Madame Butterfly (1932) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Good adaptation of the well-known story; would love to see on video
robb_77215 September 2006
A straightforward, non-musical adaptation of Giacomo Puccini's immortal opera, this early version of the classic story is based solely on David Belasco's original play. In other words, there is no actual opera present (although some of Puccini's magnificent score is used as underscore) and the film plays out completely as straight drama. The screenplay does not make any considerable attempt to disguise its stage-bound origins, although the Russian-born director Marion Gering (who helmed many pictures for star Sylvia Sidney) does a competent job of approximating the look and feeling of war-era Japan. This was decades before on-location filming became a standard practice, and the film's art design and set decoration manages to perform the difficult task of disguising the Paramount lot as such another distinct country within comparatively meager resources.

The luminous Sylvia Sydney takes a significant gamble in attempting to play the young Japanese girl Cho-Cho San (in fact, such casting would undoubtedly be seen as politically incorrect today), however, the Bronx-born actress is more than up to the challenge and delivers quite a totally convincing performance. The character of Cho-Cho is so incredibly passive and naïve that she often comes dangerously close to becoming an artificial caricature, yet Sydney portrays the role with such genuine pathos and non-cloying sweetness that she comes across as tragic rather than foolish. Her accent also always sounds credible, and she even manages to believably look Japanese with the assist of limited stage makeup. I was terribly impressed wither her overall performance.

A young Cary Grant ably plays the object of Cho-Cho's tragic love, and he looks breathtakingly handsome in his Navy uniform. The bulk of the movie consists of Sydney and Grant playing off one another, although Charles Ruggles is likable as Grant's fellow Lieutenant. Perhaps the biggest surprise is that Shelia Terry's "other woman" character is portrayed as being sympathetic and understanding, when she would have surely been written and acted as a one-dimensional monster by most filmmakers of the era. None of the characters in the "Japanese" supporting cast (nearly all of whom are American-born actors playing Japanese) are fleshed out enough to stand out, although Edmund Breese is convincing as Cho-Cho's stereotypically disapproving grandfather.

If the film has a primary shortcoming, it is that the entire premise feels a little flat when performed as a straight drama. Although it is well-written and reasonably paced, the drama simply does not soar to the appropriate level of intensity without the accompanying swell of the opera. There is still much to recommend, however, in this very touching picture, primarily the terrific performance of Sydney, which is worth watching totally on its own merit. I really do wish this film would be properly released on home video, as it deserves to be seen.
20 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Superior if seldom seen film of early Belasco play
eschetic-219 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
In 1900 David Belasco opened a one act play at the Herald Square Theatre on Broadway for a successful month's run. It was based in turn on an 1898 short story of the same name by John Luther Long. Thus was MADAME BUTTERFLY born. With the United States having recently entered the world stage with Commodore Perry's "opening" of the long self-isolated Japan in 1854 and the establishment of a pseudo-empire of its own with the protectorates (former colonies) taken from Spain after the war with her in 1898, the play was nothing if not timely.

The melodrama hit an emotional chord not only in the United States but around the world; in Italy in 1904, Giacomo Puccini used the story (and some scholars suggest actual events in Nagasaki in the late 1800's) for his opera MADAME BUTTERFLY, which has become a world-wide perennial. The opera has even been staged on Broadway five times from 1918 to 1948 - which becomes significant when one sees how well the themes from the opera are used in this film version.

The underlying story is dismissed by some today as racist for the Japanese lead's subservient devotion to her American semi-husband, but Belasco was looking at the relationship of U.S. personnel and unfamiliar cultures - not through the "enlightened" eyes of the 21st Century, but the eyes of a parochial nation just emerging from its own informal isolation, and Butterfly herself, in the screenplay by Josephine Lovett and Joseph Moncure March (famous for his "Wild Party" poem), justifies herself quite well.

Director Marion Gering was well respected in his day but all but forgotten today; a reputation depressed by the length of his career, not the quality of his work, and MADAME BUTTERFLY is some of his best work. Paramount regularly used him for quality work and especially for their star Sylvia Sidney, guiding most of her films from 1931 to 1934. He beautifully balanced the story in which - even in 1932 - the American junior officer, Pinkerton, does not come across particularly well, abandoning Butterfly in the second half as he does. Giving the devoted Butterfly her full due, Gering, through co-star Cary Grant, lets the audience see what she saw in her Pinkerton and gives Pinkerton some real regret and guilt over his treatment of his "temporary wife." It is a fine performance from the young Cary Grant, already growing in stature from his performance earlier that year for the same director in the Tallulah Bankhead, Gary Cooper film DEVIL AND THE DEEP, which introduced Charles Laughton to American audiences. In fact, Gering would pair Grant and Sidney once again for THE THIRTY DAY PRINCESS in 1934.

