Mountain Justice (1937) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A forgotten gem from Warner Brothers.
mark.waltz22 June 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Backwoods nurse Josephine Hutchinson and doctor Guy Kibbee want to start a series of clinics to help the poor people who can't afford medical attention. Unfortunately, Hutchinson is saddled with an abusive father (Robert Barrat) who uses his temper to keep his wife (Elisabeth Risdon) and two daughters (Hutchinson, Marcia Mae Jones) in line. With the help of doctor Kibbee and his spinster fiancée (wicked witch Margaret Hamilton), Hutchinson escapes to the city for training, and comes back to fulfill her dream with Kibbee. Unfortunately, her father is unwilling to take her back into his life, and takes his frustrations out on younger daughter Jones. When Jones turns to her older sister for help, an accidental death puts Hutchinson on trial for murder. Her New York lawyer beau George Brent comes to the mountains to help her, leading the way to a gripping conclusion.

I was pleasantly surprised by how gripping this film was from start to finish, filled with humor, romance, and melodrama. Hutchinson, one of the most underrated leading ladies in history, is convincing; beautiful, yet not glamorized. She has audience sympathy from beginning to end. Brent, who would support many of Hollywood's most popular leading ladies of the 30's and 40's (Davis, Stanwyck, Oberon, Francis, etc.), does his job well; it is a shame that in few Hollywood films of this era, he would be the focus of the story. Risdon and Jones as Hutchinson's mother and sister, do well in small, yet important roles. Barrat, as the abusive father, is so hateful, though he gives his character a quiet proudness that influences his shameful violence. It is hard to praise a performance which requires him to be so hateful, but yet, it is filled with realism that any abused child can relate to.

In comic second leads, Guy Kibbee and Margaret Hamilton are hysterical as an engaged couple heading towards the altar for 30 years. (Hamilton, it should be noted, was only 35 when this film was released!) Their wedding scene is absolutely hysterical. For one of the few times in her film career, Hamilton plays a totally sympathetic character, making it hard to believe just two years later, she would enter film immortality as the wicked witch in "The Wizard of Oz". In a small role as Hutchinson's New York chum, Mona Barrie makes the most of her few scenes. "Mountain Justice" is a film regularly seen now on TCM, and makes fascinating viewing.
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Edith Maxwell case!
JohnHowardReid13 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Copyright 6 November 1936 by Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. New York release at the Rialto, 12 May 1937. U.S. release: 24 April 1937. 10 reels. 83 minutes.

SYNOPSIS: Patricide - obviously suggested by the Edith Maxwell case.

COMMENT: This engrossingly dramatic Warner Bros social documentary has been produced on an extremely lavish scale. Director Curtiz is in his element with the huge crowd scenes and has creatively and imaginatively handled the stunning courtroom sequences as well as the film's other tense moments.

Unfortunately, despite Curtiz's forceful efforts - aided by wonderfully skilful photography by Ernest Haller - the powerfully suspenseful atmosphere is a little undermined not only by some trite dialogue and stereotyped characterizations, but by some misguided efforts at comedy relief. Scriptwriters Norman Reilly Raine of Tugboat Annie fame and Luci Ward of innumerable "B" westerns are solely to blame.

In the Edith Maxwell part, Josephine Hutchinson plays with spirit yet dignity. A difficult role, but she handles it with perfect assurance and ease. Barrat is equally right as her brutal father. In a more conventional role, Brent comes across with reasonable force. Heading a great Warner Bros support cast, Marcia Mae Jones deserves a special mention as the heroine's understandably rebellious child-bride sister, whose flight is the catalyst for "murder".
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mountain Melodrama
wes-connors15 December 2013
"Even in this age of advanced civilization there are still many communities which cling grimly to the stern, unbending principals of our ancestors. And sometimes the defiance of Youth against implacable tribal laws results in tragedy," according to the forward...

Our heroine is attractive young nursing school student Josephine Hutchinson (as Ruth Harkins). She would like to start a clinic in her backwoods mountain community, with sympathetic doctor Guy Kibbee (as John "Doc" Barnard), but the endeavor is forbidden by Ms. Hutchinson's ignorant and fundamentalist father Robert Barrat (as Jeff Harkins). When a carnival passes through town, Hutchinson meets New York lawyer George Brent (as Paul Cameron), who is in town to prosecute Mr. Barrat for shooting a surveyor. Hutchinson and Mr. Brent are mutually attracted, but Mr. Barrat forbids marriage...

As the brutal, whip-wielding father, Barrat's performance is the one to watch. His wife and daughter, former British "silent film" star Elisabeth Risdon (as Meg) and veteran child actress Marcia Mae Jones (as Bethie) are exceptionally well cast. Also interesting is the long-time unmarried relationship formed by Mr. Kibbee and the inimitable Margaret Hamilton (as Phoebe Lamb). "Mountain Justice" is heightened to the point of no return, but it's certainly interesting. The production is artful, with notable work from director Michael Curtiz and (black-and-white) photographer Ernest "Ernie" Haller. Their work would look better if some of the melodramatics had been toned town, however.

****** Mountain Justice (4/24/37) Michael Curtiz ~ Josephine Hutchinson, George Brent, Robert Barrat, Marcia Mae Jones
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Intense and Interesting
Torchy19 January 2010
In spite of its faults, I was really impressed by this movie. Warner made a number of social justice flicks during the thirties, and I thought this was one of the best. Strong performances, tight script and lots of action.

Some people have complained about certain plot points, and it's true that the writers could have made things more believable. And while some of the mountain folk are portrayed sympathetically, over all the script does not paint a flattering picture of the townspeople. My biggest problem with the script is the ending. For most of the film the main character is determined to become a nurse so that she can help her community. At the end she decides to dump all that and become a housewife. I didn't buy it.

Still, this movie really pulled me in, and the tension keeps building right up to the climax. Writers Norman Reilly Raine and Luci Ward do a good job with the characters and situations. Josephine Hutchinson is excellent, and most of the cast is strong. Michael Curtiz keeps the pace brisk. The scenes where the young woman confronts her father are intense and harrowing. I think this movie is one of Curtiz' high points from the thirties, and it's a shame it's not better known.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I want you and you want hillbillies
utgard1413 December 2013
Good-looking melodrama about a backwoods girl (Josephine Hutchinson) who dreams of opening medical clinics for hillbillies, but most contend with abusive father (Robert Barrat). Outrageous at times with some ridiculous caricatures in place of real characters. But still it's entertaining and moves along nicely, helped by an able cast. George Brent plays the Northern lawyer in love with Hutchinson. I believe he was the only character who actually said the word hillbilly in the film. But he said it often and with such disdain each time I couldn't help but chuckle. Guy Kibbee and Margaret Hamilton are the lovable old couple that help show the audience the hill people aren't all as evil as Barrat.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
supposedly based on a real case
ksf-210 November 2019
Apparently based on a real case, according to the Trivia, this court trial film has some big hollywood names -- George Brent, Guy Kibbee, Mona Barrie, and even Margaret Hamilton (a couple years before Wizard of Oz !) Josephine Hutchins is Ruth Harkins, violently abused by her father. it's a little uneven, but does its best to tell the story of a daughter, determined to make her own way and marry who she wants to marry. it's pretty good. purports to show the ways of the appalachian mountain folk. Directed by Michael Curtiz, who made some pretty big films in his day, and won the oscar for Casablanca.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Remarkably good, forgotten film
vincentlynch-moonoi11 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This is a remarkable film, especially for 1937! Think of it -- the physical and sexual abuse of minors and young women and mothers, fratricide, and lynching. Wow!

The title tells it all -- legal and moral views of hillbillies coming into the 20th century. Of course, there's also a love story here -- that between George Brent and Josephine Hutchinson. The story is of an abusive hillbilly father that clearly thinks he owns his wife and two daughters -- one in her early 20s, the other approximately pubescent. After several beatings, the older daughters leaves for NYC where she becomes a nurse, and then returns to her hometown to help a local doctor open a clinic. Meanwhile, the father is forcing the young daughter to marry a low-life hillbilly. The older daughter kills her father as she is being beaten with a whip, and goes to jail to be tried for murder. George Brent to the rescue, as a NY city lawyer already hated in the town for previously winning a conviction (and short jail term) against the father when he committed murder. The ending may seem implausible in today's legal climate, but was possible back in those days...albeit just a tad to happy.

There are some wonderful performances here. George Brent is fine as the NYC lawyer. Josephine Hutchinson is absolutely wonderful as the older daughter, and every time I see her in an old movie I wonder why she didn't become a major star; she is a fine actress. Guy Kibbee plays the old doctor, and is good in the role, although most of his screen time in in the first half of the film. You'll hate Robert Barrat as the father, but it's an excellent portrayal. The judge is played by Joe King...and is named Joe King in the film; interesting, and a character actor you may recognize. Margaret Hamilton has a charming role as the spinster out to wed the doctor...and she succeeds; unfortunately, her screen time fades as the movie progresses. Unfortunately, Fuzzy Knight plays a likable hillbilly here; for a change I found him tolerable. Elisabeth Risdon plays the mother; another character actor you'll recognize, and this was typical of the roles she often played. Marcia Mae Jones plays the younger daughter well, and you'll recognize here as well (you may remember her as the semi-invalid daughter in Shirley Temple's "Heidi").

I rarely give "8"'s, but I am here. This is a forgotten gem!
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Quite stupid but also quite entertaining!
planktonrules20 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Before I begin, I must point out that even if you think I am being too harsh about MOUNTAIN JUSTICE, you can't possibly think this seriously flawed film deserved a score of 10! Films like GONE WITH THE WIND and DR. STRANGELOVE have many reviews with scores well below 10--this very obscure and strange little film from Warner Brothers surely isn't up to the quality of these films is it?!

So why did I say the film was quite stupid...well, because it was! While the film was quite entertaining, the studio produced a script that just didn't make a lot of sense and was full of plot holes. In the process, they made "hillbillies" (I assume from the Ozarks) look like complete sub-humans! Obviously Warner didn't particularly care if no one in the hills would want to see this sort of "exposee" film--but they couldn't have seriously believed that the city folks would accept this film based as fact! I'll give you a few examples of the silliness. First, when the insanely brutal Robert Barrat shot a government employee on his land, the jury gave him 90 days in jail! It seemed to imply that this was a federal employee--and if this were the case, it would have been held in federal court--not some backwoods locale and 90 days for a shooting?! Second, when Barrat later decided to kill his oldest daughter by flogging her to death, the fact that he was attacking her when she finally fought back seemed irrelevant. None of the wounds or the past shooting seemed worth mentioning. And, despite this being a very, very local affair, newspapers read "Nations Eyes on Ruth Harkin" and the trial seemed to get more attention than the O. J. trial!!! Then, when the autopsy showed she did NOT kill him and he died of a heart attack, she was convicted of murder anyway and sentenced to 25 years!!! Not content with this, those "crazy hillbillies" dressed like dumb make-shift klansmen and tried to string her up--while the police offered no resistance! Talk about far-fetched! None of this made any sense at all--even the stupidest mob in the world wouldn't have behaved this way--plus they would have worn better masks than old hopelessly large potato sacks. Talk about having to suspend disbelief!!

So although the plot made no sense and the film was way over the top stylistically speaking, I still gave the film a 4--which might seem generous. Well, the 4 isn't for the lackluster performance of the leads (particularly George Brent--who looked very much out of place and ill at ease)--the 4 is for Robert Barrat's amazing performance. He was total scum and played it very convincingly--so much so that I was rooting for the daughter to kill the old jerk! Normally, Barrat almost always played city types and never anyone remotely like the guy in this film. The change of pace for this character actor was appreciated. In addition, Guy Kibbee and Margaret Hamilton provided some excellent color. The weirdness and salaciousness did hold my attention.

Not a good film, but it was entertaining. Plus, the message seemed to be that it really ISN'T worth trying to change these hillbillies--they really are beneath contempt!! Talk about bigotry.

If you do see it, two things to look for. First, although the film takes place apparently over several years, Ruth's little sister never seems to age. Additionally, in a case of impossible lawyering (is that a word?), the Prosecuting Attorney at the beginning of the film is the Defense Attorney for Ruth's trial and the Defense Attorney is now the Prosecutor!! On what planet would they do this??!?!

Finally, if you do want to see a GOOD film about mob rule and miscarriages of justice, two contemporary films that are almost infinitely better are FURY (1936) and THEY WON'T FORGET (1937). Both have stronger emotional impact and both are very intelligently written.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
bears no resemblance to hillbillies
grafxman13 April 2008
The movie is entertaining but bears absolutely no resemblance whatsoever to hillbillies I grew up with. Behaving the way he does, the father character would have been shot dead in his teenage years where I come from in West Virginia. A brutal thug like him would never have fathered any children if he did survive because no woman would ever have married him.

In the hillbilly culture where I come from, the family group is typically one of matriarchy. As for the father selecting his daughter's husband, that is totally and completely ludicrous. In the hillbilly culture I grew up in, father's will typically object strenuously to their daughter's selection of a mate but that's only because he doesn't want her to leave the house.

As for the doctoring there, most people don't go to doctors or dentists. The hillbilly medical practice goes like this: you ignore the pain until it either goes away or gets so bad you can't stand it and you have to go see a doctor. If it goes away, which it usually does, then you didn't need a doctor anyway. If it gets so bad you can't stand it then maybe it's something serious or maybe it's something you can live with. Dental practice goes like this: you never do anything to your teeth until the cavities get so bad you can't stand the pain. Then you go to the dentist, get them pulled and get false teeth.

Personally speaking, I never brushed my teeth until I joined the Navy in 1963! I never took a shower either! Needless to say, those bad practices and habits were quickly altered in boot camp.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Hollywood Hillbilly hack job..
st-shot25 September 2018
In Mountain Justice Hollywood displays its early contempt for southern hill folk that remains in one form or another unabated to this day. Portrayed en masse as ill bred, bad tempered, poor mannered ignoramuses one is surprised not to see them living in caves and grunting.

Country doc Barnard dreams of bringing a health center to his backwoods community but is met with skepticism by the coarse locals. Local girl and assistant Ruth Harkins shares his dream but is prevented by her father who views improvement and progress as disrespecting tradition. He responds brutally to his daughter and her "crazy notions" but she remains undaunted in her effort to help a community that in large part despises her.

Director Michael Curtiz offers up a share of tense moments that raises the tenor of storyline at times and there's a wonderful confident turn of a disheveled country lawyer played by Robert McWade but the treatment and interpretation of the Hillbilly community throughout the film remains rife with a bias that for the wrong reason would hold any interest today.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Powerful True Story of Mountain "justice" and danger of Tyranny.
jlthornb5125 October 2019
A superb film and important cautionary tale about mob justice and the danger of ignorance in a rural community. Josephine Hutchinson gives a powerful performance as the victim of a male dominated society that does not truly recognize her as an equal or even as a human being. Treated as a slave and abused by a sociopathic father, she is defended by a New York lawyer played by George Brent with sensitivity and skill. The character of the hill society is blown wide open as this tremendous story unfolds and the viewer will make inevitable comparisons to the current authoritarian regime in Washington in the year 2019. A profound message to our own generation that the sins of the past are being repeated unless Americans fight for the rule of law and not let a demagogic sociopath in the Oval Office destroy those who disagree with him. This is an example of Hollywood films of the 1930s tackling important issues with courage and intelligence. Issues confronted in this film include the vital need for education, an honest law enforcement and judiciary, respect for women as equal citizens, and a proper system of medical care. Most significant is how essential the rule of law is to a free and just society, an issue that touches all our lives and the future of our children today.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Too Many Weak Moments
Michael_Elliott17 December 2013
Mountain Justice (1937)

** (out of 4)

Michael Curtiz directed this rather disappointing film from Warner about mountain girl Ruth Harkins (Josephine Hutchinson) who wants to help a local doctor (Guy Kibbee) build various hospitals so that the poor can have good health. Her abusive father finds out about all of this and her relationship with a New York lawyer (George Brent) so he puts a major beating on her. In self defense the daughter ends up killing her father and the trash locals want her dead too. MOUNTAIN JUSTICE has quite a bit of stuff going on in it but sadly very little of it works. Warner made all sorts of "message" pictures that often dealt with injustice as well as revenge. This film features that stuff but the entire plot is just so paper thin that it was hard to take any of it serious. The biggest problem is that this father is so mean that it's hard to believe that even these trash locals would buy into supporting him. Even if you do believe that they would, the courtroom sequence at the end is just so obvious because you know there would be so many ways for the lawyer to get the woman off these murder charges even if the trash jury convicted her. I'm not going to ruin the final act but it too really feels rushed and thrown together. The performances are another mixed bag but it seems like Brent wants nothing to do with this material. Even in some bad movies he still manages to deliver good performances but that's not the case here as he just comes across bored and wishing he was somewhere else. Hutchinson delivers a fine performance but it's not strong enough to carry the picture. Kibbee, Robert Barrat and Margaret Hamilton are all good but the screenplay really doesn't do much with their characters. There are a few effective moments including the way Curtiz uses shadows for the beating and murder. There's also an effective sequence towards the end when the rednecks decide to put masks on to kidnap the girl from jail. Still, these scenes just aren't enough to overcome all the weaker moments.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed