Flying Elephants (1928) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
One of the silliest movies ever made-- and a goodly one, withal
wmorrow5911 July 2002
Consider this prospect: Laurel & Hardy & Company are cavemen in furry pelts, running around in a remote canyon somewhere enacting what amounts to a silent version of The Flintstones. It doesn't seem to promise much in the way of great comedy, does it? A capsule summary of Flying Elephants might elicit groans from those who haven't seen it, and, what with comedy being so subjective and personal, there are probably plenty who've seen it and dismissed it as silly, juvenile, low-brow, etc. All I can say is: okay, guilty as charged, but I confess I really enjoy this movie anyway. Whatever else it may be, this two-reeler also happens to be quirky, fast-paced and off-the-wall, with a surreal wackiness that other comedians occasionally attempt but only rarely achieve. The Marx Brothers managed it in Duck Soup and for short stretches elsewhere, and the Fleischer Studio guys and Tex Avery made some cartoons that reached this level, but Flying Elephants is one of a kind. You can't just crank out stuff like this; the charming weirdness would wear thin pretty quickly.

Although Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy each appear prominently, Flying Elephants isn't really a "Laurel & Hardy" comedy as such. At the time this was made they were working together a lot but hadn't yet gelled as the team we recognize. Babe Hardy's performance is quite funny and oddly consistent with his later work; his special rhythms, gestures and expressions are there, despite the wig and the animal pelt he's wearing. But Mr. Laurel is the one who really gets freaky, hopping about in a curly blonde wig like a sissified Harpo Marx. The name of his character, Little Twinkle Star, tells the tale. It's anomalous in his career but nonetheless one of Stan's most energized and memorable turns, and a revelation to anyone who thinks he's a one-note performer. Stan has a fly-fishing sequence that is a comic high point, and it's just the sort of eccentric routine he could make his own.

Much of the plot-- such as it is --concerns courtship and marriage rituals among these cave dwellers. The movie begins with an absurd wedding ceremony which sets the tone for what follows. We learn that a royal decree has compelled the males to take wives, although, come to think of it, you wouldn't expect people in animal pelts to care much about formal nuptials. Much of the dialog (conveyed via title cards, of course) is in a strange, pseudo-Medieval slang. There are gags involving trained goats, animated fantasy beasts, a man in a bear suit, and an animal (a cow, perhaps?) disguised as a dinosaur. Speaking of dinosaurs good old Jimmy Finlayson is on hand, identified as a "wizard" apparently to justify a vulgar but funny pun utilizing the word. A decided bonus for modern viewers is the supporting cast of cute starlets in abbreviated cave flapper outfits, complete with bobbed hair, furry boots, and garters. A gorgeous young actress named Viola Richard plays Finlayson's daughter, Blushing Rose, and her close-ups can melt your heart decades after the fact. Viola seems to have vanished from the screen not long after this film was made, for some baffling reason.

Oh well. There are still prints of Flying Elephants around to amuse, amaze, and tickle those viewers open to this sort of thing.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Flying Elephants is an early Laurel & Hardy comedy in which their standard characteristics haven't been formed yet
tavm2 August 2011
After years of reading about this early Laurel & Hardy short in Randy Skretvedt's "Laurel and Hardy: The Magic Behind the Movies", I finally managed to watch this Stone Age-set comedy on Hulu as linked from IMDb. Unlike their later classic work, here Stan and Ollie aren't together much and when they are, they're fighting over a girl they want to marry. As Skretvedt said in the book: "They appear to be as much of a team as Popeye and Bluto." Still they, and James Finlayson, provide much laughs whether hitting each other (or anybody else) on the heads or doing some kind of face dance. I also liked it when Stan landed on a cactus. So on that note, Flying Elephants is worth a look if you're an L & H completist. P.S. The stunning woman playing the girl-Viola Richard-was from Lafayette in my current home state of Louisiana. The title refers to Ollie's talking to another female about elephants flying to the South this time of year as we see just that after he mentions it. That animation was provided by Roy Seawright in his first of many accomplishments at the Hal Roach studio. And this was the last L & H short distributed by the Pathe Exchange as Roach could no longer tolerate the movie company's inept distribution methods. He'd eventually choose M-G-M for his future dealings.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bizarre, Almost Surreal Laurel and Hardy Silent Short.
JohnWelles25 March 2010
"Flying Elephants" (1928), a Laurel and Hardy short made in the last years of the silents is also one of the comedy's duo most bizarre film. The title itself is logic deifying, as the movie itself.

The story is weak: in the stone age, the king declares that all males must marry within twenty-four hours. Around this slender plot, Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy do their best they can but, as they spend most of the picture apart (which is strange, as their first "official" movie together, "Putting Pants on Philip", had been made two years earlier), the result is never really satisfying and the high pint of the picture is when there is a shot of animated elephants with wings on flying into the distance, hence the title. The elephants were animated by Walter Lantz and is possible the most surrealist aspect in all of Laurel and Hardy's movies.

It's not a great short by "the boys" but there are several good gags that will reward Laurel and Hardy film buffs.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Silly, Goofy Stuff That You Can't Help Enjoying
Snow Leopard23 February 2006
This relatively early pairing of Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy (not quite yet the team of 'Laurel & Hardy' as we know them) has a great deal of silly and goofy material - and it's practically impossible not to laugh as you watch it. Their casual, good-natured approach and the offbeat story material are the movie's most obvious features, but it is their skilled comic timing and the way they blend themselves in with the props, settings, and the rest of the cast that make it work.

It's a rarity amongst their movies in being set in the past - in this case, all the way back to the Stone Age. The setting and characters are presented in an exaggeratedly broad fashion, with plenty of clubs and the like. The two main characters contrast, with Hardy playing a more or less stereotypical caveman, and Laurel playing a character who would have been lucky to survive for five minutes in the real Stone Age. It adds some deliberately anachronistic medieval dialogue in the inter-titles, plus Hardy's "Flying Elephants" line, which comes out of nowhere.

It gets quite amusing at times, although it's very likely that lesser comics could not have made it work nearly so well. The two stars are joined by a good supporting cast, headed by their frequent foil James Finlayson. Viola Richard and Dorothy Coburn play a couple of attractive cave-women who are, nevertheless, not to be trifled with.

Even compared with their own best movies, this is quite unrefined and outlandish. But, at least if you like Laurel and Hardy, it's also pretty entertaining to watch.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Perhaps the silliest Laurel & Hardy movie around.
Boba_Fett113813 August 2006
This is perhaps the Laurel & Hardy movie with the most silliest and random humor in it.

The movie has a silly premise and it is entirely set in the Stone Age. This movie perhaps was a sort of experiment to see how the audience would react to a Laurel & Hardy movie that was not set in the 20th century and featured some almost cartoon like humor. In my opinion it's a rather failed experience. Although the movie does entertain, it really misses the Laurel & Hardy touch. It makes this movie basically just as good (or bad) as any other '20's slapstick movie.

Although the movie is simple and silly, it certainly is no bad movie to watch. It has some real good funny moments in it, especially the scene in which the James Finlayson character gets thrown of the mountain is priceless but overall it still is a pretty simple movie that is too odd and different to please the most hardened Laurel & Hardy fans.

The comedy seems to be very random, just like is the case in animated cartoons. Probably the reason why this is the silliest Laurel & Hardy movie around. It also doesn't make the movie the most consistent Laurel & Hardy comedy short around.

To be honest the title cards were often funnier to read than it was to watch this movie. Not a really a good or common thing for a Laurel & Hardy movie.

Stan Laurel does play a pretty good and very different role. It shows his variety as an actor and he shows that he can be funny, no matter what sort of role he plays. When he enters the screen the movie becomes truly entertaining and fun to watch. It's too bad that he gets introduced rather late into the movie. The movie also features Laurel & Hardy regular James Finlayson, who doesn't play a very big or significant but still fun role. Further more the movie is mostly filled with some pretty looking young cave-women.

A very silly movie. Beware not to expect a regular early Laurel & Hardy silent comedy short.

6/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Laurel and Hardy in the stone age
TheLittleSongbird11 August 2018
Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy were comedic geniuses, individually and together, and their partnership was deservedly iconic and one of the best there was. They left behind a large body of work, a vast majority of it being entertaining to classic comedy, at their best they were hilarious and their best efforts were great examples of how to do comedy without being juvenile or distasteful.

After a string of short films that saw the duo in the right direction, where there was more than before of the partnership (though not yet fully formed) and Hardy had more to do and became funnier and more interesting than in his earlier work, 'Flying Elephants' is very watchable but a bit disappointing. Not a misfire ('25 Minutes from Hollywood' was the misfire really for me of the previous outings) and not quite a step backwards, but not really a sign of things moving forward.

Laurel is great fun with great comic timing and Hardy also scores highly. There are a fair few amusing moments, it moves efficiently and there is a nice enough charm. The rest of the cast are solid, and the whole cast blend with the stone age setting very well.

'Flying Elephants' doesn't look too bad, do quite like the broadly rendered setting. The inter-titles dialogue is anachronistic but appealingly so.

On the other hand, the story is non-existent and there are instances of over-stretching. There is a lack of refinement in the storytelling, where it's a bit disorganised, and the effects are charming enough but also on the creaky side.

Also found for my liking that things do get a bit too silly and over the top, even for the broad setting. While Laurel and Hardy perform very well individually, they spend too much time apart and there is nowhere near enough of them together.

Concluding, nice and amusing but not near one of the best representations of the legendary duo. 6/10 Bethany Cox
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Laurel and Hardy, right before they were
lee_eisenberg21 May 2019
One of the last movies in which Laurel and Hardy appeared before they officially became a team was "Flying Elephants", casting them as cavemen vying for a woman. Stan and Ollie were still perfecting their routines, so the comedy here isn't what we're used to for them; there's a lot of bonking heads with clubs. It's enjoyable enough for its brief run time, but just remember that it's more low-key than most of Laurel and Hardy's work.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Caveman Comedy
JoeytheBrit2 March 2010
Although both Stan and Ollie appear in this stone-age comedy, it isn't really a Laurel & Hardy film, because there's no sense yet of the boys working as a comedy partnership. They're simply a couple of stock comics Hal Roach decided to put together in a film. I believe Stan and Ollie appeared together in a number of films for Roach before he twigged to what a comedy goldmine he had on his hands.

Flying Elephants isn't a particularly funny comedy, although it does have a couple of amusing moments. It's decreed that any single man not married within 24-hours will be banished or killed – or both. So Stan and Ollie both go out, club in hand, to snare themselves a woman. Although stone age women seem to be in plentiful supply – everywhere you look there's one of them lounging around on a rock waiting to be picked up – both boys have trouble bagging one for themselves and end up going after the same woman – who just happens to be the daughter of James Finlayson, the victim here of a raging toothache.

The film is enlivened by some amusing special effects which, of course, look incredibly creaky today, but which also add a measure of charm to the proceedings. Stan probably makes more of an impression with his effeminate skipping and shaggy blonde wig, and it's interesting to see the gradual evolution of what would become the movie's greatest comedy duo.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It's the stone age, and the boys are looking for mates
weezeralfalfa10 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
In this minor Laurel + Hardy (not really Laurel AND Hardy) silent comedy short, we are back in the stone age(more or less). King Ferdinand has decreed, by mouth and writing, that all men must marry within 24 hr. or sent to hammer rocks. From the looks of things, there is no deficiency of willing maidens, yet there is strong competition for them, often involving skull-crunching clubs. One couple asks a presumed priest or shaman to marry them. He goes through a series of rituals, and declares them soul mates. The last step is for each to grip an end of a string with their teeth. The shaman then strikes the string with a stout stick, causing their heads to knock together(funny).Ollie shows up and the (presumed) shaman tells him to read the king's rock writing, about the order to marry immediately. Ollie begins looking for a mate. He finds a prospect lounging on a rock ledge, and asks her to see the elephants flying over. But, then he receives a blow to the head from a caveman standing higher. So, he finds another girl, with the same result. Yet another looks at him suggestively. But, he says no thanks, I already have 2 knots on my head. Nonetheless, a goat targets his backside........Stan, as Little Twinkle Star, slows up, intent on finding a mate. He finds a girl, but then a man shows up and carries her off. He finds another girl and slings her over his shoulder. But, she soon wiggles free, and initiates a wrestling and kicking match, which Stan loses. Next, he finds Blushing Rose: daughter of Saxophorus (James Finlayson) who has a massive tooth ache. There don't seem to be any dental experts around, so Blushing Rose has the idea of tying a string around the tooth, with the other end tied around a large rock, which is too heavy for Finlayson to move.. However, Ollie can lift it. He has the idea of throwing the rock over a cliff. But Finlayson goes over the cliff with the rock, and takes quite a tumble. However, he seems to have escaped without any serious injuries, and is elated that his throbbing tooth is gone. Stan arrives with several fish, after a disastrous start. He hopes that will convince Finlayson that he can support Blushing Rose. But Ollie also wants to marry the girl, so he and Stan have an argument Stan entices Ollie over to the cliff edge and intends to kick him off, but backs down at the last second. Nonetheless, that goat that earlier butted Ollie, butts him again, and he goes over the cliff. Apparently, Stan assumes he dies, as he doesn't go check on him.. Rather, he runs to Blushing Rose and hugs her. They sit down on a rock(0ops,It turns out to be a bear!). I will leave the finale for you to see. See it at YouTube.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not bad compared to other silent comedy shorts, but not up to the standards of later Laurel and Hardy films
planktonrules13 November 2006
This is a bizarre little film in pretty much every way I can think of off the top of my head. Although it technically is a Laurel and Hardy film, it was made early after they became a comedy pair and it was obvious from this film they still hadn't gotten the formula exactly right. Instead of the usual situation in which Stan and Ollie are friends, they are actually rivals in this peculiar film.

The film begins in the Stone Age. The king has made a rule that all men or they will be "banished and banned--or both". So all the bachelors are out trying to get married. And, in caveman fashion, this means meeting a nice lady and bashing her over the head with their giant clubs. The special effects and sets are pretty minimalistic, as the cast and crew went into the California hills and wore animal skin clothes. The only "prop" other than that was a fake Triceratops. While the film is almost entirely action-oriented (partly because it was a silent film), the film had very peculiar subtitles that had the actors speaking in old English?!

Overall, this is a very odd little curio and is not an especially good representation of the team's work. This isn't because the film is silent, as they made some excellent silent shorts, such as BIG BUSINESS or SHOULD MARRIED MEN GO HOME?--it's more because the film is just weird and one long and not especially hilarious joke. Plus, the movie appears, in spots, to be pretty much filmed without a script and the actors just mug for the camera. For devout fans of the team, this is a must, but for all others, it's pretty skip-able and you should seek out some of their better shorts first.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Flying Elephants
jboothmillard4 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy are the most famous comedy duo in history, and deservedly so, so I am happy to see any of their films. It is the Stone Age, 6000 years ago, and all men are forced to marry or work on the rock pile, but King Ferdinand orders all males over 13 and under 95 years must marry, or be banished, die, or both. We see an example of a marriage, in front of the law tablet, with the priest testing soul-mates, and bashing the couple's heads, literally. Arriving in the land is wizard Saxophonus (James Finlayson) with his daughter Blushing Rose (Viola Richard) and a long lasting toothache. Then along comes the Mighty Giant (Ollie) from the bogs, looking for anybody's wife, and after seeing the new law, he says he get any amount of women he wants. Trying to woo some women he gets constantly clunked on the head by a jealous man, and also a butt from a goat, so he think something doesn't want him to be with those women. Then along comes merry swain Little Twinkle Star (Stan) searching for romance, and hearing someone shout the new law, he giggles at the idea, and merrily jumping around he manages to tumble down a hill into a prickly cactus. After this Twinkle tries copying a caveman's technique for getting a girl, by picking her up and taking her away, but the girl he picks doesn't want it, and they have a kicking and tossing argument. Then Twinkle sees and chases Rose round a bush, and when he gets to her father, he will only allow a marriage if he proves himself as a provider of fish. While Twinkle goes to catch fish harpooning and using flies, Rose tries to ease her father's pain by pulling out the aching tooth with string tied to a rock. The father can't throw it, so the Giant comes along and does instead, but ends up throwing him over the cliff as well, but after tumbling, it seems it worked. Both Twinkle and Giant meet each other, and only one can have Rose with her father's permission, so they start squabbling, but Twinkle manages to send Giant off the near cliff with the help of goat's butt. After returning to Rose, Twinkle and she sit on what they think is a rock, but it turns out to be a brown bear that they wake, and running away in the cow and cart, they flip it upside down, and the film ends with the father and the couple with the bear joining them under the cart. Filled with some small slapstick and not too bad classic comedy, it isn't great, but it's a silent black and white film worth looking at. Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy were number 7 on The Comedians' Comedian. Okay!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nice use of California desert footage.
mark.waltz12 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Long before Mel Brooks showed his version of the first marriage in "History of the World Part 1", Laurel and Hardy starred in this caveman comedy short that has to be seen to be believed. I know that they had done some period pieces set in the 17th century, but this takes them back several millenniums. The king of the caveman has declared that all men must marry within 24 hours or face banishment or death, or both!!! That of course leads to a panic among the single gentlemen of the cave social set, and they are klonking potential brides on the head at huge rates to bring them to the local marrying man. Of course, Laurel and Hardy go after the same one (Edna Marion), daughter of James Finlayson who is dealing with a sore tooth and in no mood for silly antics.

For much of this film, I smiled at much of the comic visuals, and on occasion my last were loud and uproarious. But it is a strange short, not in line with anything else you seen the boys do, and certainly not presenting them in a stereotypical Laurel and Hardy manner. Finlayson is very funny in his expressions of how he deals with each of the rivals, and very grateful to one for ridding him of his loathesome tusk. Laurel is very funny trying to fish with the truly oldest method of catching fish, and there's also a very funny moment involving a wagon, a mule that takes off too soon, and a bear. I'd like to have gotten a glimpse at the ancient creature who chases Laurel away, but the camera is only on it for a quick second. I don't know that I would revisit this comedy short very often, but it's definitely one that Laurel and Hardy fans (as well afficianados of classic comedy) should see at least once.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed