Boefje (1939) Poster

(1939)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Annie van Ees was the Michael J. Fox of the thirties
Chip_douglas30 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Based on the 1903 novel by Marie Joseph Brusse and preceded by his own stage adaption, rumors of a movie version of 'Boefje' had been circulating ever since Dutch movie tycoon Loet C. Barnstijn obtained the rights. But it wasn't until may of 1939 when a certain Mr. Ter Linden of the City-concern announced that he had taken over the property and planned to film and release it before the year was through. He hired one of the last German directors still working in Europe, Detlef Sierck, as well as scriptwriter Carl Zuckmayer. Corrie Vonk was considered for the title role, as she was already under contract at Barnstijn's 'Filmstad' studio. However, her her husband Wim Kan had pledged to writer a couple of scripts just for her (which never came to pass). So, the actress who had been playing Boefje on stage since 1923, Annie van Ees got to play her most famous part on the silver screen. This time without wearing false eyebrows and a wig, but with a boyish haircut. And all of this despite the fact that she was already 45 years old and the title role is a 12 year old boy.

Boefje is set at the very start of the 20th century in pre-WWII Rotterdam. Jan Groverts, aka Boefje is a scruffy street kid who is always getting himself into trouble with his best friend and neighbor Pietje Puk (Guus Brox). Unschooled, left to his own devices and often beaten by his father (or at least so he claims), Boefje is not a particularly smart boy, and despite a tendency to steal and lie, his heart is still in the right place, as evident in the scene where he saves a cat from drowning when other (real) children are throwing rocks at it. A good natured pastor (based on the author) takes notice and takes him under his wing. And sends him to a boarding school after Boefje accidentally sets Pietje's mother's curtains on fire.

Boefje manages to escape while smoking a cigar during a break from working in the fields (all the grown ups keep handing these 12 year old boys cigars while Boefje himself gets them from the steps of the Mayor's residence). He travels home to Rotterdam where Pietje gets him back in trouble the same night, his own grandfather accuses him of a crime he did not commit and he takes pity on the Pastor's kitchen help, Anna when she in turn is framed by Pietje Puk. The film offers an honest portrait of times gone by (as well as shots of Rotterdam before it was decimated during the war). However, the acting is very theatrical, especially Annie van Ees as Boefje, who is constantly shouting.

On the last day of filming, director Detlef Sierck decided that Europe was getting too dangerous for a German refugee, so he and his wife boarded a steamer for the States and never looked back (or saw the finished film). He would change his name to Douglas Sirk and go on to greater fame in Hollywood. Boefje itself was actually chosen to compete in the very first Cannes film festival that was to be held in September of 1939, but was canceled when the war broke out. However, during the 55th edition held in 2002 it was decided to screen the 7 nominated films from 1939, pitting 'Boefje' against 'The Wizard of Oz', 'Goodbye Mr. Chips' and others. The price eventually went to Cecil B. DeMille's 'Union Pacific'.

7 out of 10
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The tarnished angels .
ulicknormanowen6 January 2022
The last film Detlef Sierck made before he left for America and became Douglas Sirk .

The most remarkable thing in this forgotten movie is the lead: Annie Van Ees played the role of Jan on stage ,a male teenager,at 29 ; in Sirk 's effort ,she was 45 (you read well) and she is still thoroughly credible as a sixteen-year-old boy ; it's a performance only equaled by Julie Harris' who,at 27 , played the part of a twelve-year-old girl in Fred Zinneman ' s "the member of the wedding"(1952)

"Boefje" belongs to Sirk's melodramas, but arguably the only one which does not take place in a well-to do milieu ;we only catch a glimpse of this privileged class during the scene of the rich kid's birthday ,when he refuses to put his lips to the harmonica stolen and soiled by a hellion's lips .Jan is a Dutch urchin ,some kind of Victor Hugo's Gavroche ;In Rotterdam , he 's longing for the American dream : he would bring a box of cigars for Daddy , a hat with feathers for mom and a box of candies for his sisters ; poverty leads him to theft and without the intervention of the pastor ,he would end in jail where he would meet inmates worse than him: it would be his definitive downfall .

Religion men play a prominent part to get Jan back on the straight and narrow ,but there are no existential concerns ; they would later appear in such works as "the first legion" , "battle hymn ", and mainly in the discussion between the soldier and the professor (played by the author,Erich Maria Remarque ) in " a time to love and a time to die" but Sirk was not a believer and the Brothers' role is to act as guardian angels to their pupils, and to preserve the family unit. Grandiose ending with organ and choir , reminiscent of " das Mädchen vom Moorhof"(1935) and a forerunner of that of "imitation of life" (1959)

Humor is not absent : the stolen herrings and the flypaper on the pastor's sleeve .
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting but not great
chrisgreseque7 November 2022
There were so few Dutch films made in the 30's and the 40's that I decided to watch 2 of them... out of curiosity.

One of them was Boefje.

The first thing that surprised me was that it was made by Douglas Sirk (billed as Detlef Sierck), who had recently left Nazi Germany because his second wife was Jewish. I could not see in this film any relation to the films made by the same Douglas Sirk in the US, not the same technique, not the themes he was later comfortable with... Nothing at all. It is as if it was another film maker altogether.

I can image that he made this film in the Netherlands to make some money before emigrating to the United States... This being said, it is not a bad film at all.

Lead actress Annie van Ees is totally credible as a 12 year-old petty hoodlum, even though she was about 45 herself at the time. She actually looks like an adolescent boy: her face & mannerisms... The only thing that "betrayed" her is when she runs. She looks like a girl running.

The fact that she played the role on stage before has a lot to do with the fact she fits the role perfectly.

On the other hand, her delivery is quite stagey and at times fairly annoying... Boefje was her only talking picture!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed