The Spider (1931) Poster

(1931)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Lots of B-Movie Stars
Maleejandra3 July 2008
The Spider begins with a magician's show. The great Chartrand (Edmund Lowe) can make people disappear and his assistant dazzles the crowd with his psychic abilities. A woman and her uncle come to the show looking for their long lost relative; in fact, the assistant is the woman's brother, but his amnesia has kept him from finding her. Suddenly during the performance, the lights go out and a shot is fired. The woman's uncle has been murdered, and it is up to Chartrand to find the killer among the audience.

El Brendel and Kendall McComas (of Our Gang fame) provide a few laughs as mischievous members of the audience. The story is predominantly serious and features some interesting ghoulish effects. Overall, though, the story is pretty standard and the film is mediocre, but enjoyable.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Nice design - no plot
the_mysteriousx6 September 2004
This was co-directed by the great set designer William Cameron Menzies, who had a fantastic, if erratic career. In the early 1930s he made a trio of magic-themed thrillers for Fox, this being the first, the next being the superior Chandu the Magician and the third being Trick for Trick, directed by Hamilton McFadden.

The Spider is a decent film that basically involves a murder by gunshot in a theater of patrons watching a magic act performed by Chartrand the Great, played by a solid Edmond Lowe. How someone sitting next to the murderer would not notice the gun going off is implausibly absurd, to say the least. It would be forgivable if there was a plot. It involves a woman who goes to a magic show to see if her missing brother is Chartrand's amnesiac assistant, whom he is. Her hateful uncle, who previously tried to do away with the brother is the man who is murdered. Her brother, naturally, is the prime suspect.

The suspense is missing, but the style is excellent. Much low-key lighting and some terrific magic act sets make this worthwhile. It does pale in comparison to similar thrillers of the period as the mystery is so random and thin that it really brings the film down. Worth the time, though, of any 30s mystery film aficionados.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great style...though not always logical.
planktonrules14 January 2020
During the 1930s, murder mysteries were a dime a dozen in Hollywood. Apart from westerns, I honestly think they made more murder films than anything else! So, when I tell you that "The Spider" is a murder film, don't immediately assume it's just like all the rest!!

The setting for the crime is a theater. Chartrand (Edmund Lowe) is a stage magician whose tricks are huge, spectacular and real crowd pleasers. During one of his performances, something strange happens. Chartrand's assistant, who has amnesia, sees someone in the audience he recognizes. At that moment, the lights go off and shots ring out. The assistant's mean uncle is now lying dead on the floor...and none of the many folks in the theater saw much of anything. Unfortunately, the police investigating seem to be like MOST cops in these mysteries...they're idiots who keep jumping to conclusions. And you know the cops are a mess when Warren Hymer plays one of them!! So, it's up to Chartrand to try to help the police figure out who really is behind the murder.

The best thing about the film is the wonderful sets and style...they are wild and breathtaking. The second best thing is Edmund Lowe, who is excellent as usual. What isn't so wonderful are some of the supporting characters who mostly are unncessary and were apparently added for comic relief. The worst is El Brendel...who usually is very annoying. Also, all the psychic mumbo jumbo wears thin after a while. While Chartrand is obviously supposed to be a great magician, at times he seems to have god-like powers...which is pretty silly. Overall, a mixed bag that at least has the distinction of being unusual and it will definitely keep your attention.

By the way, one silly cliche in this one is one I've seen too many times. The magic show, which is almost completely a visual medium, is at one point being broadcast over the radio!! As silly as this sounds, it could be worse--I've seen film supposedly having them broadcast dancing and dancing lessons on the radio! Huh???!!!!
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Magic and mystery in a neat little thriller
dbborroughs3 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Edmund Lowe plays the magician Chartrand. During a performance of his show the lights in the theater go out and a man is shot. The police are called. Chartrand must use his tricks in order to find the real killer and not the suspect that the police have chosen.

Forgive me for being a bit vague, but there are one or two twists that giving a more detailed ploy description would give away, and in a film like this half the fun is just having the film happen before you. The film is pretty much set entirely in the theater during and immediately following the performance. Its a hoot as the film moves between the police, Chartrand and his crew and the audience, who are both chopping at the bit to go home and wanting to know what really happened. To be certain there are a couple of logic problems if you take a moment to think about things, but I'm guessing that for most of this 59 minute gem you're going to be simply too carried along by whats going on screen to think (it as after all a cinematic magic trick). Simply put this film is a fun ride and one of the most enjoyable mysteries I've seen.

This is one to search out.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed