Die Hose (1927) Poster

(1927)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Metonymy: The Container for the Thing Contained
boblipton25 January 2009
Pretty young Jenny Jugo has her undergarments fall down as she and her much older husband are on their way to Church one fine Sunday morning. She is so embarrassed that she rushes back home. Her husband, on returning, starts to rant, but a little domesticity in the form of bacon restores harmony. However, the rest of the world assumes that her morals are as loose as her knickers and complications ensue.

This film is very professionally written and performed, but it lacks any sort of comic underpinnings. Instead, everything becomes a snickering symbol, from misshapen cigars to bowling bowls that land in the gutter, to men destroying their beds to collapsing candles. We see symbolic representations of rape, voyeurism, masochism and homosexuality, but the one attempt at non-normative sex -- the local Prince invites young Jenny for dinner and she writes a note to her husband that she is tending to a sick relative -- doesn't happen. Miss Jugo is quite affecting as the ill-at-ease subject of his venery, but, as you might expect, little comes of it.

The problem with this comedy is that it goes on for far too long and is aimed at far too intellectual an audience. There is little that is overtly funny; instead, all the real jokes are symbolic, suitable for Freudian analysis.

Charley Chase would have made a good two-reeler of this -- indeed, he did a good two-reeler with socks serving as symbols of sex. But in this movie, everything happens symbolically and beneath the symbols there is no reality.

The director of this movie, Hans Behrendt, was a specialist in comedy. He escaped to Austria when the Nazis came to power and made movies there until 1936. After the Anschluss, he fled to Belgium, but they caught up to him in Belgium in 1940. He died in Auschwitz two years later.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
She drops her panties but he's watching the clock.
F Gwynplaine MacIntyre26 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I saw 'Die Hose' in October 2007 at the silent-film festival in Pordenone, Italy; they screened a print from the Murnau archive in Wiesbaden.

The official English-language title of this film is 'A Royal Scandal', but a more accurate translation of 'Die Hose' would be 'The Pants', with the double meaning of either outer trousers or inner undergarments: indeed, this somewhat stagey film (based on a stage play) has the general feel of one of those old Whitehall farces in which Brian Rix would predictably lose his trousers.

Werner Krauss plays Theobald Maske, a low-echelon bureaucrat whose job is one of dull routine. Henry James once described one of his protagonists as 'a man you can set your watch by', but Theobald Maske seems to be a hostage to the clock. Arriving at his time-serving desk job, he has nothing to do but fuss with his moustache and watch the clock ... until noon, when he mechanically eats his packed lunch. Then back to clock-watching.

SPOILERS COMING. But it's not Werner Krauss who loses his trousers here. (I'm not sure that the world is ready for Dr Caligari in his underpants!) The titular garments belong to pretty Jenny Jugo, as Maske's much younger wife. At the climax of the film, she loses her step-ins (the stylish knickers of the 1920s). It's a moment fraught with possibilities, but we know that this 1927 film isn't going to do anything really dangerous.

I was slightly annoyed that this film never indicated why the pretty and vivacious young Luise (Jenny Jugo) would be married to the older, tubby and porridge-faced Theobald. However, plenty of other films have presented similar pairings with no more explanation, so it would be unfair of me to single out 'Die Hose' for this lapse.

According to the programme notes at Pordenone, when 'Die Hose' was originally released, a Berlin film critic compared Krauss's characterisation to a George Grosz character. I wish that I hadn't read this comment before the screening; I'm somewhat familiar with Grosz's work (he was a satiric artist and political cartoonist who often depicted blimpish bureaucrats), and now I wonder if I would have spotted the resemblance myself without that comment in the programme notes.

'Die Hose' is the nearest thing I've seen to an Ernst Lubitsch comedy that wasn't made by Ernst Lubitsch. Unfortunately, although this movie hits many of the same notes so typical of Lubitsch, it tends to pound them heavily rather than utilising Lubitsch's famously light touch. My rating: only 6 out of 10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The way to a man's heart.....
brogmiller25 December 2019
Adapted by Franz Schulz from the play by Carl Sternheim and directed by Hans Berendt this 'blend of grand burlesque and satire', in the words of Potamkin, was considered too highbrow by the critics but proved to be a great success with the paying public. It is immensely enjoyable with some splendid comic touches. The plot is perfectly simple. Owing to what would now be termed a 'wardrobe malfunction' at a public event the pretty wife of a pompous, petty official becomes an object of desire for a fifth-rate poet, a hapless young barber and a Prince Charming. Needless to say she chooses the latter but has a pang of conscience and returns to hubby who is decorated and promoted by the Prince as a reward for his complacency. The playing is faultless all round. The lovely Jenny Jugo plays the wife,Rudolph Forster the poet, Veit Harlan the barber and there is a marvellous comic turn by Olga Limburg as the 'woman across the street'. The official,Theobald Maske, is another of the unforgettable gallery of characters created by the superlative Werner Krauss. He is self-satisfaction incarnate and is far more concerned with matters of the stomach than the heart. Krauss was a master of make up and the real star of this film is his outrageous moustache! Interesting to see Harlan as a young actor. He made his directorial debut(uncredited) eight years later and went on to become one of the most distinguished and notorious of directors. Director Berendt however went on to perish in Auschwitz. I found this film on You Tube to be far more enjoyable once I had turned down the intrusive and aggravating score that has been tacked on. Should your musical ear be as sensitive as mine, I advise you to do the same. Whatever happened to solo piano accompaniment?!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed