So Big (1953)

Director:

Robert Wise

Writers:

Edna Ferber (novel)
John Twist (writer)

Release Date:

31 October 1953 (USA)

Genre:

Drama | Romance

Plot:

After the death of her father and the loss of his fortune, Selina takes a job teaching school in the Dutch community of New Holland...

Plot Keywords:

Pulitzer Prize Source | Based On Novel

Awards:

Won Golden Globe.

Cast

Jane Wyman	...	Selina DeJong
Sterling Hayden	...	Pervis DeJong
Nancy Olson	...	Dallas O'Mara
Steve Forrest	...	Dirk DeJong
Elisabeth Fraser	...	Julie Hempel
Martha Hyer	...	Paula Hempel
Walter Coy	...	Roelf Pool
Richard Beymer	...	Roelf, age 12-16
Tommy Rettig	...	Dirk, age 8
Roland Winters	...	Klaas Pool
Jacques Aubuchon	...	August Hempel
Ruth Swanson	...	Maartje Pool
Dorothy Christy	...	Widow Paarlenberg
Oliver Blake	...	Adam Ooms
Lillian Kemble-Cooper	...	Miss Fister (as Lily Kemble)

Runtime:

USA:101 min

Country:

USA

Language:

English

Color:

Black and White

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1

Sound Mix:

Mono (RCA Sound System)

Certification:

Australia:PG | Finland:S | USA:Approved (PCA #16405)

Company:

Warner Bros. Pictures

Movie Connections:

Version of So Big (1924)

Why Robert Wise?

This is a remake of the 1932 version starring the great Barbara Stanwyck. Not quite a shot-for-shot remake. This version is longer and includes some material the original left out and has a slightly more cynical ending than the original. All you need to know about the first version is Warner Bros./ First National/ Vitaphone, which equates to a mass produced, assembly line product running typically 60-80 minutes in length. That's just how most Hollywood films were in the early 30s. And often times, the movie suffered, as a result. All that being said, this version is considerably better.

Jane Wyman is great as always, and by this time in her career, she was able to be much more selective of the types of roles she chose. Sterling Hayden is pretty much the same in every role he ever appeared in: stoic; regardless of the material. Nancy Olson does a good job, but is not on screen hardly at all. The biggest problem, however, is Steve Forrest as Wyman's son. He's stiff, bland, and doesn't appear to have any acting ability whatsoever.

The most curious aspect of this picture, however, is it's director,... Robert Wise. Wise first made a name for himself early on as the editor for Orson Welles' first two films, "Citizen Kane" and "The Magnificent Ambersons". This is one of only a few directors (the other 2 who come to mind: Howard Hawks and George Cukor) who made a movie in every genre. And to go a step further, he made masterpieces in every genre except perhaps comedy and western (horror- "The Body Snatcher", "The Haunting"; sci-fi- "The Day the Earth Stood Still", film noir- "The Set-Up", "Odds Against Tomorrow", musical- "West Side Story", "The Sound of Music", drama- "The Sand Pebbles", "Somebody Up There Likes Me")

Does this sound like someone who should be directing a remake of "So Big"? (He already had "The Set-Up" and "The Day the Earth Stood Still" under his belt.) That's not to say there's anything wrong with this picture. It is what it is: an above average melodrama. The point is a much less talented director could have handled it. It always amazes me how such a brilliant man like this wasn't appreciated more. His career was filled with films just like this, sandwiched in between his great ones. It was quite common at that time for directors to be assigned to direct something, often without even having a chance to read the script before deciding whether they wanted to or not. Saying 'No' to the studio bosses wasn't much of an option either, if you wanted to keep working. And I can't help but wonder if that was the case quite frequently with Wise as well, directing whatever he was told to. As a result, he's never mentioned with the great directors, and that's very unfortunate. If you haven't already, make it a point to start watching his movies. Not just his masterpieces, all of them. This is a great director who deserves to be more recognized.