The incorporation of themes from the Puccini opera as background music heightening the emotions is beautifully done - most notably during Butterfly's all night vigil the night she expects her Pinkerton to return and during their final confrontation.

Those only familiar with the opera will note minor plot differences (Butterfly's final act itself was eliminated in the 1915 silent film with Mary Pickford; here its motivation is changed!), but overall this is a solid, still entertaining presentation of an important, touching play which holds heightened interest because of the world famous opera drawn from it.

It's mildly criminal that the lovely film (the settings and cinematography, after some stock opening shots of Japanese scenery, holds up far better than many of its compatriots from 1932 - the view of the harbor with the American fleet from Butterfly's window is spectacular) is not yet available for general audiences on DVD; a must see for any opera lover or Cary Grant fan (note that the song Grant sings to his Butterfly just before leaving for his new assignment is cut from some prints in circulation - presumably for time and rights issues rather than the quality of his singing, which is at least marginal), and a revelatory performance from Ms. Sidney.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Till Death Due Us Part"
lugonian30 November 2002
MADAME BUTTERFLY (Paramount, 1932), directed by Marion Gering, stars Sylvia Sidney in one of her most atypical movie roles of her career, as well as memorable, that of a Japanese maiden. Those familiar with the Giacomo Puccini opera of that same name, will take notice that this screen adaptation is not an operatic reproduction but just simply a straightforward dramatic story in itself.

As for the plot, Lieutenant Benjamin Franklin Pinkerton (Cary Grant) and Lieutenant Barton (Charlie Ruggles) are two American Navy officers on shore in Japan. At a gathering, Pinkerton meets Cho-Cho San (Sylvia Sidney), a beautiful Japanese maiden who is about to become a Geisha. She disgraces her family by accepting Pinkerton's love to become his bride. Although she takes her marriage vows seriously, theirs are not truly bound with love. After the "honeymoon" is over, Pinkerton returns to the states with the fleet, with Cho-Cho San, whom Pinkerton has nicknamed "Butterfly," remaining in Japan where she keeps his home until he returns. Three years pass. During that time, Cho-Cho San, has given birth to a son she names "Trouble" (Philip Horomate). She is still confident that someday her husband will return to her. But what has happened to Pinkerton during that time? Did he go down with his ship? No quite. He has married his fiancé, an American girl named Adelaide (Sheila Terry), whom he intends on taking with him to Japan.

Sylvia Sidney, who by this time has been playing tragic American heroines in such Depression dramas as AN American TRAGEDY and STREET SCENE (both 1931), resumes playing this sort of role, but this time as a Japanese girl. She gives a believable performance, particularly with her round doll face features. Cary Grant, still relatively new to films and on a fast rise to leading man status, is acceptable as Pinkerton, giving one of his more noted performances during his early years as a screen actor, which began the very year of the release of MADAME BUTTERFLY. Charlie Ruggles provides some humorous moments as Barton.

The supporting cast includes: Helen Jerome-Eddy and Grandma San; Edmund Breese as Cho-Cho's grandfather; Sandor Kallay as Goro; with Irving Pichel as Yomadori; Berton Churchill as Sharpless; and Louise Carter as Suzuki.

Rarely seen in recent years, MADAME BUTTERFLY used to have frequent revivals during the mid afternoon or after midnight hours on commercial television way back in the 1960s and 70s, and with Cary Grant who had reached super star status in motion pictures lasting more than 20 years (retiring in 1966), his name alone would guarantee viewer-ship whenever shown.

While MADAME BUTTERFLY is an acceptable version based on David Belasco's play, the plot, however, can be a trifle slow at times during its 85 minutes of screen time, but Sylvia Sidney's performance, the presence of Cary Grant, as well as the reproduction of Japanese settings, make this curio worth watching, it it could ever be found or revived again. (***)
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sylvia Suffers in Fancy Dress
richardchatten8 November 2019
Heaven knows what possessed Paramount to cast Sylvia Sydney in this in the first place, unless it was a desire to find a novel context for her to suffer in. Given that they did, it's actually been done with taste and elegance, Puccini is used quite well as incidental music on the soundtrack, and Miss Sidney is as moving as she always is (we can imagine only too well what a western woman wronged so grievously would have done with the dagger she reaches purposely for at the conclusion).

Those outraged at the casting of a Jewish/American actress as a geisha should also take note of the fact that All-American cad Pinkerton is played by a Bristolian.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a tragic romantic story
dienoss4 October 2010
it is a shame that movies like this one don't get much attention!.. Cary Grand is playing a role of an American Lieutenant who marries a Japanese woman who wanted to be a geisha. it's a tragic romantic story, about loyalty and how some cultures don't understand other cultures. it's a classic movie.. short and no unnecessary scenes. all the scenes are related to the plot. i liked it a lot, enjoyed watching it, and Cary Grant was so young!. it made me learn something about the Japanese culture: how they are very loyal, accept other cultures, and maybe adopt them as well. how they are honorable, and live to be good people and be honored till the end. the plot is well developed, and the action of the movie happens fast.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sylvia Sidney In Another Fine, Heartbroken Performance
boblipton16 February 2021
John Luther Long wrote the short story that Belasco turned into a successful stage play, and Puccini an opera he tinkered ith for three years and five versions. Long described himself near the end of his life as "a sentimentalist and a feminist." He based the tale on one his sister, a missionary in Japan, had told him. There's no doubt it qualifies as sentimental and feminist!

Like most of Sylvia Sidney's roles in this period, the audience waits for the moment when she breaks down in inconsolable tears over the unworthy B.F. Pinkerton. Gary Cooper had been proposed to play the role. Cooper was too important, and Cary Grant was young, very good-looking, and wouldn't cost the production much in the part; given how much set designer Wiard Ihnen and costume designer Travis Banton were spending, it was a good choice. Grant isn't called to be on screen for that long, and isn't called on to do much in the way of acting; Berton Churchill as the American consulate, offers a far more nuanced performance in about four minutes of screen time.

It's clear why this movie disappeared for decades. With suicide, bigamy and miscegenation in the mix, there was no way to re-release it under the Production Code. Alas, if it's not one thing, it's another; nowadays, its use of yellowface renders it equally problematic. Nonetheless, looking at it through the character's broken English, it's another of Miss Sidney's fine performances in a heartbreaking story, one that convinces me that sentimentality and feminism is a good thing.... at least by late 19th century standards. And the visuals are superb.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Madame Butterfly review
JoeytheBrit18 April 2020
An American naval officer leaves his Japanese wife without realising she is pregnant with their son. Ponderous film version of Puccini's opera that features none of its music until the final credits. Sidney is good as the tragic Cho-Cho San, but Cary Grant gets little chance to shine as B. F. Pinkerton, who comes across as a flippant and unlikable character. The couple's reunion is achingly poignant, but it's a bit of a slog getting to it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Lucky Find
chrystalgkafka9 January 2020
I spied a photo I'd not seen before, went on a google search, Et voilà: Cary Grant as Pinkerton! What a thrill! Like found treasure in nana's attic. An adaptation of the original play, a few years pre-opera and Japan open to west still fairly new, was relevant for its time, although, a little different from the Puccini. In some ways, however, the story makes more sense. Sorry Giac!

Sylvia Sydney is incredible. She's more convincing as the embodiment of Cho Cho San, than most actors of the era, who seemed largely to be playing as if to audience than camera. (Not that I'm knocking it, the 30s and silent are my favs. Just sayin'. Psst it's the scenes and costumes. Moving Art.)

This version of Madame Butterfly absolutely worthwhile! If for the performance of Sydney and her costumes alone. Okay, and Grant's pretty face. One warning for opera lovers though: Other reviews point to Puccini's "incidental" music throughout. I may be wrong, but I only heard the overture at the opening credits and the main aria at the end. Everything in the middle not Puccini as far as I can tell. I say, still worth it.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very well made but dated.
planktonrules28 October 2020
There is no way in the world a film like "Madame Butterfly" could be made today. After all, the entire cast of Japanese folks are played by white folks painted up to look like Asians. Such things were pretty common back in the day....and included films like the Charlie Chan series, "Dragon Seed" (with Katharine Hepburn playing a Chinese lady) and "The Conqueror" (with John Wayne as Genghis Khan and his hottie played by red-headed Susan Hayward!!). My complaint is not just that they are offensive but they also really were ridiculous...especially when Hollywood could have easily given jobs to Asian actors! But such was the attitude of the day....and such is the Japaneseness of "Madame Butterfly". Now not all is bad when it comes to the 'Japanese' in the film. The costumes and sets are terrific and it is obvious Paramount spent a lot of money to make the film. So, at least it looks great.

The story is based on the David Belasco play which was then made into a Puccini opera by the same name. The film, however, is not an opera though some of the music from the opera is included as incidental music.

Lt. Pinkerton (Cary Grant) goes out on the town with his navy pal, Lt. Barton (Charlie Ruggles). Soon Pinkerton meets Cho-Cho San (Sylvia Sidney) and he's smitten with her. But he's informed that he cannot date her or spend time with this geisha. Barton sees a loophole and suggests Pinkerton marry her....and then dump her when his ship leaves. She doesn't realize that Pinkerton is a dirty dog and they are married. Soon after the wedding, Pinkerton leaves....and Cho-Cho waits several years for him to return. In the meantime, she's had his child...a child who he doesn't know he has. Later, Pinkerton returns to Japan....with his new American wife!! What's next? Well, it's best I don't spoil it...see the film.

The story is lovingly made and looks great...and it's also quite moving. It is such a darn shame, then, that the casting decisions were so stupid....fine for 1932 but still stupid when you see it today. Part of this problem isn't just because such casting seems racist. It's also that folks in 2020 know a lot more about Japanese culture and know that what they are being given here is less Japan....and a lot more Puccini and Belasco.

Overall, a very good film version but one that begs to be remade. And, I have to knock off a point for Grant's singing...it's among the worst I've ever heard by an actor...even worse than Lee Marvin's singing in "Paint Your Wagon" but thankfully Grant's is confined to only one terrible song....and it's not a musical with multiple numbers!
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Superb drama and film of the tragic story made famous by an opera
SimonJack9 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
"Madame Butterfly" is a very good film based on an original 1900 stage drama by David Belasco, which he had adapted from an 1898 short story of the same title by John Luther Long. After he saw the play in London in 1900, Italian composer Giacomo Puccini wrote the opera that soon became known and performed around the world. This is a love story and tragedy, in which Paramount cast Sylvia Sidney as Cho-Cho San, aka, Madame Butterfly. The main male lead is Lt. B. F. Pinkerton, played by Cary Grant. It was his 8th film in his first year in the movies, and already he had become a leading man.

This film is a wonderful exponent of the acting profession. The setting and story are in Japan, and most of the characters are Japanese. Yet, the entire cast consists of Caucasian Hollywood actors. So, the challenge of the dramatic arts here was to create scenery and roles that appear as closely as possible to be Japanese. And Hollywood had all the building trades, artists, costumers, advisors and specialists to do just that. But in 1932, Japanese actors were a rarity any place outside of Japan. So, the makeup artists went to work to transform the white actors and actresses into Japanese. And, the actors learned to speak their roles as native Japanese would when they learn to speak English through social exchange.

The result of all of this is a wonderful film with a cast who all look, sound and play their parts superbly as Japanese. Sylvia Sidney is especially endearing as Cho-Cho San. Cary Grant's Lt. Pinkerton starts off rather brash in a couple of places, but then mellows. Charles Ruggles plays the usual role of a buddy, friend, or comrade in arms that is often in films of military men, especially off duty. His Lt. Barton has been to Japan before, and takes Pinkerton under his wing to show him a good time. So, they go to Goro's Tea House, "where English is spoken," for a dinner and night of music, dancing and entertainment by geishas.

Cho-Cho San had just been acquired by Goro for training as a Geisha from her grandfather and mother. And, Goro was about to arrange a wedding for her after his best client sees her and asks about her. But, the young Pinkerton, who doesn't know proper procedures in such a place, leaves the room where he and Barton are being served dinner with a show. He discovers Cho-Cho San who tries to hide from him. Well, after the turmoil that this causes has ended, Pinkerton says that he will marry Cho-Cho San. That is after Barton tells him that marriages were not so binding in Japan, and that once he leaves Japan, Cho-Cho San would be considered divorced and able to marry again.

While the American fleet is in port in Tokyo, Pinkerton is at home evenings with his wife in the home he has acquired for them, They are very happy. There are some little incidents in between before the day comes when he leaves. Then, instead of telling her that he may never return, he lets her think that he will be back in the spring, when next the robin's nest. But back in the States, he marries his school hood sweetheart, Adelaide, after telling her about his Japanese marriage. Several months after Pinkerton leaves, Cho-Cho San gives birth to their son, whom she names Trouble, until his father can rename him. But, when three years pass, Cho-Cho San goes to the American consul to inquire about the nesting habits of robins in America. When Pinkerton is again assigned to a fleet that is based in Tokyo, his wife flies ahead to be their when he arrives. He asks her to go with him to explain to Cho-Cho San. And, just before that, Cho-Cho San had turned down her grandfather's demand that she return home with them to find another husband, since her husband had divorced her.

Cho-Cho San is excited to see Pinkerton, but then saddened when she sees Adelaide, who waited outside in their taxi. Cho-Cho San was going to surprise Pinkerton with their son, but now she doesn't signal maid, Suzuki, to bring to he boy out to meet his father. So, after Pinkerton leaves, she sends her son with Suzuki to her grandfather to bring him up in the ways of their Samurai tradition. She says she will follow. But, instead kneels by her small family shrine with Pinkerton's picture. She recalls the words of the American pledge in marriage, "until death do us part." She then stabs herself with a dagger and dies with her last words, "I love you always."

This is an excellent film with a sad ending. Those who have had a suicide in their family will see the sadness much deeper than most. The mother will miss the love and joy seeing her son grow. The son will miss knowing and loving his mother. And all of the family with miss the love and job between and among themselves.

Cho-Cho San's key line is early in the film. After Pinkerton kisses her she says, "Before kiss, I love you. Now I know I love for always."

One other thing struck me about this film. It has clips that show the sizable American naval force that was based for a time at Tokyo. Remember that this is 1932, a couple of decades after the Japanese culture was open to interrelationships with Western cultures. Neither the movie nor the story it was based on show any animosity toward Americans by the Japanese. Yet, less than eight years later, Japan would join Germany in the Axis of World War II, and the next year it would bomb Pearl Harbor and lead the U. S. to officially join the war. That was just nine years after this movie came out.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Extremely Boring and Rather Flat
Michael_Elliott10 March 2017
Madame Butterfly (1932)

** (out of 4)

Liutenant B.F. Pinkerton (Cary Grant) and Lt. Barton (Charles Ruggles) are on leave in Japan when they decide to have some fun during the night. This leads them to a party with a few maiden's only to have Pinkerton quickly fall for Cho-Cho San (Sylvia Sidney) who is about to become a Geisha. Before long the two are married but shame is about to strike Cho-Cho.

MADAME BUTTERFLY was based on the David Belasco play and it was a huge hit, which made sense for Paramount to then turn it into a motion picture. Sadly, this film here is pretty darn boring from start to finish and there's really very little in it to recommend. There are all sorts of problems with this film ranging from the direction to the casting and I'd even argue that the story just doesn't translate very well to the screen here.

The biggest problem is the fact that they've got an all white cast doing these Japanese roles. Look, I understand that this was just common practice back in the day and I really don't blame the filmmakers and I'm certainly not going to go on some sort of political rant. With that said, there isn't even an attempt to make these white actors even sound Japanese. I love Sideny but she was just wrong for this role here. She might hit the dramatic notes just fine but the lack of an accent just doesn't help matters. With everyone speaking pretty much English it just makes the film seem all the more cheap.

Even Grant isn't all that good here. His charm is on 100% but the character is just rather bland as are the supporting players. Speaking of bland, director Marion Gering doesn't do a thing with the picture. Visually it's quite boring and I'd argue that the story itself drags out so badly that by the hour mark you're just ready for it to be over. MADAME BUTTERFLY has been filmed several times since but this 1932 version is just flat.
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"There is no other room in my heart but for Madame Butterfly."
clanciai9 October 2023
Sylvia Sidney makes a very convincing and sincere interpretation of the tragic young geisha, 15 years, who ends up in a sudden marriage with an American naval officer, Cary Grant, very young and dashing, the most good-looking Pinkerton I have seen, who doesn't understand the Japanese mentality and codes at all and behaves like a swine, in reality trampling her down in the drain after having given her a son. In the opera he realises his shame and returns to Butterfly but too late. He doesn't in the film. Russian Marion Gering makes as sincere a film version as possible of the embarrassing tragedy and pastes it together with most of Puccini's music, which gilds the entire film from beginning to end. Only Puccini could save Madame Butterfly. There are some great scenes with Cho-Cho-San's Japanese family, the grandfather makes an impression, and the environment is well composed. There is even an American scene included. It's a remarkable film for 1932, and Marion Gering's work is no patchwork but honestly sincere. David Belasco, who wrote the original play, ought to have been satisfied, while of course we recommend Puccini's full opera.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed