Invisible Agent (1942) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Invisible Agent (1942) **1/2
Bunuel19768 July 2005
Of the "Invisible Man" series made by Universal, I was only familiar with the first two (both of which I'll rewatch again presently) - the James Whale original being one of my all-time favorites.

Ever since it was released as part of the "Legacy" set, I had mostly read negative opinions about this film - and even Leonard Maltin gives it a pretty low rating. However, I was very surprised by how much I enjoyed it! True, the leads are rather bland (why on earth is Ilona Massey credited before Jon Hall?!) but, then, INVISIBLE AGENT has a formidable trio of villains - Peter Lorre, Sir Cedric Hardwicke and J. Edward Bromberg - going for it (who even make Curt Siodmak's script sound better than it is). Besides, I must say that I'm a sucker for both WWII and espionage movies, so that's a big plus as well...which, I guess, means that it isn't really a horror film and that The Invisible Man is the hero! Oh well, you can't have everything!

John P. Fulton's still-impressive special effects (exposed a bit here by the extra clarity of the DVD transfer) deliver the goods and, all in all, the film made me keen to get to the remaining titles in the series.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Transparent Mission
lugonian3 February 2008
INVISIBLE AGENT (Universal, 1942), directed by Edwin L. Marin, is Universal's attempt in keeping H.G. Wells' "Invisible Man" stories in circulation by bringing them up to date, this time through the use of an original screenplay by Curtis Siodmak. Jon Hall, best known for his South Seas adventure tales with Maria Montez, might have become an unlikely candidate for the title role, but succeeds on his own merits. Though not exactly in the same league as its predecessors, especially the original 1933 classic starring Claude Rains, it's more of a propaganda film than horror, in the tradition of earlier outings as ESPIONAGE AGENT (1939) and Alfred Hitchcock's FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT (1940), both starring Joel McCrea.

The story opens in New York where foreign agents, Conrad Stauffer (Sir Cedric Hardwicke), a Nazi leader, and Baron Ikito (Peter Lorre), a Japanese, break into a printing shop run by Frank Raymond (Jon Hall), who's secretly the grandson of scientist Frank Griffin, inventor of an invisibility formula. (Is this in reference to Frank Griffin from THE INVISIBLE MAN RETURNS (1940), overlooking the fact that it was Jack Griffin from THE INVISIBLE MAN (1933), being the true inventor of that formula?) Knowing his true identity, the agents demand the formula from him. After going through the torture test that nearly causes him the loss of his fingers in a cutting machine, Frank manages to make his getaway and report the incident to John Gardiner (John Litel) of the American Embassy. When asked to relay the formula to the government, he refuses, but gives in after the bombing of Pearl Harbor that leads America into war, on the condition that he act as an invisible agent for America by spying on the Germans instead of their trained agents. Once he parachutes on enemy lines, Griffin, now invisible, follows his instructions by meeting with Arnold Schmidt (Albert Basserman), his contact, owner of a coffin shop, who secretly relays the information to England. Griffin's next assignment is to contact Maria Sorenson (Ilona Massey), Stauffer's mistress and counterspy who's under watch from Karl Heiser (J. Edward Bromberg), a Nazi officer. After finding himself trapped inside a fishing net full of hooks that leaves him helpless, Griffin accuses Maria, whom he now loves, to be his betrayer, and must somehow break free in order to acquire the secret plans revealing the Adolph Hitler's attack on New York.

Although related to the previous Invisible Man sequels, INVISIBLE AGENT is often treated as an outsider mainly because it's more of a spy vs. spy story than the science fiction/mad scientist formula. Regardless of a fine supporting cast consisting of Hardwicke as the central villain and Lorre, even more menacing, coming close to resembling the Oriental sleuth, Mr. Moto, a character he portrayed in eight film mysteries during the late 1930s, through the use of his thick glasses, the somewhat unbalanced script appears to be geared more for the juvenile audiences out to cheer for their unseen hero. Humor takes precedence over the seriousness nature of the wartime story during its 81 minutes. Top-billed Ilona Massey, who arrives late in the story, plays a Mata Hari-type mystery woman leaving audiences wondering whose side she is on. That's one of the fun parts of the movie. Her key scenes include her encounter with the invisible agent and placing cold cream on him to see his face; and her attempt in having dinner with Nazi Heiser with the unseen Griffin having the time of his life disturbing them by moving things around and driving Heisler to the point of distraction. And speaking of driving, the plot is highlighted by a well staged car chase between Griffin and the Nazis. The scene where the invisible agent, giving himself a bath, covered with soap suds, is realistically done, thanks to John P. Fulton's first-rate contribution to the special effects department that equals the credibility to his earlier technique for THE INVISIBLE MAN and THE INVISIBLE MAN RETURNS.

Formerly distributed on video cassette around the 1990s, and rarely visible on the television markets in recent years, INVISIBLE AGENT's current availability happens to be on DVD as part of its "Invisible Man" movie package. Next in the series, THE INVISIBLE MAN'S REVENGE (1944) also starring Jon Hall. (**1/2)
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better Than Expected
Prichards1234519 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Invisible Agent has had a pretty low reputation for years amongst horror fans, but that is probably to do with the type of story on display here rather than the quality of the film itself. It's a good, enjoyable adventure movie, a world away from H.G. Wells perhaps; but one only has to look at Universal's identi-kit Mummy series to realise that can only be a good thing. This is a welcome change of pace from the usual formula.

Jon Hall plays Frank Griffin, Grandson of Claude Raines' original Invisible Man (and like Lon Chaney Jr in The Wolfman about a foot taller than his progenitor!) Guardian of the secret formula for invisibility he's approached first by the Nazis and then the Allies for aid in the war effort. Guess whom he chooses? In a quite startling opening sequence the head Nazi, played by Sir Cedric Hardwicke in his usual phoned-in style, prepares to use torture to get what he wants, ably aided by Peter Lorre's sinister Japanese Baron, who wants to rid Griffin of several of his fingers...

Escaping and later Parachuting into Germany, Griffin, now invisible himself, stumbles on a plot to invade America. With the help of a double agent, the gorgeous Ilona Massey, he sets about turning the tables on Hitler's henchmen.

It's slightly curious that the film features both comic and genuinely sinister Nazis who commit torture, shoot people, break old men's fingers etc. But the only real fault is the inclusion of a comedy dinner sequence where the Invisible One mocks J.Edward Bromberg's attempts to woo Massey during a cosy meal for two. It goes on much too long and isn't funny at all.

That aside, this is a rewarding and entertaining sci-fi spy thriller, which builds to a rousing climax and is graced by John P Fulton's engaging special effects and the ever brilliant Lorre, possibly the only Hungarian who could convincingly play Japanese. A unique, immensely talented, and fascinating actor; Invisible Agent is worth seeing for him alone.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pretty good
dgeer8023 October 2004
I actually didn't even know about this film, let alone not knowing its ties to the Universal Studios' Invisible Man series. I was pleasantly surprised by this movie. Sure, it's not Claude Rains' "The Invisible Man" film, or even Vincent Price's "The Invisible Man Returns." It's not really even a horror film. But this movie had a pretty decent story.

It was about a man who is the grandson of the original Invisible Man They referred to the original as "Frank Griffen" in this story, but the original was actually named "Jack Griffen," and his brother was named Frank in "The Invisible Man Returns." Why they were inconsistent, I'm not sure. Anyhow, the grandson gets offered a fortune to sell his grandfather's secret formula to the Nazis, but refuses and goes undercover as a spy for the United States using the formula to spy on the Nazis to find out their plan of attack on the U.S. Very good plot.

With some good special effects and some great, the technical aspects of this film were at least just as good as the previous films. We even got some good warfare explosions. And the story was definitely enjoyable. So despite inconsistencies with previous Invisible Man films, this film is definitely worth a look.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Lorre and Hardwicke Steal the Show
utgard1425 February 2014
Jon Hall plays Frank Raymond, the grandson of the Invisible Man, who has changed his name from Griffin to Raymond and runs a print shop in hopes of avoiding people looking for his grandfather's formula for invisibility. When Axis agents led by the nefarious duo of Stauffer (Cedric Hardwicke) and Ikito (Peter Lorre) show up and threaten Raymond, he decides to become the Invisible Man and spy for the Allies.

The least of Universal's Invisible Man films but still enjoyable. The continuity's a little sloppy. Frank is said to be the grandson of the original Invisible Man, also named Frank Griffin. But the original was named Jack. It was his brother from The Invisible Man Returns that was named Frank. Plus the original Invisible Man died without kids, unless we're to believe his fiancée in the first movie was pregnant. Anyway, it's probably best to assume Frank Griffin took credit for his brother's discovery...or, you know, don't bother explaining it at all because it's really not that important.

Hall is fine but his character can be irritating at times. The film's worst scene is where he pranks Nazi Karl Heiser (J. Edward Bromberg). The whole scene is a juvenile attempt at laughs that fails badly. Bromberg's character is a perfect example of the movie's main flaw: the out of place comedy within the darker wartime plot. For the most part, Heiser is a joke and treated like Schultz from Hogan's Heroes. But then there are scenes where his darker side comes through that makes the comedy parts a poor fit. Ilona Massey looks great but her character seems to exist just to fall for Hall, even though he treats her pretty crappy. The climax of the movie plays like an action serial with the Nazis pursuing Hall and Massey as they try to escape by plane. What happens next I won't spoil but it's unintentionally silly.

Two characters that actually do work are the evil Stauffer and Ikito, played by Cedric Hardwicke and Peter Lorre. These two are the best part of the film, providing a real menace to the hero. Lorre's Ikito is an especially evil character. He begins the film by threatening to chop Frank's fingers off and later ingeniously (and sadistically) catches him with a net lined with fish hooks! These great actors own every scene they're in and it's worth seeing the movie just for them.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great Comedy
whpratt121 March 2008
Enjoyed this great 1942 comedy starring Jon Hall, (Frank Raymond) and Peter Lorre, (Baron Ikto) and Cedric Hardwiche, (Conrad Staffer). Frank uses his grandfather's secret formula which can make a person become invisible in order to find out secret information from Nazi Germany. It is believed that the Nazi's are going to bomb the United States and Frank is set to find out this information. Cedric Hardwicke. (Conrad Stauffer) plays the role as a Nazi officer who wants to catch the Invisible Agent and obtain his secrets. Ilona Massey, (Marie Sorenson) helps Frank Raymond who is very suspicious of her involvement in this situation. There is lots of comedy and Peter Lorre gave a great supporting role. Enjoy.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Inspired by H.G. Welles.
michaelRokeefe29 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This straight forward drama from Universal is considered a war-time propaganda piece. Another sequel following H.G. Welles' "THE INVISIBLE MAN". Jon Hall plays Frank Raymond, the grandson of the original invisible man, who volunteers his service to Axis and uses a strong formula that makes him invisible. Raymond's assignment is to invade German troops to obtain a list of German and Japanese spies doing business in America. Frank manages assistance in his task from the lovely Maria Sorenson (Iiona Massey), a German espionage agent, who is involved with two well-connected German officers.

There are elements of humor as the American spy is invisible and antagonizing Nazi officers and troops. The Third Reich is stymied trying to protect their secrets.

Other players include: Sir Cedric Hardwicke, Peter Lorre, J. Edward Bromberg, John Litel, Holmes Herbert, Mabel Colcord, Keye Luke, Albert Basserman and Milburn Stone.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Invible Man in war, with Fulton on board... but not Whale
j-cf5 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is not the James Whale's Invisible man, far from that, but it's still quite interesting on an historical point of view: America can involve ANY of "her" heroes in wars, even the psychotic one created by Wells. And besides that… it's funny! The hero is dumb (what a pitiful spy!), but this can be related to the original movie (the first Invisible man became insane because of the drug, this one becomes stupid and suspicious - kind of a "war symptom" for America… or France!). Some scenes reminded me of the Whale's movie (which had also a lot of humorous parts), like the barn scene. The directing is correct, not great (Marin is not Whale), and the editing is poor. Characters are sympathetic (the villains, anyway: Lorre and co can manage that). What gives the movie his "power" (on a low level: it's not Lubitsch's To be or not to be) is the distance taken with the story told, which is plain silly (how come a dumb like Griffin Jr Jr can make the drug by himself? And if he can't, this drug has an impressive power of conservation, having been made half a century ago!). But before all that, what keeps this kind of movie alive are the wonderful special effects created by John Fulton. The parachute scene is quite impressive, and so is the cream scene. An enjoyable movie, representative of the Universal's evolution at that time, when the studio capitalized on the "addition principle" (pardon me for my poor English): since we are in war and since Frankenstein can meet the werewolf, why couldn't the Invisible man fight the Gestapo? After all, Nazis were way much scary than any Universal monster… because they were real (nevertheless, America ignored the horrors of concentration-camps at that time, that's why Nazis could still be funny in the movies). A regret anyway: where the hell are Claude Rains and his incredible voice?
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Entertaining but flawed WWII Hooey
pjmuck16 July 2003
Like most American war propaganda films, this film probably presented the perfect propaganda needed at the time to rally a nation, but viewing it today it manages to make the allied forces (and most specifically Americans) look like racist ignorant buffoons in the process. It makes no excuses for it's blatant propaganda messages and obvious opinions of the German or Japanese ("I can't tell you people apart", to quote one of Hall's lines), nor does it even attempt to understand their cultures (Hari Kari, for example, is grossly misunderstood and misrepresented in this film). But I won't argue the issue, because, after all, it's only a movie, and America needed their villians clearly cut and defined to swallow the bitter pill of war.

But honestly, how inept is our "hero" in this film? He's supposed to be on a serious mission to thwart an air raid on New York city (I consider that pretty serious), yet the minute he touches ground on German soil he takes great risks in exposing himself by opting to make his presence known by playing pranks rather than staying low and "out of sight". He frequently jeopardizes the success of the mission because he can't resist grabbing a chicken leg or a glass of wine while in the company of the Gestapo, or falling asleep in facial makeup. And while it makes for some entertaining scenes that utilize the invisible effects, his behavior is completely implausible and downright ridiculous. Think of how easy his mission would have been had he just quietly moved about and retrieved the info he needed without bringing attention to himself. (But that doesn't make for a very entertaining movie, now does it?).

If I were the Maria Sorenson character in this film, I would have kicked him in his unmentionables.
15 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good movie that could have been even better
mgconlan-128 October 2008
"Invisible Agent" was one of the few Universal "series" horror films I hadn't seen until now. It's basically a good concept for a film — turning the Invisible Man loose on the Axis and a formidable set of German and Japanese villains including Sir Cedric Hardwicke (just as despicable here as he was in "The Invisible Man Returns"), Peter Lorre (who just about steals the entire show) and Keye Luke. Lorre doesn't wear any "slant-eye" makeup to turn himself Asian, but he hadn't as Mr. Moto either and he's just as believable here. Still, there are a number of missed opportunities in this movie. Why is Jon Hall's character depicted as the grandson, not the son or nephew, of the original Invisible Man? (That would have made sense if the 1933 film had been set in the 1890's, when H. G. Wells wrote the source novel, but it wasn't.) More importantly, why did Curt Siodmak omit the key plot device that the invisibility formula turned its user into a raving megalomaniac as a side effect? One could readily imagine the Nazis trying to recruit the Invisible Agent to their side as the drug took hold of him and he started sounding like them! Still, it's a fun movie and Ilona Massey's character is appropriately morally ambiguous -- though she must have wondered about the direction of her career: she'd been brought over to the U.S. by MGM in 1939 to replace Jeanette MacDonald as Nelson Eddy's co-star in the elaborate operetta film "Balalaika," but just three years later here she was at Universal making movies like this and "Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man."
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Peter Lorre steals show in Agent
mike196411 August 2001
This is a very entertaining film, but I like it so much because Peter Lorre plays a Japanese character. Early in the film, Lorre is magnificent as he prepares to get Griffin (Jon Hall) to talk! Cedric Hardwicke is also very good as the Nazi ring leader.

I avoided this film for years, because I thought it was strictly a war movie with some Sci Fi overtones. My mistake. Very good Universal picture and belongs beside the other classics from Universal in the 1940's.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Wrong Agent Was Invisible
CommandoCody26 January 2003
Frank Raymond (Jon Hall), grandson of the original Invisible Man, still has the old family formula but won't allow anyone to use it, even though World War II is looming on the horizon. After an unfriendly visit by Axis agents (Sir Cedric Hardwicke and Peter Lorre) and the attack on Pearl Harbor Raymond comes to his senses. He offers the Allies the use of the formula but insists that no one uses it but him. After all, the drug is dangerous but it's never really explained why. Allied Command somehow agrees to go along with this dumb idea. Apparently, it never occurred to them that something might happen to Raymond. If so, what would then become of the drug?

Raymond becomes a phantom commando with a heavy boot for Nazi rears. He parachutes into Germany (an amusing scene). He's supposed to meet with a couple of people and steal vital information. Instead, Raymond spends time wooing the beautiful German double agent he's assigned to work with (Ilona Massey) and playing puerile pranks on an overweight Nazi with an undersized brain. Ultimately, Raymond saves the day by thwarting a far-fetched plot to attack New York.

Despite its faults, this was probably just the ticket for uplifting the morale of American audiences in dark, early days of the war. Sir Cedric Hardwicke and Peter Lorre steal the movie as a Gestapo official and Japanese spymaster, respectively. Their performances are much better than this lighthearted film deserves. I laughed most over Raymond's confrontation with and escape from Hardwicke and his mindless minions at Gestapo headquarters. Still, it bothered me that Ms Massey's character wasn't selected to become to become the Invisible Agent. She was well placed, well trained as a spy, and highly motivated. She knew all the right people, who had access to the right information, and demonstrated cool under fire. Most important of all, she was a lot smarter than Raymond. If she was invisible, I'm sure the war in Europe would have ended much sooner!
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Irresistible, goofy, action-packed sci-fi wartime comedy/drama: spoilers ahead!
WoodrowTruesmith24 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I love this movie more every time I see it. Sure, there are little gaffes (they get original Invisible Man Jack Griffin's name wrong, and Jon Hall's teeth show up when only his skin is supposed to be visible with cold cream) and there's a regrettable, dated crack about how "Japs all look alike" (especially ironic since Hungarian Peter Lorre looks nothing like Keye Luke (who was Chinese) nor any Japanese you ever met) but in the main, it's one of Universal's best wartime efforts, with some terrific John P. Fulton invisibility tricks.

Curtis (Curt) Siodmak's script is surprising, funny and even scary (Lorre and that guillotine paper cutter!) and it moves like lightning. Betrayal is a constant theme, with witty commentary on the treacherous relationship of the Axis "partners" and the mutual backstabbing by the two Nazis played by Cedric Hardwicke and J. Edward Bromberg. ("I pity the Devil when you boys start showing up in bunches," cracks the hero.)

The invisibility drug still seems to lead to some kind of madness (its users often have to be "liquidated", per Hardwicke) but apparently the insanity is not as severe as that suffered by Claude Rains or Vincent Price in the previous entries. It makes hero Frank Raymond (née Griffin) both manic and reckless, as well as extremely suspicious of Ilona Massey, an irresistible Mata Hari-type in that negligee...!

Siodmak pulls out all the stops for the remarkably violent climax, with a prison break, a nasty fish-hook trap, a Nazi-Japanese brawl, all the villains getting machine-gunned or stabbed or self-disemboweled, a car chase, an air field set ablaze and then bombed, and that parachute escape from the crashing plane...man, wartime audiences must have cheered this thing!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The Invisible Man in Self-Contradictory Wartime Propaganda
Cineanalyst3 October 2018
The fourth entry in Universal's multi-picture deal of works inspired by the novel by H.G. Wells, "Invisible Agent" may be the worst of the bunch (the next, "The Invisible Man's Revenge" (1944) is a mess, too). It's bad enough that it adulterates "The Invisible Man" story into rah-rah propaganda, but it's also incredibly stupid about it, to the point of having contradictory effects. Sure, Karl Heiser seems like he's auditioning a generation too early for Sergeant Schultz in the "Hogan's Heroes" TV series, and the Nazi minions are pushed around by the Invisible Agent like they're the Keystone Kops. None of it's funny, even though it was intended to be, but that's hardly the biggest problem. Worse is that the hero, the Invisible Agent, is arguably more boorish, incompetent and racist than the buffoonish Nazis in the picture.

Frank Raymond, the descendant of Jack Griffin, the original Invisible Man of the book and the 1933 film of the same name, agrees to become invisible to aid the Allies cause in WWII. Once transparent, the first thing he does is get incredibly lucky that the Nazis didn't shoot him in his parachute because they were dumbfounded by his disappearing act. Next, instead of going about quiet espionage for vital information, he knocks Heiser about, alerting the Germans and the Japanese agents to his presence in Germany. Besides jeopardizing a mission that was supposed to retrieve intelligence on a large-scale upcoming attack on the United States, Frank also puts fellow agent Maria's safety at risk. Oblivious, he also falls into the trap of Nazi Conrad Stauffer, and fortunate for Frank, the Nazi's slight display of superior intelligence is no match for Frank's fists--again. Later, Frank again puts Maria's life in danger, as well as that of the old man, another spy for the Allies, who has his hands broken and is never rescued due to the egregious incompetence of Frank who makes a sleazy phone call to Maria, who he by now has the hots for (he even watches her undress, whistles at her and surprises her with a kiss while he's invisible). But, never mind, at least Frank never seems to mind the fate of the old man for the rest of the picture. Nope, instead, he blames Maria of being a double agent! Then, gets himself caught by the Japanese. Despite his unfounded suspicions, Frank rescues Maria for her ability to fly a Nazi plane to England. Again, he's extraordinarily lucky that not one of the dumbfounded Nazis fires upon him as he carries the seemingly-flying Maria to the plane they confiscate and, again, is fortunate that they receive cloud cover as they're fired upon by anti-aircraft weapons.

Besides being incredibly reckless and stupid, Frank also displays his racism from a relatively mild crack about the German way of thinking to the textbook racist comment, "I can't tell you Japs apart." Which is especially ludicrous given that the Austro-Hungarian-born Peter Lorre, seemingly preparing for his future Mr. Moto role, plays the main Japanese antagonist. At first, I assumed he was playing a German. Moreover, with Frank's creepy behavior and unjustified suspicions towards Maria, her comment about women being treated like dogs by the Nazis rings hollow.

None of this is to say that making a mockery of Nazis couldn't be both effective ideologically and artistically. Charlie Chaplin did it in "The Great Dictator" (1940), and Ernst Lubitsch did it earlier in 1942 with "To Be or Not to Be," to name two of the earliest and most successful examples. "Invisible Agent," on the other hand, undermines its own propaganda with the stupidity of its hero and the unevenness of its comedic treatment. Jon Hall is also a pitiful successor to the Invisible Men of Claude Rains and Vincent Price, or, heck, even Virginia Bruce in the surprisingly funny "The Invisible Woman" (1940). Although there was some potential to this scenario, it seems that writer Curt Siodmak, who himself escaped Nazi Germany, didn't have a good sense for comedy. "Invisible Agent" probably would've worked better had he stuck to the procedural elements and detective plots that were effective in his other Universal horror films such as the "The Invisible Man Returns" (1940) and "The Wolf Man" (1941).

The one thing this and most transparent man films have going for them are the visual effects. For the third time, John P. Fulton received an Oscar nomination for his traveling matte work on one of Universal's invisibility films, and he surely would've received another had the category existed at the time of the original "The Invisible Man" (1933). For "Invisible Agent," Fulton portrayed the usual gimmicks for drinking and smoking, as well as those involving clothes, but he also showed the Invisible Man taking a bath and applying cold cream to his face, which with a towel and shades, restore part of his appearance.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What A Cool Movie!
stagemom-218 September 1999
Wow, this movie is a perfect blend of intrigue, comedy and action, and it's done with quite a bit of flair too. Definitely corny at times, but that's part of the fun. As is the case with all Universal Horror pics from 1930-45, this chiller is incredibly moody and atmospheric. 8/10. Watch it with the lights off.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Silly, but not half bad
Woodyanders11 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Frank Raymond (likeable Jon Hall), who's the grandson of the invisible man, uses his grandfather's invisibility formula so he can sneak into Germany as an undercover spy in order to thwart the Nazis and romance beautiful female double agent Maria Sorenson (the charming and elegant Ilona Massey).

Although director Edward L. Marin relates the inane, but still enjoyable story at a snappy pace and maintains an amiable lighthearted tone, he alas overdoes the goofy slapstick humor, with the portrayal of the Nazis as bumbling buffoons coming across as both annoying and embarrassing. The special effects are strictly hit or miss: The invisibility stuff holds up pretty well while the painfully obvious miniature planes leave a lot to be desired. Fortunately, there's a trio of excellent villains who ensure that this movie remains watchable: Peter Lorre as oily Japanese weasel Baron Ikito, Cedric Hardwicke as the smoothly sinister Conrad Stauffer, and J. Edward Bromberg as the smarmy Karl Heiser. A pleasant diversion.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
good, from a story by H.G. Wells
blanche-223 August 2019
Jon Hall is an "Invisible Agent" in this 1942 films, from a story by H.G. Wells. The film also stars Ilona Massey, Peter Lorre, J. Edward Bromberg, and Sir Cedric Hardwicke. Wells was also responsible for the "Invisible Man" series from Universal.

During WW II, Frank Raymond (Hall) injects himself with a serum, invented by his grandfather, that renders him invisible. He parachutes into Germany on behalf of the Americans. He goes to the home of a well-connected woman (Massey) and listens in on her dinner conversation with a Reich member (Bromberg).

Raymond has a little too much fun ruining the meal, and it doesn't take a Germans after the formula, led by Conrad Stauffer (Hardwicke) to hear his story and realize the Invisible Agent is in their midst. Raymond, however, is not easy to catch and causes plenty of chaos.

Fun movie with fun effects. Too bad handsome Jon Hall was invisible for most of the film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Briskly efficient thriller
Leofwine_draca1 May 2022
INVISIBLE AGENT (1942) is the penultimate instalment of Universal's "invisible" series, this time taking a timely segue into WW2 espionage territory. Our hero, Jon Hall, plays a sap hired by the American forces to parachute into Nazi Germany and use his invisible status to steal some top-secret documents. He has a female German to help, but unfortunately the Nazis are soon onto him...

It's a brisk little effort that I rather enjoyed, with the different backdrop and scenario adding freshness to the franchise. The bad guys are well supported with Cedric Hardwicke particularly sinister, and Peter Lorre is a delight as a slimy Japanese (!) villain with a fine line in judo moves. Our hero is pretty dumb at times risking exposure for booze and chicken - but the FX are typically ingenious and there's a fiery set-piece that works really nicely, plus a quite lavish action climax to enjoy.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Universal Monster goes to War
davidmvining20 October 2022
The Invisible Man franchise seems to be the most malleable of the Universal Monsters. Frankenstein is about a specific set of ideas. Dracula is about a specific character and type of horror. The Mummy is built around setting. The Invisible Man, however, is built around a concept. It can be used for comedy like in The Invisible Woman or a revenge tale like The Invisible Man Returns or psychological terror like in the original film. The idea of using the concept in a wartime thriller feels like a great way to use the concept in a new way. It's not great at it, struggling to get our characters into the right place to get the action moving, but once it's there, it uses the concept quite well.

Frank Griffin (Jon Hall) is the grandson of the original invisible man and has a vial of the serum hidden away as he leads a life as a small printer under another name when some German agents led by Conrad Stauffer (Cedric Hardwicke) and accompanied by the Japanese agent Baron Ikito (Peter Lorre). Griffin gets away, runs to the US government, and promises his services with the invisibility serum after the outbreak of war. They decide to send him into Germany to figure out the secret date of Hitler's plan to attack America. This grandiose plan that Griffin gets sent into is silly, and I really think the film would have been helped with something smaller and more focused, like he needs to find the location of an ammunitions manufacturing plant, or the identity of a spy the Department of War believes is in their ranks (this probably wouldn't have gone over well with the DOW in 1942, so scratch that).

The effort to get Frank into Germany involves a drop from a plane with him turning invisible during the drop while the Germans on the ground watch the man disappear. This doesn't make strategic sense (drop him away from the lights and don't make a demonstration of the invisibility in front of the enemy), but it's an excuse for special effects, and it's at least good special effects. He meets the local contact who sends him to Maria (Ilona Massey), a woman with close ties to the upper echelon of the Gestapo. This is where the film firmly becomes a comedy in the vein of The Invisible Woman with Frank making a fool of Karl Heiser (J. Edward Bromberg), a high-ranking member of the Gestapo who has romantic desires regarding Maria. It's decent comedy with overall pretty strong special effects (certainly better than the extremely obvious wires evident in The Invisible Woman), but it's not really the promise I expected from a spy adventure in this franchise.

It was about this time that I got up to make some popcorn, and I played out the rest of the film in my head. It was just going to be lightly comedic spy fun. When I got back and pushed play again, though, the film actually moved in the direction that I had been hoping for. That happened with the reappearance of Stauffer. The comedic in nature Heiser is suddenly pushed aside for the more focused and cruel Stauffer who figures out that the invisible man is around and that it's Frank Griffin just by talking with Heiser for a few minutes. It becomes a cat and mouse game between the two. It's limited to a handful of sets (Universal was not putting a lot of money into these movies anymore), but it's effective.

It really evolves into a tense game of wits that actually ends up having three sides when Baron Ikito manages to capture Frank to use him for Japan's purposes, essentially turning on his allies. It's a ratcheting up of tension and stakes that works in the film's favor. It also allows Frank to use his invisibility in a spy context, which is well done.

The film ends on a happy note, which feels off and I would have probably preferred an outright propaganda ending like in Man Hunt (not that it would have been great). My ideal ending would have included the madness of the serum that gets addressed early and never mentioned again, with Frank perhaps losing his mind on the way to deliver the information he's gathered. Maybe an open-ended finale where it's questionable whether he can actually get there in time before he completely loses it? Just a nice ending where the guy and the girl end up together just feels wrong.

Still, as an overall package, Invisible Agent works through a light and cluttered opening to deliver some pretty solid spy stuff later that fully utilizes the concept of an invisible man as well as delivering some quality special effects. The direction by Edwin Marin is mostly centered around the special effects, and that's handled well, while the script by Curt Siodmak is far more effective than his previous work on The Invisible Man Returns. It's a nice move in an interesting direction after the dull repetition of The Ghost of Frankenstein.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
It's Not Easy Dealing With An Invisible Agent
bkoganbing19 November 2007
When a bunch of Nazis come calling on Jon Hall at his print shop in New York City, they seem to know all about him and the background he has tried to hide. Seems as though an ancestor of his was none other than Claude Rains who as John Griffin invented that invisibility formula that had the entire United Kingdom on edge. Hall barely escapes from the agents who include Cedric Hardwicke for the Nazis and Peter Lorre as a visiting ally from Japan.

Right after Pearl Harbor like Wonder Woman, Hall decides his talents are best put to use in the Allied Cause. His condition is that he alone will be given the invisibility drug, mindful of the bad side effects it has including causing the madness that killed Claude Rains back in the day.

Hall finds out some vital information, like the day the Axis is going to invade the USA and who their agents are in America. He has the help of the beautiful Ilona Massey, but he's not quite sure what side of the fence she's playing.

The Nazis are stupid, even more stupid than usual in these films, but they've also got a lot of intrigues going among each other, between Cedric Hardwicke and J. Edward Bromberg to see who will be top dog under Himmler in the S.S. And Peter Lorre does not think terribly much of German efficiency and with these two around who could blame him. Maybe the Japanese ought to gain the secret of invisibility and they might be calling the tune in the Axis.

It all makes for one horrific wartime propaganda flick that would be hooted off the screen by some and would offend others. Peter Lorre who was Jewish Hungarian, gets to do his Mr. Moto act with malevolence saying such things as you occidentals have this really big fetish about your white women and Hall coming back that he can't tell any of you monkeys apart.

To be fare to Hardwicke, Lorre, and Bromberg, it's not easy dealing with an invisible man. Too bad they were at war with the British or they could find out how Claude Rains ultimately met his end.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Almost Worth Seeing
Lebowskidoo2 July 2020
Using the invisibility formula to spy during wartime is a great premise, but it's pretty blandly put together. There's also continuity issues that seem really unnecessary and just ignorant. I mean, it's your own movie franchise and even you cannot get the names right?

It all begins in a promising way, with Peter Lorre being all creepy/sinister, but then it plays it too safe and wants to be comedic at the same time. It's watchable, but could have offered a lot more.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
At 6.0, this film is horribly overrated
planktonrules20 March 2009
I wonder why this film has a 6.0 rating on IMDb. Is it possible people saw this bad film and actually thought it was good?! The world is a strange place, indeed.

Now I started watching this film strongly predisposed to liking it. After all, I adore the Universal horror films of the 30s and 40s and the Invisible Man series is among the best. Plus, the idea of the Allies using the invisibility formula to infiltrate Nazi territory to do some spying is an inspired plot idea. Yet, almost miraculously, the Universal folks produced a very bad film.

Most of the problem is that unlike most other horror films of the time, this one was very often played for laughs. Considering that the guy is supposed to get important information and get out, his sticking around to play tricks on the incredibly stupid Nazis was really dumb--and not in a good way! Plus, after a while, it was obvious that there was an invisible guy running about--talk about a great way to maintain your cover! Additionally, instead of the usual conniving and evil Nazis like you'd see in an American wartime propaganda film, here they are complete morons--almost like what you'd see in a Three Stooges film. If it were a Stooges film that would be great...but not in a horror film. Making it a straight drama would have improved the film tremendously.

Additionally, it's obvious Universal simply didn't care when they made this film. Even for a B-movie, it is cheap and has a slapped together look. The models used for airplanes for the film were pathetically unrealistic and it was obvious they were bad models. Also, having Peter Lorre (whose heritage in reality was German) playing a Japanese man was ridiculous. In fact, it wasn't until later in the film that you even realized he was supposed to be Japanese! Now I understand that Lorre played the lead in the Mr. Moto films (where he was supposed to be Japanese), but here he didn't even try to look or sound Asian. Mantan Moreland would have been just as fitting an actor to play this role. Finally, throw in an unimportant and ridiculous love story that comes out of no where and you have the ingredients for a truly awful film.

Exceptionally poor writing, indifferent direction and actors who couldn't have possibly made this material work and you have INVISIBLE AGENT in a nut shell. Don't say I didn't warn you! Fortunately, the next film in the series (THE INVISIBLE MAN'S REVENGE) is quite a bit better.
8 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Massey is snazzy, Hall has a ball
JohnHowardReid17 November 2006
Another really big-budget sequel to the original Invisible Man, this one has a screenplay that's witty yet adventurous and packed with hair's-breadth escapes. It also provides great opportunities for some of our favorite character players including a delightful trio of treacherous heavies: Peter Lorre, J. Edward Bromberg and Sir Cedric Hardwicke. It's also good to see the lovely Ilona Massey, who made only eleven Hollywood movies between 1937 and 1960 (this is the fifth), though it's disappointing that she doesn't get to sing. Never mind, she does wear some really lovely gowns. Jon Hall is personable enough as the reluctant hero, though he fails to handle the switch in his feelings towards the heroine with complete conviction.

Marin's direction is admirably fast-paced (we suspect producer Frank Lloyd took a hand in the action sequences) and other credits, including Lester White's attractive photography, are equally outstanding. Special effects fans will not go away unhappy either.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
To the Point!
pinballwizard-5363917 November 2020
An enjoyable continuation of the Invisible Man story, this time finding the grandson is possession of the secret invisible formula. The Nazi's want it and they aren't gonna get it...or are they?

A good movie with a few twists and turns. Some twists a bit better than some of the turns (Peter Lorre playing a Japanese...again...ugh). Ilona Massey is easy to watch in all her scenes.

Plenty of Hitler salutes and off-color remarks about Japanese to make a viewer think "did he just say that?...damn!".

Some bright spots are the camera work Nd the models made up and put to good use for good special effects. The movie clocks in at about 80m or so and that was just about the perfect timing.

6 stars
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Interesting idea, not so great execution
kingofdanerds7 June 2022
Universal decided to keep the Invisible Man train going and so in 1942, we got Invisible Agent which was directed by Edwin L. Marin (Bombay Mail, Paris Calling, and The Sweetheart of Sigma Chi) and stars Ilona Massey (Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man, International Lady, and Balalaika), Jon Hall (The Invisible Man's Revenge, Arabian Nights, and The Hurricane), Peter Lorre (M, Casablanca, and The Maltese Falcon), and Cedric Hardwicke (The Invisible Man Returns, The War of the Worlds, and The Ten Commandments). The film proved to be a huge financial success upon release.

Frank Griffin, who is either the grandson or nephew of the inventor of the invisibility serum, volunteers to become a spy for the United States. His mission is to be invisible and go to Nazi Germany and search for information on what the Nazis are up to.

Universal put out another Invisible Man film that is not really that interesting to watch. Invisible Agent has a promising plot seeing that this film was a World War II film released during the time of World War II. The idea of what would happen if the knowledge of the invisibility serum got around to the Nazis is a promising enough idea. But what we get is the same antics as before with the Invisible Agent going around and playing pranks on the Nazis rather than being an ominous invisible being. In fact, this film would have been better off making the Invisible Agent visible because despite being invisible, the agent makes himself very well known to the Nazis that he is there. This loses any sort of tension that is an important aspect to have in an espionage film and again, the pieces for something great was there, but the opportunity was sorely missed. The film does try to connect to the original film by making the main character a relative of the original Invisible Man but even they goof it up. They literally say in the film that he is either the nephew or grandson of Frank Griffin even though the original invisible man was named Jack Griffin. So even something so simple as getting a single string of continuity was messed up. The special effects are probably at their weakest here in this film though still impressive all around. There is a particular scene where the Invisible Agent's eyes and teeth are visible a couple of times and this is the first instance that I found this to be apparent within this series. The acting is nothing to write home about. My big complaint is actually Peter Lorre who is an Austrian-Hungarian American playing a Japanese man. Sure, it might have been acceptable back then, but I mean come on now. It even took me way longer than it should to have realized that Peter Lorre's character was Japanese because the film decides to make that apparent in the last half of the movie.

Invisible Agent had an interesting story premise but was rendered completely uninteresting. It's one of those films I'll probably forget about in a week's time.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed