Body and Soul (1925) Poster

(1925)

User Reviews

Review this title
23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Wishing for a director's cut
GLSmyth6 June 2005
Of course, we will never have a chance to see a director's cut of Body and Soul. Were that possible, then we would certainly see a completely different movie.

Many of the obvious flaws in the film were due to Oscar Micheaux's difficulties in getting the production past the censors. Despite the fact that the convict is acting as a minister, the act of showing one in a minister's robes drinking was too much for the time.

Today it would be a matter of getting several million dollars from the studio and re-shooting sections of the movie. Oscar Micheaux did not have this luxury. This meant that he had to use the little money available to him to change a completely unacceptable movie into one that would help pay the bills.

The only way to do this was to add an ending that corrected everything, and cut the sections of drinking, which happened to be crucial to the story. This resulted not only in a lack of explanation for the story and very clumsy movements from one scene to the next.

The drinking scenes have been replaced, which lengthens the film to eight of its original nine reels. This certainly helps, but the alternative ending remains. I am thinking that the director's cut would not have included this and Oscar Micheaux would have a much better movie.

Of course, Paul Robeson drives this movie (his only silent appearance), and moviegoers now know of his brilliant voice. Sans this, his penetrating eyes showed the emotion that must have matched his stage performances, which makes this a movie that can be recommended.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting Film
artroraback3 February 2003
Body and Soul is an interesting film. Paul Robeson makes a powerful debut in this film about an escaped prisoner who blends into a small community as a beloved pastor. This film is an interesting period piece and was written, directed, and starred African-Americans in an era where that sort of thing wasn't done. Audiences today would be shocked at the stereotypical performances of the supporting cast and would be shocked that an African-American made this film. Well worth seeing for movie buffs. Robeson gives a great and powerful performance.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rough around the edges, but interesting nonetheless
gbill-7487717 March 2020
A melodrama involving a con man who (somehow) has assumed the role of a preacher (Paul Robeson), and along with an ex-cellmate, sets out to bilk the townspeople out of their money. He's also got his eye on a young woman (Julia Theresa Russell) who just so happens to prefer his kinder twin brother. Robeson turns in a reasonably strong performance in the dual role, even if the character of his twin is somewhat ridiculous. Russell is reasonably good too, and the rape scene told in flashback evokes horror and is well done, probably the film's best.

Overall the film suffers from a weak script, complete with an enormous "it was just a dream" cliché. Accounts vary as to whether the unsatisfying conclusion was due to the considerable problems Micheaux had getting it approved, which unfortunately resulted in a significant hack job. As it is though, it suffers from sloppy editing, has dangling plot points (like the ex-cellmate), and drags on for longer than it should have.

Looking at the film through the lens of today can also be troubling, because the dialogue the characters use is what we think of as stereotypical. As with other films from Micheaux, he unapologetically criticizes the African-American community. Later he would say this:

"I have always tried to make my photoplays present the truth, to lay before the Race a cross-section of its own life, to view the colored heart from close range. My results might have been narrow at times, due perhaps to certain limited situations which I endeavored to portray, but in those limited situations the Truth was the predominant characteristic. It is only by presenting those portions of the Race portrayed in my pictures in the light and background of their true state that we can raise our people to greater heights. I am too much imbued with the spirit of Booker T. Washington to ingraft false virtues upon ourselves, to make ourselves that which we are not. Nothing could be a greater blow to our own progress. The recognition of our true situation will react in itself as a stimulus for self-advancement."

Thus, we have this dialogue, and we have the church congregation falling for the lengthy sermons of a low-life who drinks alcohol out of what looks like a water glass while preaching. Micheaux and other black leaders like W.E.B. DuBois saw religion critically, and as something holding back African-American progress. That's something we also see in the film 'Within Our Gates.' The portrait of ignorance is not flattering, and some black filmgoers were not amused. One at the time likened it to D.W. Griffith's 'Birth of a Nation,' saying "One would expect a white screenwriter to fan the flames of hatred. But what can we say when a black man portrays our people in the same manner?" The white censors were also displeased, seeing in the evil traits of a minister, even a false one, as "sacrilegious, immoral, and would tend to incite to crime."

There is thus a brave honesty here, at least until that ending sequence, and for that I admire Micheaux. He also shows the vulnerability of women in the rape (although it's not the case that she's not believed - in fact it's the opposite, her mother and the congregation believe her and attack the culprit). While rough around the edges, there's a certain power in being a film from a legendary African-American director and featuring the debut of a star, Robeson, who was incredibly multi-faceted and should be better known. Both have done better work, but I'm glad I saw this one, and it's worth checking out.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Oscar Micheaux's Body and Soul was a fine film debut for Paul Robeson
tavm5 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This silent Oscar Micheaux production is notable as the first film of Paul Robeson, later to gain fame in the Broadway and movie version of Showboat. He plays a convict posing as the Reverend Isaiah T. Jenkins and his brother Sylvester. Both are pursuing a woman named Isabelle played by Mercedes Gilbert, a native of Jacksonville, Fla. which is where I once lived in from 1987-2003. Her mother, Martha Jane, is played by Micheaux's sister-in-law, Julia Theresa Russell. Martha Jane is a fan of the reverend and is excited about his upcoming wedding with her daughter. Isabelle prefers Sylvester but he doesn't meet her mother's approval because he doesn't make enough money (I guess the fact Isaiah is a man of the "cloth" is an exception to the mother). When the mother briefly leaves the reverend and Isabelle alone, the reverend looks to threaten the daughter but Martha Jane seems to arrive before anything bad happens. A later flashback extends the scene and explains why the daughter is so afraid of him...This was a pretty effective depiction of a tragedy as performed by the three lead players especially in Robeson's various moods as the convict-reverend. Micheaux also subtly implies a later possible rape scene in a cabin and mines some humor out of the audience of a rousing sermon near the end. Because the New York censor board couldn't accept the tragic ending, however, the director, with barely any more funds to shoot multiple changes simply had the whole thing be the dream of the mother with a happy ending for Isabelle and Sylvester. It does, however, show us both the good and bad sides of Robeson in playing dual roles to a black audience that could not have afforded to see him on Broadway at the time. So to anyone interested in early black cinema, Body and Soul comes highly recommended.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Can these old bones live?
Prof_Lostiswitz5 May 2003
Its nice to see there was a Black director (Micheaux) with the gumption to take on difficult themes (like a crooked preacher and sexual abuse). Unfortunately his mastery of technique wasn't very good; this movie resembles the sort of thing D.W. Griffith was doing in 1913, both in form and tone (cf. A Girl and her Trust). Cinema had evolved by 1925.

There is one great comic sequence that is worth the price of the movie, an over-the-top sermon (on the valley of dry bones) in which the whiskey-guzzling preacher has his congregation in such ecstasy that they do what looks suspiciously like break-dancing. Robeson, usually the good guy, here proves that he is equally adept at playing a sleazebag when required. There is a similar "sermon" in The Blues Brothers that was surely inspired by this one. The comical stereotypes would normally cause us to cry "racism", but this movie was made by and for blacks.

Body and Soul explores serious issues and has moments of great fun, but is mainly of historical interest.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth watching !
mojo200412 January 2006
A very moving film for its time.I'm a big Paul Robeson fan and I'm glad TCM shows a lot of films with all Black casts.I think it should be shown along with the 1929 film "Hallelujah".It also has an all Black cast and has religion as its theme but it's not a silent film.This film ran a little too long but I never stopped watching.Touchy subject matter even today.Right on point even today!Even though Robeson found fame who knows what talent the others had that skin color stopped from them also becoming well known.That's why I love these films.The Black Church must have shunned this type of film back them and the actors couldn't have had an easy time of it.I'd call this a silent soap opera.The mother really loved her daughter a whole lot.Mercy!The daughter was the ultimate tragic figure.The Minister.One word-Sinister!
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Robeson Steals the Show
Michael_Elliott12 February 2017
Body and Soul (1925)

*** (out of 4)

Paul Robeson plays a really sinister con man who will dip to any level to get what he wants. He pretends to be a Reverend and soon he sets his eyes on the good girl Isabelle (Mercedes Gilbert). At first her and her mother just see him as a kind-hearted preacher but soon the daughter realizes his evil ways include trying to steal her life savings.

Director Oscar Micheaux had already made several movies but there's no question that this here was going to be his epic. Robeson was already well-known on the stage so the two of them teaming up seemed like a grand idea but apparently the two men fought for most of the shooting time and apparently they hated each other so much that Robeson wouldn't even discuss this film. It's also said that the original version was much darker but the director was forced to cut it down by several reels, which is really too bad.

As it stands, BODY AND SOUL is a very impressive movie and it's really shocking at how well it turned out and especially when you consider that the budget was very low and of course there was the behind-the-scenes issues. There's no question that the greatest thing about the picture is the performance by Robeson who really does do a terrific job at coming off as this holy man. He certainly makes you believe this fake side of his character and it's easy to see why someone would fall for him. The actor also perfectly nails the more sinister side of the character.

The film looks very good, again, for its budget and the editing is also good. The entire movie looks very professional, which wasn't always the case for these early race movies. I'd also argue that the story itself was quite good and it really wasn't too often that you'd see any movie taking a look at religious figures in a negative way. BODY AND SOUL is certainly another winning film from the director and a great start for Robeson.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The problem with this movie is that it isn't very good.
plaidpotato5 February 2003
Some very good films have been made which could be described as talky. I'm a huge fan of Woody Allen, for example, and most of his films are quite talky. And that works for Woody, largely because his films feature sound. But in a silent film like Body and Soul, long static scenes of characters sitting and chatting tend to be a bit dull.

The acting, with a couple of female exceptions, is quite good and quite understated for the era. Paul Robeson, in particular, is very effective as the menacing preacher man--that is, his facial expressions are effective, but his body language is stiff and constricted, as though a chalk X had been drawn on the floor and he'd been directed to stand on it and not move, probably to save the cameraman the effort of moving.

A handful of creaky pans are all the camera movement we get in Body and Soul. The camera seems absolutely bolted to the floor. The compositions are crude, with the subject of interest generally being dead-center in the frame. It's all very reminiscent of those old tableaux-style films from two decades earlier, except for the editing.

As if to compensate for the lame camera work, Micheaux edited the crap out of this film. I didn't do the count, but I'd guess there were about 2-3 times as many cuts as in a typical non-Russian film from 1925, and that would be great if there were some rhythm to it, some reason for it, but it seemed like Micheaux was cutting for the sake of cutting--awkward pointless jump cuts galore. Some of his choices were downright bizarre, most particularly his rampaging, out-of-control use of cross-cutting. He'd cut away repeatedly from some dramatic scene to show us one of his other characters sitting in a chair someplace completely else, staring, or combing his hair, for no reason I could determine. Perhaps he just wanted to keep a handle on his characters in time, check in and see how everyone was doing.

Another thing that annoyed me was that the Yello-Curly character was introduced very early in the film as if he was going to have some important function. He was developed a bit, and then suddenly disappeared without a trace. Disappointing, because he was one of the most interesting characters in the film--and one of the ugliest and oddest-looking humans I've ever seen.

Despite the many flaws, this story still could have been interesting. An evil manipulative preacher. A mother who probably subconsciously realizes that her daughter is being raped and abused, but who refuses to acknowledge it, or to even listen to her daughter on the subject of the preacher. Although the preacher and the daughter were not blood-related, there were incestuous overtones. In a way, it kinda reminded me of Laura Palmer's story in Twin Peaks. And then just when the story was becoming gripping and tragic, and I was getting into it, Micheaux pulled the rug out from under me. He ended with the worst kind of hackneyed cliche, the kind of ending that was probably boring and stupid even in 1925.

Body and Soul is of some interest, probably, as an historical document, but it's not a good watch, and I can't rate it any higher than a 4/10.

4/10
15 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Compelling Movie with Charismatic Performances
CJBx79 March 2014
BODY AND SOUL (1925) is the third of Oscar Micheaux's surviving silents, with a cast exclusively comprised of African-American actors. It tells the story of Isaiah Jenkins (Paul Robeson), a phony reverend who preaches to a congregation in a small town in the American South, who is really an escaped convict. The locals look up to him, including Martha Jane (Mercedes Gilbert). Martha tries to push her daughter, Isabelle (Julia Theresa Russell) into marrying the reverend, even though she is already seeing his twin brother Sylvester (also played by Robeson). Isabelle, though, sees that he is not as pious as he appears to be. An incident takes place between Isaiah and Isabelle that drives Isabelle away from home, and Martha Jane is forced to confront an unpleasant truth she never would have imagined...

I felt that this was the best of Micheaux's surviving silent movies. The narrative is straightforward and easy to follow, without being burdened by excess characters or lengthy explanations. As was common with many silents, there are some melodramatic contrivances at times but nothing really insulting. Micheaux's narrative here is well focused and a flashback scene makes the movie more powerful. Paul Robeson is the main standout here, with a very charismatic performance as the fake preacher, alternately charming, intimidating, and aggressive – his acting is very expressive. Mercedes Gilbert, a famed black stage actress of the time, also does some nice work as the mother who has to accept that appearances can be deceiving. Some of her gestures and expressions are very much of her time, but she still projects a magnetism and emotional sincerity that makes her work convincing. Julia Theresa Russell is a bit more low-key, quite naturalistic in her portrayal.

Micheaux has some very effective camera-work here, particularly in the flashback scene which conveys disturbing events well with just a minimum of imagery and skillful editing. Not all of the editing here is superb, though – there are a few awkwardly staged moments, like a poorly choreographed fight scene and occasional repetition of action. However, despite that, the movie has an abundance of outstanding scenes.

BODY AND SOUL is, in conclusion, an advance over Micheaux's previous silents WITHIN OUR GATES and THE SYMBOL OF THE UNCONQUERED. It succeeds because of a focused, straightforward story, charismatic performances, and skillful production. SCORE: 8/10
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Potentially good movie ruined by government interference
morrisonhimself21 February 2022
According to reports, some censoring body objected to the portrayal of a minister as a villain, so producer/director Oscar Micheaux tacked on another ending, and maybe it satisfied a moronic censor, but it ruined the movie.

Since Oscar Micheaux was and is one of my motion-picture heroes, I would never say "don't watch." As I have noted before and will again, that he got to make movies at all is deserving of our admiration, and that they were all, or nearly all, flawed is secondary.

He had imagination and ability, and he had watched enough films by real masters, including D. W. Griffith, to know what to do. Alas, he never had the budget for good editing, or, apparently, for enough rehearsals. So his cutaway shots, his changes of angle, and other aspects of big-budget and skilled movie-making were too often missing.

Still, so what? He made movies!

He raised the money, usually wrote the original story and the script, hired the actors and crews ... and made movies!

In "Body and Soul," he had Paul Robeson. As I said to a friend, somewhat of a waste, using that magnificent voice in a silent film. Fortunately for us, Robeson went on to make talkies, and recordings, and gave many a live concert.

In "Body and Soul," Micheaux had some other talented actors, many of whom honestly deserved acclaim and a chance to perform more often. For whatever reasons, including ignorance on the part of establishment movie-makers, they didn't get that chance. Our loss, as well as the performers'.

This presentation, shown on TCM 20 February 2022, was further marred by an abrasive noise in place of a music score. It wasn't 1920s-era jazz, just percussive noise. Very distracting.

Never mind. Any time an Oscar Micheaux movie is available, I'll be watching, if at all possible. And I urge you to watch also.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Slow, simplistic, and facile
evening13 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
An all-black cast from the earliest era of the movies acts out a parable on the evils of refusing to face the truth.

Sister Martha Jane (Mercedes Gilbert) turns a deaf ear to her marriageable daughter's protest that local Rev. Jenkins (Paul Robeson) is a drunk and a thief. And it looks like it all turns out tragically.

However, the sadness turns out to be a dream, and lovely Isabelle (Julia Theresa Russell) gets to marry the man of her choice after all.

This movie has a few good scenes (i.e., see how Jenkins handles a chance to show mercy with a pursuer), and it's unique to find much of the dialogue in a Br'er Rabbit-style patois.

Robeson creates a strong presence on screen, and the cast puts forth a good effort, but the fairy-tale ending detracts greatly from the power of this nascent work.

Still, I'm glad I caught this historical oddity on TCM.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Good "Race Film" for the 20's
tbarnettjr2 January 2006
This was a good movie! I just saw it for the first time. I've never ever really sat down to watch a silent movie not to mention a "race film" made by a black producer back in the 1920's. I was impressed yet at the same time distraught by the stereotypical overtones. Being a man born in the 50's the written dialog was a bit challenging to decipher. However, I did enjoy the chance to interpret what I was seeing and not be forced to feel or react to things like most films do today.

I enjoy films made by black producers because they often carry historical inferences but sadly still adorned with stereotypes. Nowadays it seems to be all about special effects, graphical imagery and money. Micheaux's "Body and Soul" doubtless was also about money because he had to pay bills too, but it's obvious he was into his craft. You can see this from the acting and storytelling. It emanated the typical and cynical parody of life which has manifested throughout generations. This film didn't need special effects to be appreciated or tell the story. The emotional acting of Isabelle (Mercedes Gilbert), the daughter, was impressive and a major faction of the film. The animated deceitful behavior of the reverend (Paul Robeson) along with well emphasized facial expressions was very entertaining. The mother's acting (Julia Theresa Russell) was descent. The ending was questionable. It moved the film into a completely different direction? Can't figure that one out? Maybe it was Micheaux's mind working the "What If?" factor.

Micheaux, obviously no Alfred Hicthcock, I can see had to avoid subversive film-making to implore the white film industry with their vision of blacks. I'm sure if he were alive today I'd say, "Oscar, there's no reason for you to feel shame or disgrace having to produce films that way because things aren't so different now. They may seem to be, but still the same."
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
the great Paul Robeson
SnoopyStyle21 February 2022
Two escaped fugitives bring ruin to an African-American community. One passes himself off as Rev. Isaiah T. Jenkins (Paul Robeson) and the other is his cellmate Yello-Curley' Hinds. The fake reverend corrupts a member of his congregation, Isabelle Perkins, who happens to love Sylvester, Jenkins' long-lost identical twin brother.

First, I don't like some of the text which tries to use colloquial black speech. It's downgrading but also makes it harder to understand. Maybe the black audience of the day feels more comfortable with that. This is to be black cinema made for a black audience. I'm willing to accept it for what it is. On the other hand, I don't think some of the plot points make sense.

The mother wouldn't buy Sylvester revealing himself as a reverend right after telling her daughter to find herself a reverend. The mother would assume that the young couple is faking it. I also don't think the twin brother idea works in this plot. Apparently, this movie was chopped up to satisfy the censors and maybe the longer version functions better. The main aspect that really works is the great Paul Robeson. He is the magnetic lead and he delivers compelling performances.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Great story destroyed by ending!
hemisphere65-130 December 2021
Despite the technical shortcomings, Micheaux made an edgy film...then ruined it with the tacked on happy ending!

Apparently this was his only way to get the movie approved, but it's still unfortunate.

Robeson is really convincing, but he stands alone as a notable performer here.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Jack-Leg Preacher
pcraft8161 March 2001
Warning: Spoilers
This film is about a Jack-Leg Preacher. A Jack-Leg Preacher is a crooked one. He drinks ands rapes women and then condemns people for his own gain. If that isn't Jack-Legged I don't know what is. Luckily for his the people that go to his church, the whole movie is just a dream, and he may not even be all too Jack-Legged. He may be a nice preacher.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great historical value because of its niche production and intended audience
steiner-sam10 February 2023
It's a cynical, satirical drama set in 1925 rural Georgia, telling the story of a crooked preacher in a small African American congregation. Paul Robeson made his film debut in this picture. Micheaux produced "Body and Soul" for African Americans; thus, white audiences did not see it.

Isaiah T. Jenkins (Paul Robeson) is an escaped prisoner in the fictional town of Tatesville, Georgia. He drinks, gambles, and tries to get money from members of his congregation. He associates with the owner of a speakeasy (this is during Prohibition) and his former jailmate (Lawrence Chenault).

Two members of his congregation are Sister Martha Jane (Mercedes Gilbert) and her daughter, Isabelle (Julia Theresa Russell). Martha Jane survives by doing laundry for people and has saved a sum of money she has hidden in the family Bible. Isabelle is in love with Sylvester Jenkins (Paul Robeson), who happens to be Isaiah's upright twin brother and an aspiring scientist.

The film follows Isaiah's efforts to get Martha Jane's money and his aggressive pursuit and manipulation of Isabelle. A plot twist at the end doesn't really follow the rest of the movie. New York authorities heavily censored the film, reducing its length, and only the edited version survived. It's unclear what Micheaux may have genuinely intended.

"Body and Soul" has great historical value because of its niche production and intended audience. Robeson has a strong film presence, as do Mercedes Gilbert and Julia Theresa Russell. A worship service scene near the film's end is quite remarkable. However, the production is not polished, and the acting of secondary characters is weak.

Silent films are genuinely a different genre.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Just because
linnaeabrenna5 October 2020
Just because I saw the bad review and low star rating I had to say something. I loved it! The innocent originality of 1920's plots comes shining through again here. Surprises and a surprise ending. The characters were compelling and interesting. Some of the stereotypes made me uncomfortable at first, but hearts of gold and multi-dimensional features soon wash that away. The scenery was hypnotic in it's honesty in poverty and it's street scenes that don't appear to have been altered because a camera showed up. The score was jazz with acid jazz highlights. Very respectful of the ethnicity of jazz's roots and the undergrowth Paul did. Anyway, I loved it! Watch it, it's worth it.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sort of like the black "Elmer Gantry"--and very innovative for its time.
planktonrules26 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Considering that this film was an all-black production with a very low budget, the results are surprisingly good. After all, many films made by the black community to be viewed by the black community were pretty dreadful affairs--mostly due to the incredibly poor production values. Here, however, Oscar Micheaux manages to make a film that is better than most mainstream films of the day. Part of is that he got a lot out of his cast and the money used to make the film and part of it is because the plot was so daring--and very ahead of its time.

Paul Robeson (in his first film) plays a horrible man. He is a con-man and poses as a preacher to bilk decent people out of their money. And, on top of that, he's a hard-drinking man who is not above using and destroying women in the process. For much of the film, his evil ways go undetected and he's seen as a pillar of the community. However, late in the film he goes way too far and his actions result in the death of a woman who inexplicably loved him. He is confronted with his evil near the end and this was very exciting. Unfortunately, this very modern and cynical look at church charlatans ran afoul of censors and Micheaux unfortunately was forced to tack on a bad ending that detracted, a bit, from the impact of the overall film.

Despite not getting a chance to hear Robeson's gorgeous voice since this is a silent, it did give him a great chance to show he could act--and act very well. In fact, of the many all-black productions I have watched, this has some of the best overall acting. Sure, there are a few silly characters here and there--but not many. Most are quite believable. There are a few minor quibbles about the film--apart from the ending. First, Robeson's character is not introduced well. Instead of seeing him live like the devil, the intertitle cards at the beginning tell about him--too much really. Second, the woman dying was clichéd. You don't just die of a broken heart and it could have been done in a much more believable manner--such as a suicide or having him beat her to death. Still, compared to all the films of the day, it was a wonderfully made film--and well worth seeing.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Robeson's Powerful Performance Lifts the Film!!
kidboots9 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The original production of "Body and Soul" was a nine reel extravaganza but when Oscar Micheaux applied for an exhibition license, the New York Motion Picture Commission denied approval on the grounds that it would "tend to incite crime" and was immoral and sacrilegious. Micheaux had to edit it down from 9 to 6 reels. Paul Robeson, the star, was billed as "the greatest of all coloured actors". He received $100 per week salary plus 3% of the gross after the first $40,000 in receipts. Robeson, by 1925, was already a theatrical star who had been given roles in "All God's Chillun Got Wings" and "The Emperor Jones" by playwright Eugene O'Neil and George Jean Nathan had dubbed him "one of the most eloquent, impressive and convincing of actors".

Yes, there are a few problems and the ending is a real let down but Robeson's performance as the charlatan preacher is just so powerful. One astonishing scene shows him calmly preaching, then, with the help of a hidden liquor bottle, whipping himself and the crowd into a frenzy. I know it was a silent film but his performance was so vivid, strutting up and down the pulpit, chanting, singing - completely unforgettable. Robeson plays an escapee who is passing himself off as Reverend Jenkins - his past is about to catch up with him though when his former cellmate "Yellow" Curly Hinds tracks him down and wants him to help recruit local girls for a burlesque show. Jenkins has a nice racket going on in Tateville, the women of the town being mesmerized by his preaching technique - with the result he is never short of cash!! Isabelle, who is engaged to Sylvester who just happens to be Jenkin's estranged twin brother, is unconvinced of the preacher's piousness but unfortunately her mother is one of his greatest fans. It does stretch audience credibility but there is quite a bit missing - Sylvester seems to disappear from the movie after an establishing scene. Isabelle's mother can't understand her antipathy toward the preacher and arranges what looks like an exorcism but when she arrives home it is to find her daughter gone!! - along with her life savings!!

Months later her mother tracks her down in Atlanta and there are some really interesting location shots of a city on the rise. She watches in secret as the half starved girl is given food from a sympathetic stranger (who looks suspiciously like one of the preacher's cronies) and goes to her shabby room to collapse - what happened to the money she took!! It takes a lot of persuading and a flashback of a nightmare experience in an abandoned cabin but Martha Jane is finally convinced of her daughter's innocence and the scene is set for a gripping denunciation in the church!!

Like a few of these "race" movies the leading actress, this one was Julia Theresa Russell, tended to make only one or two films then return to oblivion but Russell was quite adequate in the role.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great movie
PWNYCNY27 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is one of the great movies produced during the silent screen era. First, it features a great performance by Paul Robeson who plays a duo role as a con man posing as a preacher and his straight laced twin brother. Second, the movie provides a story in which African Americans are portrayed as complex characters, devoid of the stereotypical depictions typical of the movies of that time. In some respects this movie is a precursor to the 1960 movie Elmer Gantry, especially as it relates to the depiction of the corrupt clergy/con man and how appeals to religion is used to rip off a hapless and clueless public. Further, the story is complex, with a lot of interesting characters, and is well acted. All in all, it is a first class cinematic event.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Paul Robeson's Double in Oscar Micheaux's Film of Duplicity
Cineanalyst3 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
In a sense, "Body and Soul" is considerably different than director Oscar Micheaux's two earlier surviving silent films, "Within Our Gates" and "The Symbol of the Unconquered" (both 1920). The narrative doesn't so much explicitly tackle grand national issues of racism, including lynching and the KKK, educational uplift in the Booker T. Washington tradition, "passing" or interracial relations as those two do, but rather focuses on the more intimate subject matter of a conman minister, although there is surely a commentary there on guarding against susceptibility to such abuses of church. Others have mentioned, as with much of Micheaux's oeuvre, that the story may be drawn from his own experiences--in this case with his preacher father-in-law allegedly having stolen money from him, or that it drew from newspaper stories about unscrupulous pastors of black churches. Regardless, hypocritical ministers were a recurrent character in his films, including the self-hating Ned in "Within Our Gates" who belittles himself to become ingratiated with white men.

In another sense, though, "Body and Soul" is quite similar to those other two films by engaging critically with other texts. Indispensable to this understanding is Charles Musser's essay, "To Redream the Dream of White Playwrights: Reappropriation and Resistance in Oscar Micheaux's Body and Soul." While others have pointed out how "Within Our Gates" and "The Symbol of the Unconquered" may be viewed as rebuttals to D.W. Griffith's "The Birth of a Nation" (1915), having studied that widely-accessible film myself, I'm sure I would've seen the parallels regardless. Not so much in the case of the texts that "Body and Soul" is argued to be reworking. This is because, as with the film's star Paul Robeson, in his screen debut, those sources are from the 1920s stage. As with Griffith's film, however, the three plays all depict black character experiences as created by white authors, and the first great African-American filmmaker, Micheaux found fault in those depictions.

The intriguing difference in the texts Micheaux's films interact with is that with "The Birth of a Nation," the ground for debate, in addition to cinematic techniques, was historical and the real world, albeit as through the lens of melodrama: Griffith's perversion of the history of slavery and Reconstruction and Micheaux's work amid the Great Migration and the 1919 Chicago race riot, for instance. Although still melodrama, "Body and Soul" is reacting to plays more in the mode of fantasy. This provided an opportunity for Micheaux to better get at the root of such entertainment, theatrical and cinematic, as forms of illusion--of dreams and nightmares. As Musser outlines, the plays are Nan Bagby Stephens's "Roseanne" and two, "The Emperor Jones" and "All God's Chillun' Got Wings," by Eugene O'Neill. All starred Robeson, as does "Body and Soul."

So brilliant is this casting and intertextuality that the equivalent almost would've been had Micheaux managed to cast Lillian Gish in his prior films. As Musser suggests, Robeson was smart enough to realize "a joke," as actually reads one intertitle, of Micheaux casting him as the conman in this reversal of plays he starred in, which may be why he's reported to have neglected mentioning in later years his screen debut and only film where he was directed by an African American. Ironically, instead, citing the 1933 adaptation of "The Emperor Jones" as the beginning of his movie stardom. Even some contemporary reviewers considered the three plays racially obscene, including O'Neill's penchant for racial slurs. Indeed, the character Isabelle condemns her mother's use of such a word in Micheaux's film. Additionally, as Robeson plays dual roles here, the good and the bad twins, Musser writes about how Robeson was something of a real-life doppelgänger to fellow black stage actor Charles Gilpin, who preceded Robeson in starring in the very same plays. Supposedly, Robeson was a more compliant actor than Gilpin, who would alter parts of the plays, including dropping the derogatory language.

On the other hand, Robeson, as Musser points out, added a greater charismatic and sexual dimension to his parts, which plays well in "Body and Soul" where the older women of the congregation support the minister's lavish lifestyle as if out of misplaced sexual desire. In the case of Isabelle's mother, Martha Jane, this adds an incestuous quality--in line with similar subject matter in "Within Our Gates"--when the patriarchal minister rapes Isabelle--only compounding Martha Jane's guilt and subsequent awakening. Even if the casting is also a rebuke of Robeson's theatrical career and public statements, it doesn't diminish the accomplishment here of a terrific performance. Not only an actor already doubled by playing a conman (or actor) who performs as preacher, he's also doubled as two characters. More than a common opportunity for stars to play off their screen personas with opposing personalities, or to reflexively recall the doubled nature of cinema itself as a mass-produced recording, in this case it also alludes to W. E. B. Du Bois's concept of double consciousness, of African Americans' "soul" in conflict with seeing their body through the eyes of a white-supremacist society.

The criticism of the plays goes beyond words, to their message and overall representation of African Americans. This is Robeson's minister, who even after stealing from Martha Jane and raping her daughter--leading to her death--tricks her into turning the other cheek in forgiveness, which he promptly reciprocates by also killing her son, as if putting the lie to a play such as "Roseanne" that ends with the act of forgiveness. It's also why the film being framed as a dream is effective--placing the nightmare of such theatrical double consciousness in its proper place as a harmful fiction. If it weren't all a dream, too, as Musser points out, the dual roles would render the entire narrative of the bad brother corrupting the same town where the good brother lives and would presumably expose him illogical. Moreover, J. Ronald Green (in the book "With a Crooked Stick--The Films of Oscar Micheaux") does a fine job of explaining how the different dresses of Martha Jane clue us into what is dream and what is "reality" in the film. The dream logic also explains away what I would otherwise find some confusing crosscutting (the mother's initial dosing off edited together with scenes of the drunken preacher entering a home, e.g.) to go along with Micheaux's characteristically elaborate POV, flashback and dream structures. Nevertheless, there is some fine filmmaking elsewhere, such as the withholding of information until the big flashback as to the relationship between the pastor and the Isabelle, or in the documentary style of the Atlanta scenes and the judicious cutting of the rape scene.

Although Micheaux's prior films were sometimes too depressingly realistic, whether depicting "passing" and racial discrimination, lynching, or the KKK, along with attempted incestuous rape, the inevitable hopeful messages of uplift in these race films was always something of an aspirational dream. When Martha Jane awakens in "Body and Soul," then, she's only left a nightmare for a dream, Robeson's duplicitous minister for his good race man twin, the black community led astray by church for middle-class aspirations, the death of her daughter's body in the cinematographic recording of still images for the afterlife of her soul in the dream that is the projection of movies.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Rough around the edges, but roundly terrific
I_Ailurophile19 March 2022
Even before taking the content into account, it's safe to say that 'Body and soul' is a landmark title. It marks the screen debut of star Paul Robeson - and at least as importantly, as one of filmmaker Oscar Mischeaux's scarce surviving silent features, it marks one of the very earliest movies made by a black director. These qualities alone make this worth checking out, to say nothing of a somewhat progressive narrative centered around a corrupt individual abusing a position of power, and striking thematic content of the folly of unquestioning faith. It's a little rough around the edges, sure, but in general this title is certainly strong enough that I'd have no qualms recommending it to just about anyone.

Importantly, what weaknesses present here are less about the film's substance and much more about its construction. One could assume loss of fidelity with time, or perhaps constrictions of technology or experience. Either way, there's an inelegance to the editing and sequencing whereby cuts are needlessly made between concurrent scenes, or basic movement or placement of characters in a shot are staggered and unnatural. Partly due to these deficiencies in the editing but also arguably owing to unsteady direction from Mischeaux, there's a slight disconnect between scenes, and between shots within a scene, as well as stilted and unnatural motion and orchestration of any given moment. All to say - to no small extent, 'Body and soul' often struggles with a definite air of being staged, and contrived. None of these faults meaningfully detract from the cinephile's engagement, though they do comprise the sort of idiosyncrasies of the silent era that make early movies difficult to abide for some modern viewers.

Yet notable as these issues with the picture's craft may be, what truly matters most is the content communicated through that craft. And where it truly counts, 'Body and soul' isn't just solid, but it's even more satisfying and rewarding a viewing experience than I had anticipated. Mischeaux's screenplay bears varied characters with depth and complications. Dialogue, as related through intertitles, specifically maintains the distinct mannerisms and dialectical flourishes of the figures herein. Above all - the scene writing, and the narrative it builds bit by bit, is filled with wonderfully engrossing drama, a story with heart and emotional investment. This most crucial aspect of 'Body and soul,' in my opinion, stands tall with the best that the silent era, and cinema at large, has to offer. There's sharp intelligence in the writing, including plot development and a narrative flow that is very carefully considered. Moreover, though the fundamental build of the picture is imperfect, Mischeaux illustrates a keen eye with tactful, thoughtful shots, including close-ups, that serve to help round out the tale with welcome touches of brilliance.

And with that - recognizing what restrictions are placed upon them by the feature's construction, the cast is outstanding. Very honestly, everyone involved exhibits masterful skill, with dexterous range, nuance, and physicality to bring their roles to vibrant life. This obviously goes for Robeson in the lead role, but also Mercedes Gilbert and Julia Theresa Russell, giving blistering and absorbing performances as Sister Martha Jane and Isabelle, respectively. Why, furthremore: the silent era is well known for acting often characterized by exaggerated body language and facial expressions, an adaptation from the stage in accordance with the lack of sound or dialogue. It was comparatively rare, and late in the timeframe, when players began to demonstrate more naturalistic, subtle methods - and when they did, they were often criticized for it, as we saw with screen legend Louise Brooks. To my absolute pleasure, those before the camera in 'Body and soul' rather seem to bridge the gap between these styles of acting, carrying themselves with both robust, vivid comportment and an understated force of personality. It's truly a delight to watch as a viewer.

Add as one last profit cinematography that, almost 100 years later, remains crisp and clear through all the efforts of preservation, and the end result is a classic that holds up extraordinarily well. One may well argue that a couple story beats aren't necessarily conveyed with all due clarity, or that the movie is a little long in the tooth - and the very, very end represents a trope in storytelling that I utterly despise. And again, the curtness in the rudimentary facets of the production is unfortunate. Nonetheless, these are nothing compared to the fabulously rich, gripping narrative, and sturdy acting, that effect such terrific value. Again, there's no mistaking that this won't appeal to anyone who isn't already enamored of silent films, and I won't sit here and say that it's without problems. But from start to finish and in all ways there's much to love about 'Body and soul,' and all these years later it still sticks out as a film that's well deserving of its lasting reputation.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This film is probably one of the more famous specialty . . .
pixrox121 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
. . . flicks produced for segregated cinemas Down South in the early 1900's. It may explain why the Civil Rights Movement, starting around the time of this movie's release, became so controversial. As anyone familiar with the movement well knows, many if not most of the leaders were ordained or self-styled clergymen of some sort. The federal government assigned a legion of special agents to monitor these dudes, many of whom were subsequently incarcerated for various infractions of the sort documented during BODY AND SOUL. This story issues from "the horse's mouth," as they say.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed