Killer Dill (1947) Poster

(1947)

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Supporting Frank Albertson is such a jerk that it makes enjoying the comedy next to impossible
dbborroughs20 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Salesman who can't get a girl, plays it like a tough guy to win himself one. Unfortunately he also looks like a notorious gangster and finds himself in deep trouble.

Set in 1931, the film is clearly the product of the 1940's, no real attempt was made to actually make the film look like when it was set (clothes and hairstyles are definitely post war). I don't think it would have made any difference as to when the film was set so I don't know why they bothered to make it 1931. The film itself is a mildly amusing comedy of the fill in the blanks kind. Once you realize that the harmless Dill is going to be confused as killer you can pretty much wind it up and follow its path without thinking. The big problem with the film is Dill's attorney friend played by Frank Albertson. Albertson's character is as big a jerk as they come. Constantly out of money he is forever borrowing cash. Worse he does whatever suits him best, even to the detriment of everyone around him. I don't think I've seen as big a heel or jerk in a film in many years.He's such a slime that its almost impossible to believe that anyone, even the downtrodden Dill, would put up with him (most amazingly he actually has a fiancé). Albertson is such a jerk that the film ceases to be a comedy (weak though it is) and simply become a Theater of Cruelty production. How much abuse can he hand out before he gets his comeuppance?? I didn't want to find out.

Not horrible, but not really good either. This is 70 minutes best spent somewhere else.(Gargling is always good)
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Immediately forgettable
bensonmum216 July 2021
Salesman Johnny Dill (Stuart Erwin) gets confused for a mob boss. Much alleged hilarity ensues.

This will be short and sweet - I didn't care for Killer Dill. The main character and his supposed comic antics really annoyed me. Very little of it worked. And, to make matters worse, I didn't care for Erwin in the Dill role. He doesn't have the physical presence necessary to play the heavy. The writing is lame and childish with Dill going in and out of tough guy mode and none of the other characters seeming to notice. Ugh! There's not much here to recommend.

The only real highlights for me were Mike Mazurki and Milburn Stone. Both gentlemen acquitted themselves well and deserved to be in something better than this.

Overall, Killer Dill is an immediately forgettable film. I think my rating is more than generous and based almost solely on Mazurki and Stone.

4/10.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Waaa... Waa... Waa.....
Spuzzlightyear17 November 2005
Killer Dill is similar to another movie I've seen recently, "Babyface Morgan" about a regular schmo who is somewhat placed into the criminal underworld by accident, to hilarious results! In Killer Dill's case though, the results are pretty lame though. A regular guy, played by Stuart Ervin, is fighting with his brother for the attention of a goil. She likes adventure in her men, and Ervin isn't cutting it. However, when he notices that she kind of gets off on Gangster men, he tries to be like one, and gets way over his head when the local Mafioso lay the blame on him for an inside whack job on Public Enemy # 21. (Possibly the best joke in the movie). During the trial, he's found innocent, but like O.J., Blake et al, everyone believes he's actually Guilty! So he has to prove he's guilty before there's another inside whack job, this time on him.. This is just OK I guess. The plot is somewhat blah, the humor somewhat silly, and there's some rather unnecessary characters placed for length. (Like the curiously, for no reason whatsoever, Scottish (!!) undertakers) and a rather lack of energy throughout this.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
silly farce of average joe bumping into mob boss
ksf-27 August 2018
Usually the second banana, this time it's Stuart Erwin playing the lead, a salesman who accidently bumps up against the mob boss Moronie. He spends the whole first part of the film trying to tell a girl how he feels, but something always interrupts them. He vows to be more assertive, but clashes with the big boss before that can get straightened out. The usual goofy plot of mistaken identity. Bodies that appear and disappear. It's pretty silly. but entertaining if you just go along for the ride. Directed by Lewis Collins; Collins had started in silents, and moved into talkies. Died young .. a heart attack at 55. This is a Nivel Pictures/Max King Production... but I couldn't find anything on Nivel Pictures (Levin... backwards ?). Max King ony made seven films in the 1940s. not much on him either. Film showing on Moonlight Movies channel. It's pretty good. and some fun old scenery of Los Angeles.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
descent b movie
petersjoelen6 February 2024
He is a lingerie salesman who, because he is such a softie, has no success at all with the ladies who don't like him at all but who all fall for the bad gangster types.

By accident, one of the gangsters is killed by a competitor and his body is dumped in his apartment.

Now everyone thinks that the seller is a new crime boss and he is assisted by his lawyer friend who has never won a case.

One thing is certain: beautiful women fall for the wrong types, it is exaggerated here, but there is some truth in it.

Furthermore, it is an amusing comedy with a nicely playing Stuart Erwin and a stunning lady Anne Gwynne who at first doesn't want to know anything about him but (unbelievably) still falls for him at the moment supreme (oh well, there has to be a happy ending, right? ) .
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A time-passer, and that is all...
planktonrules29 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
"Killer Dill" is the one and only film made by a low-rent B-movie studio, Max M. King Productions. And considering they never released another film, you could probably assume that the public did NOT flock to theaters to see this film. While the movie isn't bad, I could understand this reaction. First, while I have never really understood the popularity of Stu Erwin in the 1930s, by the late 1940s, his popularity had long passed--making his anchoring of the film more of a deficit than a plus. Second, the basic story idea was done much better in earlier films, such as the wonderful "The Whole Town's Talking".

The film finds Erwin playing an underwear salesman in the 1920s (though, as other reviewers have pointed out, the clothes and hair of everyone looks right from the 40s). He is a bit of a wimp and sees that ladies don't like this--the rage is tough gangster-types. So, on a lark, he decides to act tough and see what happens. Through some strange series of events, he not only is noticed by the ladies but the mob...and soon he's on trial for murder! It's all totally ridiculous (with a very dumb court scene), yet it's also mildly amusing and a decent time-passer. High art? Nah...but still a pleasant little story about mistaken identity.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Cheap, cheesy and unfunny
frankfob27 August 2004
During the Prohibition era, mild-mannered underwear salesman Stu Erwin just happens to be an exact double for a notorious gangster, and winds up as the head of the local mob. Mistaken identity was a pretty hoary old plot device even for 1947, and director Lewis D. Collins does absolutely nothing new with it. Collins spent most of his career churning out cheap B westerns for the lower-rung studios and the even lower-rent independent states rights market, and it shows--the film has the raggedy, cheesy and rushed look of an ultra-cheap oater, and Collins shoots it like one: fast. There's no pacing, no build-up, no nothing, just a hurried succession of stale jokes, contrived situations and lackluster performances. Production values are almost nil--every time someone closes a door you expect to see the set come crashing down--and although it's supposed to take place during the Prohibition era of the 1920s, all the clothing and dialogue are strictly from the '40s, which makes you wonder why they bothered to set it during the 1920s in the first place. That's just one of the many downsides of this alleged "comedy". Do yourself a favor and don't bother to find out what the rest of them are. Skip this one.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Which Public Enemy Is That?
boblipton27 September 2023
Stu Erwin is the world's meekest lingerie salesman. He's successful, but idiot lawyer Frank Albertson borrows money from him and never repays it, and steals Anne Gwynne from under his hesitant nose. He is mistaken for Public Enemy 21 and made to act as the figurehead leader of a gang run by Milburn Stone.

The question of whether you'll like this movie depends on if you enjoy Erwin's parented, shy and slow character. I don't. That aside, it seems to be a decently run if not particularly original comedy with some decent comic performers, including Mike Mazurki, Dorothy Granger, and Dewey Robinson. Frank Albertson is mostly annoying.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed