The Lady in Question (1940) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Uneven courtroom comedy/drama with early pairing of Ford and Hayworth...
Doylenf17 April 2007
Interesting that Columbia teamed GLENN FORD and RITA HAYWORTH six years before GILDA made them such a hot romantic combination, in a rather tepid courtroom tale that's an uneven mix of comedy and drama and barely allowed the sparks to fly between Ford and Hayworth.

Actually, it's BRIAN AHERNE who gets top billing as the Parisian shop owner who sits in on a murder trial and finds himself falling for "the lady in question". Aherne plays the man as a naively foolish individual who looks forward with childish glee to jury duty--and then manages to convince the others that Rita is not guilty of murder.

EVELYN KEYES plays his equally flighty daughter and IRENE RICH is his sensible wife. GLENN FORD is his attractive and reasonably sensible son.

It soon becomes apparent that all of the courtroom scenes are going to be played for comedy rather than drama. LLOYD CORRIGAN and GEORGE COULOURIS play opposing lawyers with comic skill and CURT BOIS does an amusing job as a fellow juror who takes an instant dislike to Aherne when he's accidentally splashed with water and then becomes his amusing adversary for the rest of the story.

But the spotlight is mainly on BRIAN AHERNE and he easily walks off with the film as the bumbling shop owner who begins to think that perhaps he shouldn't have talked the other jurors into freeing Rita, after she has an affair with his son whom he finds has stolen some money in order to leave with her. Aherne had a flair for comedy that is really given the spotlight here.

There's a clever plot twist at the end in which Aherne realizes how wrong he's been about everything.

RITA HAYWORTH shows promise in a rather uninteresting role that doesn't allow her to do more than look like a decorative leading lady and GLENN FORD is clearly not yet the movie star he would become. Both have relatively minor roles compared to Aherne.

Summing up: Interesting oddity is strange mixture of comedy and drama.
30 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sweet, Oddly Charming Film!
caribeno14 November 2012
Having read all of the posts about "The Lady in Question", I can understand how disappointed some people would be, expecting either a Rita Hayworth-Glenn Ford vehicle, a la "Gilda" or a faithful replica of it's source: the French film, "Gibouille". This doesn't take away that "The Lady in Question" is an entertaining film with an odd, curious yet sweet charm that comes upon one quietly and lingers long after the film is over.

Two of the posters regarded "The Lady in Question" as a pallid remake of "Gibouille". Having seen some pre-WWII French films, they were not greatly more explicit than Hollywood was, at the time, in dealing with sex and crime. "The Lady in Question" is a mild comedy-drama made by a studio that was well-equipped to handle such material, Columbia Pictures. Director Charles Vidor, a Frenchman himself, nicely, subtly, and lingeringly establishes time and place. It greatly allows for the suspension of disbelief of hearing perfect English accents on French characters.

This film showcases Brian Aherne, who all too rarely was showcased at all, let alone in a comedy that he carried. He plays Morestan, the bicycle shopkeeper, admirably and almost succeeds in making one believe he was a middle-aged shopkeeper. He has just the right light tone to unify what is a mild plot and a minor-A film. Yes, studios didn't always make big-budget films with their stars. Many of their films, including "A" pictures, were "programmers", films that showcased stars and promising contract players. This, "The Lady in Question" did.

The players do shine, even though this film is an early entry for future stars Rita Hayworth, Glenn Ford, and Evelyn Keyes. In what could've been a merely decorative role, Hayworth truly has that "lady of mystery" quality that not only holds your attention but, momentarily, keeps one guessing as to whether or not she was guilty. Glenn Ford plays what would've been a callow juvenile with earnestness, a convincing portrait of young lust/love, and just enough vulnerability to make his love/suspicion relationship with Hayworth's character believable. Everyone acquits (pun intended)themselves very well in this film. Since the American film industry doesn't put out "programmers" anymore and we, as a public, are conditioned to see most star vehicles as big-budget affairs, it's a lost art but a beautiful one to sit, savor, and merely enjoy a well-crafted, entertaining film that isn't about anything special but delivers.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Lost something coming overseas
bkoganbing17 April 2007
The Lady in Question is noted in cinema history as the first film to feature both Rita Hayworth and Glenn Ford. However it's not their film, both are second and third billed respectively below Brian Aherne.

Columbia Pictures remade the French film Gibouille which had been done the year earlier with Raimu and Michele Morgan in the roles that Aherne and Rita had. In fact Gibouille was what launched Michele Morgan's career in French cinema.

Knowing that I think a lot of the film's humor and innuendo probably got lost on the transatlantic voyage. Aherne is a bicycle shop owner who has been picked for jury duty and is determined to take his responsibilities quite seriously. He gets on a case with Rita as a defendant who is accused of murdering her fiancé. Aherne's questions to her and his forceful advocacy of her, earn Rita an acquittal.

But Brian's not finished. He offers to give her any kind of help she needs because while she has a legal acquittal, she's got a reputation like O.J.'s. Aherne takes her in which causes all kinds of complications with his wife, Irene Rich, son Glenn Ford, daughter Evelyn Keyes, and her fiancé Edward Norris.

The Lady in Question is probably done in by the infamous Code firmly in place in Hollywood. Stuff that the French cinema could and did do, were forbidden here. Columbia also had to keep it in the French setting because of the differences between their jury system and our's.

Still Rita and Glenn do shine together, although no one I'm sure would ever have predicted their mega-hit Gilda six years later. Actually Edward Norris has the nicest performance as the no good rat of a fiancé that Keyes has, who tries to put the make on Rita.

It's a pleasant enough film, but I'm betting the original French version must be infinitely better.
24 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable Funny Classic Film
whpratt121 April 2007
Greatly enjoyed this film which is full of drama and plenty of laughs along with a great cast of new stars who would become very famous and successful on the Silver Screen in Hollywood for many years. Charles Vidor produced this film and that is living proof this is a great 1940 extra special film. Brian Aheme, (Andre Moestan) is a bicycle shop owner who desperately wants to become a juror in a court case and gets himself deeply involved with the trial of Natalie Roguin played by Rita Hayworth and Andre Moestan feels great compassion for Natalie and manages to sway the jury into setting her free. Andre gives her a job in his bicycle shop and lets her live with his family above the shop. Glenn Ford plays the role as Pierre Moestan, the son of Andre and he falls madly in love with Natalie. Evelyn Keyes, (Francois Morestan) gave a great supporting role as the daughter of Andre Moestan who wants to get married in the worst way and is simply boy crazy about all men and full of the devil. It is great seeing such great super stars so very young and just starting out in their Hollywood careers. Enjoy this film. I must also mention that Evelyn Keys had just given a great performance in "Gone With The Wind", 1939 and played a great role in this film and went on to become a great Pin Up Girl for our Fighting Troops during World War II.
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Lost in Translation
ilprofessore-124 January 2019
This is the sort of dramatic comedy the French knew how to do superbly, but Hollywood was unable to carry off in 1940. Blame it on censorship. The original 1937 French film starred the great tragic comic actor, Raimu, famous for his work in Marcel Pagnol's Marseilles comedies. Brian Aherne, a fine actor, is still too much of the English matinee idol, too young too thin to play pater familias roles, although he tries. This was a role for an older man. Edward G. Robinson might have gotten in right. Rita Hayward is as always lovely and believable. Glenn Ford is only the juvenile in this one. A few years later both would have their great successes together. Harry Cohn took a chance on this one.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very entertaining
HotToastyRag17 August 2020
I never thought I'd see the movie that would endear me to Rita Hayworth. I'm notorious for criticizing her, but not only did I not hate her in The Lady in Question, but I willingly admit she gave a fine performance. This isn't her usual role; there's no shade of Gilda in it.

An unrecognizable Brian Aherne stars as a peasant patriarch who owns a bicycle shop. He's too soft in his business and gets hassled by his wife, Irene Rich. His daughter Evelyn Keyes is young, foolish, and in love with the boy next door, but Brian doesn't want to see her grown up so soon. His son Glenn Ford (who looks adorable in his young curls) has a passion for astronomy. Brian has just been called to jury duty, and his excitement is adorable. He's waited 27 years to sit on a jury, and he won't let anything stop him. He's insulted when he's relegated to an alternate, but when a juror keels over, he literally snatches the seat out from under while others are attending to the man's health. The case is a murder trial, and Rita Hayworth is fighting for her life. Brian takes his duties incredibly seriously, and his enthusiasm is infectious. It's hard to believe this is the same Errol Flynn lookalike who sculpted a nude Marlene Dietrich in Song of Songs, when he's so convincing as a middle-aged, paunchy, stubborn, not-too-bright, peasant. If you liked him in My Son, My Son, you've got to see him in this.

The script is very funny, even though the subject matter lends it more to a drama. Brian's tongue is faster than his brain, and he often talks himself into a corner with no way out. While trying to end a conversation with an irritating pal, he accuses him of winking at his wife in church. At the dinner table, he tries to distract everyone from the topic at hand by praising his wife's soup. When that doesn't work, he asks for salt, insisting that she never puts enough in the soup. When that doesn't work, he spits the soup out and leaves the table, claiming she always puts in too much salt and he can't stand to eat it. With a mixture of quick comedy, dramatic plot points, and great acting, you'll have a very enjoyable evening when you rent The Lady in Question.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Even Though Aherne Is No Raimu...
boblipton1 August 2023
Brian Aherne is the petit bourgeois proprietor of a Parisian bicycle shop. He is pleased to be on a jury for the first time in his life, a trial in which Rita Hayworth is accused of murdering her lover. He browbeats his fellow jurors into finding her not guilty. Later, she confesses to him she has not been able to find a position, given the notoriety, so he hires her for his shop and moves her into his home. Soon, he finds himself in hot water with his wife, Irene Rich, who clearly thinks him a sentimental fool, and his son, Glen Ford, who falls in love with Miss Hayworth.

Aherne puffs and blusters a lot under the direction of Charles Vidor. It turns out this is a remake of 1937's GRIBOUILLE, with Aherne playing the role originally taken by Raimu -- clearly a difficult comparison to make, especially as I have not seen the original. However, I can easily imagine Raimu playing the role in the same manner. As it stands, this is a very enjoyable movie on its own, with nice roles for Curt Bois, Evelyn Keyes as the daughter of the house, Keep an eye out for Vernon Dent as a gendarme, and William Castle as a juror.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The mystery could not make up its mind whether it wanted to be a comedy or a drama.
pitzerclan24 February 2000
Having seen (and commented on for IMDb) the more recent movie by the same title with Gene Wilder, I wanted to watch the 1940 movie to see if there was any resemblance between the two. There was none. Although I am less qualified to evaluate this movie, considering it was made eight years before I was born, I must say it seemed to me that this court-room mystery could not make up its mind whether it wanted to be a comedy or a serious drama. There were alternating comedic and serious touches which I believe detracted from the overall enjoyment of the film. However, the story was enjoyable for a one-time viewing. Rita Hayworth and Glenn Ford were familiar to me. Brian Aherne was unfamiliar to me in name, but I believe I recognized him from other movies. He reminded me a little of blustering William Powell in "Life with Father," a movie I cannot stand. It seemed to me the wife could have seen through the father's stories a lot sooner, the silliness of the daughter was overdone, and the scenes with Glenn Ford and Rita Hayworth could have been more revealing as to their true feelings for each other. The pairing of the daughter with the fat boy was predictable. And I don't know that the real truth about Rita Hayworth's character really made all that much difference in the end. But these are just my opinions, and I'm glad to say I was able to view the film this once.
14 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Middle of the Road Lady
daoldiges9 August 2022
This is supposed to be a comedy/drama but doesn't quite hit the nail on the head either way. As a result the whole thing feels a bit muted. Still, it is at times mildly entertaining. Aherne and Ford are fine, and Hayworth is believable and already quite beautiful. A bit of a disappointment considering some good elements, but still watchable.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
mostly much ado about nothing..
ksf-214 July 2019
A young Glenn Ford and Rita Hayworth, six years before their best film "Gilda"! In this one, Brian Aherne is a juror , on a trial where Natalie (Hayworth) has been accused of murder. Ford is the juror's son. Much time spent showing us what happens in the jury room... gets pretty silly, all those insults and yelling. I guess it's possible, but not really likely. In this one, Hayworth is so quiet, and low key, compared to her strong will and personality in Gilda. She meets up with Pierre, the juror's son, and of course, they fall in love. This takes place in france, but the story seems to have come from hungary or something, like Shop Around the Corner. Lots of bicycles and cycling around town, like a european town, or eastern europe. It's kind of fun, but a lot of going around the mulberry bush, as grandma used to say. Much ado about nothing, as the story goes. It's all over quickly, and they live happily ever after ! pretty good stuff. i hadn't seen this one before. Directed by hungarian Charles Vidor, who had worked with Hayworth and Ford on four films. for a guy who died so young at 58, Vidor was married four times, and one wife was an actress in this very film!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Safely watchable stuff with Hayworth and Ford an amiable pairing.
hitchcockthelegend10 October 2008
Andre Morestan is delighted to get called up for jury service, determined to take the job seriously he is very upset when he is merely put on the reserve list. However one of the other jurors falls ill and Andre grasps the opportunity with gusto and honour, the case is a tricky one, a pretty woman named Natalie Roguin is accused of murdering her partner. Andre asks some probing questions and manages to sway the outcome to earn Natalie an acquittal, this in spite of the other jurors not being totally convinced as regards Natalie's reputation. taking things further, Andre gives Natalie a job at his bicycle shop. Andre's son, Pierre is quite taken with Natalie, and this coupled with the nagging doubt over her innocence from other quarters puts a major strain on the Morestan household.

This is a remake of the French film Gibouille, it's an interesting piece that never quite gets out of first gear. Rita Hayworth looks lovely and plays off well with Glen Ford's Pierre, whilst Brian Aherne is very entertaining as Andre, but one never gets any sense of feeling with the characters. In a film that purports to be a comedy drama, you find that the picture is caught between both genres, the comedy is sporadically interesting but the drama then comes across as staid. I personally haven't seen the French original but i wouldn't be at all surprised if Gibouille is a bit more daring and close to the knuckle with its execution?. This is a decent picture and one that certainly has a watch-ability factor for cast and outcome of story, it just really should have been so much more one feels. 5.2/10
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Engaging Little Film
Noirdame7926 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A charming, cute movie, the first to pair Rita Hayworth and Glenn Ford, directed by Charles Vidor. Brian Aherne is funny and touching as Andre Morestan, the family man who finds himself a jury member on the case of young Natalie Roguin (Hayworth) accused of murdering her lover. After she is acquitted, Andre takes pity on the poor girl and gives her a job in his bicycle shop, as well as providing room and board, but concealing her true identity from his family. His son, Pierre (Ford), however, knows who she is as he stole into the courthouse one day during the trial. His obvious attraction to her is sweetly presented, with his clattering case of butterfingers. Only when he begins to suspect that she is having an affair with his father, does he reveal that he knows her true identity. After the misunderstanding is cleared up, the young duo fall in love, but Andre's opposition, as well as Natalie's fear of her true identity being revealed, puts a strain on the situation. Things change for the worse when the ne'er do well fiancée, Robert (Edward Norris) of Pierre's sister Francoise (Evelyn Keyes, best remembered as Scarlett's whiny sister Suellen in GWTW), makes advances toward Natalie when he discovers the truth. Then Natalie's innocence comes into question in Andre's mind, until he learns that there is new evidence that Natalie indeed acted in self-defense. A happy little ending wraps up about an hour and a half of this interesting little gem. Irene Rich is great as Michele Morestan, wife and mother, who provides warmth and wisdom.

The chemistry that Hayworth and Ford would go on to display in four more films is very apparent here; their scenes together are adorable, boil over with chemistry, and it is little wonder that they went on to become one of the great romantic screen couples, as well as stars in their own right. And Aherne regarded this as one of his favorite films - and it's easy to see why!

Needs to be on DVD.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gribouille comes to America while staying in his native land.
ulicknormanowen9 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
"Gribouille" (=short-sighted idiot ,the nickname her missus gives to her hubby in the first version) is an endearing obsolete movie ,which retains a certain charm. It features roughly two parts: Michele Morgan stands trial:she has killed (by accident) her lover, a rich kid whose father wants to avenge. The judge and the jurors seem to have a thing about this "bad " girl whose dad was a deserter and who has already had four lovers.(this is passed over in silence in the sweetened remake)But one of the jurors makes the jury change their mind as new evidences are found:Raimu,predating Henry Fonda in Lumet's work, helps save the defendant from the "eleven angry men".(in the remake ,there is mainly one adamant juror who wants the defendant convicted)

Morgan is acquitted but nobody wants to hire her. So the ex-juror makes her an assistant in his cycle shop , but his family will ignore who she really is. Of course the son falls in love with the girl but his soon-to-be brother-in-law has nastier plans about her.

In spite of the little changes I mention above,Charles Vidor 's remake is faithful like a dog to Marc Allégret 's 1937 original ;even the customer who wants to swap his bike for a tandem ,and the other way about ,every other day ,is included .Brian Alerne is less under his missus' thumb and one feels a little midle-age lust ,not present in Raimu's portrayal :but the son ,here portrayed by Glenn Ford , feels betrayed like Gilbert Gil.

It was the first time Glenn Ford had played opposite Rita Hayworth ;she was still unassuming ,self-conscious ,but their first tête- à- tête reveals a beauty who would burst into full bloom when Charles Vidor reunited them for "Gilda" six years later which made her a sex symbol; the action still takes place in France and how funny it is to hear the actors pronounce the names of the streets!(Saint-Sulpice!)

But all in all ,this is a good remake ,the material was perhaps not much so great in the first place,but the results are pleasant.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
broad acting
SnoopyStyle19 August 2016
Andre Morestan (Brian Aherne) owns a Paris bicycle shop with his family. He's eager to serve in a jury. The trial has Natalie Roguin (Rita Hayworth) facing a murder charge. Andre convinces the jury to acquit. After the trial, he gives her a job at his shop. He keeps her identity a secret from his family but his son Pierre (Glenn Ford) recognizes her. His daughter Francois is overjoyed to be engaged to Robert LaCoste who owns the dance studio next door. Robert turns out to be a lascivious sleaze with his eye on Natalie.

It's a lesser old movie. The acting is broad and so are the attempts at humor. This is a remake of a French film and I'm sure a ton of jokes don't get through the translation. The trial takes place in the first thirty minutes. Andre is a childish considering the situation. It seems to be aimed as a comedy but it's not funny. After Natalie gets the job, there are some sitcom-like misunderstandings. Again it's not funny but it's still watchable. The movie feels short-changed and the shorter running time may have something to do with that.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It Was Okay
ldeangelis-7570826 February 2023
That's really all I can say about this film, it was okay, mildly entertaining (thanks for the most part to Brian Aherne, as Andre Morestan)) but nothing to make it stand out among the reels.

Compared to the drama/sexual tension of their other films, the chemistry between Rita Hayworth (Natalie Roguin) and Glenn Ford (Pierre Morestan) falls flat. Also, the movie is what today is called a "dramedy', but neither the dramatic moments nor the comic ones are all that outstanding. I also had trouble believing Natalie was innocent, as least completely. There had to be more to that story than was revealed.

Like I said, it was okay, but nothing special.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Abominable Hollywoodization of a great French farce
inframan20 April 2007
Where to start? They took an earthy classic French face (Gribouille) & timidly translated it into faux Oscar Wildeian summer stock frillery. Brian Aherne becomes Raimu & Rita Cansino Hayworth becomes Michele Morgan. Glen Ford (14 years Aherne's junior) plays Aherne's son.

Aherne was about 38 when he made this, a handsome, debonair lightweight matinée idol (who allegedly was the object of Noel Coward's song, Mad About the Boy). Nice fellow, but a real travesty in this part. Whose fault? Probably the director, Alexander Korda, because the rest of the cast is just as bad, Irene Rich, Evelyn Keyes, Lloyd Corrigan (?).

What they forgot when they bought this property is farce is not just about manners & plot, it's about character & culture.

Ah well, Ford & Hayworth would grow up & make Gilda 6 years later. Same director!
13 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Rita Hayworth as a dishonored call girl and Glenn Ford as a young astronomer - both young and innocent
clanciai9 August 2021
This is a delightful comedy with grave strokes of some very serious business. Rita Hayworth is brought to trial for suspected murder of her lover, as they struggled about a gun and the gun went off. Brian Aherne as a bicycle shop owner is one of the jurors and takes pity on her, inviting her to work for him and live in his house, where also the son Glenn Ford lives, a wannabe astronomer, who gets confused by her presence. There is a lot of exquisitely delightful French family business here, as complications rise around her case, as some keep insisting that she was guilty. The film is adorable even in translation, and the characters are all perfect - Brian Aherne taking the prize as the concerned but temperamental father, who fortunately suffers from a more sensible wife. As they are running some bicycle business, a certain tandem problem keeps returning with additional complications to more complicated relationships, but the ultimate release is reached when finally the tandem issue is resolved. Glenn Ford and Rita Hayworth are both adorable as very young here, and you can't help recalling their later film "Gilda" made by the same director with even more critical circumstances to deal with. I am afraid this comedy has been rather underrated, as it actually is first class all the way.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I assume the French version must have been a lot better.
planktonrules4 November 2015
Back in 1937, there was a French film ("Heart of Paris") and it starred the great actor, Raimu. Now, three years later Hollywood released a remake--and I can only assume the remake wasn't as good-- partly because Raimu was a wonderful actor and because this American version just wasn't particularly inspired nor did it make a lot of sense.

When the film begins, Natalie (Rita Hayworth) is on trial for murder. Although many on the jury think she's guilty, Andre (Brian Aherne) insists for no real logical reason other than his gut feeling that she's innocent. Because he's so vehement, she is acquitted. Then, Andre invites her home to work for him and he gives her a place to live! None of this makes any sense, nor does it make any sense when inexplicably, Andre turns on his new protégé.

The film didn't make a lot of sense and I found it all a bit tedious after a while. Not a terrible film but certainly one that's easy to skip.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very good comedy with Brian Aherne at the helm
SimonJack7 April 2023
This film has a fine cast, including the first of half a dozen pairings of Rita Hayworth and Glenn Ford. It is only Ford's seventh film, but Hayward had made more than 30 films since 1934. This is a good look at the young Ford before he became the more mature character most movie fans will remember him as. Other members of the supporting cast do very well too. Curt Bois is very good as Henri Lurette, and Irene Rich is especially good in the role of Michele Morestan.

But "The Lady in Question" is a Brian Aherne showcase all the way. His Andre Morestan is a character, in a true sense of the word - comical at times, caring at other times, and conflicted often enough. Who couldn't help liking him or wanting him for a friend? Aherne's particular persona in putting flair into scenes is shown at its best here. It's the stuff that provided much laughter in one of the funniest comedies of all time, "Merrily We Live" of 1938. And, that he used for much laughter in "The Great Garrick" of 1937, and in "Hired Wife" of 1940 and other films. This is one actor one would have liked to see in more comedies.

When this film was made, Aherne was one of the top box office draws, especially in comedy. He was an all around actor and good in drama and mysteries. But I think he excelled in comedy. Yet he only made 14 comedies of his 70 credits, which included mostly TV series roles in his last decade. By the mid-1960s he was through with acting and retired permanently at age 65

This story is set in Paris. Morestan and his wife own a bicycle and music shop and live above it. He is thrilled to be called for jury duty selection, after waiting nearly 30 years. The humor is apparent when he is contrasted to most people who try to avoid jury duty. Well, he holds out and eventually persuades his fellow jurors to enter a not guilty verdict in a murder or suicide case. But then, when he feels sorry for and invites the acquitted poor girl, Natalie Roguin, to stay in their home and work in their store, the humor ramps up. Suspicion, jealousy, envy, distrust, false impressions, romance and more with Andre's wife, son and daughter, her suitor, and Mr. Lurette, a fellow juror.

The film has a slight blanket of intrigue over whether or not Natalie was guilty of a crime after all. And it has a very nice twist for an ending. Here are a few favorite lines from the film.

Andre Morestan, "What makes everyone think that a trial is a picnic?"

Michele Morestan, "I don't want you to go to trials. If your father wants to associate with criminals, let him; but not you." Andre Morestan, "Tell your mother that a juror associates with the police, not with criminals."

Andre Morestan, "I've told my wife so many lies, I don't think I could ever tell her the truth now."
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Delightful entertainment!
JohnHowardReid18 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Without any preliminary fanfare, Columbia launched one of 1940's most delightful entertainments. Once you overcame the manifold implications of a title like The Lady in Question, you were rewarded with an hour and twenty minutes of delectable domestic fare that was by turn droll, downright funny and slightly dramatic, but always irresistibly humorous.

Director Charles Vidor has not only managed to keep his characters in situations that are plausible, but has imparted to the whole an infectious atmosphere of home and hearth. The screenplay by Lewis Meltzer represents an adroit translation of the French film by Marcel Achard which was released in New York in 1939 as Heart of Paris.

Not the least of the film's virtues are its players. Brian Aherne contributes one of his finest impersonations as the blustering, good-natured owner of a Parisian bicycle shop who, upon being called as a juror, is so touched by the pathetic girl accused of murdering her lover that he holds out for her acquittal, then takes her into his family on the pretext that she is the daughter of an old classmate.

His efforts to hide the girl's true identity from his wife, and then to thwart the romance which develops between her and his son, lead to many amusing (and touching) domestic complications. To attempt to give further details of the plot would be to do the film an injustice, for it springs to life out of situations of a sort which invariably seem frightfully dull in print.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed