We Live Again (1934) User Reviews

An interesting curio

[brendangcarroll · 5/10 · 20 October 2013]

I finally caught up with this film on DVD and it provoked a lot of questions that merit further research into its production history. I can easily see why it was such a box office flop, despite its high production values, luminous photography and fine cast. Although Goldwyn hired a slew of heavyweight writers (Maxwell Anderson and Preston Sturges among them) the script frequently gets bogged down in preachy rhetoric and as others have noted here, pro Communist theory. Anna Sten is extremely photogenic but her acting style is so emotive, I wondered if she believed she was appearing in a silent film. Frederic March gave a beautiful performance in contrast. The most interesting aspect of the film is its treatment of casual sex and illegitimacy, both taboo subjects under the soon to be enforced Production Code. I'm sure this film was never reissued after 1934 for that content and also its very left wing undercurrent, which may explain why the DVD print was in such remarkable shape. The supporting cast (as always in such films of the period) makes it a joy to watch. It is fascinating to compare with THE SCARLET EMPRESS (released the same year) and ANNA KARENINA (1935) An interesting curio and worth seeing.

What it lacks in script and polish it makes up for in handsome visuals

[AlsExGal · 7/10 · 24 January 2023]

Russia-set costume drama from United Artists, Samuel Goldwyn, and director Rouben Mamoulian. Callow young nobleman and soldier Prince Dmitri (Fredric March) has an affair with peasant girl Katusha (Anna Sten), unknowingly leaving her pregnant and without support. Many years later, he encounters her again when he is serving jury duty and she comes up for trial on charges of murder, and he swears to help her however he can. Also featuring C. Aubrey Smith, Jane Baxter, Ethel Griffies, Sam Jaffe, Charles Middleton, Jessie Ralph, Leonid Kinskey, Dale Fuller, Richard Alexander, and Halliwell Hobbes.

Based on the Tolstoy novel Resurrection, what this lacks in script polish it makes up for in handsome visuals. Mamoulian was one of the few directors who seemed to recall, after the advent of sound, that film is a visual medium. Too many early thirties films are static, turgid gabfests, whereas Mamoulian takes care to frame beautiful compositions with striking lighting and visual splendor. The highlight here is a lengthy Russian Orthodox church ceremony. March and Sten turn in decent performances, but the film is hampered by a rushed telling of the tale, and a trite ending.

Not the least bit believable, but quite interesting.

[planktonrules · 7/10 · 9 July 2010]

This is a film that took me by surprise as its message, at times, seemed rather pro-communist. I don't think that was the intention of the film, but considering it was made during a period in which Hollywood was having a minor 'red scare' of its own, I am surprised it was made.

Frederic March plays a very idealistic nobleman in pre-Revolutionary Russia. Unlike the rest of his kind, he is in favor of land reform and the removal of the class system. It's apparent he's been reading and agreeing with the writings of some of the radicals of his time.

Pretty Anna Sten is a peasant who works the land owned by March's family. She knows nothing of democracy or communism as she's uneducated and her wants are very simple--she wants Frederic. And, in a moment of weakness they sleep together--something that would not have been allowed to have in the film even later in 1934 due to the strengthened Production Code. This is especially true since she becomes pregnant!! But, by this point he's left and has no idea she was carrying his child.

Time passes and Anna is forced into a life of prostitution to support herself. Her 'beloved' Frederic, however, has settled into the life of a nobleman--forgetting all his political ideals and agreeing to marry a rich noble woman. When, by chance, Anna comes back into his life, however, he is shaken and wants to do the right thing. Is it too late? Especially since by now Anna herself is now on the political left! While none of the film is the least bit believable, it is entertaining and very slickly produced. It looks real nice and the romance is good as well--even when the plot gets a bit strange! Worth seeing and like most of Sam Goldwyn's other films, happens to be in the public domain.

waiting for lefty

[blanche-2 · 6/10 · 8 October 2012]

"We Live Again" from 1934 is filled with balalaika and Russians singing. If you can tolerate that, which is endless, you can perhaps find a kernel of interest in this film, which stars Frederic March and Anna Sten.

March plays a socialist who returns to his family farm, where he preaches equality of the people and romances a servant (Sten). However, he soon is seduced by the comforts of the upper class, with no knowledge of the hurt he has left behind.

Some time later, he is ordered to do jury duty and the servant has been accused of poisoning and robbing a man.

This is not an exciting film -- in fact, it's downright boring, particularly in the beginning. I watched it to get a gander at Anna Sten, who was brought over to the states by MGM with the intent of making her into a Garbo/Dietrich. She was very beautiful as well as a good actress, but it didn't take a genius to know that sticking her in this kind of film wasn't going to endear her to the public. She would have done better in the type of lighter film that Zanuck gave the actress Annabella. She appears to have stayed in the United States after MGM dropped her, married a producer, and worked in film and television until the mid-'60s.

Normally I love Rouben Mamoulian's films, but this one was a miss.

Too Daunting A Task

[bkoganbing · 6/10 · 13 March 2011]

I am convinced that Samuel Goldwyn was jealous of Louis B. Mayer and the fact that the company Mayer headed and that bore Goldwyn's name had Greta Garbo as its biggest star. Why couldn't he have a legend like Garbo, so he tried to create one in the person of Anna Sten. We Live Again from the Leo Tolstoy novel of the same name represented Goldwyn's second attempt to launch her as a star.

Sten was not a bad actress by any means, but for whatever reason the public just didn't buy into her. Her performance as the seduced and abandoned peasant girl is flawless as far as I could see.

This was a novel I think where Tolstoy came the closest to saying what was explicitly wrong with Russian society. He saw the inequities and backwardness of a society where the serfs were only liberated in 1861. He's certainly all in sympathy with Fredric March's first incarnation as a young noble who has read into social reformers as typified by Sam Jaffe here.

March's character does not believe in doing anything by halves. He likes Sten, she likes him, but she's aware of the social differences when they interact. When his aunts Ethel Griffies and Jessie Ralph tell him he has to get on with life and assume a place of responsibility in the world, March becomes an army officer.

That's where March's second incarnation comes in. Now we see him as a two fisted, hard wenching young army officer. When he meets Sten in that persona, he does the girl the ultimate wrong.

Years later he happens to serve on a jury where if you'll note the people are complaining about this new fangled western idea that has been brought to old Mother Russia. He sees the now degraded Sten who has been innocently caught up in the homicide/robbery of a café patron where she was a waitress. Without money for a proper defense (that's one idea from the west that did take root) it's off to Siberia for her.

And here's where March lurches into his third incarnation. Tolstoy's answer to Russia's problems, a genuine re-commitment to the ideals of the Russian Orthodox church. During services it's like March is hit with conversion at a revival. Get rid of all your possessions and join Sten in exile in Siberia. The two stroll hand in hand to Siberia just like March did with Elissa Landi in The Sign Of The Cross.

Tolstoy took lots of pages to tell this story and it might have been too daunting a task for Goldwyn and director Rouben Mamoulian. March's character is quite frankly ridiculous much as he tries. The whole Goldwyn team gave it their best try, but the story just doesn't jell on screen and Anna Sten suffered for it.

However Fredric March did get another crack at Tolstoy. Ironically at MGM in Anna Karenina and with Greta Garbo and that is a much better film than We Live Again.

WE LIVE AGAIN (Rouben Mamoulian, 1934) ***

[Bunuel1976 · 7/10 · 14 March 2014]

Having started my Easter marathon with a Fredric March title, I decided to follow it up with all his as-yet-unwatched costumers (which are not necessarily epics!) in my collection. This was one of a score of adaptations of the Leo Tolstoy classic "Resurrection": tellingly, 19 of them were made in a six-decade span (between 1909 – a D.W. Griffith one- reeler available on "You Tube"! – and 1968) but only once, a 2001 made- for-TV production directed by the Taviani Brothers, since then! It is only the second I have watched and own (the other being 1937's THE STRAITS OF LOVE AND HATE by one of my favourite auteurs, Kenji Mizoguchi, which I had frankly forgotten was inspired by the source material in question!). Actually, I also recorded the 1958 German rendition off Italian TV some time back – but have been unable to track down the VHS in time to make a comparison! Another that involved a notable film-maker was Marcel L'Herbier's, dating from 1923. For the record, director Edwin Carewe alone made two movies – a Silent in 1927 and a Talkie in 1931 (itself backed by a simultaneously-shot Spanish- language version!), all retaining the original title – which makes one wonder why it was deemed necessary to have so many Hollywood takes of it in close proximity!!

Anyway, it is worth noting that this was Fredric March's second and last collaboration with Rouben Mamoulian after the superlative, Oscar-winning DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE (1931): incidentally, the supporting cast here also includes Edgar Norton and Halliwell Hobbes from that horror film milestone! Besides, the director would helm three efforts in a row starring foreign divas – namely German Marlene Dietrich in THE SONG OF SONGS, Swede Greta Garbo in QUEEN Christina (both 1933) and Russian Anna Sten in the picture under review. In fact, the latter was movie mogul Samuel Goldwyn's answer to the other two (contracted to Paramount and MGM respectively) but, despite a trio of good pictures made in quick succession – the others being Dorothy Arzner's NANA (1934) and King Vidor's THE WEDDING NIGHT (1935) – she did not quite acquire their legendary status (perhaps because her looks were too close to Dietrich's?)! And, having mentioned both March and Garbo, the former would return to Tolstoy territory when playing Vronsky to the latter's ANNA KARENINA (1935) – whereas he was somehow never paired with Dietrich…

After this lengthy intro, I will get to the subject at hand: given the Russian setting, the film (co-designed by Richard Day – also responsible for March's recently-viewed THE AFFAIRS OF CELLINI, from the same year – and lensed by the renowned Gregg Toland) impressively evokes the golden age of Soviet cinema in its overpowering visuals and general ambiance, which extends to painstaking pastoral and religious rites (there were, in fact, a few too many of these for my liking…since they threatened to engulf an essentially thin, hackneyed and melodramatic plot line!); for what it is worth, both Leslie Halliwell and Leonard Maltin rate this a lowly * and ** respectively. March is a nobleman and Sten a servant-girl in his family's household (which staff comprises Jessie Ralph, also from the afore-mentioned CELLINI): in spite of their class difference, they grew up together and, as per his Socialist leanings, he now considers her an equal. However, tradition binds him to a military career – so he only returns home during Summer; on one of these occasions, he takes his affection towards her a little too far and, after going back, she discovers to be pregnant – his aunts (his sole surviving kin), refusing to believe their nephew had anything to do with her condition, summarily dismiss her! Predictably, she goes on a downward path from then on and becomes a woman of the streets (not that we ever see any of her experiences). Still, with the passage of time, March too (who goes from clean-shaven to sporting a pencil moustache and, finally, a goatee) has not only forgotten all about her (and taken up with magistrate C. Aubrey Smith's daughter instead) but replaced his former idealistic beliefs with a hedonistic lifestyle more attuned to his dashing uniform (at one point shown alighting his cigarette with the cover of the very book that had informed his revolutionary fervour)! Interestingly, its author – played by Sam Jaffe – turns up towards the end as a political prisoner.

When we next meet the heroine, she is in a courtroom – accused of poisoning a 'client', which she thought was merely sleeping powder, at the behest of her thieving 'accomplices' (including Leonid Kinskey) – presided over by Smith and on which March himself is serving as a juror! When a technical error in the formulation of the verdict condemns her to five years hard labour in Siberia (with the ubiquitous Charles Middleton as overseer), March moves heaven and earth in the attempt to have the sentence revoked but, when this fails, he realizes that his destiny is with Sten (undergoing a spiritual rebirth, which is what the title refers to) – since he blames her waywardness on his own callous behaviour – and divides his legacy equally among the vassals working the estate. While this self-sacrifice presumably forms the core of Tolstoy's original work, it does not really convince in the screen transposition (co-written by Preston Sturges{!} and famed playwright Maxwell Anderson); if anything, it must have presented the male star with a case of déjà vu in view of the very similar conclusion to Cecil B. De Mille's THE SIGN OF THE CROSS (1932)…and, as it happens, up next in my March/Easter schedule is his other film for that flamboyant director i.e. THE BUCCANEER (1938)!

I felt uncomfortable watching the entire thing

[theepicgamer-18347 · 1/10 · 4 May 2021]

The beginning scene with Nekhlyudov impregnating maslova took up half of the movie, then we move onto the trial of Maslova and Maslova's time in jail being most of the rest of the movie. At 11 minutes left, Nekhlyudov's journey to resurrection finally begins and it was as rushed as you would expect for 11 minutes covering the majority of the novel. We then proceed to the disneylike ending where everything is suddendly better now that Nekhlyudov becomes Buddha and goes to jail with the Maslova that is somewhy now inclined to forgive him. They then proceed to walk into Siberia happily with a beautiful chorus in the background. I feel like they wanted this movie to be longer but realized that is would be limited to 1.5 hours halfway into the production.

superior sketch of Old Russia

[mukava991 · 8/10 · 23 December 2008]

With Samuel Goldwyn as producer, I knew this would be a cut above average but I was unprepared for the jolt it gave me. This adaptation of the Tolstoy novel was made by people with intelligence and soul and it shows. Director Rouben Mamoulian and his team provide - by Hollywood standards, at least - an evocative slice of 19th century Russian life in this moving tale of a young aristocrat who under pressure from family abandons his populist leanings to pursue a military officer's career; he also uses and abuses a beautiful servant girl (Anna Sten), only to encounter her years later while serving as a juror at her trial for murder. His way of coming to terms with the situation is what makes the story great.

Mamoulian, ever the cerebral showman, serves up generous tableaux of Old Russia: peasants laboring in the fields, Eastern Orthodox church ritual, decadent aristocratic house parties – all adding to our understanding of the era and the forces that shaped it. The film is filled with beautifully staged pictures packed with information about that place at that time. Deftly constructed scenes illustrating the social divide are interspersed with gently erotic interludes between the major players. The ideas which captivated the minds of millions during the Russian revolutions of the 20th century are clearly spelled out in brief but pointed conversations among philosophical adversaries. Gregg Toland's ravishing cinematography serves the script, never going for the elaborate effect unless the effect serves to heighten the story and the point being made at the moment.

Anna Sten is notable for the honesty of her emotional expressions. Her reaction when she realizes that March has used her as a common whore is original and unconventional by the standards of the period. She was an actress of both passion and charm who was mishandled by the studio system and derailed from what could have been a major film career. Some say her "thick Russian accent" destroyed her Hollywood career, but no one seeing this film could possibly agree. Yes, she has an accent, but far thinner than Garbo's in Anna Christie or Grand Hotel. No, there had to be other reasons for her drift into comparative oblivion, and those reason are related to the unreal commercial hype surrounding her introduction to American audiences.

Fredric March was one of the better and more versatile actors of his generation. His moments of self-revelation toward the end of this film are masterfully executed. The supporting cast includes C. Aubrey Smith as an insufferably smug pillar of society, Ethel Griffies (the crusty ornithologist in Hitchcock's The Birds three decades later) as March's conservative and doting aunt, and the warm and homely Jessie Ralph as one of Sten's servants. A bearded Sam Jaffe plays a radical polemicist in a manner as sane and clear-headed as he was insane and pinheaded in The Scarlet Empress. Leonid Kinsley is very well cast as a peasant on the dock with Sten at the trial. It is worth mentioning that March played another selfish 19th century military man in another Tolstoy adaptation a year later – namely Vronsky in Selznick's Anna Karenina. This film must have been good practice.

Gawd

[ctomvelu1 · 4/10 · 24 August 2009]

A real groaner from the early 1930a, WE LIVE AGAIN tells the story of a Russian soldier who does wrong by a serving girl and years later, attempts to set things right for her, now a wrongly convicted murderer headed for Siberia, and redeem himself at the same time. This may have been based on a Tolstoy tale, although I was reminded however faintly of DR. ZHIVAGO. It is only worth watching for a young Frederic March as the soldier turned nobleman with a heavy conscience. His costar, Anna Sten, is a bad European import, shrill and definitely no Greta Garbo. Also, there appears to be continuity problems with the film, possibly due to bad or hasty editing. Watch it for March.

A Very Good Fredric March Film

[purplecrayon · 8/10 · 29 August 2002]

I have recently discovered the actor Fredric March, and so have been watching many of his movies. I must say, I thought it would be a good one, since Rouben Mamoulian directed it. I was right; this is a beautifully filmed movie. It is poetic, visual art. I personally did not find the editing choppy at all. I felt the story was a good one, and the actors all well chosen. Anna Sten was a beautiful woman, and a very good actress in this film, the only film I have seen her in so far. She was very convincing as a peasant girl; innocent,naive, childlike. She and Fredric March did very well together. I thought Fredric March was georgous in this film, young and handsome,dashing in those Russian military uniforms and long Russian shirts.

Loved his little mustashe too,but I did not like the beard in the end of the film. My favorite scenes were of Anna and Fredric together when young lovers; when chasing her through the field and climbing the tree, when they were at the Easter church service, when he comes to see her at her bedroom window... the scene in the conservatory was well done. But how sad to see that Fredric's military life has hardened him and made him a selfish cad. Thankfully, unlike his character in "Anna Karenina", he realizes his sin and makes his wrongs right. I appreciate the moral uprightness Fredric achieves by the end of the film. In summary, this is a beautiful film and I highly recommend it.

Russian love story not in the "Dr. Zhivago" class...

[Doylenf · 5/10 · 13 November 2008]

There's a heavy dose of Russian music and quaint customs in WE LIVE AGAIN, but it's a dull affair under the direction of Rouben Mamoulian.

FREDRIC MARCH is a Russian officer in love with a peasant girl. Their affair leads to her pregnancy which ends with the death of the child while March is away unaware of the circumstances his sweetheart (ANNA STEN) has undergone. The screenplay cuts away from these circumstances but we can only assume she becomes a "fallen woman." What starts out as light hearted romance turns into a turgid melodrama as Sten suffers and suffers for her sins. She's sent to Siberia for five years by an overbearing judge (C. AUBREY SMITH) and the overly melodramatic ending has March wanting to repent for his sins by joining her in Siberia for the duration of her sentence.

It's pretty heavy going with both March and Sten doing their best to make it look like a decent drama. The supporting cast includes JESSIE RALPH, ETHEL GRIFFIES and, in a very small role, SAM JAFFE.

Summing up: Easy to forget.

Reborn for each other

[jarrodmcdonald-1 · 1 March 2014]

This film, based on the Leo Tolstoy story 'Resurrection,' is a Samuel Goldwyn production. That means a big budget, excellent stars, a thoughtful script and Gregg Toland's eye behind the camera. Although it takes awhile for the story to get underway, the playful countryside scenes involving the characters of Fredric March and Anna Sten do well to help establish the atmosphere of Russia in the beginning. Set against this backdrop, their love relationship develops despite obstacles in attitude and social class.

Of course, the lovers get separated: he goes on to a promising future among the elite; and she, after having lost his illegitimate son, is forced to take desperate measures to stay alive. These actions cause her to be put on trial where he happens to be serving on the jury.

Not wanting to spoil the outcome of the plot, let's just suffice it to say that both of them are challenged to re-examine past ideals as they begin to fall in love all over again. It's one of those tales that plays on an epic scale, but the dialogue is sharp and gives us plenty to think about as the story moves toward its logical and fateful conclusion.

Resurrection

[wes-connors · 4/10 · 16 May 2014]

In 1875 Russia, beautiful servant girl Anna Sten (as Katusha Maslova) smiles prettily as she works in the fields. Normally a house servant, she enjoys laboring so much, Ms. Sten voluntarily went out to work with the field hands. Other women don't smile quite as beautifully as Sten. Meanwhile, handsome young prince of the estate Fredric March (as Dmitri Nekhlyudov) returns home for a visit. He shocks relatives by declaring beliefs about equality between peasants and royalty – then Mr. March (accurately) predicts a Russian Revolution will occur, if the noble class doesn't improve life for the lower class...

Aside note, the Communism theme present in this story was an idealistic view then held by many in the west – they would not agree with how the hoped-for egalitarian society transformed into the repressive dictatorships we are familiar with today. March is uncomfortable accepting gifts of food from obviously needy peasants. He is amazed upon seeing Sten after six years. Declaring she's a "raving beauty," March romances the servant girl...

Thus begins Samuel Goldwyn's production of Leo Tolstoy "Resurrection" (retitled "We Live Again") for his Greta Garbo-patterned discovery Anna Sten. Her second American film gets a wonderful start with direction by Rouben Mamoulian, photography by Gregg Toland and beautiful set decoration. However, the leading woman still seems taken aback by the Hollywood launch – understandably, being "Goldwyn's Garbo" was a daunting enterprise...

March is almost always good, but the operative word "almost" is earned by his military scenes. While drinking and carousing with various women, he displays some increasingly goofy faces. As the story goes on, we see Sten and March "make hay" on a rainy night. The blessed event created turns into a problem for Sten, who finds herself on a downward spiral. She adopts March's ideals, while he loses them. Years later, they meet under extraordinary circumstances. Sten and March do their best in the courtroom sequence – but, neither they nor we needed the mini-flashback dissolves to happier times.

**** We Live Again (11/1/34) Rouben Mamoulian ~ Anna Sten, Fredric March, Jane Baxter, Jessie Ralph

Anna Sten is better than you'd think....

[Dr. Ed-2 · 8/10 · 13 March 2001]

based on her reputation as one of the 30s biggest bombs. Imported from Europe to be the new Garbo/Dietrich/Rainer, Sten starred in three misbegotten Hollywood films that ruined her reputation. "We Live Again" with Fredric March looks as if it could have been better. I suspect sloppy editing that ruined the continuity and tooks the guts out. The result is a gorgeous film that is choppy; the ending is rushed--signs of bad editing. Sten returned to Europe and made occasional supporting appearances in US films. Good supporting cast includes C. Aubrey Smith, Ethel Griffies, Jane Baxter, Leonid Kinskey, Sam Jaffe, and silent-screen actress, Dale Fuller.

Well intended social drama suffers from mood swings.

[mark.waltz · 4/10 · 16 February 2013]

At first, this Russian class drama seems as if it is set in the old south with happy peasants replacing the singing slaves. The sets and costumes are straight out of a Georgian plantation, and I don't mean the former Russian territory of Georgia that seceded into its own country. Anna Sten is the peasant childhood friend of wealthy aristocrat Fredric March, on the verge of being adopted by two of his maiden aunts. When she is left pregnant (by March) and alone, her life falls apart, and she ends up on trial for accessory to murder. March steps up to her defense, but by this time, she is emotionally dead, and so is he. They hope individually to either stay dead or come alive again as her unfortunate journey to Siberia approaches.

This is one of those missed opportunity dramas that seems to be a shell of its legendary novel "Resurrection" by Tolstoy. Exceptionally directed and lushly produced, it also suffers greatly from an indifferent performance by its leading lady. Ms. Sten is bland as the virginal peasant girl, and her transition to tramp is nothing short of unbelievable. She acts her "bad girl" part through the constant sneering of her nose. March does not suffer from that fate-his performance is alternately noble and self-serving, sometimes a fighter for the people, other times a clash-obsessed bourgeoisie, but always flowing from one to the other believably.

Other than Sten, the film's major problem is the boring narrative. It never sustains one particular mood, although it has an amazing supporting cast including Jessie Ralph as Sten's aunt and C. Aubrey Smith as the judge who is ironically March's father-in-law to be. Once the two characters got into the pattern of discussing their dead lives (Sten refuses to come back to life, afraid of being hurt), it becomes even more empty, missing out on convincing me that these characters really had good reason to be so emotionally low, and it is covered for such a short period of time. Because of that, one feels that about 10 minutes or so of important material was unfortunately cut out.

They Live Again, He Lives Again, It Lives Again...

[marcin_kukuczka · 8/10 · 4 July 2010]

When we consider such a classic writer as Leo Tolstoy, what we recall are, practically, two titles: WAR AND PEACE and ANNA KARENINA. We exclude other of his great works, for instance his last novel RESURRECTION.

The same thing seems to take place in cinema. While WAR AND PEACE and ANNA KARENINA are perhaps the two most popular screen adaptations of the great Russian writer, Tolstoy's 1899 novel occurs to be marginalized. Yet, the movie buff who not only obeys the rule of "fame wins popularity" but looks for something according to his/her preferences will find absolutely overwhelming films that may be watched and admired within the commercial walls of modern reality. One of such films is, undoubtedly, WE LIVE AGAIN (1934) by the innovative director Rouben Mamoulian, the film based on the aforementioned 1899 novel by Leo Tolstoy titled RESURRECTION.

If we consider the master director Rouben Mamoulian and the unusual way he handled his direction (just to mention some of his greatest movies like APPLAUSE, QUEEN Christina, DR JEKYLL AND MR HYDE, THE MARK OF ZORRO), we also notice that WE LIVE AGAIN is somehow underestimated and skipped. Nevertheless, if you are quite knowledgeable about Mamoulian's touch and once decide to see this film, you quickly realize that WE LIVE AGAIN appears to be no exception from the rest.

We are supplied with a wonderfully poetic handling of the story with excellent camera work and unforgettable scenes. From the very beginning that introduces viewers to the images of awakening nature in fields and blossoming trees, we clearly get a true rarity, something precious, artistic that, unfortunately, has not always been a desirable goal in cinema. The Russia of the 1870s is vividly depicted with its injustice, corruption and inequalities. There is a fabulous moment showing people hugging one another and saying "Christ is risen" on Easter Vigil. Something the code years in cinema really loved. Yet, within the decadence of conventions, does the proclamation convey anything more than a sheer slogan? The later story shows it does... The depiction of the social injustice expressed in the visual moment of the camera moving from a poor pot of prisoners' food to the lavish tables of aristocracy is another powerful merit of the movie. That was Mamoulian with his unbelievable flair for poetic view, poetic image; he talks to our hearts through image.

However, it is not only the director with his magical touch who makes the movie a true pleasure to watch. It is Fredric March in the lead as Prince Dmitri. Although some reviewers have already discussed his merits, I would like to highlight a point that, perhaps, has not been sufficiently examined yet. What makes March's performance so unique is not the actor's experience with the director Mamoulian two years earlier while working on the classic DR JEKYLL AND MR HYDE. Of course, that experience is one of the reasons for his fluent acting here but not the only reason indeed. It is neither any crucial moment in the actor's career, according to some confusing statements, as if at that moment (1934) Fredric March found himself between great director (Mamoulian) and great writer (Tolstoy). What makes the portrayal unique is a change of heart, a spiritual transformation that March beautifully executes. Having had experience with that sort of content in THE SIGN OF THE CROSS (1932) by Cecil B DeMille (some critics said that actually this change was hardly convincing), he supplies us with the fullness of genuine transformation of spirit, of heart in WE LIVE AGAIN. Here, he is not convinced by his beloved Christian girl that it is good to be a martyr but by the inner experience and a touching prayer. He is not afraid to become a mocked scapegoat in a decadent society, he does not hesitate to lose his wealth. All he wants is to stand in truth, atone for evil deeds and start a new life. Dmitri, as if, rises again from the miserable death in selfishness to the glorious life in love. The way March crafts this aspect is a must-see!

His co-star, Ana Sten as Katusha is, certainly, not the proportion of stardom that was the privilege for Garbo, Shearer or Dietrich at that time. Yet, I don't quite think that a very famous actress would have done well in role of a poor village girl whose only 'sin was poverty.' The role of Katusha must highlight social injustice, bitter tears and certain degree of genuine innocence in the 'lost paradise' of youthful enthusiasm. Those are the key aspects of Tolstoy. He shows the fact that innocence and good heart suffers in the decadent world of low-spirited materialism. And Ms Sten is very good for this role. Consider her moments of the trial and the bitterness she wants to convey in the talks with Dmitri. There are feelings of anger and helplessness, of hope being lost...fortunately the hope that may still experience the miracle of resurrection. In the final moment, she beautifully escapes the tendency of a clichéd face so notably encountered in the genre and evokes something powerful yet usually ignored on screen.

A special mention must also be made of the supporting cast, in particular C Aubrey Smith in the memorable role of Prince Kortchagin. and Jessie Ralph as Matrona Pavlovna. Although Ms Ralph is perhaps best remembered thanks to her significant role in CAMILLE, C Aubrey Smith was a mainstay of silver screen Hollywood production, including films by greatest directors like Mamoulian, Griffith, DeMille, Von Sternberg and LeRoy.

WE LIVE AGAIN by Rouben Mamoulian is a fabulous film, another classic that has so many things to offer. Its thought provoking content based on the great writer's own thoughts and its genuine artistry make it worth seeing in the 21st century so that it can live again in our minds after all these years.

Goldwyn's Folly, Act Two.

[st-shot · 4/10 · 28 May 2014]

Sam Goldwyn trots out his Garbo manqué Anna Sten for the second time with the same disastrous results as the first (Nana) in a Tolstoy adaptation We Live Again. Once again Sam pulls out all the stops; top shelf production design and director (Ruben Mamoulian), legendary lensman Gregg Toland and major leading man Fredric March to buttress the "star" power of Sten who shines like a five watt bulb.

Prince Dmitri drops by the old homestead to check in on the family and knock off a piece of serf tail with his all grown up childhood playmate Katusha (Sten). The next day he bolts without saying goodbye, leaving her a few rubles and pregnant. Being in a family way she is forced to leave the homestead spiraling into a life of dissolution and desperation over time. Dmitri on the other hand continues to live a princely existence until he crosses paths with defendant Katusha in a murder trial in which he is a juror. He passionately defends her innocence, feeling he is possibly responsible for her crime but she is convicted and sent to Siberia. Overwhelmed by guilt and love he joins her.

Sten once again underwhelms with her big button eyes and mushy diction as the put upon Katusha. One would think living a life of hard knocks would have toughened and jaded her but Sten can not sustain anything outside of her mousy sensitivity and she remains grounded in clueless little girl. March brings the same Vronsky like dash to Dmitri and holds up his end well but all Anna can do is respond all wide eyed and wimpy. C. Aubrey Smith as a symbol of Russian Monarchy justice is right on while Sam Jaffe's radical is allowed brief but effective rebuttal.

Toland's camera-work ( evening scenes in particular) is typically flawless and the set design lavish but Anna in the lead swings and misses again while Mamoulian hammers the lid shut on this turkey in the final scene with our lovers reuniting and walking off hand in hand, smiles on their faces to a life and more than likely demise serving a five year stretch laboring in a Siberian gulag surrounded by prisoners who fail to share their optimism.

A masterpiece along with Les Misérables

[fermainclancharlie · 10/10 · 30 March 2020]

While Anna karenina is just a story about adultery, We live again and Les Miserables is a powerful social critique of social inequality, the situation of prisons, retreat and the redemption of individuals for past failures. Frederick March was excellent in this film and in the classic based on the book by Victor Hugo. These are two very profound stories. Tolstoy was a genius

the Christian left as opposed to the Christian right

[karlericsson · 10/10 · 18 November 2010]

The most evil place on earth is the place where the difference is the greatest between the good that might be possible and the evil that actually is. That place today is the USA but it was not always USA. Once it was Russia and maybe even the Soviet Union. In these times there was an evil Christian right and a good Christian left but the big fraction was the evil Christian right so the revolution threw out Christianity all together. And today in the USA things are not much different and more and more people are waiting for the revolution in the USA, unfortunately though, those people are not in the USA - they are like me, outside looking in. This is a film on a novel by Tolstoy and, as far as reality goes, it is quite naive. But that's quite OK. That's how novels should be - something that shows us how good things might be and not just how evil they actually are. It is the message of the Christian left, which is always revolutionary just like Christ was and not evil like the pope who told South Americans that Christ was not an anarchist, which, of course, he was most assuredly. There is a struggle between the Christian left and the Christian right in USA today. In the media however we only see the evil Christian right. This film is more about the good Christian left. See it.

Not perfect, but well worth the money!

[JohnHowardReid · 8/10 · 28 July 2014]

An expensive film with the money well spent on a number of set pieces including the Easter mass, the seduction, the attempt to see the prince at the railroad depot, the scenes at court. These particular episodes are well handled by director Rouben Mamoulian, but otherwise, however, he's often content with long, static takes. Fortunately, the movie is always beautifully photographed by Gregg Toland. It's also artistically set with a rousing, Russian-style music score by Alfred Newman. With the backing of a solid support cast, Fredric March delivers a luminous performance as the prince, although his dialogue is often somewhat lacking in polish, even stilted. In fact, March seems a bit strained and even unconvincingly eager in his early scenes, but comes into his own in the movie's central and later episodes. Available on an excellent Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer DVD.