Dangerous Years (1947) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Powerful and genially moving film with young MM
tnikkane20 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I disagree with that reviewer who didn't think very highly on this film. I found this quite powerful and moving film about juvenile criminality and while watching it, I couldn't help thinking that back in those days (in 1947) films were usually well written,contrary nowadays when sometimes I wonder did they have an actual script at all...The message of this films was well delivered and the result was actually genially moving!

Yeah, then the other aspect of this film is the fact that it was the second film featuring the young Marilyn Monroe (the third if you count the SHOCKING MISS PILGRIM, I believe there exists some controversy about Marilyn actually being in it). Marilyn was still very young and has that same kind of glowing presence and still a little timid charm as in the LADIES OF THE CHORUS, her next film.

Yeah, it's a bit part, but still a whole character with some lines - much more appealing and also more interesting than, say "Polly" in the FIREBALL...
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Give A Kid A Break
boblipton25 March 2024
Billy Halop is being tried for murder in the first degree, As the trial advances, information comes out. Some of it is not presented to the court, but in private conversation.

If this somewhat preachy but ultimately kind-hearted courtroom drama is remembered, it is as the first movie that Marilyn Monroe appeared in. If you look, you can recognize her, as the blonde waitress at the roadhouse in a couple of shots. As for the other performers, among the adult performers, Jerome Cowan has a nice non-comedic role as Halop's defense attorney, and Nana Bryant is sweet as a nurse from an orphanage. The movie is littered with past and current juvenile performers, including Scottie Beckett, Ann E. Todd, Darryl Hickman, and Dickie Moore.

I think the presence of these players is to underscore the message of Cowan's closing argument, that some youngsters get the break of loving parents, and others don't, and the latter often turn out bad; it's the unloved who deserve a break. Perhaps these performers are there to emphasize that message to the audience.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Extraneous issues and situations
bkoganbing15 May 2020
A whole lot of Hollywood's best known juvenile actors got into this film about juvenile delinquency post World War II. It could have should have been a whole lot better.

High school teacher Donald Curtis starts a boys club in his town. But some of the followers have slipped away courtesy of a new juke joint that is catering to the young. Who;'s leading them away is new arrival Billy Halop who recruits some of them in a heist gang he's organized.

Trying to stop a heist and save his kids Curtis is shot dead and Halop the only legal adult is put on trial.

The trial takes up the bulk of this short film. There are so many extraneous issues and situations brought in he whole thing became ridiculous.

A lot of talent wasted here.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
exploited delinquent film
jade_f457 February 2005
This movie wasn't very exciting nor was the acting in it as well. I had picked this movie up at a pawn shop while I was buying strings for my guitar and decided to watch it because I had heard Marilyn Monroe was in it. It was the typical teenage movie where it displays the slums looking like San Francisco and made the teenagers all have New York accents and bad attitudes. I felt I was robbed when I noticed that Marilyn had a bit part in the movie and her name was called only once. I despise movies that promise the settings will be better the plot doesn't move you at all. The scriptwriter doesn't know how to write anything. This movie really should of stayed back in the pawn shop where I first found it.
11 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A really bad B-movie...but one still worth seeing for some viewers.
planktonrules5 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
"Dangerous Years" is one of the worst courtroom dramas I've ever seen. It's filled with ridiculous twists...ones so bad that I found myself laughing as I watched. However, it STILL might be worth watching, as it's Marilyn Monroe's first film.

The story is awful...but the actors really tried hard and the acting is NOT the problem (aside from one young lady whose acting on the witness stand is really silly). The problem is the writing. It's filled with several really ridiculous plot twists.

When the story begins, a group of teens are committing a burglary. Their leader is a young adult, Danny (Billy Halup), and when a social worker catches them, this punk kills the social worker. The remainder of the movie is about Danny's court trial. Now here is where the story falls apart. First, Danny learns that the girl he grew up with in an orphanage just happens to be the Prosecutor's daughter! What a crazy coincidence. But later, in another twist, he learns that the girl is really NOT the Prosecutor's long-lost biological child...HE is!!! Apparently, the woman in charge of the orphanage changed records in order to convince the Prosecutor that the girl was his biological child he never knew about....but in reality the boy was his child through some affair with a now dead woman. And, a woman from the orphanage shows up in court and intends to tell everyone that Danny is the Prosecutor's son! The scene is ridiculous and the lady jumps up in court and without finding out WHY and WHO she was or letting the attorneys learn more, the judge just tells her to step into the witness box to testify!! Now it gets even crazier...as she's about to tell everyone that Danny is the Prosecutor's son, she DIES of a heart attack!!!! And, the young man, ready to take his deserved punishment, doesn't tell anyone the truth because he doesn't want the girl to know the truth AND because he deserves his punishment!! None of this made any sense and really was impossible to believe....and left me mad that I'd even wasted my time with the movie.

As far as Monroe goes, she plays a waitress and has a few lines near the very beginning of the film. Nothing remarkable here...and her delivery is very different from later movies, as she sounds quite a bit different. This alone is the ONLY reason to watch this crappy movie.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed