They Had to See Paris (1929) User Reviews

There's No Place Like Home

[museumofdave · 7/10 · 28 July 2019]

There were many popular films during the period when this film was made that stressed the warmth and honesty of the average American, that in spite of European culture being championed for its rich social and artistic culture, the ordinary, plain-speaking American was, if not superior, just as good, and small town life, grounded in the traditions of family and decency was just as admirable as anything one might find in the ancient cultures of Europe, of Paris in particular, the city of high life and fine culture. And what plain-speaking American could better represent the best of the small town ethos would be better than man-of-the-people and celebrating philosophical comic, Will Rogers, appearing here in his first American talkie, and in contrast to all his family co-stars, so down-home and folksy, he exemplifies the wise, loveable man of the street worthy of everyone's emulation. There are some incredibly rich early renderings of small-town Oklahoma life outside and inside Will's Garage business, capturing the essence of the high regard given him by his friends and family and local children, and there is a remarkable series of scenes as a parade of cars drive out to see a gusher erupt, as as folks line up at the bottom of the hill, hundreds of gallons rush down to the watchers and engulf their shows in black oil. This film can be slow by today's fast-paced sense of sit-com humor, but there is much to enjoy as the transplanted family attempts to ingratiate themselves with the aristocratic French--except for Will, who always holds out for commonsense and cannot understand why his wife rents him a manservant to help him put on his trousers. The sound quality in the film gets a bit muddled now and then due to age, but there are subtitles, and even without them, the plot moves nicely along. It's lesser Borzage and lesser Rogers, but still fascinating to fans of early sound films.

The first time I've seen Paris.

[dbdumonteil · 22 December 2008]

Frank Borzage's movies often took place in Europa:"Street Angel" was located in Italy,"little man what now?" "three comrades " and "mortal storm" in Germany and the sublime "Seventh Heaven" in France,like this one.There are more examples.

"They had to see Paris" is a very minor work,compared to such masterworks .We are used to greatness when we deal with such a genius as Borzage.However,this little comedy shows that Borzage knew what he was talking about.

The Nouveaux Riches' desire to enter the aristocracy was a subject the Pre-Nouvelle Vague French cinema often treated.To name but two ,there was Gance's "Le Maitre De Forges" and Jean Dreville's "Les Affaires Sont Les Affaires".Borzage's approach was not that different from theirs except that they generally favored melodrama whereas he opted for comedy.

A comedy which is not always really funny :the armor gag is rather ponderous.But the father repeating his son's lines ("I've made up my mind....") is good fun.Borzage displays his love for French folk songs by making the nightclub singer teach the Yankee the perennial "La Madelon" -which was incidentally THE song of the Poilus in WW1-

Of course there are clichés ,but coming from an American director ,it's forgivable!For instance whereas the girl is dreaming of marrying a marquis her brother opts for a bohemian life .

These American people cannot understand why they have to PAY to marry their daughter to an aristocrat! The dowry was something sacred in France in those times ,and it should be given ,not only in the aristocracy.

Coming after "Lucky star" ,"they had to see Paris" is necessarily a let- down.Consider it Borzage's holiday homework.

Fortunately, the DVD has captions!

[planktonrules · 8/10 · 23 March 2010]

If you watch an American movie from 1929, you'll most likely notice that the sound is not particularly good. Some of the characters will be hard to hear clearly and the film will seem quite flat compared to films made just a year or two later. You can't really blame these movies for this, as sound was such a new medium and they certainly hadn't worked out all the kinks. For example, they hadn't worked out how to add music and an actual orchestra was stationed just off camera to perform live! While "They Had to See Paris" has very, very poor sound, compared to the average film of the day, it's actually better than most. Some films from '29 (such as Mary Pickford's "Coquette") are nearly impossible to enjoy today due to the poor sound. Fortunately, this Will Rogers film has closed captioning AND captions on the DVD--a definite plus.

The story is very, very similar to the movie "Dodsworth" (1936) in that some simple American folk strike it rich and the pushy wife insists that they must travel to Paris to better themselves and expose their children to "culture". "Dodsworth" is a serious drama, however, and is one of the very best films of the 1930s--and holds up wonderfully today. "They Had to See Paris" is a comedy and just doesn't have the same timelessness as this other film--though it is pleasant and Will Rogers' first sound film.

Soon after striking oil, Rogers' family moves to Paris. Although the wife and his two kids go crazy in this town, Rogers remains pretty much the same man he was--a simple boy from Oklahoma. They never see their college-age son--he's always running about Europe with new friends. The daughter is running about with a handsome man--who you suspect is there only to leech off the family. And the wife has become quite the snob despite her very humble roots. The messages of this film seems to be to appreciate who you really are and to be content with this. In other words, don't try to be someone you aren't.

Rogers plays the character you'd expect--slow talking and simple but also but with a lot of common sense as evidenced by long string of insightful barbs along the way. Interestingly, Rogers physically looks quite different in this film compared to the more famous films he'd make just a couple years later (such as "Judge Priest" and "Dr. Bull"). His skin complexion in "They Had to See Paris" is very dark and his mixed American-Indian blood is very noticeable. However, later, he appeared very white in comparison. I assumed the director and cinematographer worked hard to make him appear a bit lighter skinned to downplay this--which, I guess, is rather sad.

The film features Rogers in some nice little vignettes. One of the nicest involves a very dull party the wife throws to impress her new "friends". He gave away his tux and she wants him to stay upstairs during this party, as he'd no doubt embarrass her. However, the party is a crashing bore and the guest of honor, a Russian noble, only has a good time when he wanders upstairs and meets Will. The scenes of these two men together are pretty cute--showing that despite their huge differences, people are people.

Overall, while it seems very dated today, the film, for 1929, is very, very good. It's charming and filled with nice performances. But, because times change, it's probably a film best appreciated by true devotees of early sound films.

Slow-moving comedy had some funny moments

[Sleepy-17 · 31 May 2000]

This film features Will Rogers in his first talkie. It's an OK effort, but the camera is stodgy and most of the characters are two-dimensional. Great exteriors, good oil-strike scene, followed by the usual "Innocents Abroad" situations. Marguerite Churchill is a knock-out as Will's daughter.

And this too is well worth seeing

[robert-temple-1 · 8/10 · 3 August 2013]

I have just seen this delightful satirical film for the first time. It is one of the earliest sound films, having been made in the first year of full sound. It contains numerous excellent scenes shot in Paris by a second unit, which are carefully intercut by director Frank Borzage with the studio-based material. It is interesting, for instance, to see the American Express Building on the Rue de Rivoli in Paris where all the American expatriates went to receive their remittances from home, collect their mail, and do their banking in the 1920s. So people seeking twenties Paris shots should look not only through newsreels and documentaries but in such feature films as this, where the quality and relevance are often superior. There is a very good shot of the corner of the Café de la Paix, for instance. This film is based on a novel of the same title published in 1926 by Homer Croy (I have the copy which he signed to his editor). I met Homer when I was 16 because I wrote to him after reading his book STARMAKER about D. W. Griffith, whom he had known well. Homer invited me to come and see him, and I did so several times. He and his wife Mae Bell (I thought it was 'Maybell') lived on Pinehurst Avenue, opposite the small Bennett Park, in the northwest Bronx. It was a quiet and tranquil area where they had lived for decades. There was little crime, but they said it had been much nicer and more genteel before the War. He and 'Maybell' had been married since 1915. They knew all the old-timers of the cinema, and frequently had tea with Lillian and Dorothy Gish at the Elysee Hotel in Manhattan. Homer knew Stan Laurel very well and got him to sign a book for me. Homer wanted to introduce me to all of them, because he was so thrilled that there was a teenager who knew and cared about D. W. Griffith. (Although I did not meet her through him, Anita Loos nearly fell over when the next year I told her I admired D. W. Griffith. She said: 'There's hope for the young yet! I could never imagine that a teenaged boy of these days would speak to me about D.W.') The Croys were very charming, countrified (he was a Missouri farm boy and liked to boast about it), and old-fashioned. Homer talked constantly about Will Rogers, the star of this film, for whom he wrote many scripts, and whom he idolized as a person. Homer was a real eccentric. He wrote to me a lot and always put foreign postage stamps on the envelopes, with crazy comments on the backs of the envelopes, and the stationery and envelopes were from strange hotels all over the world, which he had obviously collected on his travels. I still have these. But back to the film. Will Rogers plays Pike Peters, who has a garage in Claremore, Oklahoma (Rogers was himself from Oklahoma, by the way). He owns some land on which a trial oil well is drilled, and it comes a gusher. Suddenly from poverty he becomes rich and, as Rogers says in the film: 'I can't get used to earning $1000 a day.' His wife (played by Irene Rich), newly emboldened by riches, turns into an insufferable snob and speaks constantly of the need to 'meet the right people'. Rogers has no interest in 'the right people' but decides that he must humour his wife and indulge her high-fallutin' whims. She insists that they must go to Paris, where all 'the right people' are, and with any luck, a 'right person' suitable for their unmarried daughter Opal (played by Marguerite Churchill) to marry, preferably acquiring a title in the process. This is of course a dig by Homer at the Americans who had already done this, such as Winaretta Singer, who had managed to marry a French aristocrat and thus at a stroke become the Princesse de Polignac, one of France's oldest and most distinguished titles. The Croys had visited Paris in the 1920s, and are occasionally mentioned in memoirs of the period. They thus had first-hand experience of the setting of this story. (Anita Loos made a much greater hit when she went to Paris because she had become so controversial as a result of GENTLEMEN PREFER BLONDES.) The family duly make their way to Paris and ensconce themselves in one of those huge suites which rich Americans and South Americans used on their trips to Paris in those days. Rogers is often left behind as his wife goes social-climbing because she finds him too embarrassing. They meet a marquis who says he wants to marry Opal and is in love with her. But when he demands a huge dowry, Rogers refuses to pay it and infuriates his wife. But Opal realizes the man may be a gold-digger, which of course he is. However, before this he had encouraged them to rent a gigantic château and to hold a reception for over a hundred people. Rogers gets a shock when he realizes that all the guests are being paid to attend, with an exiled Russian grand duke getting 1000 francs for the evening. When he complains to his wife that she is buying a reception's worth of guests she is furious and bans him from the reception, so he has to wait upstairs. But he creeps out and peeks down the grand stairway and ends up meeting and befriending the grand duke. They both escape the horrible reception and have drinks and then go to sleep in the same bed for the night. The wife is astounded that her hick husband has bonded with her grandest and most expensive guest. The film is very amusing and satirical, and Rogers is his usual softly-spoken and self-effacing country-boy self. The film is highly recommended.

Good early talkie Will Rogers comedy

[mush-2 · 24 October 2010]

It starts out slow going and suffers from the early talkie stodginess. But once Will Rogers and family hit Paris, it picks up and has some genuinely funny moments. Example, Rogers sees his daughter and boyfriend clad in white fencing uniforms and says, "Ya got the Kulu Klux Klan here too?"

The humor is on the Beverly Hillbillies level of the clash between the crude if honest Americans vs. the effete French aristocracy. As another reviewer mentioned, the plot closely follows Dodsworth, which is a much finer film. Still it has its moments, mostly belonging to Will Rogers and Fifi D'Orsay who theater buffs will recall from the original cast of Sondheim's 1970's Follies.

Borzage does good work with the cast , especially Rogers from whom he coaxes some sensitive moments. Worth seeing for especially for Borzage or Rogers fans.