Chi è senza peccato.... (1952) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Tearjerker with interesting, if ambiguous, angle on Catholic Church
adrianovasconcelos30 December 2021
Director Raffaelo Matarazzo typically churned out films full of melodrama, pathos, vagaries of fortune often precipitated by the hands of ill-intentioned relations, and human endurance to the hilt. In CHI É SENZA PECCATO you also need to add the injustice of the Italian legal system. As the saying goes, the law has to be blind, and in Maria's case it is certainly blind to the difficulties of her situation.

Basically, beautiful Maria (Yvette Sanson) is having the fairy tale of a life, with a suitor (Stefano) who genuinely loves her and moves to Canada to earn some dough for their future life as a married couple when her sister Lisetta decides to open herself to a not so honorable suitor (Dario) who leaves her pregnant under grandmother Comtessa Lamieri's stern order to discontinue the affair and ignore the existence of the child. This seemingly evil Comtessa convinces Maria to keep the Dario-Lisetta tryst under wraps. Meawnhile, Lisetta falls very ill and dies upon birth, whereupon Lamieri orders one of her female servants to drop Nino, the baby, by a Catholic convent.

Maria, having married Stefamo by proxy, now looks for the baby but the Comtessa keeps manipulating her into keeping everything quiet not to disgrace the already deceased Lisetta. Maria, obviously not the sharpest of knives, goes right along with the Comtessa's suggestion and it is hardly surprising that she is suspected of having abandoned the baby. She duly goes to jail for 18 months and has great difficulty regaining order in her life, now that her name is blackballed by her undeserved stay in the pen.

It is at this point that one male priest speaks the film's title: "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone." If memory serves me right, he does not say anything else in the entire film. The church takes the child under its wing and suddenly a veritable miracle occurs: the comtessa grasps the extent of her evil actions and cries. So does Maria, who reclaims the child as soon as she leaves jail and becomes virgin Maria with child via her deceased sister. A true miracle of conception by proxy!

Poor Maria goes through sordid, painful times, becomes ill herself - but, guess what? Good old Stefano has become rich, visits Italy from Canada just in time to catch the bits and pieces of the whole story, realizes that Maria is still virginal, and kind soul that he not only wants to stay married, he is even keen to become stepdad to Nino. How romantic!

This concoction of romantic drama can be quite heady but it does not have much to do with reality. I suppose that in postwar Italy this was the type of film that both reflected hardship and hope when all chips were stacked against one. I am not Italian and I am not of that time, so forgive me for not believing any of it, and remaining mostly interested in the ambiguous angle on the mystery of conception under Catholic faith.

Re the film's merits: competent direction; typical weepy script in Matarazzo's work; good photography enhancing the physical beauty of leads; great performance by Rpsay as the also rather ambiguous comtessa; sentimental performances by Sanson and Nazzari.

Worth watching despite above mentioned shortcomings.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone!
ulicknormanowen22 May 2021
You do not change a winning team :after "i figlio di nesseno " , past master of melodrama Raffaello Matarazzo meets again Amadeo Nazzari , Yvonne Sanson and French Françoise Rosay (cast again as comtessa , not Pamieri ,but Canali this time.

A comtessa who plays a prominent part in Maria's downfall ;France never gave Rosay such nasty hypocrit parts! To save her ne'er- do -well grandson,she sacrifices the girl he got pregnant and then her sister ,the unfortunate Maria(Sanson) suffers ,suffers ,and suffers : prison, the loss of her husband (by proxy ), illness , poverty ,you name it ;husband (Amadeo Nazzari) and wife are separated by the Atlantic ocean , and ,it's unusual,both stars have little time together on screen .

If you do not like melodrama,you must move on;if you do,like me,this is your cup of tea, melo with a capital M;the screenplay is dense and will send you tearing to an entire box of kleenex ; Sanson is touching as the so-called mater dolorosa ; like her ,a specialist of the genre (see also 'tormento" where they are both featured ) , Nazzaro gives a restrained effective performance .Rosay is masterful as the selfish comtessa (selfish till the very end) who ,pretending to help Maria ,plunges her into misfortune .
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Love and marriage in separation in the mountains of Italy and Canada with great complications
clanciai21 May 2021
This is an amazing story, apparently originated by Lamartine, "Genevieve", but here it is turned into a typical Matarazzo film full of pathos, suffering, atrocious ordeals and great human endurance under impossible and sometimes inhuman conditions, leading to injustice, incarceration, and no end to human tribulations. Francoise Rosay is impressingly magnificent as the grandmother who has to send her favourite grandson to Buenos Aires to conceal his roguery in making a poor young girl pregnant, who then leaves a son and dies. Her sister has to take care of the baby and is charged and sentenced for having tried to do away with it, and that's the drama. The most interesting scene is perhaps the wedding, when she (Yvonne Sanson) and her lover in Canada (Amedeo. Nazzari) separated by the Atlantic, nevertheless carry through their wedding, a regular Catholic wedding, and they actually never separate although they try to. It's a deeply fascinating and moving story finding new ways of developing its great emotional pathos all the time, and the end is the greatest surprise of all. Yvonne Sanspn was never more beautiful, Amedeo Nazzari was never more likeable in eloquently restricted delicacy, and Raffaello Matarazzo probably never made a more romantic film.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed