Doctor Syn (1937) User Reviews

Honest, decent crime.

[hgallon · 7/10 · 6 January 2000]

There are some black and white films which as they grow older become more and more evergreen. (The obvious example is Casablanca). This is one such, although it may not appeal to the young and non-british. Some of its fascination lies in the attitudes, acting styles and techniques which are so neatly frozen in time. If the plot seems a little contrived here and there, or the dialogue rather stilted especially in the romantic scenes, it all adds to the feel of the period in which the film was made (rather than that in which it was set).

The plot centres on the coastal hamlet of Dymchurch, where a detachment of the Royal Navy is about to make a search for smuggled goods. The inhabitants of the village are outwardly honest and simple folk, but many of them have nefarious secrets to conceal.

The original novel "Dr. Syn", derived from Kentish local legend, was very much darker and bloodier than this film. Likewise, George Arliss's performance as the mild and unctuous parson bears little outward resemblance to the eponymous reprobate of the novel. However, Arliss's character becomes much more believable and deserving of the viewer's wholehearted sympathy towards the end of the film.

There are some other acting highlights, notably Wilson Coleman's tipsy country doctor and Graham Moffat's Dickensian fat boy. This was one of Margaret Lockwood's early starring appearances and she smiles, bursts into tears and pouts beautifully throughout.

The action sequences all start suddenly without any preceding build-up of tension, and end even more quickly. The comic aspects of the film are given greater emphasis than the action and this adds to the general lightness of atmosphere. The only menacing undertones are provided by the constant references to dark goings-on on the surrounding marshes, and Meinhard Maur's performance as the mutilated mulatto seaman, intent on revenge.

All in all, the film is delightful nonsense which deserves more attention than it has received.

Strange Doings In Dymchurch

[bkoganbing · 7/10 · 19 October 2007]

The final screen role of George Arliss finds him back in the United Kingdom in the title role of Doctor Syn. At first glance he's the mild mannered vicar who takes a paternal interest in pretty Margaret Lockwood and her budding romance with the young squire in the area, John Loder. But in reality he's got a far better second career going as a smuggler.

Doctor Syn ought to be good at it. In reality he's the famous pirate Captain Clegg thought to have been hung years ago. And some of the village establishment in Dymchurch where Arliss has his parsonage really work for him in the smuggling trade.

Roy Emerton of the Royal Navy has come to Dymchurch to uncover the smuggling racket. He's a dogged fellow and his probing uncovers some disturbing information.

Arliss gives a fine farewell performance in his last screen role done for his country's cinema as opposed to Hollywood. It's fascinating though that Alfred Hitchcock with an eye towards the American market and our Code changed the pirate/parson in his film, Jamaica Inn, while apparently no one felt any compunction about doing that for Dr. Syn.

Two remakes were made of this story, Hammer did one with Peter Cushing in the title role and Walt Disney had a three part television story that starred Patrick McGoohan.

Best performance in the supporting cast is that of Graham Moffatt who comes off as a British Lou Costello. He plays an apparently dimwitted young kid who turns out not to be so dumb in the end.

Doctor Syn was a fine film for George Arliss to leave the cinema with and it still holds up very well today.

To see George Arliss

[jacksflicks · 7/10 · 3 February 2010]

This is is a rather creaky, flawed effort, that reminds me a little of Jamaica Inn. And yes, this is George Arliss's last film, and he is indeed getting on. But he hadn't lost that unique Arliss delivery -- exuberant I'd call it -- that's so delicious to watch. And he had that angular look that lent itself to so many vivid characters, from Disraeli to Rothschild to Richelieu. He had a gaze that added the dimension of guile, even to his heroic characters, and also made him a great villain, as he was in The Green Goddess and finally (or as another reviewer says, eventually) in Dr. Syn.

Every glimpse of the great Arliss is a treat, and you should grab anything you see him in, because his vehicles are very hard to find. And that includes this one. If for no other reason, see it to see the man who discovered Bette Davis.

Good Entertainment With Atmosphere & Action

[Snow Leopard · 11 March 2002]

This version of the old legend of "Dr. Syn" is good entertainment, with some effective old-fashioned atmosphere and a story that includes plenty of action. Most of the acting is pretty good, with George Arliss giving a good performance in the lead, a young-looking Margaret Lockwood providing the charm, and Roy Emerton in an energetic if somewhat exaggerated role. Not all of the characters come across as well as theirs do, but more than enough of it is good to make the movie worth watching.

The story starts with a government ship coming to a seacoast town where there have been rumors of smuggling, and where secrets abound. It soon leads to an entertaining cat-and-mouse game that takes some interesting, if sometimes implausible, turns. It's a little uneven at times, but it holds your attention, and the way it all comes out still works. Overall, it's a good adventure story that deserves a look.

Ok but...

[markfisher-76405 · 6/10 · 23 February 2022]

It's an ok film a little dull perhaps and not much more to be said I'm afraid. The hammer version called Captain Clegg is a far superior film and we'll worth a look.

"And leave me alone with all these sailors!"

[hwg1957-102-265704 · 6/10 · 8 July 2017]

Based on the novel by Russell Thorndike this is a good film set in the village of Dymchurch where a group of sailors led by Captain Howard Collyer R.N. arrrive to look for smugglers. It is the village where the once notorious Captain Clegg was buried and where on the salt marshes strange phantom riders have been seen. The titular Doctor Syn is the local vicar who watches over and helps his flock. The director Roy William Neill keeps a firm hand on the narrative and incident follows incident at a lively pace with amusing and interesting dialogue.

In his last film elderly George Arliss plays Dr. Syn and is OK. Margaret Lockwood and John Loder don't have much to do. Fortunately there are great character actors in support; Roy Emerton, Graham Moffatt, George Merritt, Wally Patch and Muriel George. Meinhart Maur mimes and moans as a mulatto. There is a character called Dr. Pepper but I don't think that was an early example of product placement.

The version I saw had poor picture quality which was a shame as some shooting was done on location but it was difficult to see. Roy William Neill went on to direct many Rathbone/Bruce Sherlock Holmes films, some of which were excellent.

An Okay End of a Career

[dbborroughs · 5/10 · 25 April 2004]

The final film of the actor George Arliss was this version of the story of Dr Syn, who was a pastor by day and a smuggler by night. Later versions would star Peter Cushing for Hammer and Patrick McGoohan for Disney, this is the weakest version of the story.

The movie is okay melodrama, but isn't anything to write home about. Certainly had it not been an a multi-feature DVD I would never have picked it up, but now that I've seen it I can't say it was a complete waste of time.

Part of the problem is that Arliss was well past his prime when he played the lead. While the fact that he was pushing 70 should not be held against him; the fact that he looked very close to dead, or at least embalmed and was playing a man of action should. The role should have been played by Tod Slaughter and you would have had a classic film.In his day Arliss was hailed as a great actor of the stage, unfortunately sound came too late to allow him to be anything but okay.

If you want an okay time killer or to see a once great actors last gasp then see this version of Doctor Syn, otherwise stay away.

Surprisingly flat....and a sad end to a distinguished career.

[planktonrules · 4/10 · 5 July 2017]

During the 1920s and 30s, George Arliss made some magnificent movies (such as "The Millionaire" and "The Working Man")...and earned an Oscar for playing the lead in "Disraeli". Because his career was so distinguished, it's sad that it ended with a rather dull film...one that SHOULD have been so much better. But sadly, "Dr. Syn" just isn't all that interesting.

The film begins briefly in 1780 and you see a pirate crew member called 'the Mulatto' left for dead by pirates. Twenty years pass and Captain Clegg the pirate has faked his own death and is now the parson, Dr. Syn. So, he's a preacher by day and the leader of a band of smugglers by night. However, the Mulatto is back...and so are men intent on capturing Clegg and putting Dr. Syn out of business.

While all this sounds VERY exciting, the direction is sluggish and uninspiring. And, it lacks the energy and scope to make it a memorable film worth your time.

Odd doings in Dymchurch

[theowinthrop · 8/10 · 24 November 2005]

Most people are acquainted with the story of Captain Clegg and Dr. Syn from the Walt Disney series with Patrick McGoohan entitled, THE SCARECROW OF ROMNEY MARSH. Basically it is about an area of the coast of 18th Century England which is a haven for successful smuggling. The British government is seeking to stop this, and they keep failing to catch the leader and his followers. The reason is that the leader (McGoohan in the Walt Disney series, and George Arliss here) is not such a bad guy, and the laws being enforced are ruinous and unjust to the local populace.

This version was Arliss' final film, and it is amazing to me that this movie and DISRAELI are the only two Arliss performances that are on video (I'm not sure if they are on DVD). Like DISRAELI it is a period piece, but his Dr. Syn is not a real historical figure. Still he keeps to most of Arliss's normal role characteristics. Syn is actually the ex-pirate Captain Clegg, who was supposed to have been hanged for piracy a decade earlier at Dymchurch. Clegg and his crew settled in the area, continuing careers as smugglers. But the smuggling laws are broken here because of the unfair effect on the population (they raise revenues for a tyrannical government, and don't take local expenses into consideration). The government sends a leading pirate hunter (Roy Emerton) to the area with a mulatto (Meinhart Maur) who knows what Clegg looks like. Maur was mutilated and abandoned on an island by Clegg years before. What we don't learn until later is that the mulatto had attacked Clegg's wife and daughter (the attack must have shortened Mrs. Clegg's life), so that Clegg was justified in what he did.

The film shows how Emerton slowly figures out that Clegg is Syn, and how Syn and his crew do manage to escape again at the conclusion. But the film is a fun one for all that, and a fitting conclusion to Arliss's curious and worthy film career. Brief as it was he did raise the level of acting by his subtleties - and erased some of the bombast that plagued Victorian and Edwardian theater.

Early adaptation

[Leofwine_draca · 5/10 · 6 June 2021]

I saw this one playing on Talking Pictures TV and thought I'd check it out: DOCTOR SYN (1937), the first British adaptation of the popular Russell Thorndike novel series, which was later remade by Hammer as CAPTAIN CLEGG (aka NIGHT CREATURES). This black and white version of the tale feels lower budgeted and not as lavish as the Hammer version, although it has a certain amount of atmosphere in the coastal scenes and the direction by Roy William Neill (later to shoot FRANKENSTEIN MEETS THE WOLF MAN and various Rathbone/Holmes movies) is good enough. George Arliss plays Syn in a much more sympathetic light than Cushing would, and is well supported by a game cast including Margaret Lockwood and Graham Moffatt. For a 1937 film this one's dated somewhat and feels a little talky at times, leaving it average overall; the Hammer one's a bit better.

"There's Queer Goings-On In Dymchurch!"

[stryker-5 · 27 December 1999]

In the year 1780, the notorious pirate Captain Clegg marooned a mulatto sailor on a desert island. The sailor's ears and tongue were mutilated, and he was trussed up and left for dead. Now it is 1800, and the scene is set in Dymchurch, an English coastal village. A detachment of sailors from the Royal Navy has arrived in the village to hunt down smugglers and contraband. The mulatto is part of the naval complement, having been rescued many years previously by the warship's crew. In the village churchyard a tombstone marks the last resting-place of Captain Clegg, who was hanged for piracy ... or was he?

In this costume yarn the village of Dymchurch is a law unto itself, the whole community being actively involved in the smuggling industry. At night men dress in the eerie garb of the 'marsh phantoms', and take their orders from the sinister Scarecrow. Why does the village parson, Doctor Syn, react so violently to the presence of the mulatto?

George Arliss plays Doctor Syn in this, his last film. As one career was ending another was beginning, an incredibly young-looking Margaret Lockwood appearing as Imogene the barmaid.

The scenery is nice and atmospheric, successfully evoking the rickety feel of vernacular architecture of the period. The Ship Inn is particularly good.

Undercranking the camera in order to liven up the fist fight seems a somewhat clumsy technique to the modern viewer. The humour, mainly in the form of Jerry Jerk the overgrown schoolboy (Graham Moffatt) doesn't come off. And would a coroner really allow a naval captain to turn an inquest into a discussion forum on smuggling? How does the captain know about the parson's injured wrist?

Verdict - An odd little British film with nice atmospheric sets.

End Of The Line For Arliss and almost for Gaumont British

[malcolmgsw · 5/10 · 2 May 2013]

As has already been pointed out Arliss was pushing 70 when he made this film and he is about 20 years too old to realistically play this role.It was also the penultimate year of Gaumont British as a viable production company.In 1936 they made 12 films,in 1937 when this film was made,8 and the following and last year 2.The company would close down Lime Grove studios and become involved in the financial disaster that happened in 1938.There was even a Board of Trade inquiry which was inconclusive.As a result Rank purchased the assets and that was the end of Gaumont British.This film creaks along.In fact the makers seemed to forget one little fact.Clegg had not been ordained as a preacher,merely swapped identities with the original preacher.So at the end he conducts the marriage of Loder and Lockwood,but of course they aren't in the circumstances legally married.Rather a better film is "Ask a Policeman" the Will Hay comedy based on smuggling.

Unnecessarily Dull and Dreary

[Uriah43 · 4/10 · 6 September 2020]

This film begins in 1780 with a person known simply as the "Mulatto" (Meinhart Maur) being dragged off of a boat on and tied to a tree on a deserted tropical island where he is abandoned without any food or water as a penalty for betraying a pirate captain. The scene then shifts to a small town on the English coast some 20 years later at a church service where the local parson "Dr. Syn" (George Arliss) has just dismissed everybody early upon hearing that a British patrol has arrived with the intent on searching all of the buildings. As it so happens, this entire area has gained a reputation for being the main port of entry for smugglers and the leader of the patrol named "Captain Collyer" (Roy Emerton) has been sent to put a stop to it. Unfortunately, what he doesn't know is that the identities of the smugglers is only known a few villagers and they are very well-connected. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say that, although this story certainly seemed interesting at first, the manner in which it was delivered could have used significant improvement. For example, many of the scenes were shot at night and in the foggy surroundings of a nearby marsh. Because of this there were times when it became difficult to actually ascertain what was happening. Of course, this film was produced in the 30's when the technology wasn't nearly as good as the present so I suppose some allowances should be made. But even so there were some scenes which were still a bit too dull and dreary and they affected the overall picture. Be that as it may, while this certainly wasn't a bad film by any means, it could have been better and I have rated it accordingly.

Far better than the Disney version

[bbmtwist · 10/10 · 10 July 2016]

Due to a tight script, fine direction, a rapid pace, and Arliss' final performance as Dr. Syn, this is a winner in every direction.

Light comedy, action, suspense, drama, all coalesce in this initial adaptation of Russell Thorndike's action novel.

I just came from watching the excruciatingly dull three part Disney adaptation of a number of the novels under the title THE SCARECROW OF ROMNEY MARSH.

Arliss' film is superior to the Disney in every way.

Highly recommended. That's all I have to say, but the review guidelines require ten lines, so I am filling them up.

The vicar has two faces.

[mark.waltz · 4/10 · 12 April 2016]

That lovable old rascal, George Arliss, certainly got around in costume dramas, focusing on the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Between Disraeli, Voltaire, Alexander Hamilton, and Cardinal Richelieu, Arliss had played his share of historical characters on screen. Unfortunately, today most of his films are pretty much the same; he continuously sticks his thespian nose into government business, rises in power, and seems to spend more time working to reunite young lovers than he is in trying to accomplish anything to benefit society.

Arliss is pretty much doing the same thing here, playing vicar by day and pirate by night. This is a convoluted version of an often filmed tale, and after a great beginning where a pirate betrayer is left to rot on a deserted island (strapped to a pole so he can't escape), it moves quickly downward into an 80 minute long boring piece of British celluloid that is often difficult to watch due to an excessive number of characters and many convoluted plot twists. this seems more like a vehicle for British horror star Todd Slaughter rather than Arliss who concluded his film career here.

The young couple whom Arlisw sticks his nose into is played by the young Margaret Lockwood and John Litel, and a plot twist that is revealed three- quarters into the film is just too absurd to believe and to try considering Arliss is previous foray into these type of roles. While expertly crafted and beautifully filmed, It suffers from severe mood swings, sometimes appearing to be several pictures smashed into one, and ultimately ends up an eye rolling mess. this is also one of those British films where the variety of accents makes it often difficult for American audiences to completely understand, and that is rather distracting and ultimately takes away from the interest of seeing the plot fleshed out.

This film creaks somewhat

[j_paul_murdock · 5/10 · 31 July 2021]

Unfortunately, Margaret Lockwood isn't involved in this film, one of her first, half as much as she should be. It is a vehicle for classical actor George Arliss to give his rather angular looks to camera. This was Arliss's final film and one of Gaumont's final films too!

Rather like Jamaica Inn, this is a story of smuggling in the 18th Century but set in Romney Marshes rather than Cornwall. It starts though with a prelude of a man, his tongue cut out and his ears cut off, being abandoned on a desert island by a pirate and his men.

We cut to Dymchurch where Margaret Lockwood, the local barmaid, is being courted by both the reliable but rather elderly schoolmaster (whom she doesn't love) and the rather wayward but dashing son of the squire (whom she does love). However, Dr Syn's sermon is cut short by a signal that the navy is arriving to check out rumours of smuggling. Of course, almost everyone is in on the smuggling, except for the doctor who believes the stories of the marsh spirits that ride at night - they are, of course, the smugglers in disguise.

Among the navy crew is the Mulatto that the pirate left for dead. The pirate who is buried in Dymchurch cemetery. Like a sniffer dog, the Mulatto uses his heightened senses to confirm that something is up and after a couple of wild goose chases, Dr Syn realises that the game is up. The pirate's tomb is found to be empty for a start as Dr Syn is, in fact, the pirate in disguise and the leader of the smugglers! Not only that, but he turns out to be Margaret Lockwood's father!

When the schoolmaster is killed, Dr Syn's parting gift to his daughter is a special dispensation for her to marry the squire's son.

This film creaks somewhat and does Arliss's distinguished career no justice as he himself is at least 20 years too old for the part. The only sparks for me are the relationship between Margaret Lockwood and John Loder as the square's son, and the masks in their frightening simplicity of the 'marsh spirits'. The little comic scenes seem to jar somewhat. The Disney version - Scarecrow of Romney Marsh - with Patrick McGoohan apparently handled the action better.

Phantoms on Horseback

[richardchatten · 8/10 · 23 February 2023]

George Arliss makes his swansong as a wily old fox in an adaptation of Russell Thorndike's smuggling yarn which has to be the only book filmed by both Hammer Films and Disney.

The first film made in Britain by the ever reliable Roy William Neill, a succulent supporting cast includes Roy Emerton as Captain Collier swaggering about in gold braid, dear old Wally Patch trades in his bowler for a bosun's hat, fans of Will Hay will savour Graham Moffat as a resourceful choirboy rejoicing in the name Jerry Jerk with ambitions to become a hangman, while Wilson Coleman plays a character called - I kid you not - 'Dr Pepper'.

much more than a black & white film

[spj-4 · 9/10 · 28 April 2006]

I regard this black & white movie highly, for it has many applications into the modern struggles of those seeking justice - in any era! It has stood the test of time. That's something the lack of vision of fundamentalists & puritans, across time & place, fail to appreciate. Freedom of speech is not an issue to such conservative powers who had a powerful voice in 1937 when this movie was made, as to today. Rationalism & fundamentalism are entirely broad enough for themselves. No room for fantasy, adventure or contrary thought some would respectfully observe. No complexities of life or possibility.

The character of "Dr Syn" is displayed as the quietly pious but genuine pastor looking after his flock, is a credible cover for his secretive nocturnal activities of much merit & substance in their justice. Such justice is something that hardliners would portray as an extravagance they can do without. Indeed, people without a breath of vision won't find much here. They can just listen to too many politicians or shock-jock media personalities who could have an immediate fix to any confrontation without justice but suitable to themselves.

Dr Syn might have appeared to be a bible basher. But that is where his common bond with bigots & hypocrites ceases. He was of principle & integrity in his justice, remaining committed to the marginalised outcasts he is sympathetic to the cause of. As such, his expression of two seemingly conflicting characters neatly blends into his one person of integrity. No hypocrisy. No injustice.

In a dictatorship of such historical authority of that time, he is forced to present a message faithful to his faith, but remain loyal to his kin of broader vision & concern for true justice & friendship beyond lip service. He is a bridge between kingdoms of much merit. Such as were his friends were people not intending to crucify a king of heaven or be unjust traffic cops, across time & place. In a modern world, harsh & unmoved in raking up revenues for corrupt governments, it has much relevance to its message.

Of course, such things as rum-runs were anti-authority & subjective in judgement - something black & white thinkers who don't like others having free will, prefer to oppose. But the drama presented in "Dr Syn" is anything but black & white. The dilemmas of the broad-thinking parson not engulfed by religiousness as he might have been, are passionately voiced by the protagonist in actor George Arliss. If this final movie of his life was his only offering, it would have been a substantial contribution in an otherwise productive life & varied acting career.

I think the plot is a realistic one & believable in the era of small churches were scattered along the English coast, & has been verified as historical fact. In such places, activities such as illegal liquor trade & potential invasion were commonly witnessed or experienced threats, that caused the citizens to be wary & vengeful in forming any trust bar their most trusted relationships.

In reality, this movie is much more than an historical piece. Certainly, it is much more than a black & white movie as some may dismiss it!