Un revenant (1946) Poster

(1946)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Revenge is a dish best served cold.
brogmiller1 January 2021
Five masters of French cinema, namely René Clément, Jean Cocteau, Jean Delannoy, Julien Duvivier and Christian-Jaque, each gave the world a classic in 1946. Of these it is the one directed by Christian-Jaque that seems destined to be overlooked. Even in the context of his total output it is cruelly underrated.

Some have suggested that it is too clever for its own good but that is a moot point.

It is a beautifully crafted piece of cinema and the last thirty minutes or so represents film at its best. Arthur Honegger's haunting score and the atmospheric cinematography of Louis Page add to the film's effectiveness.

It is essentially a tale of retribution in which ballet producer Sauvage, played by Louis Jouvet, returns to Lyons in order to exact revenge on those who tried to kill him twenty years ago. His targets are rapacious businessman Jerome Nisard and his wife Genevieve. He dupes Genevieve who left him for Jerome and is trapped in an arid, loveless marriage, into believing that he still loves her. Jerome happens to be in hot water financially and is trying to arrange for his idealistic son Francois to marry the daughter of wealthy, influential parents. Sauvage sabotages this scheme by engineering a meeting between Francois and his prima ballerina, the tantalising Ludmilla Tcherina, knowing that she will probably hang him out to dry which she proceeds to do.

Good writing makes good actors even better and the cast has the advantage of brilliant, trenchant dialogue by Henri Jeanson. Jouvet is an actor touched by genius and along with his trademark air of mystery he subtly shows us the pain that motivates his actions. Francois Périer in his breakthrough role as the young Nisard captures brilliantly the emotional torment of one who loves not wisely but too well. The most touching scene is that in which the Genevieve of splendid actress Gaby Morlay is left standing on the platform watching Sauvage's train pull away knowing that with it goes her last chance of escaping her dreary existence. Jean Brochard is immaculate as Jerome and as Gonin his business colleague, Louis Seigner is always good value. One cannot fail to mention doyenne Marguerite Moreno, as imperious as ever as Francois' wily old aunt.

True cinephiles will always appreciate this film's qualities but one is mystified by its general neglect. Perhaps it is just too cynical and bleak in its portrayal of human nature. Interestingly enough it also questions whether revenge, although a natural instinct, is ever really justified or indeed gives satisfaction. As Robert Louis Stevenson observed: "Sooner or later everyone sits down to a banquet of consequences."
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hello stranger!
dbdumonteil26 January 2007
This film is another definitive proof that the FRench cinema did not begin,as too many people innocently think ,with Robert Bresson or the Nouvelle Vague.

"Un revenant" has everything: a dream of a cast where Jouvet is of course the stand-out:just hearing him speak is just a joy,his ironical vengeful voice makes this work unwatchable if it is dubbed; supporting actors are up to scratch:Gaby Morlay was probably never better as Genevieve ,a woman who accepted a compromise solution and whose life is definitely lost;Jean Brochard and Louis Seigner shine in their parts of mean bourgeois,the latter not afraid of marrying his only son with an ugly bubble head girl to assure the prosperity of his business;François Périer is the perfect romantic young lead,reading Goethe's "Werther" ,and epitomizing the youth which the fifty-something around him have never known;Ludmilla Tcherina is as competent as a gorgeous bitch as she is as a ballerina (she was a real "Danseuse Etoile de l'Opera de Paris");and last by not least,Marguerite Moreno,one of the French Monstres Sacrés ,as the rich childless auntie .

Remarkable sequences: Jean-Jacques (Jouvet),coming into his bedroom after twenty years;the same, painting a picture of the young François (Périer) as he looks at the things the boy keeps in his room; the sensational part in the opera theater ,where all the characters gather for the show,which does not really take place on stage;Geneviève looking through her opera glasses and saying goodbye to the posh despicable world she 's still part of;François looking at the whirling group of ballerinas from the flies ,and falling;The aunt 's final soliloquy when she confesses she expects nothing from the great beyond ;and more...

Henri Jeanson steeps his pen in venom and writes some of his most brilliant lines.Jouvet/Jeanson who had already worked wonders in previous movies (the most famous example being Carné's "Hotel du Nord" )team up for the very best ,under Christian-Jaque's masterful directing."Un Revenant" ,which was given four stars (out of four) in the "Dictionnaire des Films" is a must for everyone interested in the evolution of the French cinema.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Many Happy Returns
writers_reign1 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
A full decade ahead of the New Wavelet Christian Jacque, Louis Jouvet and a belle equipe were showing the Godards and Truffauts how the Big Boys do it and neither Godard nor Truffaut ever made anything even remotely as good as this and Godard never will. It all comes together like clockwork from Henri Jeanson's caustic script, written at times with a quill dipped in vitriol, to Christian Jaque's perfect direction which coaxes performances close to perfection from Louis Jouvet on down. Ludmilla Tcherina is especially effective in her very first film which gives her lots of chances to remind us that she was first and foremost a great ballerina and Francois Perier shines as the callow youth besotted with her to the point of attempted suicide. Louis Seigner was still popping up fairly regularly in films at this time (1946) and etches a standout portrait of a ruthless businessman prepared to sacrifice his son on the altar of Mammon and let us not forget Marguerite Moreno adding yet another unforgettable portrait to her gallery of grotesques. If ever a film needed a major revival it is this one. 10/10.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A man comes back...
myriamlenys24 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
A French family of rich silk manufacturers has gotten in hot water, due to careless investments. In order to save both the family fortune and the family name, it is decided that the son and heir of one of the owners will marry a rich heiress. This is not to the liking of the said son, who is a jolly, carefree lad with a romantic streak. In the middle of this domestic crisis there arrives an old friend. The man is an unwelcome reminder of an old scandal - or is it an old crime ?

Excellent movie, halfway between psychological drama and thriller. The French word "revenant" (he-who-returns) has a double meaning : it is both a playful term indicating a long-lost acquaintance who turns up unexpectedly and a far less playful term meaning a person who has come back from the dead. "Revenants" of the second type tend to be dangerous : at best they are desperate to rejoin the community of the living, at worst they harbour some kind of grudge. And indeed, the movie is about a person who desires retribution for a vicious wrong... There is some memorable acting going on, especially by protagonist Jouvet, who conveys a masterful blend of threat, charm and deep-seated anger.

The plot is intelligent ; it is also told in an intelligent way, creating a movie which is vivid, evocative and suspenseful. "Un revenant" is also quite witty. It contains a nice array of rapier-sharp portrayals, blistering observations and darkly funny scenes. (Watch the scene near the end, when a crucially important letter is burned - and then watch the use to which the flames are put, during an exchange of the most blameless and conventional politeness. That "Please do" alone is worth a monument.)

The satire is not there as an adornment, it serves a purpose, which is to identify and condemn evils human beings are prone to. One of these evils consists of an undue reverence for money, especially old and ancestral money : you get whole dynasties, reaching back for centuries, where young people are made to marry people they don't love. This is where that gruesomely distorted reasoning kicks in : yes, yes, young Sylvie (or young Nini or young Mathilde or young Marie) absolutely does not want to share the rest of her life with that person, but if she marries him she will get richer than she already is and that will make her happy ! Give this whole "crying for seven weeks" thing twenty or thirty years and then SHE will make HER children cry THEIR hearts out ! And that will make everybody happy ! Oooh, if only all families were as caring and responsible as ours... In the movie, there is a scene where someone demands respect for the silk firm, which has been around "since Restauration". Unless I'm forgetting my French history lessons, this is a period somewhere between 1815 and 1830, when the French dynasty of the Bourbons occupied the throne once again. It's a clever touch, linking the family of the silk manufacturers to a mouldering and creaking regime of dynastic kings. And yes, one can be sure that the Bourbon family tree itself contained many an inoffensive soul who was forced to marry against his or her will...

Another asset : "Un revenant" is partially set in the world of classical ballet, what with the lead character being a choreographer of some reknown. Lovers of the ballet, or of the history of the ballet, will be sure to appreciate the (fragments of) performances shown.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Disenchanted vaudeville
hubertguillaud4 February 2022
With its flashy dialogues, its mockery, Christian-Jaque's bourgeois drama could still have some assets. But this revenge remains cold, theatrical, despite its disillusioned depths. The film doesn't tip over into a detective story and almost remains an easy and disenchanted vaudeville.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed