Springtime (1929) Poster

(1929)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Spring is in the air
ackstasis30 November 2008
Disney's "Silly Symphony" series was an important training-ground for animators to sharpen their skills and experiment with difficult visual effects, such as rainstorms and water reflections. 'Springtime (1929)' was directed by Walt Disney himself, and, though it is a primitive short films by most standards, one can nonetheless recognise the development of important techniques and ideas that would later be relied upon for subsequent masterpieces, such as Burt Gillet's 'Flowers and Trees (1932),' Wilfred Jackson's 'The Old Mill (1937)' and, most significantly of all, Disney's feature-length magnum opus, 'Fantasia (1940).' Animated in black-and-white, of course, 'Springtime' celebrates the arrival of spring in a secluded wetland, where anthropomorphised insects, frogs and birds commemorate the new season by dancing joyously in time to music, and generally eating their way down the food-chain. Flowers rise from the soil to perform a quick-step on two legs, while trees melodiously wave their arm-like branches.

'Springtime' was the first in a series of four Disney cartoons, each instalment celebrating a particular season. Spring is traditionally all about growth and new life, and the sheer exuberance of the forest creatures is skillfully translated to the screen. Bird chicks are born in their nests, one after the other, and everybody appears to be having a rather entertaining time. I find it interesting how the theme of death is incorporated so lightly into such an upbeat musical cartoon, with almost every character falling victim to a predator almost immediately after we have watched their performance: the caterpillar in sequentially gobbled up by the raven, the grasshoppers are devoured by the frog, the frogs provide a hearty meal for the stork, and, for the finale, the stork is swallowed up by an unexpectedly deep puddle. Though the lightning effects are admittedly rather primitive, the raindrops are animated very well, and Disney would only get better at it.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A bit dark...
planktonrules17 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Back in the early days of Disney Studios, the company made a huge number of so-called 'Silly Symphonies'. These cartoon shorts did not feature the usual Disney characters like Mickey or Donald but were musical shorts featuring lots of new and not so cuddly characters. A few were actually quite dark--such as skeletons, demons and in the case of "Springtime" animals that spend a lot of the film eating each other--and not in a cute way! The film is a musical that shows animals cavorting about in the springtime--but this fun is interrupted when some frogs eat each other and then they are eaten by a bird--only to be regurgitated! Pretty weird stuff and clearly the sort of time many would be surprised today to see when they hear that it came from the same people that brought us Goofy and Bambi! Worth seeing if you are an early animation nut.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Economists generally blame this cartoon for instigating . . .
pixrox15 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
. . . The Great Depression and World War Two. You need to review SPRINGTIME to evaluate the evidence with opened eyes for yourself. Incongruously released Oct. 24, 1929 (which is in the middle of AUTUMN on most calendars)--the dire day launching The Depression--the only question is proving the causal relationship between these two events. ALL the working stiff song & dance performers pictured here--the caterpillar, the grasshoppers, the frogs and the stork--are cruelly murdered in the midst of their revelry. Read THE GRAPES OF WRATH for an account of how the Real Life Depression slew humans and turtles alike. SPRINGTIME's director/producer is widely considered to be Broadway's original inspiration for the hit song "Springtime for Hit-Leer." SPRINGTIME provided a select group of fat cat miserly evil-doers, led by deceptively avuncular W. Himself--to establish their novel world order over the slain stiffs of millions.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nature celebrates spring
bellino-angelo201431 August 2017
This is the third Silly Symphony, and the first dedicated to the seasons (the others being Summer, Autumn, Winter).

In Springtime there are some animals and flowers that dance celebrating the spring, but then a storm arrives. After the rain, near a pond, they all dance to the Dance of the Hours.

In this short animals have a starring role; two ladybirds, a caterpillar, a crow's family, two cute grasshoppers, some turtles used as drums, a spider that uses his web like an harp, some dancing frogs and a stork. But there are also, at the beginning, few trees and some dancing flowers, and a tree that washes himself with the pouring rain.

The strange thing of this short is that every creature dies after his performance; the caterpillar is eaten by the raven, the grasshoppers swallowed by the frog, the frogs are the stork's lunch, and in the end, the stork is swallowed by a giant puddle.

In the end it's a nice short, and it's a must-see for all animal lovers. Featuring Grieg's ''Morning Mood'' and Ponchielli's ''Dance of the Hours''
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More silly seasons.
OllieSuave-00720 June 2018
There is really not too much to see here, just a bunch birds and swamp animals moving to music as Spring approaches. There is plenty of clever sound and visual effects and catchy music, just not much in a plot. But, I thought that the excessive scenes of birds gobbling up little animals were a little too much for a children's Disney cartoon.

Grade C+
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Isn't Springtime the New Awakening
Hitchcoc11 April 2018
There isn't much to engage us here. It is indeed springtime when all the flowers, insects, birds, and so on emerge. What this cartoon shows us is the food chain as each small element comes out with happiness and hope, only to be swallowed up by something bigger and stronger. If you think they are cute, you will see them sadly devoured. The animation here is pretty cheap and there is little movement.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Well the dancing flowers were nice.. Warning: Spoilers
Oh my I am gonna come off as such a crabcake in this review, because I'm afraid that this short really doesn't work for me at all. It's not very fun, it doesn't have any real charm that I could see, and I know it was only the third ever Silly Symphony to be put out and it was all still very much a work in progress as far as the quality and very art of the animation was concerned, but the sound is just awful. As the creatures dance around there is so much tinny klop klop klopping noise that just to me sounded horribly cheap and brutal, like someone is tapping a pan with a teaspoon, it just doesn't sound good at all. I also don't like the more weird unnatural touches like when the caterpillar separates its body segments and the stretchy limbs of the bird, that kinda thing is much more Fleischer than Disney. And I know it was perfectly mild but I really didn't like the animals eating each other, and it wasn't like they all come back alive and well at the end either. I mean I get that in their own way the animators were probably trying to show what really happens in nature from the animals that they doubtlessly observed, but I didn't like that! Thank goodness it didn't become a regular thing! I didn't mean for this to be so negative but I'm only being honest. In fact I've been getting back into these shorts a lot lately, but this is as poor a short as I remembered it, I'd rank it among the series' worst. Most of what is in it was later done again more effectively in later Symphonies like "Flowers and Trees", and even the 1930 "Summer" short. And much like Summer it feels more like a depiction of the animal life of a swamp environment than anything to do with Spring, apart from the opening flowers and hatching chicks at the beginning. It's not even remotely a good tribute to the first season. So to me at least the third time is not always the charm. Oh well, it's still a part of the rich evolving tapestry of a series that had far greater animated wonders yet to come... Not their best!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not good
kaicesbr14 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Continuing my Silly Symphony marathon, since it's not on Disney+ yet, let's find it on Youtube. I never watched either. I'll watch and comment. Now I understand why some Silly Symphony shorts are not available on Disney+, I know that Steamboat Willie is not part of Silly Symphony but from the ones I watched so far only Steamboat Willie and The Skeleton Dance were good. Because this Springtime and El Terrible Toreador are extremely bad. Conclusion: Bad, I hope Silly Symphony improves over time otherwise my marathon will be exhausting. As always the soundtrack is the best thing about the animation but as I said in the El Terrible Toreador review that's not enough.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Spring is indeed in the air, and this is a pretty darn good tribute to the springtime
TheLittleSongbird14 October 2009
I really loved this Silly Symphony. Why? Everything is good about it. First of all, there is stunning black and white animation, that after all this time, doesn't look at all dated. Second, is the appealing characters, then again, I love all the characters in all the Silly Symphonies; they never fail to bring a smile to my face. Third, is the music. Now I look out for this element, every time I review a film, cartoon or TV programme on IMDb. Most of the short contained wonderful classical music favourites like Morning from Peer Gynt by Grieg and Dance of the Hours from La Giaconda(also used in Fantasia) by Ponchielli. All in all, wonderful, wonderful, wonderful! Bethany Cox
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Nicely animated and largely about the food chain in action
llltdesq18 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This is a Silly Symphony from Disney. There will be spoilers ahead:

There really isn't much of a plot here, it's simply a series of gags loosely strung together, although a few of them can be grouped together as examples of the food chain in action, as various bugs and amphibians get eaten by some other critter.

In addition, there are a few nice bits, like a tree and some other flora reacting to a rainstorm, culminating in lightning striking the tree, with fascinating results.

Lots of dancing and moving around to classical music selected by Carl Stalling, the music and animation pair up reasonably well overall.

This short is available on the Disney Treasures More Silly Symphonies DVD set, which is well worth getting. Recommended.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Disney's Salute To The Seasons, Opus One
Ron Oliver22 September 2000
A Walt Disney SILLY SYMPHONY Cartoon Short.

It is SPRINGTIME at the marsh, and the joy of the season is causing the various birds & bugs to dance about rapturously and eat each other up...

This black & white cartoon is basically an exercise in action/reaction animation. The Disney artists seem to have an unending supply of posterior gags, often rather vulgar. The tuneful soundtrack with its familiar themes pushes the action along - most notably Ponchielli's `Dance of the Hours,' which would be showcased to great effect eleven years later in the Studio's FANTASIA.

The SILLY SYMPHONIES, which Walt Disney produced for a ten year period beginning in 1929, are among the most interesting of series in the field of animation. Unlike the Mickey Mouse cartoons in which action was paramount, with the Symphonies the action was made to fit the music. There was little plot in the early Symphonies, which featured lively inanimate objects and anthropomorphic plants & animals, all moving frantically to the soundtrack. Gradually, however, the Symphonies became the school where Walt's animators learned to work with color and began to experiment with plot, characterization & photographic special effects. The pages of Fable & Fairy Tale, Myth & Mother Goose were all mined to provide story lines and even Hollywood's musicals & celebrities were effectively spoofed. It was from this rich soil that Disney's feature-length animation was to spring. In 1939, with SNOW WHITE successfully behind him and PINOCCHIO & FANTASIA on the near horizon, Walt phased out the SILLY SYMPHONIES; they had run their course & served their purpose.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed