Paid in Full (1950) Poster

(1950)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Any chance of a refund?
kalbimassey15 April 2022
Following an opening salvo of schmooze fest bonhomie and lighthearted romance, perpetuated by Eve Arden's irrepressible, razor sharp wit, Paid in Full hints at both film noir and psychological drama, prior to falling flat on its face, wallowing in the worst excesses of mawkish afternoon soap.

The movie confronts some delicate and distressing personal issues, but in such a contrived and gauche fashion that the events, traumatic as they are, feel like they have been grafted on to the narrative for maximum emotional mileage, rather than as natural and integral aspects of the story.

Paid in Full may have scored heavily on the 'not a dry eye in the house' ratings at the time of its release, but disappointingly wastes the talents of its three leads, the aforementioned Eve Arden and the hugely undervalued Kristine Miller. Overlong, overblown and overwrought, this turgid tearjerker now seems stodgy, dated and largely implausible.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Serendipitous!
guitarrgirl27 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this film in 1989 right after my daughter was born. I was recovering from a C- section for placenta previa. I had never heard of it before, so when I heard it in the film I was intrigued. While the film's depiction of the medical facts were not accurate, it really did cause me to find out more information about the condition as mine was undiagnosed before The day I delivered. I wish I could find this film on DVD or TCM. I would love to see it again. I only remember it through my half-dazed state, but I do remember the drama was good and the performances were believable. I love Cummings. I highly recommend this film to anyone, not just the hormonally imbalanced. If you ever find it roaming around the net don't forget to tell me about it!! I really am dying to see it again. My daughter is now 23!! Anyway, it truly was a serendipitous thing that I was able to see the movie at that exact moment in my life.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
turgid drama
blanche-28 January 2022
Boy what a potboiler.

Robert Cummings stars with Lizabeth Scott and Diana Lynn in "Paid in Full" from 1950.

Cummings plays Bill Prentice, who works side by side with Jane (Scott) in the advertising section of a department store. She's in love with him, but he is in love with her gold-digging sister, Nancy (Diana Lynn). He has bought an engagement ring for Nancy and wants to propose.

If you thought Veda Pierce was bad, Nancy has her beat. Right after a millionaire gives her the kiss-off, Bill proposes, and Nancy accepts. You can tell right away there are going to be problems - he wants a wedding with just Jane and a couple of other people present. She wants a $500 wedding gown (almost 6,000 in today's money) that her sister gets for her. The wedding turns into a packed church affair with bridesmaids.

Nancy is terribly unhappy - Bill doesn't pay enough attention to her. She makes him miserable. Jane, meanwhile, still in love with Bill, is dating. Since her mother died giving birth, there's apparently a genetic problem, and Jane won't be able to have children. It is her great sorrow.

Nancy has a baby but is jealous of the attention Bill gives her, is angry with Jane for decorating the nursery, and winds up cutting off Jane and doing what she can to keep her husband away from the baby.

I won't tell you the rest - it's the stuff of soap operas. Lizabeth Scott is lovely, but no one is that good a person. Diana Lynn plays her role beautifully, she's a terror. Cummings, as the man in the middle, doesn't have much to do, but he's always likeable. Eve Arden, as a coworker of Jane's and Bill's, is an outspoken riot.

This is a woman's picture, all right, the kind Kay Francis did in the early '30s.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A soap, but a good one.
lime-32 April 1999
Caught this film by accident some years ago in a hospital waiting room. It's a soap, for sure, but I was unexpectedly impressed by the acting and the direction, which made the teary script work far better than it had a right to. A thoroughly, impressively professional job all around!
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great Cast, Lack of Psychological Sense
goldenagehollywood8 July 2021
I liked this film until about halfway or two-thirds of the way through. It had great concepts, complicated relationships and psychology, and compelling storylines. The actors are wonderful and really pull off their roles well. They're well cast. However the second half or final third is marred by terrible psychology and loose ends. Things start not making sense and never stop. There are some Hail Marys in here that just don't work well. You really have to push the boundaries of realism to enjoy this one, which is a shame since it had such a strong start.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A waste of Lizabeth
mls418210 December 2021
We love Lizabeth Scott when she's bad. She isn't bad in this, the script and the rest of the cast is. Bob Cummings should stick to light comedy and the other leading lady is so bland I can't remember her.

The overwrought accident that causes all the guilt and melodrama is as ludicrous as the sacrifice made at the ending.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The story as well as I can remember it....
AlsExGal6 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
... and I remember it as a good little soaper. It used to play on AMC prior to their format change in 2002, as did all of the old Paramounts and Universals.

The other reviews don't capture the essence of what is going on in this film. I am just going to warn you upfront that this review spoils this film completely. Lizabeth Scott plays Jane Langley, a career girl, seemingly destined for what used to be called spinsterhood, which seems unbelievable given her elegant good looks and demeanor. Diana Lynn is Nancy Langley, the rather grabby younger sister. Their mother died in childbirth and Jane raised Nancy, who ends up marrying Bill Prentice (Robert Cummings), a secret love of Jane, then Nancy almost immediately gets pregnant and has a baby girl, whose safety she is hysterical about. This puzzles Jane until she has a talk with the physician that treated their mother during her final illness and has been a friend to her all through the ensuing years. Jane learns, through the most euphemistic of medical language - all that was possible at this time in cinema history - that both she and her sister have inherited their mother's tendency for difficult pregnancies, except back in 1950 this particular disease meant death for mom shortly after birth.

Jane's case is severe - thus the doctor always encouraged Jane to work on her career and not look to marriage. By "severe" he means that even one birth would cause Jane certain death. With birth control being what it was - or wasn't - in 1950, she should never take a chance. As for Jane waiting until she was in her mid to late 20s to have such a talk that so deeply effected the understanding of the lifestyle choices that were encouraged in her case, just suspend your beliefs and go with it. Nancy however, is not so severely effected, the good doc believes she could have one healthy pregnancy and no more, thus Nancy is frantic about the safety of the only child to which she could ever give birth. So now Jane understands Nancy's protective attitude.

As fate would have, Jane accidentally kills Nancy's child in an automobile accident. Nancy somewhat loses her mind in her grief, and Bill and Nancy end up divorcing. Jane concocts a plan to restore her sister to her sanity and to her husband.

Jane meets Bill in Mexico in a bar, a few dances, a few drinks, a few love songs on the juke box and it's off for a marriage license ( I didn't remember it ever being this easy girls did you?). With no birth control there is the inevitable deadly pregnancy. Remember now, Bill knows nothing about any of these medical problems. Thus Jane conveniently dies after giving birth to another baby girl, also fathered by Bill, and this brings Nancy and Bill back together to care for the now motherless child. Thus Jane's debt is "paid in full", although her debt was not by malice in the first place.

Although a real soaper I have fondly remembered this film for the twenty years since I have seen it. I do wish Paramount would restore it - maybe they already have. I thought Miss Scott gave a fine performance in this one. Funny, I was just thinking about it today after not having seen it for years, and came home and found Lizabeth Scott had just died. This would be great as part of a tribute to an actress seldom seen because she spent so much of her time at Paramount which doesn't seem to care about its classic films that much.

The reason I am basically telling you everything I can remember is because the chance of you ever seeing it is probably remote. Forgive me if I have gotten some of the details wrong since I am working with memories that are twenty years old.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Corny, Convoluted, and Not Believable Soap - Paid in Full
arthur_tafero13 November 2021
There is good soap and corny soap; this film definitely falls into the latter category. Gone With the Wind and West Side Story are good soaps and both have innocents who are sacrificed in the course of events, as this film does. However, the former films have a much higher degree of believability; this film does not. Robert Cummngs, Lizabeth Scott, and Diana Lynn all give worthy performances, but even their best efforts cannot overcome a highly flawed story line. In real life, these sisters would probably never have spoken to each other again after the failed first marriage, much less remain in constant contact. All the ensuing events after the first marriage rang false to me. For soap lovers only; and for those who still believe in the Easter Bunny.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Mothers worthy and unworthy
clanciai2 January 2023
A pregnant woman drives a car up to a hospital, passes out at the wheel, is brought in for immediate surgery, she says she is a Mrs Milligan and has a reference to a doctor Winston, and when the hospital calls this doctor up, he has no knowledge of any Mrs Milligan. As she lies on the operating table between life and death, telling the doctors to rather save the baby's life than her own, her life passes by for her in her memory, which is shared with the audience. That's how it starts.

Her life with her sister appears to have been totally self-sacrificed for her younger sister, as she feels responsible for her, as their mother died at her birth, and she herself is well aware that she cannot have children without risks to her life. All this information of course raises some concern with the audience about her condition of giving birth. The younger sister marries Robert Cummings, a dashing young upstart ready for a career, and they have a daughter, but the marriage is not a success, as she never really loved him, while the one who really loved him was Lizabeth Scott. There's the intrigue.

The story is authentic, it was found in "Reader's Digest" and made a decent film of directed the accomplished William Dieterle, who presents another of his invaluably sensitive creations, with appropriate romantic music by Victor Young sung by Dean Martin - the finest scene of the film before everything falls asunder, - so it is not really a noir which usually was Lizabeth Scott's acting realm, but rather a psychological drama about motherhood. The most interesting scenes are the discussions with the doctor of the sisters, who is perfectly aware of all the details of the case of the sisters and their mother, but who is powerless against the ways of destiny. It leads up to a meltdown, you keep hoping until the end, but at least there will always be a continuity.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lizabeth Scott and Diana Lynn Shine
drednm12 January 2014
PAID IN FULL boasts terrific work from two underrated actresses, Lizabeth Scott and Diana Lynn, here playing sisters. Scott is the older one, the sensible sister who has raised Lynn after their mother died in childbirth from something called placenta previa. Scott works in a department store as an illustrator while Lynn, a spoiled little witch, works as a model. Lynn is trying to hook a rich husband but when that fails she grabs upwardly mobile Robert Cummings, who works with Scott and is Scott's secret love. But it's no secret to Lynn.

Lynn has a baby, but she's psychotic with jealousy and hates sharing the child with Cummings or anyone. After a few plot twists which lead to divorce. Scott marries Cummings and has a baby even though she has the same disease her mother had.

Scott often played rotten ladies, sort of a queen of noir films in the 40s and 50s, but here plays the goody good girl, while perky Lynn, often cast in kid sister roles, seemingly exults in playing the witch. Cummings stands around. Eve Arden plays the man-hungry co-worker, Stanley Ridges the kindly doctor, and Carol Channing makes her film debut. A rather lurid women's picture but well worth catching.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed