Unholy Partners (1941) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Brisk newspaper potboiler shows roughhouse origins of The fourth Estate
bmacv15 July 2003
This fleet and raffish newspaper melodrama was released the same year as Citizen Kane and in its far more modest way is almost as much fun. Like Kane (and dozens of ‘30s potboilers before it, most churned out by ink-stained wretches come west for a piece of the Hollywood action), it's a cautionary reminder of the roughhouse beginnings of the Fourth Estate.

Reporter Edward G. Robinson, overseas winning The Great War, started a peppy servicemen's paper The Doughboy. When he returns to New York, he wants to run the same sort of rag – a tabloid for the straphangers. `The war's done things to people,' he tells his old-school editor. `We've made life cheap. and that makes emotions cheap...There's no privacy left...Keyholes are to look through.'

But getting start-up money proves hard, and he ends up striking a bargain with big-time gangster Edward Arnold, who'll stay the silent partner. But when Robinson's let-the-chips-fall-where-they-may style threatens Arnold's interests, the partners become adversaries. `What people want to put in papers is advertising,' Robinson lectures Arnold. `What they want to keep out is news.' After Arnold tries to strong-arm his way into control of the paper, Robinson vows to put him out of business.

LeRoy was an old hand at filming quick-and-dirty dramas that rested, however lightly, on timely social issues. So he predictably does as well (if not a mite better) as he did a decade earlier with Robinson in Five Star Final. Other players include Laraine Day, Marsha Hunt and William T. Orr, but Robinson and Arnold dominate, as they should. The story takes a clumsy and fanciful turn or two near the end (with Robinson suddenly delivering a reverent paean to the press at odds with everything he stood for), though even these twists echo big stories of the roaring ‘20s. The closing sentiment of Unholy Partners, however, is a dubious one: That the `tabloid age is over.' A pass through the supermarket checkout aisle or a few clicks of the television remote show how laughable that prediction was.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Tough Movie: STOP Gritty Story: STOP Unsentimental Heart: STOP
Svengali-20016 February 2003
This film is not perfect, but it is gritty enough to be real, in the style that is more in keeping with films of the later 40s. The two Edwards play well off each other, and it is a shame that they didn't make more films together. Although it was not a strong film for the female cast, it did give Laraine Day and Marsha Hunt some scope to show they were more than the dolly-birds that many directors took them to be. Call me superstitious, but three of the main cast were born in 1917 and all 3 lived to 2002, with the two lasses still going strong. Perhaps it is a sign that the director chose some strong actors to make this film hum along effectively. As to its portrayal of the paper business, it is highly contemporary in its grasp of how media men prefer to make the news than report it. The very fact that Miss Hunt and her husband, Robert Presnell were allegedly blacklisted for their communist (for this read, Liberal) sympathies in the 1950s is an ironical grasp of the power of the press over any idea of truth or talent over power and influence. Mervyn LeRoy remains an icon of morally strong, but unsentimental film-making in what is often a candy-coated world. 9 Stars.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
newspaper drama
blanche-217 July 2013
I was interested in this film for two reasons - I like Edward G. Robinson very much, and just last year, I saw Marsha Hunt at Paramount's 100th anniversary party, 95 years old, with all her marbles, looking marvelous. It is wonderful to see her here, at the age of 23.

Unholy Partners takes place after World War I, when a newspaper man, Bruce Corey (Robinson) returns from the conflict - but not to his old reporting job. He wants to start a different kind of newspaper -- more of a tabloid, something people can fold over and read easily in the subway. But he doesn't have the money. He approaches a crooked gambler, Merritt Lambert (Edward Arnold) and wins the $250,000 from him that he needs, making them partners. Corey starts the paper along with his secretary (Laraine Day) and an assistant, Tommy (William T. Orr). Conflicts arise when Lambert objects to the investigation of certain stories that involve him.

This is a good film, somewhat melodramatic, with a pretty Hunt singing "After You've Gone" - she had a wonderful voice - as she plays Gail Fenton, who is dating Lambert, but has drawn the interest of Corey's assistant (Orr). If you baby boomers will think back, you may remember that at the end of every TV series produced by Warner Brothers there was the name Wm. T. Orr - Orr became a very successful executive producer. Robinson, Arnold, Day, and Orr are all very good.

This film came out around the same time as Citizen Kane so probably got lost in the shuffle, not that it's anywhere near as good. The interesting thing is they talk about the end of tabloid era. Little did they know that we're still in it, worse than ever.

The paper Corey starts, The New York Mercury, was based on the newspaper The New York Mirror. One of the reviews mentions reading the Sunday funnies. I did too. It was a fun paper.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
In the Shadows of Charles Foster Kane
theowinthrop12 April 2004
I saw this movie over twenty years ago, but it remains somewhat more memorable for the speed and sureness of it's directing and acting, particularly the dynamite pairing (I believe the only time it happened) of Robinson and Arnold. Theirs, as it turns out, is an unholy partnership, with Arnold slowly realizing that his control of a major newspaper would give his criminal economic power a tremendous boost, and Robinson slowly realizing the responsibility of a newspaper is more than just ballyhoo and gossip (would that a certain current newspaper tycoon would learn this - but he won't). Inevitably the partnership ends violently, with Robinson left in a very, very peculiar position of knowing too well who killed his partner.

Unfortunately, Mervyn LeRoy's film was smothered in 1941 by Orson Welles' first masterpiece (and greatest film?) CITIZEN KANE. But though Kane does show how a newspaper empire is built (and almost lost) by Kane, that film is actually a look at a flawed "great man", and the problem of how people remember the man's actions. This space is not adequate to go into the plot of KANE (or it's technical brilliance), but one should only note that Charles Foster Kane's ego also involves grasping at a political career aimed at the White House, marrying two women (and losing both of their love for him), building an opera house and failing to control public views on culture, and building a modern version of a pyramid as a final monument to that ego. The many sides of the character of Charley Kane keep our attention with repeated viewings, but such a depth is not found in LeRoy's film. This does not dismiss the LeRoy film as a failure, but relegates it to an entertaining movie only.

The interesting thing is that UNHOLY PARTNERS has (like KANE) a basis in fact. KANE is based (whether Welles admitted it or not) on the life of William Randolph Hearst, with his political interests and his social pretensions. And yes, Susan Alexander is a nasty swipe at poor Marion Davies. But in UNHOLY PARTNERS, the newspaper is based on THE NEW YORK MIRROR, a tabloid that popped up in the 1920s, and lasted into the 1960s (I remember reading it's Sunday comic sections in my first eight years). The newspaper was edited by Phillip Payne, who loved spreading scandalous stories to sell his paper. He also enjoyed ballyhoo - stories about aviators, channel swimmers, murder cases, baseball and football stars, actors and actresses - you did not read THE MIRROR to get an intelligent political viewpoint. He is not known for having any criminal partner, but the Arnold character is clearly based on Arnold Rothstein, the man who fixed the 1919 World Series, and was known as "the big bankroll" being the contact man between Wall Street and the underworld. In 1928 Rothstein was shot to death in a hotel elevator, and the crime was never solved. That same year, like Robinson's character, Payne was killed when a plane he was flying across the Atlantic crashed into it.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not A Partnership That Can Last
bkoganbing13 October 2010
Fresh from World War I, Edward G. Robinson has all kinds of new ideas about his chosen profession of journalism. But his old newspaper won't see things his way. Not discouraged, but needing cash he gets it from Edward Arnold a gangster with whom he becomes Unholy Partners with.

Although Arnold is at first a silent partner and gives Robinson a free hand with the paper, it's not a partnership that in any way can last. Robinson, and more particularly reporter William T. Orr, starts looking into the activities of Arnold's friends and later Arnold. And then Orr becomes interested in Laraine Day who is a nightclub singer that Arnold has taken a kind of lease out on.

The whole film builds toward the inevitable showdown of Arnold and Robinson and the two really dominate the film, the other players barely getting any innings in their performances. Arnold is a very careful man in maintaining a respectable front and he sees the possibilities in controlling a large media outlet. Not unlike that other Arnold film character from 1941, D.B. Norton from Meet John Doe.

Charles Dingle who is a favorite character actor of mine is in Unholy Partners. But he's in a very subdued role who Arnold has under his thumb by controlling Dingle's gambling debts. Dingle's not at all the arrogant and pompous man he usually plays. And I miss that.

Robinson and Arnold make quite a good pair of matched adversaries. Unholy Partners showed they should have done more work together.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"You don't care whose face you kick on your way up the ladder."
utgard1420 October 2016
Edward G. Robinson plays a newspaperman who comes home from World War I with a plan to launch a tabloid newspaper. The problem is he can't find financial backing from any reputable businessmen, so he gets it from racketeer Edward Arnold. Which is fine, at first, until Robinson starts running stories that tick Arnold off.

Enjoyable crime drama from MGM with solid turns from the two Edwards playing characters that aren't so nice. Kind of funny that the protagonist in this is less likable than the villain!. They always tried to give Eddie G. young love interests and in this one it's Laraine Day, who wasn't even born when WWI ended. She's fine but miscast as one could never see her being into Robinson and, frankly, she's at least a decade younger than she should have been. Really I'm not sure why it was necessary to set the film in the post-WWI years, especially when they don't try very hard to capture that era. Many of the hairstyles and clothing are of the 1940s not 1920s. The movie also features a banal "young lovers" subplot. William T. Orr plays the guy and he is nothing special. Lovely Marsha Hunt plays the girl and she gets to sing, which is nice, but other than that also nothing special. Despite some issues, there's no way a movie starring Edward G. Robinson and Edward Arnold could be a total misfire. The movie is most interesting when these two are on screen together. Give it a look for the Eddies.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Excellent until the finale.
planktonrules29 June 2019
Up until the last few minutes of "Unholy Partners", I really enjoyed the picture and might have scored this one an 8. However, the ending was illogical, anticlimactic and just plain bad....undoing so much of the good in the movie.

The film begins with Bruce Corey (Edward G. Robinson) returning from duty in WWI. He's once again welcomed back to the old newspaper that he edited but he really doesn't want this job...he wants to start his own paper. Unfortunately, financing it seems impossible until Corey makes a 'deal with the Devil'....he gets a notorious gambler named Lambert (Edward Arnold) to put up the money and be his silent partner. However, this partnership is a disaster, as Lambert wants Corey to use the paper to advance his crooked agenda....and Corey begins attacking Lambert in his paper! Sooner or later, you think that Corey is going to get his head blown off, as Lambert is no stranger to using the rough stuff! What's to become of this unholy alliance?

The acting and writing for this one were both excellent. And, this is what makes the finale so inexplicably bad. The film didn't know when to end the story and it took a simple case of self-defense and twisted it so badly that the audience was bound to feel cheated by the story. It's a real shame....though the film still is watchable.

By the way, in an unintentionally funny scene, Lambert gives Corey the money for the paper....$300,000. Well, the stack of bills for such a huge transaction would have easily filled a suitcase (or more) yet Lambert is holding what looks like about 20 bills....an impossibility. $10,000 and $1,000 bills are almost never in circulation....and even if they had been, the stack was way too small. Given that the dollars would have been $100 (or less), the stack would have included 3000 bills...a HUGE stack of money, not the tiny stack you see in the picture.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid performance by Edward G. Robinson; very good film
vincentlynch-moonoi28 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I always liked Edward G. Robinson, but I don't like the typical crime dramas he so often appeared in. So when I found him to not be a gangster, I reveled in his film persona. This is one of those films. Yes, there's an element of crooks here...but it's not Robinson; Robinson is, in fact, the good guy here.

And, this is a better film than I had anticipated. Robinson plays a hard-boiled newspaperman who, after WWI, starts his own newspaper. He plays a bit fast and furious with the facts, and sometimes makes news happen, but at heart he tries to make things right. Unfortunately, in order to start his own newspaper he had to take in a silent partner -- a "businessman" who is more a hood than businessman -- Edward Arnold. Ultimately, Robinson deeply regrets the partnership and decides to go after Arnold...at his own peril, and at the peril of one of his young reporters.

It's good, but it's not all good. Unfortunately, Laraine Day (who is sort of secretly in love with Robinson) lets us down with acting that is just blah through the first part of the film, but nearer the end of the film she does quite nicely. Lately I've seen Day in a number of films, and while once in a while I thought she was very good, mostly I am finding her to be just middling. But Robinson and Arnold make up for that with some fine acting.

In terms of the supporting cast, Marsha Hunt, whom I didn't really recognize, but who had a fairly long career in film, does nicely as the girl in love with the young reporter, but who has cozied up to Arnold to advance her singing career and to try to save her father from scandal. William T. Orr does satisfactorily as the young reporter. Don Beddoe is good as one of the men in the newsroom.

I can't decide whether I like the ending or not. If you're expecting a happy ending...well...you'll just have to wait and see...they keep you guessing until the very last minute.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Another great newspaper drama from Mervyn LeRoy
bowiebks15 October 2002
This was a "new" one to me...I don't recall ever hearing or reading a thing about it. Touches of comedy and a terrific story, with wonderful scenes of Robinson and Edward Arnold turning in superb performances. Nice support from the likes of Marsha Hunt, Larraine Day, Don Beddoe and the very underrated DON COSTELLO, so memorable in "The Blue Dahlia." An interesting companion piece to LeRoy's 1931 "Five Star Final" which also starred Robinson. Superior writing and directing, but a twisty ending which comes over as contrived.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
When this flick was released, publicity flacks for the nefarious movie studio . . .
oscaralbert19 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
. . . of the groaning fat cat one per centers tried to one-up the beloved iconic concurrent Warner Bros. classic, CASABLANCA. "Look," these PR liars shilled, "BOTH our feature and Humphrey's star gangsters from the Warner War Room. BOTH films have poignant scenes at their endings with airplanes taking off in the fog. And BOTH movies are built on the framework of star-crossed love affairs not meant to be. CASABLANCA and UNHOLY PARTNERS are two peas in a pod." No, Leo, they're most definitely not! UNHOLY's botched finale tacks on an extraneous SECOND conclusion back in the newsroom. And Eddie can't haul Hump's water in a million years. Plus, any "chemistry" between the dark frog prince and Miss Day evokes sulfuric acid more than sweet perfume.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Muddled Melodrama
boblipton15 October 2002
Potentially interesting story of go-ahead newspaperman Robinson and gangster Arnold as co-owners of groundbreaking tabloid newspaper, wrecked by reducing almost everything to melodrama. Despite the shadowy George Barnes cinematography and great performances by leads and supporting cast, the glossy MGM house style takes the sort of ripped-from-headlines story that director Leroy used to do at Warner Brothers -- often starring Robinson -- and reduces it to mush.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Get behind the desk, Tommy. We have a job to do."
clanciai18 December 2017
One of those neglected masterpieces on a minor scale that were outshadowed by more garish and spectacular sensations, like "Citizen Kane" of the same year, that made its hit by targeting Randolph Hearst, which ruined Orson Welles' career to some irrepairable extent, but this film is equally brilliant if not even more, or at least it is even better written, although lacking the flamboyant Welles technique, while Mervyn LeRoy's direction efficiency actually is on more top speed all the way. Robinson's newspaper man is equally controversial and ruthless as Welles but stays on a human basis, which citizen Kane does not.

The film is also very reminiscent, and perhaps even more so, of Ben Hecht's and Charles MacArthur's famous "Front Page" of 1931, remade as "His Girl Friday" 1939, which also remains human all the way. They are parallel cases of super brilliant journalism, while "Unholy Partners" is more to the thiller side - shots are actually fired, there are crooks involved, and not until the end you stay uncertain whether Robinson's ruthless editor is on the crooked or the right side.

There are many ingenious turnings in this fantastic web of journalistic intrigue, and it would be a pleasure to see it again. I never wanted to see "Citizen Kane" again.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"You know a nice thing about tears, they all come out in the wash".
classicsoncall25 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Interesting that Edward G. Robinson would be playing his non-gangster role almost like a gangster here. After shaking hands with shady Merrill Lambert (Edward Arnold) on a fifty-fifty newspaper deal, Bruce Corey (Robinson) takes the tabloid approach and runs his front page with garish headlines intended for shock value. I had a sit up and take notice moment when in a concession to modern times (for 1941), Corey claimed that there wasn't any privacy anymore! Holy smokes, can you see him dealing with the internet today?

One has to chuckle a bit whenever one of The Mercury Mirror newspapers hits the stands and you catch the price tag - two cents for a single copy! Wow, there really was a time when talk was cheap. And if you were a regular customer, you always got 'the news before it happens'! You would think Corey's approach would backfire more often than not but he seemed to make it work for the most part.

I liked that scene when Lambert offered to put up his entire half of the newspaper in a rigged card game with a marked deck. Apparently Corey had been around that block once before and called him out on it while holding a full house and asking for four cards. Plenty of chutzpah there, and a brilliant move to keep editorial control of the paper on his own terms.

This wasn't the first time Robinson appeared in a film with a newspaper backdrop. He was also the editor of The Gazette in the 1931 movie "Five Star Final", remade five years later using a radio station backdrop to basically tell the same story, this time using Humphrey Bogart in the Robinson role. That one was "Two Against the World" from 1936, with the alternate title "One Fatal Hour". Both are recommended for fans of the principals, just as I would recommend this one for Robinson's effective play against Edward Arnold in an often tense story.

With a finale that eerily previews the scene in the following year's "Casablanca", Bruce Corey high tails it out of town after his final encounter with Lambert, fully intending to return at some point down the road to face the music after putting away the racketeer. It all made sense to me until the scene faded with the saddened 'Croney' Cronin lamenting her boss's decision - why exactly would there have been a campfire in the middle of the airplane terminal?

Hey, best line of the film that had nothing to do with the story - newspaper writer Mike Reynolds (Don Beddoe) commenting on his failed marriages: "My three honeymoons were the happiest time of my life"! Now that's a positive attitude.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Partners in crime
AAdaSC27 June 2011
Edward G Robinson (Corey) returns from the war and is offered his old job back at the newspaper he used to work for. However, he has bigger ideas and wants to run his own newspaper now. The only way he can get financing to start his business is to come to a deal with gangster Edward Arnold (Lambert). They become 50/50 partners in the business - the unholy partners of the title. Robinson is one of these do-gooder types who wants to clean up the city and so, when Arnold - his financier and number 1 gangster in town - tells him to back off from a story, he disobeys him coz he wants to see justice done. What a knob-head. He is basically begging to be killed off. Whether he does get what's coming to him is up to fate.

This is pretty predictable stuff with a corny ending. Robinson is good as always but Arnold is better. Thank God he is in the film. He has a sort of Raymond Burr deep voice and big thuggery frame and makes a good baddie. The rest of the cast are OK, although William T. Orr (Tommy) is slightly annoying at times. The film is not particularly good and there is no need to see it again. It finishes and then you sling it onto the junk pile - if you have any sense. Robinson's character is unconvincing and the final line is pure cheesiness. It's not a disaster but there's not a lot to say about it. Everyone has done better and it's a forgettable affair.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Perfect display of America's transformation to gritty tabloid newspapers during the early 20th century.
brliqq18 May 2002
This movie was a great reinactment of how newspapers changed their formats from pure journalism to sensationalism just after World War I. Edward G. Robinson, in one of his best unknown roles, starts his own N.Y. tabloid by becoming partners with a gangster who finances everything. The paper crusades against the underworld and soon enough the unholy partners are at conflict. A superp film that gives a better insight of the early newspaper business than "Citizen Kane"(Not saying its better than the Orsen Welles classic).Definatly a high recomendation; insight, drama, love, and guns.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
gangsta film with Edward G
ksf-21 July 2019
Edward G. is Bruce, who comes back from war, and wants to start up a newspaper. To help with funding, he takes on partner "Lambert", (Eddie Arnold) a mafia giant. and since it's being backed by a shady character, Bruce is determined to not just report the news, but also CREATE the news! all in the name of increasing publication numbers. a snapshot of a time when the thugs ran so much of business. but the people he is hurting along the way start to resent being talked about in the headlines every day. and that includes his friends, employees... maybe even his business partner Lambert. It's a pretty good film, but it had the bad luck to be released a couple weeks before Pearl Harbor day, when we were dragged into WW II. This one isn't played much anywhere; I caught this on Turner Classics, so maybe it'll get more play now. some pretty big names in it, so its certainly an interesting bit of history. also an ironic tidbit...about 70 minutes in, there's a crack about someone making a speech to reduce the size of the navy. and a couple weeks after this was released, the U.S. Navy would actually get bombed at Pearl Harbor. Directed by Mervyn LeRoy. directed some great films, although many were uncredited, like Wizard of Oz....
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
needs more thrills
SnoopyStyle18 October 2020
In New York City, Bruce Corey (Edward G. Robinson) returns from the Great War and turns down the offer to return to his reporter job at the institution of his old paper. Instead, he wants to start his own sensationalized tabloid newspaper aiming to change the entire industry. He has a tough time finding a backer. He agrees to take on mob boss Merrill Lambert as a silent partner.

There is a really great hand of poker in the middle of the movie. I wish the rest of the movie has that kind of daring and originality. Merrill's introduction should be him murdering someone. Bruce needs to show some fear to elevate the intensity. He's too cool and collected. There are no thrills in his reactions to Lambert, other than the poker hand. He does give some interesting fear but only after the incident. I still don't love the chase aspect of this thriller. It needs more actual thrills. With a few good scenes, this has some goodness especially for EGR fans.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I don'y think that any story is worth ruining a life
sol121819 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
****SPOILERS**** Edward G. Robinson as hard hitting editor of the New York Mercury newspaper Bruce Coprey bites off more then he can chew when he starts going after his silent partner in the paper big time mobster Merrill Lambert, Edward Arnold. This ends up with Corey's star reporter young 23 year old Tommy Jarvis, Wittiam T. Orr, being kidnapped by Lambert's hoods and threatened to be disappeared, or murdered, by them unless Corey hands over his 50% of the newspaper to Lambert. It was by Tommy discovering an insurance & loan shark racket that Lambert was involved in that was the straw that broke the camel's back as far as Lambert was concerned. Now taking off the gloves and playing hard ball newspaper editor Corey resorts to the same tactics that his unholy partner was involved in with him freeing Tommy from Lambert's clutches even if he has to kill to do it.

Even though the Mercury was a smashing success publishing tabloid like news stories editor Corey just couldn't help going after his partner on the paper Merrill Lambert who he felt was an insult to everything that America stands for. In turn by going on a holy crusade against Lambert Corey himself ended up being not that much better hen he is. You seem to notice that Corey was really enjoying what he was doing to expose Lambert and his bookie insurance gambling and loan shark rackets but was doing it for his own self gratification not to really help those victimized by them. In fact Cory like to do some illegal gambling on his own which ended up getting him the cash he needed to start up his hard hitting against crime newspaper in the first place. With Tommy's life now in danger because of his attempts to expose and have indited his partner in the newspaper Merrill Lambert Corey goes all out to free him even at the expense of his both reputation as well as life to do it.

****SPOILERS**** After getting the job done by whacking Lambert, who in fact tried to whack him, and getting Tommy freed Corey takes a trans Atlantic flight, that his newspaper is sponsoring, with famed French pilot Molyneaux, Marcel Dailo, across the Atlantic Ocean only to fly into a violent sea storm and be lost at sea. This not only confirms Corey's reputation as a fighter against crimes but keeps him from being arrested and indited for Lambert's murder which was in fact a case of self defense. As for Tommy Jarvis he can now go back to work replacing Corey as the editor of the Mercury newspaper and continue the work, in fighting and exposing crime, that his good friend the late or lost at sea Bruce Corey started.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Uneven and not very likable
HotToastyRag24 January 2024
Even though I liked the cast list of Edward G. Robinson, Edward Arnold, and Laraine Day, I didn't end up liking Unholy Partners. Robinson is a veteran returning to his old job at the newspaper, but his ambition gets the better of him and he wants to start his own paper. He brings his faithful secretary, Laraine, and his Army sidekick, William Orr, but he doesn't have the collateral to start his business. He gets the idea of going 50-50 with a gangster, Arnold, as a silent partner. He also gets the idea of "creating" news before the other papers get ahold of the headlines. For example, Robinson telephones instructions to his newspaper about a nightclub raid, then calls the police to orchestrate the raid.

The film felt a little uneven; was it a gangster picture or a newspaper drama? Robinson's character was obsessed with having the most popular newspaper in town, but we never saw the transition to him becoming unethical. One could argue that if he was that ambitious of a newspaperman, he was automatically unethical, but I didn't think that was what the story was trying to prove.

Laraine's character was completely one-dimensional. She was very pretty and underused as a secretary, and Robinson just treated her like part of the furniture. She was never given anything to do, or shown any explanation as to why she loved him so much when he treated her like parsley, or why she put her life on hold for years and years waiting for him to notice her when any other man would gladly have taken her off the market.

There was also a side romance between Orr and Marsha Hunt, a nightclub singer and "friend" of Arnold. They were both pretty immature, and their relationship consisted of petty bickering. All in all, there wasn't anyone I was rooting for, except for Laraine to stop loving someone who was incapable of giving her attention.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Passable But Uneven
LeonLouisRicci18 July 2013
The First Act of this mish mashed Movie is a rapid-speak "Newspaper Man" cliché with a hyped up, frantic pace that reminds one of the Screwball Comedies. The Second Act is a darkly lit and appropriately seedy looking foray into the Underworld of the Roaring Twenties. The Third Act is a Soul Searching Melodrama with much Romance and overwhelming syrupy Music and sombre revelatory Redemption.

The Second Act works the best. The shadowy Cinematography and the Good vs Evil confrontations are superb. There are some Philosophical exercises and suspenseful Scenes. It is here where the Acting ceases to be overplayed and the Characters and situations seem believable.

There is never a sense in the Movie as a whole that this takes place in the 1920's. It is so void of Period, OK maybe the Cars, that it is quite the failure on the Makeup, Wardrobe, and Set Designers. It does give a hint at the Newspaper "Game", and the Post-World War One Sociological and Media changes, but not enough to make this anything more than a passable and pedestrian Entertainment with a surprising lack of insight or reflection on its Subject Matter.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
anachronistic period film!
itsnotmike11 June 2004
Another great Edward G. Robinson performance in an entertaining film about a hard driven newspaper man,with fine performances all around. However,what gets me is this: Why place a film in a period setting and ignore aspects of that setting? In this case,this 1941 film was set in 1919. Besides a few indiscretions like inappropriate hairstyles on the women,at one point Marsha Hunt sings After You've Gone in a 1940's swing style with a big band(this is at about 15 years before the "Big Band Era"!) Funny...this film was made only twenty years after the story takes place...no one remembered what things were like? I am reminded of a similar problem(although much worse)in the Gene Krupa Story,where we had "boppy"soloists in the "twenties"! If film makers want contemporary hairstyles,music,etc.,why make a period film?
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Robinson and Arnold Make the Film
Michael_Elliott8 December 2013
Unholy Partners (1941)

*** (out of 4)

After WW1 newspaperman Bruce Corey (Edward G. Robinson) goes back to his job to try and pitch a job to his boss but he's not interested in the new ideas. In order to start his own paper, Corey starts a partnership with notorious gangster Merrill Lambert (Edward Arnold) and soon he lives to regret it. UNHOLY PARTNERS is a good little melodrama from MGM that manages to get two great actors in strong roles, although I will admit there are some pretty big flaws throughout the picture. The biggest flaw is the entire conflict of interest. I mean, Robinson's character should have known that he wouldn't be able to report certain illegal activities that Lambert is doing so when he starts doing so and the clash happens, the Robinson character seems shocked or pig-headed but what did he expect? Why the character never thought about this before making the deal is certainly a flaw in the writing but it's certainly not big enough to where it destroys the film. The best thing is without question the performances by the two leads. I'm sure reading the plot description that many would think Robinson would be playing the gangster but he was also great at playing the "good" guys just as much as the bad ones. He's quite believable in the part and I really liked the energy he brought the character. Arnold, often a good guy, really gets to shine here as the dangerous mobster and he's quite threatening. Laraine Day makes for a good love interest as does Gail Fenton. William T. Orr plays Robinson's "young" version and is good as well. The film contains a few good twists along the way, some good action, a couple nice laughs and best of all are the performances. UNHOLY PARTNERS isn't a lost classic but if you're a fan of the stars then it's worth watching.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Too classy an effort
kmoh-17 April 2020
All set up for a rip-roaring hour and a quarter, with Edward G. as the sassy newshound back from the trenches, in partnership with gangster Edward Arnold, surely two of the very greatest. Just watch Robinson outwit Arnold in a poker game for the paper. You know it won't end well. In tow are Laraine Day, who loves the former, as does naïve William T. Orr, an aspiring newspaperman who still has all his ideals intact.

It goes more or less as you'd expect, but with MGM glitz and taste rather than Warners energy. Which means it's 20 minutes too long, and with a weird drawn-out ending tacked on for no particularly good reason, and you go away after 95 minutes feeling less than satisfied. Someone shudda told those guys at MGM, class ain't everything.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed