41 out of 49 people found the following comment useful :- Influenced Numerous Filmmakers, 9 October 2001
Author:
marquis de cinema from Boston, MA
Du Rififi Chez Les Hommes/Rififi(1955) can on the surface be described as
a
French variation on John Huston's seminal heist film, Asphalt
Jungle(1950).
The difference between the two films is Rififi(1955) pays a little more
attention in detail to the robbery sequence. Also, the police aren't
involved in the aftermath of the robbery in Rififi as much as in Asphalt
Jungle. In the end Rififi(1955) is in my opinion a slightly better film
than Asphalt Jungle(1950). Remarkable Noir picture that defines 1950s
French Cinema.
Spartacus(1960) may have been the one which broke down the infamous
blacklist, but in my opinion Rififi(1955) was the film that began to break
apart the unbreakable Hollywood blacklist. First film in five years for
Jules Dassin who was victimized by the McCarthy communist hunt of the late
40s to early 50s. He got some sort of retribution when Rififi(1955)
became
a success around France and Europe. Thus defying the poisonious Hollywood
blacklist in a major way that probably inspired others to do the same.
Rififi(1955) is the most important film of Dassin's career because it not
only restored his name, but also gave him a second chance at making
films.
Jules Dassin gave the filmworld and its ever growing audiences a
masterpiece
of influential proportions. His handling of the material is exceptional
and
direction of the actors is flawless. Builds up tense situations with
precise craftsmanship. Dassin came full circle in the Film Noir genre by
directing his best and last Noir, Rififi(1955). Marked the end of
Dassin's
period in filmmaking when he was involved in doing Noir
pictures.
Rififi(1955) is the number one film in an arsenal of thirty plus films for
director, Jules Dassin. A masterpiece in acting, cinematography,
directing,
editing, and writing. Not a film to leave your seat for one minute
because
there is always something memorable going on. As brilliant as anything by
Jean Pierre Melville who was a master of this type of film. Masterpieces
such as Rififi(1955) are relatively small compared to the probably
billions
of films made in motion picture history.
The one fascinating aspect of Rififi is the precise planning and careful
execution of a robbery that takes up a bulk of the 118 minute duration.
The
main characters plan and execute the jewel heist in the same way a film
director prepares for the pre-productions, production, and post-production
of a film. Shows how difficult a Jewel heist like in Rififi(1955) is in
committing and why very few would do something like it. The fact that the
scene hardly contains a mess up like in other heist films turns this scene
into something even greater. Close as one can get to having a perfect
sequence in a motion picture.
Lack of unnatural sound in the landmark thrity minute heist sequence puts
it
in a realm of absolute realism. Any dialogue or/and music would ruin any
suspense and tension the director is trying to create. The use of natural
sound makes the heist sequence a rewarding film viewing experience. Now
Filmmakers and producers would use dialogue and music in a scene like this
because of a lack of confidence of a mainstream filmgoer's patience.
Sustains a level of consistency that never once lets down.
Maintaining a high level of suspense is what makes the heist sequence tick
to perfection. The director achieves suspense in the heist sequence
that's
rarely equaled in most robbery scenes from heist films. Jean Servais and
the rest of the main actors contribute to the suspense with some low key
acting. Getting suspense put in a scene is a task few are capable of
doing.
The robbery sequence of Rififi(1955) reaches a Hitchcockian level of
suspense and tension.
Many filmmakers from the years following Du Rififi Chez Les Hommes(1955)
have been influenced if not inspired by it. One filmmaker influenced was
Jean Pierre Melville(original choice for director of Rififi)who used
variations of the heist sequence in Le Doulos(1961), and Le Cercle
Rouge(1970). Another filmmaker influenced was Stanley Kubrick who made a
similarly themed film in The Killing(1956). Also, Quentin Tarantino whose
debut feature Reservoir Dogs(1992) was inspired by this film. Other film
directors influenced are John Woo, Michael Mann, Paul Schrader, Ringo Lam,
etc...
Du Rififi Chez Les Hommes(1955) is comparable to Bob le Flambeur(1955) in
many ways. One, Jules Dassin and Jean Pierre Melville directed
groundbreaking films in Rififi(1955) and Bob le Flambeur(1955). Two, each
film involves an aging criminal who plans and carries out a daring heist.
Three, Bob le Flambeur and Rififi finishes in fatalistic fashion. Four,
each film shares many motifs and situations that classify the two as film
greats.
Part of Rififi's charm are the colorful characters that surround the story
such as Tony le Stephanois, Jo le Suedois, Mario Farrati, and Cesar le
Milanais. Most of the violence is implicit yet effectively brutal. The
main characters led by Tony le Stephanois abide by a strong outdated code
of
honor that is remindful of Sam Peckinpah and John Woo. Jean Servais
becomes
the role of Tony le Stephanois with his cynical outlook and tired looks.
Du
Rififi Chez Les Hommes/Rififi(1955) became a favorite of mine the moment I
saw it on the big screen from beginning to end.
30 out of 42 people found the following comment useful :- the absolute best, 14 December 2004
Author:
loydmooney from san francisco
If any film approaches perfection, this is the one. Pound for pound and
scene for scene it is the best. The only others even close are the
Maltese Falcon and Asphalt Jungle, but this is the baby that beats even
them. For sheer black and white beauty it is the equal of Asphalt, and
just never lets up. Its ending is one of the best of all time, easily
the equal of Citizen Kane. And making it even more amazing it that it
was cobbled together in desperation: and made for practically nothing.
In short, a bloody miracle.
It builds beautifully. Everything in it works, even down to the great
music of George Auric.
Shot in early winter or late spring, it is authentic down to the white
gangster breaths on the air. Paris never looked more dangerously
beautiful.
Of all the films I have ever seen, it is the only one I would give a
nine and a half to. And since most of it works very well without
comment, probably it is best to just say, watch it and behold.
19 out of 23 people found the following comment useful :- It's not just the heist scene, 9 January 2003
Author:
rob-242 (rob@digitalburn.net) from Cambridge, England
Rififi deservedly gets a lot of mention for the famous heist scene, and,
indeed, that scene deserves all the credit it gets. It's a masterful
piece
of suspense, character interaction and photography. But Rififi isn't just
this one scene - every scene in the film is as masterfully put together,
and
as a whole, the film is not only taught with suspense, plot and
character,
but an adroitly told moral tale that set the scene for film noire for
years
to come.
Cinematically and technically, the heist sequence may be the most
impressive
scene of the film, but for me, it's the final scene that holds the most
power - Tony le Stéphanois's hallucinogenic drive towards
redemption.
17 out of 22 people found the following comment useful :- Hollywood, come up with your own ideas!, 19 June 2006
Author:
Camera Obscura from Leiden, The Dutch Mountains
RIFIFI (Jules Dassin - France 1955)
To me, it seems a very risky idea to attempt a Hollywood-remake of
Jules Dassin's 1955 classic RIFIFI. Planned for release in 2007, Al
Pacino apparently is gonna play the lead, taking on the role of Tony le
Stephanois. Risky business... How they're gonna pull this off?
Ironically, Dassin was blacklisted in Hollywood and went on to try his
luck in France and made this little masterpiece, aptly called by some
"The Grandddady of all caper- and heist movies". In my opinion, it
remains a one-of-a-kind classic, beautifully filmed with one of the
most memorable endings ever to be put on film. Whatever one's opinion
of the film.
In the last couple of years RIFIFI has become dangerously overpraised.
Nevertheless, this French noir-classic shouldn't be forgotten. Go see
it, before the remake is out there, in order to have some ammunition
for comparing the two.
Camera Obscura --- 9/10
11 out of 14 people found the following comment useful :- A Magnificent Fim-Noir, 21 July 2007
Author:
Claudio Carvalho from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
After five years in prison, Tony le Stéphanois (Jean Servais) meets his
dearest friends Jo (Carl Möhner) and the Italian Mario Ferrati (Robert
Manuel) and they invite Tony to steal a couple of jewels from the
show-window of the famous jewelry Mappin & Webb Ltd, but he declines.
Tony finds his former girlfriend Mado (Marie Sabouret), who became the
lover of the gangster owner of the night-club L' Âge d' Or Louis
Grutter (Pierre Grasset), and he humiliates her, beating on her back
and taking her jewels. Then he calls Jo and Mario and proposes a
burglary of the safe of the jewelry. They invite the Italian specialist
in safes and elegant wolf Cesar (Perlo Vita) to join their team and
they plot a perfect heist. They are successful in their plan, but the
D. Juan Cesar makes things go wrong when he gives a valuable ring to
his mistress.
"Du Rififi Chez les Hommes" is a magnificent film-noir, certainly among
the best I have seen. The screenplay has credibility, supported by an
awesome direction of Jules Dassin, stunning performances of the cast
and great cinematography. Jean Servais has outstanding performance in
the role of a criminal with principles guided by the underworld rules.
The famous long silent sequence of the heist is amazing and extremely
tense and certainly among the best ones of the cinema history. I am
listing this great movie in my list of favorite movies ever. My vote is
ten.
Title (Brazil): "Rififi"
11 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :- Simply stunning., 6 November 2002
Author:
meejoir (meejoir@zombie.co.uk) from Newcastle, England
I see alot of movies at the cinema (103 so far this year) and I have to say
that this is by far and away the best film I have seen this year, even
though it was released back in 1954!
I sat in awe and watched this work of genius and felt quite ashamed that I
had never even heard of it before my local art house cinema decided to show
it for a week on what looked like a new print.
The best part of the whole movie has to be the 28 minute break in where
there is no speech and no music, merely the sound of the men carrying out
the heist. Pure quality.
Although really dark in places it is lightened with the dry humour.
Not many films score 10 out of 10 but this does and also gets a gold star
for effort!!
If you ever get a chance to see this movie, please do not hesitate, it's a
classic.
15 out of 23 people found the following comment useful :- Breathtakingly brilliant! Still one of the greatest crime movies ever made., 19 March 2003
Author:
Infofreak from Perth, Australia
'Rififi' is so damn good it takes your breath away! Director Jules Dassin,
blacklisted from Hollywood, was living almost hand to mouth in Europe and
taking any job he could get, when he made this movie, a project he was
initially not at all excited by. Happily he turned around an awful situation
and ended up making a classic thriller which is still one of the greatest
crime movies ever made. One of the most influential too, having an impact on
movies like 'The Killing', 'The Anderson Tapes', 'Thief', 'Reservoir Dogs',
'The Score' and many, many others. 'Rififi' is a classic heist movie but it
is much more than that, it is a superbly written and acted character study.
The robbery sequence itself is regarded as one of the most impressive in
film history, but it is by no means the only thing worth watching this movie
for. In fact I'd go so far as to call it perfect. Every time you watch it
you discover something more of interest. Jean Servais, who later appeared in
the entertaining horror sexploitation movie 'The Devil's Nightmare', is
absolutely wonderful as Tony, a veteran criminal talked into joining his
young friend Jo (Carl Mohner) in a daring robbery. His performance is first
rate, but Mohner and the rest of the cast are equally good, including
Drassin himself as Cesar, an Italian safe-cracker who inadvertently causes
the gangs ultimate downfall. There's a brilliant scene between Servais and
Drassin towards the end of the movie which is short but unforgettable. Look
out for it. Truffaut raved about this movie calling it the best Noir he'd
ever seen. I don't think he was exaggerating, it really IS that good, and
personally I think it's a much better movie than Truffaut's more celebrated
'Breathless'. If you enjoy crime thrillers it doesn't get much better than
this! Highly recommended!
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- Film noir meets New Wave, 6 December 2006
Author:
Dennis Littrell (dalittrell@yahoo.com) from SoCal
Or vice-versa.
This is a French film noir directed by an American film maker (Jules
Dassin) who had to leave the country because of being blacklisted by
Hollywood thanks to HUAC. The premise of the story is rather
familiar--one last jewel heist for Tony le Stephanois and his buds--and
so is the ending with everybody getting... Well, no spoilers here, for
sure, since this is the sort of film in which tension toward the ending
is important.
Dassin filmed in realistic lighting in black and white on the streets
of Paris using actors and actresses who are not glamorous. The
engaging--sometimes intruding--score by Georges Auric nicely enhances
the movie and will remind viewers of many a similar score from American
film noirs from the forties and early fifties. Jean Servais plays the
hardcore, consumptive lead in a fedora much as Humphrey Bogart might
have played him. Tony's recently out of prison, past his prime, but
still tough and decisive when he has to be, his mind still sharp when
focused, the kind of anti-hero whose eyes water even though the tears
will never fall.
Dassin plays the Italian safecracker and would-be ladies man who knows
the rules but gets careless.
In film noir we are forced by the logic and focus of the film to
identify with the bad guys. Often there are levels of bad guys, the
"good" bad guys we are identifying with and the "bad" bad guys who are
out to do in our good bad guys, and then maybe there's a really bad,
bad bad guy or two. (Here we have Remi Grutter, played by Robert
Hossein, a slightly sadistic druggie.) Then there are the cops who are
irrelevant or nearly so. In more modern film noir the bad guys are not
even "good" bad guys, and they get away with it or something close to
that. In the old film noir, which evolved from the gangster films of
the thirties, the usual motto, following the old Hollywood "code," was
"Crime Doesn't Pay," with every criminal having to pay for his or her
crime before the end of the movie.
Probably the most impressive feature of Rififi is how nicely the film
moves along. The plot unfolds quickly and seamlessly much the way the
great film directors always did it, directors like Stanley Kubrick,
Louis Malle, and the best of Hitchcock. Some have actually compared
this to Kubrick's The Killing (1956) and suggest that Kubrick stole a
little. Well, directors always steal if need be, and there are some
perhaps telling similarities, such as it being "one last heist" for the
protagonist, and having the girl gum up the works. The similarities may
go deeper because as this film was nearing its end I suddenly thought,
oh, no! the suitcase in the back seat is going to fly out of the
convertible, hit the ground, burst open, and all the money is going to
fly into the air! Those of you who have seen The Killing may recall
what happened to the money near the end of the film! Which reminds me
of another film with something bad happening to the money: Oliver
Stone's U Turn (1997) starring Sean Penn. There the money in his
backpack gets blown to smithereens by a shotgun blast. Ha, ha, ha!
Getting the dubbed version of this film would be an act of sacrilege
since the dialogue (when there is some: the heist itself is done
entirely without dialogue, about 30 minutes worth) is terse and easy to
follow requiring only an occasional glance at the subtitles, which, by
the way, are quite utilitarian and guiding as opposed to having every
word spelled out.
One other thing: all the brutality is done as sex used to be done in
film, that is off camera. A guy gets his throat slit. We don't see it.
I kind of like this approach. We don't have to see the gore. You could
almost let your kids see Rififi--almost.
Catch this one now and be on the lookout for a Hollywood reprise
starring Al Pacino and directed by Harold Becker coming out next year
in which you can be sure that the violent scenes will be played out in
full.
The minutiae of what's involved in carrying out a robbery is what makes
this one of the best of all heist movies. Then there's the robbery
itself, a wordless, thirty minute nail-biter that has never been
surpassed, followed by what is probably the cinema's most pronounced
example of dishonor among thieves as things begin to spectacularly
unravel, and we have what is unquestionably the greatest of all heist
movies.
This was a tough and unsentimental film when it first appeared in 1955
and it is just as tough and unsentimental today. (It displays some of
the edgy brutality of Dassin's earlier "Brute Force"). There isn't a
flabby moment or duff performance in the entire film and Dassin
captures the milieu of seedy clubs and Parisian back streets like
no-one else and the final drive through Paris by a dying man is one of
the most iconic closing sequences of any movie. A classic.
18 out of 31 people found the following comment useful :- Film Noir: Paris-Style, 2 December 2005
Author:
ccthemovieman-1 from Lockport, NY, United States
As far as I am concerned, this film noir had two totally different
things going for it as opposed to the film noirs I am used to viewing:
1 - the setting is Paris, France; 2 - there is 28-minute scene with no
dialog.
Both make this movie a bit unique, at least to English-speaking film
noir fans. Actually, an American, Jules Dussain, shot the film, so it's
not entirely a European film. Initially, I was disappointed in this
after I had watched the first 40 minutes. It's an expensive DVD and I
was bored. However, once that silent segment started - the actual heist
(you already know what's it about), the film picked up considerably and
just got better and better.
In fact, I thought the best part of the story was what happened after
the heist. The best aspect of the entire film was the cinematography.
This is what makes the disc worth owning. It's excellent film noir
photography and a real travelogue for those of us who have never seen
Paris...and this is Paris in the mid 1950s. There are lots of
bleak-but-interesting rain-soaked Paris streets and buildings I found
fascinating to view. In fact, there were many more of those great shots
than of London in the much better known film, The Third Man.
The lead actor in here, Jean Servais, I think his name is, also is
interesting to view. Someone described his face as a cross between
Humphrey Bogart and Harry Dean Stanton, and that sums it up perfectly.
A warning for those not expecting profanity or nudity in a classic
film. This is France, not the United States, so there is a little bit
of both in here. I appreciate the DVD offering the choice of subtitles
or a dubbed version, too.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Du rififi chez les hommes (1955)
41 out of 49 people found the following comment useful :-

Influenced Numerous Filmmakers, 9 October 2001
Author: marquis de cinema from Boston, MA
Du Rififi Chez Les Hommes/Rififi(1955) can on the surface be described as a French variation on John Huston's seminal heist film, Asphalt Jungle(1950). The difference between the two films is Rififi(1955) pays a little more attention in detail to the robbery sequence. Also, the police aren't involved in the aftermath of the robbery in Rififi as much as in Asphalt Jungle. In the end Rififi(1955) is in my opinion a slightly better film than Asphalt Jungle(1950). Remarkable Noir picture that defines 1950s French Cinema.
Spartacus(1960) may have been the one which broke down the infamous blacklist, but in my opinion Rififi(1955) was the film that began to break apart the unbreakable Hollywood blacklist. First film in five years for Jules Dassin who was victimized by the McCarthy communist hunt of the late 40s to early 50s. He got some sort of retribution when Rififi(1955) became a success around France and Europe. Thus defying the poisonious Hollywood blacklist in a major way that probably inspired others to do the same. Rififi(1955) is the most important film of Dassin's career because it not only restored his name, but also gave him a second chance at making films.
Jules Dassin gave the filmworld and its ever growing audiences a masterpiece of influential proportions. His handling of the material is exceptional and direction of the actors is flawless. Builds up tense situations with precise craftsmanship. Dassin came full circle in the Film Noir genre by directing his best and last Noir, Rififi(1955). Marked the end of Dassin's period in filmmaking when he was involved in doing Noir pictures.
Rififi(1955) is the number one film in an arsenal of thirty plus films for director, Jules Dassin. A masterpiece in acting, cinematography, directing, editing, and writing. Not a film to leave your seat for one minute because there is always something memorable going on. As brilliant as anything by Jean Pierre Melville who was a master of this type of film. Masterpieces such as Rififi(1955) are relatively small compared to the probably billions of films made in motion picture history.
The one fascinating aspect of Rififi is the precise planning and careful execution of a robbery that takes up a bulk of the 118 minute duration. The main characters plan and execute the jewel heist in the same way a film director prepares for the pre-productions, production, and post-production of a film. Shows how difficult a Jewel heist like in Rififi(1955) is in committing and why very few would do something like it. The fact that the scene hardly contains a mess up like in other heist films turns this scene into something even greater. Close as one can get to having a perfect sequence in a motion picture.
Lack of unnatural sound in the landmark thrity minute heist sequence puts it in a realm of absolute realism. Any dialogue or/and music would ruin any suspense and tension the director is trying to create. The use of natural sound makes the heist sequence a rewarding film viewing experience. Now Filmmakers and producers would use dialogue and music in a scene like this because of a lack of confidence of a mainstream filmgoer's patience. Sustains a level of consistency that never once lets down.
Maintaining a high level of suspense is what makes the heist sequence tick to perfection. The director achieves suspense in the heist sequence that's rarely equaled in most robbery scenes from heist films. Jean Servais and the rest of the main actors contribute to the suspense with some low key acting. Getting suspense put in a scene is a task few are capable of doing. The robbery sequence of Rififi(1955) reaches a Hitchcockian level of suspense and tension.
Many filmmakers from the years following Du Rififi Chez Les Hommes(1955) have been influenced if not inspired by it. One filmmaker influenced was Jean Pierre Melville(original choice for director of Rififi)who used variations of the heist sequence in Le Doulos(1961), and Le Cercle Rouge(1970). Another filmmaker influenced was Stanley Kubrick who made a similarly themed film in The Killing(1956). Also, Quentin Tarantino whose debut feature Reservoir Dogs(1992) was inspired by this film. Other film directors influenced are John Woo, Michael Mann, Paul Schrader, Ringo Lam, etc...
Du Rififi Chez Les Hommes(1955) is comparable to Bob le Flambeur(1955) in many ways. One, Jules Dassin and Jean Pierre Melville directed groundbreaking films in Rififi(1955) and Bob le Flambeur(1955). Two, each film involves an aging criminal who plans and carries out a daring heist. Three, Bob le Flambeur and Rififi finishes in fatalistic fashion. Four, each film shares many motifs and situations that classify the two as film greats.
Part of Rififi's charm are the colorful characters that surround the story such as Tony le Stephanois, Jo le Suedois, Mario Farrati, and Cesar le Milanais. Most of the violence is implicit yet effectively brutal. The main characters led by Tony le Stephanois abide by a strong outdated code of honor that is remindful of Sam Peckinpah and John Woo. Jean Servais becomes the role of Tony le Stephanois with his cynical outlook and tired looks. Du Rififi Chez Les Hommes/Rififi(1955) became a favorite of mine the moment I saw it on the big screen from beginning to end.
30 out of 42 people found the following comment useful :-
the absolute best, 14 December 2004
Author: loydmooney from san francisco
If any film approaches perfection, this is the one. Pound for pound and scene for scene it is the best. The only others even close are the Maltese Falcon and Asphalt Jungle, but this is the baby that beats even them. For sheer black and white beauty it is the equal of Asphalt, and just never lets up. Its ending is one of the best of all time, easily the equal of Citizen Kane. And making it even more amazing it that it was cobbled together in desperation: and made for practically nothing. In short, a bloody miracle.
It builds beautifully. Everything in it works, even down to the great music of George Auric.
Shot in early winter or late spring, it is authentic down to the white gangster breaths on the air. Paris never looked more dangerously beautiful.
Of all the films I have ever seen, it is the only one I would give a nine and a half to. And since most of it works very well without comment, probably it is best to just say, watch it and behold.
19 out of 23 people found the following comment useful :-

It's not just the heist scene, 9 January 2003
Author: rob-242 (rob@digitalburn.net) from Cambridge, England
Rififi deservedly gets a lot of mention for the famous heist scene, and, indeed, that scene deserves all the credit it gets. It's a masterful piece of suspense, character interaction and photography. But Rififi isn't just this one scene - every scene in the film is as masterfully put together, and as a whole, the film is not only taught with suspense, plot and character, but an adroitly told moral tale that set the scene for film noire for years to come.
Cinematically and technically, the heist sequence may be the most impressive scene of the film, but for me, it's the final scene that holds the most power - Tony le Stéphanois's hallucinogenic drive towards redemption.
17 out of 22 people found the following comment useful :-

Hollywood, come up with your own ideas!, 19 June 2006
Author: Camera Obscura from Leiden, The Dutch Mountains
RIFIFI (Jules Dassin - France 1955)
To me, it seems a very risky idea to attempt a Hollywood-remake of Jules Dassin's 1955 classic RIFIFI. Planned for release in 2007, Al Pacino apparently is gonna play the lead, taking on the role of Tony le Stephanois. Risky business... How they're gonna pull this off?
Ironically, Dassin was blacklisted in Hollywood and went on to try his luck in France and made this little masterpiece, aptly called by some "The Grandddady of all caper- and heist movies". In my opinion, it remains a one-of-a-kind classic, beautifully filmed with one of the most memorable endings ever to be put on film. Whatever one's opinion of the film.
In the last couple of years RIFIFI has become dangerously overpraised. Nevertheless, this French noir-classic shouldn't be forgotten. Go see it, before the remake is out there, in order to have some ammunition for comparing the two.
Camera Obscura --- 9/10
11 out of 14 people found the following comment useful :-

A Magnificent Fim-Noir, 21 July 2007
Author: Claudio Carvalho from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
After five years in prison, Tony le Stéphanois (Jean Servais) meets his dearest friends Jo (Carl Möhner) and the Italian Mario Ferrati (Robert Manuel) and they invite Tony to steal a couple of jewels from the show-window of the famous jewelry Mappin & Webb Ltd, but he declines. Tony finds his former girlfriend Mado (Marie Sabouret), who became the lover of the gangster owner of the night-club L' Âge d' Or Louis Grutter (Pierre Grasset), and he humiliates her, beating on her back and taking her jewels. Then he calls Jo and Mario and proposes a burglary of the safe of the jewelry. They invite the Italian specialist in safes and elegant wolf Cesar (Perlo Vita) to join their team and they plot a perfect heist. They are successful in their plan, but the D. Juan Cesar makes things go wrong when he gives a valuable ring to his mistress.
"Du Rififi Chez les Hommes" is a magnificent film-noir, certainly among the best I have seen. The screenplay has credibility, supported by an awesome direction of Jules Dassin, stunning performances of the cast and great cinematography. Jean Servais has outstanding performance in the role of a criminal with principles guided by the underworld rules. The famous long silent sequence of the heist is amazing and extremely tense and certainly among the best ones of the cinema history. I am listing this great movie in my list of favorite movies ever. My vote is ten.
Title (Brazil): "Rififi"
11 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :-

Simply stunning., 6 November 2002
Author: meejoir (meejoir@zombie.co.uk) from Newcastle, England
I see alot of movies at the cinema (103 so far this year) and I have to say that this is by far and away the best film I have seen this year, even though it was released back in 1954!
I sat in awe and watched this work of genius and felt quite ashamed that I had never even heard of it before my local art house cinema decided to show it for a week on what looked like a new print.
The best part of the whole movie has to be the 28 minute break in where there is no speech and no music, merely the sound of the men carrying out the heist. Pure quality.
Although really dark in places it is lightened with the dry humour.
Not many films score 10 out of 10 but this does and also gets a gold star for effort!!
If you ever get a chance to see this movie, please do not hesitate, it's a classic.
15 out of 23 people found the following comment useful :-
Breathtakingly brilliant! Still one of the greatest crime movies ever made., 19 March 2003
Author: Infofreak from Perth, Australia
'Rififi' is so damn good it takes your breath away! Director Jules Dassin, blacklisted from Hollywood, was living almost hand to mouth in Europe and taking any job he could get, when he made this movie, a project he was initially not at all excited by. Happily he turned around an awful situation and ended up making a classic thriller which is still one of the greatest crime movies ever made. One of the most influential too, having an impact on movies like 'The Killing', 'The Anderson Tapes', 'Thief', 'Reservoir Dogs', 'The Score' and many, many others. 'Rififi' is a classic heist movie but it is much more than that, it is a superbly written and acted character study. The robbery sequence itself is regarded as one of the most impressive in film history, but it is by no means the only thing worth watching this movie for. In fact I'd go so far as to call it perfect. Every time you watch it you discover something more of interest. Jean Servais, who later appeared in the entertaining horror sexploitation movie 'The Devil's Nightmare', is absolutely wonderful as Tony, a veteran criminal talked into joining his young friend Jo (Carl Mohner) in a daring robbery. His performance is first rate, but Mohner and the rest of the cast are equally good, including Drassin himself as Cesar, an Italian safe-cracker who inadvertently causes the gangs ultimate downfall. There's a brilliant scene between Servais and Drassin towards the end of the movie which is short but unforgettable. Look out for it. Truffaut raved about this movie calling it the best Noir he'd ever seen. I don't think he was exaggerating, it really IS that good, and personally I think it's a much better movie than Truffaut's more celebrated 'Breathless'. If you enjoy crime thrillers it doesn't get much better than this! Highly recommended!
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-

Film noir meets New Wave, 6 December 2006
Author: Dennis Littrell (dalittrell@yahoo.com) from SoCal
Or vice-versa.
This is a French film noir directed by an American film maker (Jules Dassin) who had to leave the country because of being blacklisted by Hollywood thanks to HUAC. The premise of the story is rather familiar--one last jewel heist for Tony le Stephanois and his buds--and so is the ending with everybody getting... Well, no spoilers here, for sure, since this is the sort of film in which tension toward the ending is important.
Dassin filmed in realistic lighting in black and white on the streets of Paris using actors and actresses who are not glamorous. The engaging--sometimes intruding--score by Georges Auric nicely enhances the movie and will remind viewers of many a similar score from American film noirs from the forties and early fifties. Jean Servais plays the hardcore, consumptive lead in a fedora much as Humphrey Bogart might have played him. Tony's recently out of prison, past his prime, but still tough and decisive when he has to be, his mind still sharp when focused, the kind of anti-hero whose eyes water even though the tears will never fall.
Dassin plays the Italian safecracker and would-be ladies man who knows the rules but gets careless.
In film noir we are forced by the logic and focus of the film to identify with the bad guys. Often there are levels of bad guys, the "good" bad guys we are identifying with and the "bad" bad guys who are out to do in our good bad guys, and then maybe there's a really bad, bad bad guy or two. (Here we have Remi Grutter, played by Robert Hossein, a slightly sadistic druggie.) Then there are the cops who are irrelevant or nearly so. In more modern film noir the bad guys are not even "good" bad guys, and they get away with it or something close to that. In the old film noir, which evolved from the gangster films of the thirties, the usual motto, following the old Hollywood "code," was "Crime Doesn't Pay," with every criminal having to pay for his or her crime before the end of the movie.
Probably the most impressive feature of Rififi is how nicely the film moves along. The plot unfolds quickly and seamlessly much the way the great film directors always did it, directors like Stanley Kubrick, Louis Malle, and the best of Hitchcock. Some have actually compared this to Kubrick's The Killing (1956) and suggest that Kubrick stole a little. Well, directors always steal if need be, and there are some perhaps telling similarities, such as it being "one last heist" for the protagonist, and having the girl gum up the works. The similarities may go deeper because as this film was nearing its end I suddenly thought, oh, no! the suitcase in the back seat is going to fly out of the convertible, hit the ground, burst open, and all the money is going to fly into the air! Those of you who have seen The Killing may recall what happened to the money near the end of the film! Which reminds me of another film with something bad happening to the money: Oliver Stone's U Turn (1997) starring Sean Penn. There the money in his backpack gets blown to smithereens by a shotgun blast. Ha, ha, ha! Getting the dubbed version of this film would be an act of sacrilege since the dialogue (when there is some: the heist itself is done entirely without dialogue, about 30 minutes worth) is terse and easy to follow requiring only an occasional glance at the subtitles, which, by the way, are quite utilitarian and guiding as opposed to having every word spelled out.
One other thing: all the brutality is done as sex used to be done in film, that is off camera. A guy gets his throat slit. We don't see it. I kind of like this approach. We don't have to see the gore. You could almost let your kids see Rififi--almost.
Catch this one now and be on the lookout for a Hollywood reprise starring Al Pacino and directed by Harold Becker coming out next year in which you can be sure that the violent scenes will be played out in full.
6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-

A Classic, 15 August 2006
Author: Martin Bradley (MOscarbradley@aol.com) from Derry, Ireland
The minutiae of what's involved in carrying out a robbery is what makes this one of the best of all heist movies. Then there's the robbery itself, a wordless, thirty minute nail-biter that has never been surpassed, followed by what is probably the cinema's most pronounced example of dishonor among thieves as things begin to spectacularly unravel, and we have what is unquestionably the greatest of all heist movies.
This was a tough and unsentimental film when it first appeared in 1955 and it is just as tough and unsentimental today. (It displays some of the edgy brutality of Dassin's earlier "Brute Force"). There isn't a flabby moment or duff performance in the entire film and Dassin captures the milieu of seedy clubs and Parisian back streets like no-one else and the final drive through Paris by a dying man is one of the most iconic closing sequences of any movie. A classic.
18 out of 31 people found the following comment useful :-

Film Noir: Paris-Style, 2 December 2005
Author: ccthemovieman-1 from Lockport, NY, United States
As far as I am concerned, this film noir had two totally different things going for it as opposed to the film noirs I am used to viewing: 1 - the setting is Paris, France; 2 - there is 28-minute scene with no dialog.
Both make this movie a bit unique, at least to English-speaking film noir fans. Actually, an American, Jules Dussain, shot the film, so it's not entirely a European film. Initially, I was disappointed in this after I had watched the first 40 minutes. It's an expensive DVD and I was bored. However, once that silent segment started - the actual heist (you already know what's it about), the film picked up considerably and just got better and better.
In fact, I thought the best part of the story was what happened after the heist. The best aspect of the entire film was the cinematography. This is what makes the disc worth owning. It's excellent film noir photography and a real travelogue for those of us who have never seen Paris...and this is Paris in the mid 1950s. There are lots of bleak-but-interesting rain-soaked Paris streets and buildings I found fascinating to view. In fact, there were many more of those great shots than of London in the much better known film, The Third Man.
The lead actor in here, Jean Servais, I think his name is, also is interesting to view. Someone described his face as a cross between Humphrey Bogart and Harry Dean Stanton, and that sums it up perfectly. A warning for those not expecting profanity or nudity in a classic film. This is France, not the United States, so there is a little bit of both in here. I appreciate the DVD offering the choice of subtitles or a dubbed version, too.
Add another comment
Related Links