Tovarich (1937) Poster

(1937)

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
After the Revolution - it wasn't peaches and cream!
theowinthrop20 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This nice little comedy (based on a French play that Robert Sherwood rewrote) deals with a matter that was of interest around the entire world after 1917 - 1921. What happened to the remnants of the Russian aristocracy left in tatters by the hurricane of the Bolshevik Revolution? The fact was that for most of them who fled or escaped Russia there was only poverty left to face - the great estates and the jewelry and wealth had been confiscated by the revolutionary government of Lenin and Trotszky. A few had been smart enough to have funds and wealth in lands outside the borders of old Russia, but most never thought of it.

Charles Boyer is Prince Mikhail Ouratieff and Claudette Colbert is Grand Duchess Tatiana Romanoff. You have to get that straight first, because although Boyer is a Prince he is not of the royal blood (as Colbert is - being of the Tsar's family). They are married (and quite loving) but Colbert is of higher social rank - so in many scenes Boyer is forced to agree to her point of view. However, Boyer has one thing that is more important. As an aide to the Tsar (one of his duties was to tell Nicholas II what the weather was each day) he was entrusted before the end of the Empire with over 20 million francs of Romanoff money kept in a French bank. This was a sign of the Tsar's great faith in Boyer's devotion, but it was a mixed blessing. He and Colbert were caught, and she was tortured by a leading Commissar, one Dimitri Gorotchenko (Basil Rathbone). However they managed to escape.

Now in Paris some dozen years after fleeing Russia they are living in poverty. All Boyer has is a sword and a flag. But French bankers are aware that he has legal title to use the million of francs in the Romanoff accounts and hope he will. Few have the illusion that the Soviet regime is going to collapse. But, as Boyer keeps insisting, the money is not his to spend - it's the Tsar's. He was entrusted to keep it for the day of return to Holy Russia. As Boyer keeps saying, he won't spend anything: "Not a billion, not a million, not a thousand, not a sou!"

But he and Colbert have to survive. They start looking at the want ads and find a job for a butler and maid at the home of a Mr. and Mrs. Dupont, a wealthy banker and his wife (Melville Cooper and Isabel Jeans). There are also a daughter and son (Anita Louis and Maurice Murphy). Boyer and Colbert figure that their service to the Russian Royal Family in St. Petersburg's Court prepares them for being servants.

After an initially bad moment or two (particularly as the four Duponts are all somewhat selfish and demanding), Boyer and Colbert gradually win the family over by their charm, their physical attractions, and their ability to figure out how to satisfy the needs of the employers and to do the various activities in the house. But they also discover the secret of labor unions, and (horrible though it may seem) how it may behoove to join one for servants.

Then comes the critical point: a large oil deal is being set up by a consortium from Britain, France, and the Netherlands, to develop two Russian oil fields. This is unheard of - and actually Stalin's Russia is not too thrilled about having foreigners control their oil. So they send their best man to deal with this problem and meet Dupont and his associates. You got it - it's Rathbone.

TOVARICH has actually not aged too badly, even though the old Soviet Union is a thing of the past too. Boyer and Colbert make a sweet, lovable pair - willing to do anything to be successful as servants. Cooper, Jeans, Louise, and Murphy eventually show more human features, such as Cooper's momentary lapses (at one point the banker can't recall his own name). And Rathbone, although capable of governmental viciousness (in his off-screen torturing of Colbert) actually wins our respect in the end - he turns out, like Boyer and Colbert, to be as patriotic as they are. With NINOTCHKA and COMRADE X, TOVARICH makes up a trilogy of film comedies that do paint a picture of the plight of a mighty nation struggling to regain it's feet, in the face of internal disarray and rivalries, and foreign hostility. Certainly a worthy film.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
not as funny as i was suspecting
kyle_furr31 January 2004
I kept hearing this movie being compared to ninotchka, which is a movie I love, so I decided to check this out on turner classic movies. The plot can be confusing at times and their are a couple of funny scenes. Claudette Colbert and Charles Boyer are both good and so is Basil Rasthbone.
4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Russian aristocrats on the bum in Paris
clanciai17 February 2021
Charles Boyer and Claudette Colbert are always good if not excellent, and this film is worth watching for their sake. Basil Rathbone also makes one of his good appearances. The story is more arguable. Boyer and Colbert are refugees from the Russian revolution, and as Russian aristocrats of the highest order they end up in Paris, where they have to turn to extreme measures in order to survive, including even stealing. Finally they get work as servants in a rich Frenchman's house, where at a party one of their deadliest enemies from Russia, the bolshevik commissar Basil Rathbone turns up as a guest, and there are some arguments. That is all. The main theme of the story is the obligation of the aristocrats (Boyer and Colbert) to stick to their code of honour, and in that process they commit the most incredible acts contrary to common sense. If this comedy is supposed to be flippant and witty, it doesn't raise many laughs. The funniest person is the fat dinner lady of a guest who speaks a language that is impossible for anyone to understand, performing a feat of unintelligibility. The start of the film is rather amusing, but then all of the rest seems mainly rather awkward. Still Anatole Litvak is the director and Max Steiner made the music. They have both done better.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Tovarich" means Comrade
fsilva11 October 2002
Delightful sophisticated `continental' comedy (kind of a `reverse' Ninotchka), so entertaining indeed, that when it ends you have the feeling that it moved along too swiftly, keeping you wanting at least 30 minutes more of film!

French born actors, Charles Boyer and Claudette Colbert work together wonderfully well, under Anatole Litvak's very good direction, in this engaging comedy, based upon a french play adapted by Robert E. Sherwood himself, about two penniless members of the highest rank Russian nobility (escaped from the 1917 Russian Revolution) currently living in Paris, who masquerade as commoners in order to be hired as servants of an aristocratic household, full of sort-of-zany and bizarre characters.

Isabel Jeans and Melville Cooper are perfectly cast as the aristocratic couple, Mr. and Mrs. Dupont, who hire them, absolutely unaware of their new butler's and maid's pedigrees. Basil Rathbone, as always, gives an excellent performance as Comissar Gorotchenko, a very `special' guest at a lavish dinner party arranged by the Duponts, one of the funniest (and at the same time, most dramatic) sequences of the movie.

Boyer and Colbert are so utterly charming that one does not wonder why the Duponts and both, their daughter and son, are completely conquered and taken by the `undercover' Royal Russians, Prince Mikail Alexandrovitch Ouratieff (Boyer) and Grand Duchess Tatiana Petrovna Romanov (Colbert), known by them as Michel & Tina.

This was the third and last pairing of its leading stars, who had previously worked together successfully at Paramount Pictures, in `The Man From Yesterday' (1932) and `Private Worlds' (1935).
20 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An enthusiastic review.
robbiebourget25 December 1999
"Tovarich" was the sort of film Hollywood loved making -- light entertainment, a piece of fluff -- but with a subtle edge lacking in many other films of its era. This is a film that will make you smile, laugh and even choke up a bit. The performances are all brilliant and you would be hard pressed to dislike any character for long, even the 'villain' of the piece. This film even manages to convey its 'message' without being overbearing and destroying the humour. One of my all-time favourites.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
If I Tovarich Man...
Lejink30 January 2021
Sort of "My Man Godfrey" meets "Ninotchka", this is a frothy, entertaining comedy directed by Anatole Litvak, whose Hollywood movies I'm currently working my way through. The plot is pretty contrived, but no more than with other screwball comedies of the time. Boyer and Goddard had been in two movies before, neither of which I've seen, and are very comfortable together playing a now impoverished Russian noble couple, displaced by the revolution to Paris, where they live a literally hand to mouth existence. Boyer is a Russian prince in exile, apparently entrusted by the Tsar with a fortune in Russian currency for safekeeping, Goddard his duchess wife. They live anonymously in a cheap Parisian garret, with a broken bed and Goddard reduced to pilfering foodstuffs from the local market, but they resolutely refuse to tap into the fund to ease their plight.

Instead, they wind up taking jobs as a butler and maid in the grand house of wealthy French aristocrats where they put their reverse-knowledge of servitude to good use by quickly making themselves indispensable to the middle-aged scatterbrain husband and wife at the head of the house and their spoilt young-adult son and daughter. In fact, it's not long before father and son fall for the effervescent Colbert while mother and daughter form separate crushes on the debonair Boyer but things get complicated when a former Bolshevik general now elevated to high-ranking civil status, in the form of Basil Rathbone, turns up to a household soirée thrown by the Parisian couple. Rathbone's character has a stormy history with Boyer and Goddard, having persecuted and prosecuted them back in the homeland, to the extent of once perpetrating torture on Boyer in the past and who now wants his hands on the treasure-trove the couple are safeguarding.

It all comes to a head at an amusing scene where the duo have to serve food to Rathbone and other Russian dignitaries at an evening meal, who, to mix matters up further, immediately recognise their former betters.

While some of the humour is a little forced and the denouement a bit too pat, as the formerly gentrified couple meekly accept their new positions of servitude in Western democracy, once the action moves to Paris, there are some amusing scenes and situations along the admittedly cliched upstairs - downstairs / capital - communism lines.

I like Goddard in almost everything in which I've seen her and was genuinely surprised at Boyer's facility with comedy. I also liked the madcap family who adopt them. Director Litvak shows an equal aptitude for staging comedy in a little-known film I'm rather glad I was able to track down.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Comes The Counterrevolution
bkoganbing28 January 2009
Adapted from a French play authored by Jacques Deval, Tovarich had a successful run on Broadway the year before the film came out for 356 performances. Robert Sherwood did the adaption and for the screen, the talents of Casey Robinson were brought in to adapt Tovarich to another medium. Usually these collaborative efforts tend to dilute, but in the case of Tovarich, it's bright sophisticated comedy that gives both Charles Boyer and Claudette Colbert two of their best screen roles.

Boyer and Colbert play a couple of exiled Russian nobles living in genteel poverty in Paris as so many did after the Russian Revolution. She's a bit more noble than he, Colbert is actually a blood Romanov and Boyer only married into the royal family. Before he and the family were overthrown, Nicholas II gave Boyer a lot of Russian gold, smuggled out of the country which Boyer laundered to use the modern term and deposited in a French bank under his name. Although no one could have blamed him for occasionally dipping in just for the bare necessities, Boyer and Colbert have refused to do it.

What they're sitting on it for, who can tell. They refuse an a request for money from another exile Morris Carnovsky for some wild scheme to restore the Romanovs. Boyer and Colbert have woke up and smelled the coffee, the Romanov restoration just ain't happening. But what to do with that money, especially when you're living one meal to the next.

Colbert and Boyer take jobs as butler and maid to a wealthy Parisian family consisting of Melville Cooper, Isabel Jeans, Anita Louise, and Maurice Murphy. Reasoning after all that their former status has acquainted them somewhat with the finer things and how that life should be lived. It takes a bit of getting used to as far as the reversal of stations, but gradually they ingratiate themselves with the family.

The big test comes when a dinner party is given and a Commissar from the Soviet Union played by smooth Basil Rathbone is invited. He's got some history with the Romanovs and things get both funny and tense at the same time. A real achievement for director Anatole Litvak.

Tovarich was also the source of a Broadway musical from 1963 in which Vivien Leigh starred in the Claudette Colbert role.

If you think you've figured out who the good and bad people are than you are in for a surprise. Tovarich takes no sides in the politics, it presents the Bolsheviks and Romanovs with all the warts showing. It does it with sparkling humor as well. Try to catch it when broadcast next.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This is a witty and charming comedy of manners.
zhonu3 February 2000
If anyone could see the scene of the Colbert and Boyer serving at a party and not laugh, I would like to meet him. This is a stylish comedy concerning two noble emigrees who are in possession of a Bank account worth 10 billion gold francs, and who sign on as butler and chambermaid to a Parisian couple and the adventures that ensue.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It's sure hard to give a hoot about these folks, but it is well made.
planktonrules13 February 2021
"Tovarich" is the story about two members of the Russian royalty who are married and living in exile in France following the Russian Revolution of 1917. Prince Mikail (Charles Boyer) and Grand Duchess Tatiana (Claudette Colbert) are living in poverty and they eat by Tatiana stealing food from the local market....but she doesn't just steal, she steals luxury items like champagne and caviar because, as she sees it, they are above laws that apply to commoners and they NEED caviar and champagne.

After years of living in squalor, Mikail decides that it's finally time for them to get jobs (you think?!?!?!). You learn all this in the first few minutes of the film...and I found myself thoroughly hating the couple. While I am no fan of the Revolution, rich pigs like this couple were the reason for such a revolution...and the film gives you no reason to look on them positively!

When they obtain jobs as domestics, the pair are happy and their employers, at first, have no idea their servants are members of royalty. But problems develop when Commissar Grotochenko (Basil Rathbone) comes for dinner, as he represents the new Russian government and he naturally hates royals. What's next? See the film.

I was very torn while watching this film. I love Boyer and Colbert, they are wonderful here as far as their acting goes. But the problem is the plot...and I mentioned that above. Caring about the communists or royals is a real chore for me....as both sides are very nasty pieces of work. And, it's odd that in the 1930s that apparently Americans were supposed to somehow care about royals...royals who in the 'good old days' killed serfs with complete impunity and watched them starve due to indifference. I normally never get political in my reviews...but it really is difficult to divorce yourself from history with a film like this.

Overall, this is a slick looking and well acted film about folks I just didn't care about at all. I do think my being an ex-history teacher made watching this much more difficult for me than the average person...most might not realize how truly awful and cruel the Russian royals actually were.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This is a delightful and stylish thirties comedy well worth viewing.
madwriter16 December 1999
Claudette Colbert and Charles Boyer make a delightful team in this stylish thirties comedy. This film is creative and amusing in much the same manner as My Man Godfry. For anyone who enjoys black and white films this will be enjoyable. It has something about it of the grace and style of the old Fred Astaire/Ginger Rogers films.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Too Silly for Me
mich-1414 March 2005
I love old movies, so when I saw this was considered a 3 star movie, I though great another great movie to watch. My disappointment did not take long to evolve. Not only was it hard to pretend that the two main characters (boyer and Colbert) were Russian at all!! With her English accent and his Obvious French Accent was distracting to say the least. I know they were royalty, but come on!, the simplest of house task for these two as domestic servants was ridiculous. Story was mildly hard to follow and boring at times. Colbert was a bit of an over actor in this one. If the story is suppose to be in a particular country or suppose to have a particular nationality for the characters, it would be better to have them both speak a fake accent or at least both speak with an English accent so at least we can reasonable pretend they are from Russia!!
6 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Charles Boyer with a sword in his pants!
silenceisgolden13 September 2001
The scene with Mr. Boyer walking around with a sword in his pants and not being able to bend over and find a shoe is HILARIOUS! He DOES not have rheumatism! ;-) Also, the scene where the boy is caught barking at Ms. Colbert is just as good. Highly recommend for some good laughs!
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Give Characters a Little More Intelligence!
filmnoir-fanatic4 May 2006
After reading many positive reviews, I was very excited to watch this movie. The script turned out to be the biggest turn off for me. The very first scene, where the 14th of July is celebrated in Paris, catches our poor protagonists (Russian aristocracy, no less) being totally oblivious to the meaning of the festivities. I had a hard time swallowing this. Come on... Russian aristocrats learned French language and French culture before they learned Russian language and culture. I doubt it very much that they did not know what 14th of July meant for the French. I know that it's supposed to be a sophisticated continental comedy, but please do not insult our intelligence in a process. From this uninspired start, the movie just dragged on and on and on. Both Boyer and Colbert were wasted in this mediocre material. They deserved better!
3 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Tedious
AAdaSC28 November 2022
Russian aristocratic exiles Grand Duchess Claudette Colbert & Prince Charles Boyer are living in poverty in France and Colbert goes out to steal food on a daily basis. They decide they need to take a job - about time - and take up positions as a maid and butler to a wealthy French family headed by Melville Cooper (Charles) and Isabel Jeans (Fermonde). This family also have a son and daughter who live with them who look up to the new arrivals. One evening, there is a dinner party where an old enemy of our exiled duo turns up. His name is Commissar Basil Rathbone (Gorotchenko).

Rathbone turns up way too late in this film and is immediately the best character on show. Everyone else plays for comedy and it just doesn't work. It's a lame screwball comedy with too many unfunny comedy characters and a truly daft script. We learn that Boyer has been given a fortune to look after by the outgoing Russian Tsar when the Revolution struck. And I mean a fortune! So why are they living in poverty and taking domestic jobs? This film is incredibly stupid.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Sometimes it is hard to enjoy a movie considering what's going on, both during the Stalin era and the Putin era.
jordondave-2808514 September 2023
(1937) Tovarich COMEDY

Adapted from the play by Jacques Deval produced and directed by Anatole Litvak that has Grand Duchess, Tatiana Petrovna Romanov (Claudette Colbert) and her Prince, Mikail Alexandrovitch Ouratieff (Charles Boyer) attempt to elude capture from the Russian Revolution, to prevent returning a large sum of money intended for the Russian cause. They escape to Paris where they pose as butler and maid employed by the Dupont family of Fermonde (Isabel Jeans) and her husband Charles (Melville Cooper) and their two children, Helene (Anita Louise) and Georges (Maurice Murphy). It is not the matter of who's going to discover them but a question of when. The title "Tovarich" as the movie is called is the Russian word for "comrade" or "friend". Basil Rathbone also stars as the Soviet commissar, Dimitri Gorotchenko.

Sometimes it is hard to enjoy a movie considering what's going on, both during the Stalin era and the Putin era.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed