ardisson, Mario Feliciani, Andrea Aureli, Nando Tamberlani, Nello Pazzafini, PieroLuli and usual fencing master Benito Stefanelli. And two beautiful damsels in distresses : Isabelle Corey, Helene Remy.
Shot in same locations from WWII, Anzio, where took place the famous battle and American disembark, there being set the fabulous Viking battle on the fortress and rightly photographed by cameraman Enzo Serafin. As well as rousing and moving musical score by Roberto Nicolosi. The motion picture was professionally directed with verve and muscle by Giacomo Gentilomo, though containing some flaws and following in the wake of The Vikings by Richard Fleischer. Gentilomo was an Italian craftsman who direxted various Peplum and adventure movies as. Hawk of the Nile, Sigfrido, Knight without a country, Goliath and the Vampires, Charge of the Black Lancers, Slaves girls of Sheba, Battle of the Spartans, Maciste against the Moon Men. Rating 6/10. Acceptable and passable, attractive battle scenes, colorful photography and locations make the movie a decent entertainment.
This basic epic costumer belong to Vikings sub-genre, such as : the classic The Vikings 1958 with Kirk Douglas, Tony Curtis, Janet Leigh, "The Long Ships" 1963 by Jack Cardiff with Sidney Poitier, Richard Widmark, Erik the Conqueror 1961 by Mario Bava also starred by Cameron Mitchell, George Ardisson, "Knives of the Avenger" 1966 by Mario Bava with Cameron Mitchell, Fausto Tozzi, "The Norseman" 1978 by Charles B Pierce with Cornel Wilde, Mel Ferrer, "The Viking Queen" 1966 by Don Chaffey with Don Murray, Andrew Keir, "The Viking Sagas" 1995 with Ralph Moeller, among others.
Well-done in comic-book level costume adventure, concerning Vikings battling for power and glory in the 9th Century, but without historical perspective . Nice Viking Epic with noisy action, moving drama , violent fights, swordplay and impressive battles . Although full of stupid historical mistakes and unbelievable events, the picture results to be entertaining enough. Stars two tarnished Hollywood actors as Cameron Mitchell and Edmund Purdom. Cameron Mitchell is fine as the Viking He Man posing himself as a Danish Ambassador and undercover entering at the impregnable enemy fortress. While here stands out Edmund Purdom delivering a histrionic acting by imitating Laurence Olivier's Richard III. Furthermore, regular famliar faces from Spaghetti, Peplum and other Italian subgenres such as : George Ardisson, Mario Feliciani, Andrea Aureli, Nando Tamberlani, Nello Pazzafini, PieroLuli and usual fencing master Benito Stefanelli. And two beautiful damsels in distresses : Isabelle Corey, Helene Remy.
Shot in same locations from WWII, Anzio, where took place the famous battle and American disembark, there being set the fabulous Viking battle on the fortress and rightly photographed by cameraman Enzo Serafin. As well as rousing and moving musical score by Roberto Nicolosi. The motion picture was professionally directed with verve and muscle by Giacomo Gentilomo, though containing some flaws and following in the wake of The Vikings by Richard Fleischer. Gentilomo was an Italian craftsman who direxted various Peplum and adventure movies as. Hawk of the Nile, Sigfrido, Knight without a country, Goliath and the Vampires, Charge of the Black Lancers, Slaves girls of Sheba, Battle of the Spartans, Maciste against the Moon Men. Rating 6/10. Acceptable and passable, attractive battle scenes, colorful photography and locations make the movie a decent entertainment.
This basic epic costumer belong to Vikings sub-genre, such as : the classic The Vikings 1958 with Kirk Douglas, Tony Curtis, Janet Leigh, "The Long Ships" 1963 by Jack Cardiff with Sidney Poitier, Richard Widmark, Erik the Conqueror 1961 by Mario Bava also starred by Cameron Mitchell, George Ardisson, "Knives of the Avenger" 1966 by Mario Bava with Cameron Mitchell, Fausto Tozzi, "The Norseman" 1978 by Charles B Pierce with Cornel Wilde, Mel Ferrer, "The Viking Queen" 1966 by Don Chaffey with Don Murray, Andrew Keir, "The Viking Sagas" 1995 with Ralph Moeller, among others.
LAST OF THE VIKINGS (Giacomo Gentilomo and, uncredited, Mario Bava, 1961) **1/2
Bunuel197610 July 2014
With this, I start a clutch of reviews in honour of Mario Bava's centenary; I plan to watch a comprehensive marathon of his vast (and often uncredited) body of work – incidentally, virtually the only title I will be missing out on is the similar ATTACK OF THE NORMANS (1962), which I own solely on VHS recorded off Italian TV but whose tape I have been unable to track down in time! As it happens, I have a comparable copy of the film under review (with which it shares leading man Cameron Mitchell) – but, for this second viewing, I opted to check out the English-dubbed version off "You Tube"
which was not so bad as these things go, despite having to make do with washed-out colours and rampant panning-and-scanning!
Anyway, the movie was not only Mitchell's debut European venture (which, among others, led to as many as six collaborations with Bava) but the first of several "Norse operas" to emerge from Italy, clearly in the wake of the classic Hollywood spectacle THE VIKINGS (1958) – belying the film's very title, which generally implies (but is seldom the case, if ever) that a definitive statement was intended! Among those that came after it were two by Bava and with Mitchell himself, namely ERIK THE CONQUEROR (from the same year) and KNIVES OF THE AVENGER (1966). Interestingly, another offshoot "series" of THE VIKINGS dealt with various fighting people (such as Mongols and Tartars) that included not only the above-mentioned ATTACK OF THE NORMANS but THE COSSACKS (1960) as well – which had Edmund Purdom for villain and who reprises the same duties here, albeit in far more caricatured (read: scenery-chewing) terms! Indeed, the script seems to suffer from undigested gobs of Shakespeare – as Purdom's evil Scandinavian king was clearly modeled on Richard III, while a supporting character is egged on by his ambitious wife towards laying claim to the Viking throne a' la "Macbeth" and Mitchell himself displays a Hamlet-like tendency towards dragging of feet in exacting his vengeance! Plotting is otherwise quite routine (a revenge-seeking hero, impersonation, a romance that runs less than smoothly, betrayal, torture, the inevitable righting of wrongs, and what have you) but this type of crowd-pleasing fare is hardly expected to be anything more.
That said, the movie is certainly enjoyable thanks as much to the always welcome genre trappings (in the form of the vivid medieval atmosphere, a handful of violent skirmishes, the Vikings' rowdy behavior and lusty disposition, etc.) as the inferred histrionic approach (with even Mitchell – prone to calling Purdom's royal "Schven" – and younger sibling Giorgio Ardisson – the two would play unknowing twins in the subsequent ERIK THE CONQUEROR – tending to ham it up!). I would imagine that the latter picture, over which Bava had greater control, was the better overall effort but, really, none of the director's peplums constitute major achievements, let alone masterpieces! Amusingly, the Viking call sounded on the horn here felt awfully familiar to my ears – and I would not be surprised if it were lifted outright for ERIK itself!
Anyway, the movie was not only Mitchell's debut European venture (which, among others, led to as many as six collaborations with Bava) but the first of several "Norse operas" to emerge from Italy, clearly in the wake of the classic Hollywood spectacle THE VIKINGS (1958) – belying the film's very title, which generally implies (but is seldom the case, if ever) that a definitive statement was intended! Among those that came after it were two by Bava and with Mitchell himself, namely ERIK THE CONQUEROR (from the same year) and KNIVES OF THE AVENGER (1966). Interestingly, another offshoot "series" of THE VIKINGS dealt with various fighting people (such as Mongols and Tartars) that included not only the above-mentioned ATTACK OF THE NORMANS but THE COSSACKS (1960) as well – which had Edmund Purdom for villain and who reprises the same duties here, albeit in far more caricatured (read: scenery-chewing) terms! Indeed, the script seems to suffer from undigested gobs of Shakespeare – as Purdom's evil Scandinavian king was clearly modeled on Richard III, while a supporting character is egged on by his ambitious wife towards laying claim to the Viking throne a' la "Macbeth" and Mitchell himself displays a Hamlet-like tendency towards dragging of feet in exacting his vengeance! Plotting is otherwise quite routine (a revenge-seeking hero, impersonation, a romance that runs less than smoothly, betrayal, torture, the inevitable righting of wrongs, and what have you) but this type of crowd-pleasing fare is hardly expected to be anything more.
That said, the movie is certainly enjoyable thanks as much to the always welcome genre trappings (in the form of the vivid medieval atmosphere, a handful of violent skirmishes, the Vikings' rowdy behavior and lusty disposition, etc.) as the inferred histrionic approach (with even Mitchell – prone to calling Purdom's royal "Schven" – and younger sibling Giorgio Ardisson – the two would play unknowing twins in the subsequent ERIK THE CONQUEROR – tending to ham it up!). I would imagine that the latter picture, over which Bava had greater control, was the better overall effort but, really, none of the director's peplums constitute major achievements, let alone masterpieces! Amusingly, the Viking call sounded on the horn here felt awfully familiar to my ears – and I would not be surprised if it were lifted outright for ERIK itself!
An Italian Norse Opera
bkoganbing29 November 2010
A couple of Hollywood names Cameron Mitchell and Edmond Purdom who were finding it harder and harder to get decent big screen roles with the coming of television spent some time in Italy in the Sixties doing all kinds of film genres. In The Last Of The Vikings the two are on opposite sides as Viking prince Mitchell seeks to reclaim the throne of his father which has been stolen by Purdom the usurper.
In Hollywood in some of his more known features, Edmond Purdom was said to be wooden by some critics. To make up for that Purdom chews an entire carpet factory in his performance. It reminded me of Jay Robinson as Caligula on steroids it was that overacted. Purdom was such a nut case I found it hard to believe anyone would join in a revolt with this loony tune as a usurper.
As a study in the extent that overacting can be carried on screen, I recommend watching The Last Of The Vikings, otherwise beware.
In Hollywood in some of his more known features, Edmond Purdom was said to be wooden by some critics. To make up for that Purdom chews an entire carpet factory in his performance. It reminded me of Jay Robinson as Caligula on steroids it was that overacted. Purdom was such a nut case I found it hard to believe anyone would join in a revolt with this loony tune as a usurper.
As a study in the extent that overacting can be carried on screen, I recommend watching The Last Of The Vikings, otherwise beware.
Barely Caught My Attention At Times
Rainey-Dawn19 January 2017
Viking Prince Harald has returned to his homeland along with his younger brother Guntar. The two brothers soon learn that King Sveno of Norway has murdered their father. King Sveno is forcing his cousin Hilde to marry the Danish King in order to create an alliance with them. In order to stop this and avenge his father's death Harald disguises himself as a Danish ambassador to gain entrance into Sveno's stronghold. Harald runs into Hilde, learns she does not want to marry the Danish King and he falls in love with her. Harald has his hands full and more on his plate when his brother Guntar is captured and the real Danish ambassador enters the picture. Prince Harald must straighten all this out.
As exciting as this scenario sounds, the film barely caught my attention at times. The actors and the dialogue was unappealing to me. It was filmed in such a way that it left me bored with it half of the time.
2/10
As exciting as this scenario sounds, the film barely caught my attention at times. The actors and the dialogue was unappealing to me. It was filmed in such a way that it left me bored with it half of the time.
2/10
Top dollar Viking-themed adventure
Leofwine_draca16 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A rousing adventure yarn made in probably Italy's finest year for costume adventures. If not the finest then it was probably the most prolific, I'm sure that at least a hundred such titles like this and other muscleman epics must have been made in 1961. The list of them is endless, if you don't believe me then just check out the IMDb. THE LAST OF THE VIKINGS is one of the films in the seafaring sub-genre and is a colourful romp throughout, with some good direction from Giacomo Gentilomo (and apparently an uncredited Mario Bava, although I have yet to hear this verified?).
Things start off well with the opening titles playing over a Viking long ship sailing into shore. The small army arrive on land, perturbed as their trumpet calls go unanswered. This leads to a brief handful of atmospheric scenes in which a messenger walks around the surrounding countryside sounding his horn to no response, with only skeletons and ruined temples in view. After this brief but haunting interlude, the film begins for real with the arrival of a friend who tells the tale of the cruel King Sveno who has captured the Norse throne through force alone and murdered the rightful king. We immediately know that he must and will be stopped at any cost, so the scene is set for a showdown between the forces of good and evil.
Taking the lead is the underrated Cameron Mitchell, who doesn't seem to get much credit for all the movies that he's made. I'm sure he appeared in a dozen of these Italian productions over a period of years but nobody seems to dwell over him as they do Steve Reeves. Sure, he's not muscular like Reeves but his acting is as good as, if better than that of Reeves. Mitchell is the just but vicious Viking leader, Harald, who fights for the forces of good throughout the movie. He's saddled with a younger, stupid brother Guntar who gets himself in all sorts of scrapes but still finds time to romance Hilda, a Norse maiden, while all this goes on.
The film starts off slowly with little action but picks up as it goes along. The subplot of Harald infiltrating the enemy castle under the guise of a Danish messenger from the king is a good one, leading to plenty of tense and fraught moments as his identity is threatened to be revealed. When it finally is revealed, the scene is set for some good action as Harald fights off the guard and barricades himself in a prison cell where he discovers that his captured brother has been crucified! Rescuing him, the pair jump into the sea but only Harald survives. In the typical tradition he burns his brother's body on a funeral pyre. Eventually, after discovering and brutally murdering a traitor in their midst (by chopping his hand off, apparently!), Harald and his men storm the enemy castle, taking massive injuries from the arrows and spears of their enemy. Their secret, though, is to throw burning tree trunks from the top of their makeshift tower over the battlements, thus destroying most of the archers in a single go. Then the hand-to-hand combat men arrive and the scene is set for a violent confrontation man-to-man with an obvious outcome.
Although I found this film hard to get into at first, and occasionally boring, as soon as Harald goes undercover in the enemy's castle the movie picks up and stays fast-paced until the rousing climax. The photography is good, crisp and colourful and with a couple of inventive camera angles (love the camera that followed a rolling tower from UNDERNEATH as it went past). Especially in the battle scenes, which are well staged and very exciting. Also surprising is the high level of violence and brutality. During the battles one man is hacked in the head with an axe and we see blood pouring down his face! Another goes through the old "arrow in the eye" routine! Plus the usual quota of stabbings, impalings and slashings. It's all violent fun.
Another main reason to hunt down this film is to see Edmund Purdom overact like no-one before him. In the lists of bad performances, Purdom must surely rank near the top for his completely barmy portrayal of the snivelling, whining, and totally without merit King Sveno, who spends most of the film grovelling, cackling, sneering, or just generally being a creep. I love it! It makes a change from his good-natured turn as the hero in QUEEN OF THE NILE, that's for sure. Along with Purdom, Mitchell's strong hero and some unusually believable supporting acts make the cast above average. All this is topped by a stirring score which highlights the battle and action while giving the movie an almost mythical feel. In all, THE LAST OF THE VIKINGS is a bit of a classic and should be hunted down by fans of these adventure films.
Things start off well with the opening titles playing over a Viking long ship sailing into shore. The small army arrive on land, perturbed as their trumpet calls go unanswered. This leads to a brief handful of atmospheric scenes in which a messenger walks around the surrounding countryside sounding his horn to no response, with only skeletons and ruined temples in view. After this brief but haunting interlude, the film begins for real with the arrival of a friend who tells the tale of the cruel King Sveno who has captured the Norse throne through force alone and murdered the rightful king. We immediately know that he must and will be stopped at any cost, so the scene is set for a showdown between the forces of good and evil.
Taking the lead is the underrated Cameron Mitchell, who doesn't seem to get much credit for all the movies that he's made. I'm sure he appeared in a dozen of these Italian productions over a period of years but nobody seems to dwell over him as they do Steve Reeves. Sure, he's not muscular like Reeves but his acting is as good as, if better than that of Reeves. Mitchell is the just but vicious Viking leader, Harald, who fights for the forces of good throughout the movie. He's saddled with a younger, stupid brother Guntar who gets himself in all sorts of scrapes but still finds time to romance Hilda, a Norse maiden, while all this goes on.
The film starts off slowly with little action but picks up as it goes along. The subplot of Harald infiltrating the enemy castle under the guise of a Danish messenger from the king is a good one, leading to plenty of tense and fraught moments as his identity is threatened to be revealed. When it finally is revealed, the scene is set for some good action as Harald fights off the guard and barricades himself in a prison cell where he discovers that his captured brother has been crucified! Rescuing him, the pair jump into the sea but only Harald survives. In the typical tradition he burns his brother's body on a funeral pyre. Eventually, after discovering and brutally murdering a traitor in their midst (by chopping his hand off, apparently!), Harald and his men storm the enemy castle, taking massive injuries from the arrows and spears of their enemy. Their secret, though, is to throw burning tree trunks from the top of their makeshift tower over the battlements, thus destroying most of the archers in a single go. Then the hand-to-hand combat men arrive and the scene is set for a violent confrontation man-to-man with an obvious outcome.
Although I found this film hard to get into at first, and occasionally boring, as soon as Harald goes undercover in the enemy's castle the movie picks up and stays fast-paced until the rousing climax. The photography is good, crisp and colourful and with a couple of inventive camera angles (love the camera that followed a rolling tower from UNDERNEATH as it went past). Especially in the battle scenes, which are well staged and very exciting. Also surprising is the high level of violence and brutality. During the battles one man is hacked in the head with an axe and we see blood pouring down his face! Another goes through the old "arrow in the eye" routine! Plus the usual quota of stabbings, impalings and slashings. It's all violent fun.
Another main reason to hunt down this film is to see Edmund Purdom overact like no-one before him. In the lists of bad performances, Purdom must surely rank near the top for his completely barmy portrayal of the snivelling, whining, and totally without merit King Sveno, who spends most of the film grovelling, cackling, sneering, or just generally being a creep. I love it! It makes a change from his good-natured turn as the hero in QUEEN OF THE NILE, that's for sure. Along with Purdom, Mitchell's strong hero and some unusually believable supporting acts make the cast above average. All this is topped by a stirring score which highlights the battle and action while giving the movie an almost mythical feel. In all, THE LAST OF THE VIKINGS is a bit of a classic and should be hunted down by fans of these adventure films.
History can be fun and colorful, even if it's fictional.
mark.waltz15 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Yes the names are real, with the character of Harald Sigurdsson an actual Norwegian prince who did actually bite for his right to the throne, and this gives an interesting look of what ancient Norway could have been like a thousand years ago. Cameron Mitchell, best known for his roles in "Love Me or Leave Me" (Doris Day's lover) and "Carpusel" (a villainous thief who sang and danced) as Harald and MGM pretty boy Edmund Purdom as a Scandinavian Richard III like mad man who has usurped the throne. He's still handsome, but then again so has been many other tyrants throughout history. His villainous character chews the scenery that is surprising that these ancient castles don't come tumbling down is woodchuck like acting teeth.
Colorful and campy (with some delightfully silly hairstyles, a few that seem a bit too modern to be from the dark ages), this action-packed historical peplum is fast-moving and have some great sets believable costumes. I felt like I really had gone back a millennium even if some of the situations are over the top and a bit MacBethish in nature without the poetic flair of Shakespeare's words. Mitchell, with his solid white hair, is completely unrecognizable, but it's Purdom who gets to steal film simply through a very over-the-top performance with lots of sneering. There are some very bloody slaughters throughout, and you really shouldn't expect anything less from such a dark period of history. The romantic subplots are intrusive but fortunately minimal. There's very little Cinematic reference to Scandinavian history, so this one is a rare glimpse into that period and location of midevil times.
Colorful and campy (with some delightfully silly hairstyles, a few that seem a bit too modern to be from the dark ages), this action-packed historical peplum is fast-moving and have some great sets believable costumes. I felt like I really had gone back a millennium even if some of the situations are over the top and a bit MacBethish in nature without the poetic flair of Shakespeare's words. Mitchell, with his solid white hair, is completely unrecognizable, but it's Purdom who gets to steal film simply through a very over-the-top performance with lots of sneering. There are some very bloody slaughters throughout, and you really shouldn't expect anything less from such a dark period of history. The romantic subplots are intrusive but fortunately minimal. There's very little Cinematic reference to Scandinavian history, so this one is a rare glimpse into that period and location of midevil times.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
