Love 'Em and Leave 'Em (1926) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Gentlemen prefer Louise--can you blame them?
imogensara_smith8 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The few stars of the silent era who retain the power to draw audiences today have salvaged many films that would otherwise be entirely forgotten. These films don't survive by virtue of artistic merit, like METROPOLIS or THE CROWD, but by virtue of starring (or even featuring in a minor role) someone like Greta Garbo, Buster Keaton, or Louise Brooks. LOVE 'EM AND LEAVE 'EM is one of these films: without the presence of Brooks, it's unlikely that it would ever be shown. But there's historical value in such examples of average fare, and this film in particular functions as a time capsule of the 1920s. The clothes and sets alone are a treat for those interested in the period, and they realistically evoke the lives of young working people in New York.

A slight but charming film, LOVE 'EM AND LEAVE 'EM revolves around two orphaned sisters who live in a boarding house and work at a department store. The older sister Mame (Evelyn Brent) is responsible, virtuous, and slightly frumpy; the younger sister Janie (Louise Brooks) is a handful, a spoiled cutie who lives for Charleston contests and gets ahead by flirting with every man in sight. She has no scruples about stealing her sister's boyfriend (or her clothes) while she's away on a vacation, and she gets into trouble when she loses the money she's supposed to be collecting for an employees' dance on the horse races. Mame is saintly enough to come to her rescue in spite of everything, but she does so in a way that's anything but saintly, and that reveals her to be a more formidable woman than we previously suspected.

Evelyn Brent (perhaps best known as "Feathers," the gangster's moll in UNDERWORLD) is a striking woman, with narrow dark eyes, a pre-Raphaelite profile, and an intense, brooding presence. Unfortunately for Brent, she has to share the screen with the 19-year-old Louise Brooks, a situation no actress would welcome. As the spoiled Janie, Brooks is so natural and perfectly cast that you wonder if she's acting at all—which can be a definition of great acting. Somehow you can't help but like her bratty character: she's so unrepentantly selfish, and so lustrous with youthful energy and delight in her own adorableness. She glistens, with her patent-leather bob and slinky black satin dresses, her bright black eyes and snow-white face, her incandescent smile. She has a Ziegfeld girl's wiggly walk, and at the employees' dance she gets to cut loose with a fast Charleston, dressed in black tights, a white tutu, a black leotard and a white top-hat. The camera didn't just love her, it was infatuated with her. An unrepentant, fun-loving sex kitten who lives off men and throws tantrums when she doesn't get her way…come to think of it, Janie Walsh is not so different from Pabst's Lulu, though presented with none of the nuance or depth of Brooks's definitive role.

Leading man Lawrence Gray is a nondescript actor, and his character is something of a jerk even before he starts cheating on his fiancée with her sister. He has a high opinion of his skills as a window-dresser despite the fact that all his good ideas come from Mame; it never occurs to him to acknowledge this when he's praised by his boss. This character—the cocky young man who needs to learn some hard lessons—is common in films of the twenties. In this case, however, he doesn't seem to learn anything. Finally, Osgood Perkins plays the creep down the hall who lures Janie into betting on the races, and cheats her out of her money when she wins. He's perfect as a homely would-be Casanova, who "spent six months curing halitosis only to find he was unpopular anyway." He thinks he's going to get lucky when Mame goes to his room for a drink: instead, she steals his wallet and then beats the stuffing out of him. Now if only, for a finale, she would repeat the procedure on her straying boyfriend!
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Evelyn Brent
boblipton13 April 2003
Well, it's a movie with Louise Brooks, so we're supposed to talk about Louise Brooks. She plays a major supporting role as Evelyn Brent's sister, lifting the money from the dance fund for a flyer on the horses. Like most of her roles in this period, she sleepwalks through the part, at least until she gets to the dance. There she does a few seconds of a fast Charleston and smiles. Wham! Lord, the camera loves her. It's a masquerade party, so she's dressed like a showgirl, while all the other women wear long skirts. She always seems out of place in these roles. I spend my time looking at her and wondering why she isn't on a chorus line or some fat millionaire's arm. Ah, the joys of miscasting.

Evelyn Brent is wonderful, but she is only the star of the movie and she is certainly photographed to her benefit. Still, the difference in acting styles is absolutely clear: Miss Brent knows how to show her character's emotions on the screen, while Louise Brooks comes off as no more than a party girl.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Love 'Em and Leva e'Em
dreverativy30 December 2006
This is the only chance I have had to see Louise Brooks practice her dancing, and I'm afraid it isn't up to much. If she could dance she wasn't going to give the audiences of this film the opportunity to find out.

This is a reasonable effort - so probably fairly typical for Frank Tuttle. It is a sister vs. sister story - inevitably one is good (Mame Walsh, played carefully by Evelyn Brent) and the other not so good, or rather very, very bad (Janie Walsh, played by Brooks). In between them is Bill Billingsley (an average Lawrence Gray, who had a speciality in heels and sharks).

I can't help but feel that Brent was cheated. She had struggled for several years to get top billing. She achieved it in this film, but hers is largely a thankless - indeed marginal - role. She was thought to be a little old for the part (she was nearing 30), and it must be said that with her flowing locks she could easily have stepped out of a daguerreotype, for all her beauty. Brooks, by contrast looks very modern, and she carries herself in a very 'contemporary' way. There is more than an emotional gulf between these two - and unfortunately Brent falls into it. Brooks steals the film - not by acting (her handling of her gambling problem and her indebtedness is somewhat underwhelming), but by being very, very sexy. Brent was, by contrast, to cripple her remaining years as a star by trying to hard to act the part of a great actress. Her work became ever more serious, and therefore (because her talent had its limits) more stilted, and therefore dated. Sad to say, hard work brought her diminishing returns. I'm not certain that Brooks knew what hard work was, whilst she remained an actress.

This film is elevated from the level of pedestrian drama by its supporting cast, notably Osgood Perkins (Anthony's father, and a first class actor) as the vulpine bookie, though he sometimes looks as though he has swallowed strichnine; also Arthur Donaldson (as a self-important floor manager of the department store where the three main players 'work'). This was a pleasant and undemanding seventy minutes.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
You just can't keep a bad girl down!
JohnHowardReid21 January 2008
The verse novel has now gone right out of fashion, but in the teens and twenties, it was quite a popular literary form. In fact, this piece by John Van Alstyne Weaver was so successful that both a play and a movie adaptation were always on the cards.

Despite an extremely negative review by Mordaunt Hall in "The New York Times", the movie was a big hit too—and no wonder! The screenplay cleverly showcases the charismatic Louise Brooks in a made-to-order role as a super-attractive bad girl, on the make for any male that crosses her path. The sultry, splendidly selfish Louise has no trouble stealing the picture, even though Evelyn Brent (playing her motherly sister) puts up a noble fight throughout.

Aside from Arthur Donaldson as the ebullient Schwartz, the other players are no match at all for Miss Brooks, although Osgood Perkins makes the most of his innings as a sneaky, rooming-house, would-be Romeo. Lawrence Gray comes across as a rather dull and impassive hero, but it really doesn't matter much as all the colorful lines and business are handed principally to Miss Brooks, with a few snippets to Brent (who does collar our attention in the final reel), Donaldson and Perkins.

Director Frank Tuttle has not only handled the proceedings with admirable pace and flair, but by his astute choice of camera angles cleverly disguises the fact that, as usual, he has nailed the camera to the floor. Production values, as might be expected from Paramount, are absolutely top-grade. The setting in a New York department store is brilliantly realized. In short, "Love 'Em and Leave 'Em" still comes over in 2008 as an unmitigated delight.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Flirty Louise!!
kidboots24 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
"Love 'Em and Leave 'Em" was the best and last of Louise Brooks movies to be filmed in New York and when she arrived on the set she was furious. She was married to Eddie Sutherland but she hadn't spent much time with him. She finished filming "Just Another Blonde" in New York, raced out to California for a second honeymoon with Eddie, which lasted two days and she immediately got a call to report to Paramount's New York Astoria studio to start on "Love 'Em and Leave 'Em". Even though Evelyn Brent was the star, Paramount publicity went into over-drive with Louise, describing her as "like the crazy flapper you fell for last year". Based on the long running play (152 performances) by Weaver and Abbott, Paramount liked it well enough to remake it in 1929 as "The Saturday Night Kid" with Clara Bow in Brent's role and Jean Arthur as Janie the flirt but as usual the original was the best.

"Mame promised her mother to take care of Janie - and she has been thankful ever since that Janie isn't twins"!! Mame (Brent) find's it a full time job keeping tabs on her gad about sister Janie (Brooks). They both work at Ginsberg's Department Store, along with their go-getter (well, he thinks he is) neighbour, Bill (Lawrence Gray). Out of all the employee's in the store, it is Janie who is treasurer for the Welfare League dance - a big accident waiting to happen!!!

Meanwhile Mame has had a bright idea to make the window display eye catching. It involves a fan and the manager is pleased - with Bill!! He thinks it is his idea and Bill doesn't put him wise!! Behind every successful man there is a woman and Mame is behind Bill, giving him good ideas - like a hunch she has about putting a kitten in the window display to add a homey touch. Bill is not convinced but it gets him a promotion.

When Mame goes on holidays she convinces Bill to let Janie help him and give her a chance to make good - talk about asking for trouble. Janie is a maneater and with the aid of a powderpuff and some fake tears soon has Bill eating out of her hand. Mame comes home to a different Bill - a love sick Bill who only has eyes for Janie!! Mame becomes the "love 'em and leave 'em" girl - of course it is all an act but worse is to follow!! Janie lives beyond her means and to make extra money she bets on the horses with a pretty unsavoury book maker (Osgood Perkins). When he asks her for the money she owes - you guessed it, out comes the Welfare money!! And when the Welfare League asks for their money - no worries!! as Janie "puts the blame on Mame"!! (sounds like a great title for a song)!!

Evelyn Brent may have been working towards stardom for years but this role wasn't the type to showcase her talents. She was much better suited to shady lady, wronged women parts where her sultry/sulky looks were not out of place. One thing the inferior 1929 remake had in it's favour was Clara Bow, who as Mame gave the role heart and emotion. It was too easy for Louise Brook's charisma to over whelm Evelyn Brent in my opinion.

Highly Recommended.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed