The Girl from the Third Row (1949) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Questions about the meaning of life seen through a ring
doktorn24 August 2010
When you look back in time at the Swedish film industry it is easy to reduce it to Ingmar Bergman. Although it is some truth to that, films like "The Girl from the Third Row" shows Sweden was gifted with more than one great director.

In "The Girl from the Third Row" the director Hasse Ekman let two different world-views collide. In the opening scene the lead character Gusten (Sigge Furst) talks, through his own-written play, about how pointless and empty our life on earth really is. He is a kind of existentialist/nihilist character.

After the play Gusten meets a girl (Eva Henning) who watched his play from the third row. She begins to tell a story about a ring which passes from person to person and as they have the ring we get to see a short glimpse of the life these people live and the effect the ring have on their lives. Through the story of the ring and the people in possession of it she tries to convince Gusten that there is meaning, destiny and true emotions in life. Gusten is not so easy to convince though.

The two positions that collide in "The Girl from the Third Row" is quite black and white. Either life is empty, shallow and without any meaning or life has set a destiny for us all and life is full of love if we just have the courage to embrace it. With that said there is a lot of scenes and subtle details which make the lines less clear and throws other questions at the viewer.

As you should have figured out now if you read this far this isn't a film for everyone. A previous reviewer found it pretty boring and I can fully understand that you find it boring if you don't understand what the film is about. If you have asked yourself questions about the meaning of life, destiny, read a little philosophy or something like that, then I think you will enjoy this film.

I ranked it an eight in the end. I took one star off because I found the two world-views a bit to black and white and another one because I simply don't agree with the director's point of view. :)

In the end, I highly recommend it!
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best films of all time
martinpersson971 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Hasse Ekman is without a doubt one of the greatest directors who have ever lived, whether discussing sweden or abroad. His masterful handling of the human psyche and existential delving, as well as his clever humour, are rivaled only by perhaps Ingmar Bergman.

Rather fitting then that this film was made as a response to one of Bergman's films, telling a rather opposite message in a fun way, it's a very cleverly written film that works well as a companion piece to Bergman, and of course as its own entity.

Overall, an expertly written, acted and cinematographied film that is very much deserving of all the praise it has gotten.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rather Boring
ateenolover_generation27 April 2004
I don't know. I did look at this movie for a few weeks ago and I found it rather boring. In my opinion *laughs* this would be like a... what do you say in English... first movie to Lord of the rings *laughs* again* you know what I mean.

Well, it was about an old woman who found a ring that was given to her by her husband (I think it was so)that had died long ago. Then she leaves the ring into an shop that sells rings and so on. And then another pair who's going to marry buy the same ring and find out that the one who left the ring in the shop is a relative to them or something. And then the ring wanders from people to people. In the opposite of Lord of the rings this ring is good and not evil!

//Anna
1 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed