| Photos (see all 10 | slideshow) |
| Wallace Beery | ... | King Richard the Lion-Hearted | |
| Sam De Grasse | ... | Prince John | |
| Enid Bennett | ... | Lady Marian Fitzwalter | |
| Paul Dickey | ... | Sir Guy of Gisbourne | |
| William Lowery | ... | The High Sheriff of Nottingham | |
| Roy Coulson | ... | The King's Jester | |
| Billie Bennett | ... | Lady Marian's serving woman | |
| Merrill McCormick | ... | Prince John's henchman | |
| Wilson Benge | ... | Prince John's henchman | |
| Willard Louis | ... | Friar Tuck | |
| Alan Hale | ... | The Squire / Little John | |
| Bud Geary | ... | Will Scarlett (as Maine Geary) | |
| Lloyd Talman | ... | Allan-a-Dale | |
| Douglas Fairbanks | ... | Earl of Huntingdon / Robin Hood | |
| rest of cast listed alphabetically: | |||
| Frank Austin | ... | Friar (uncredited) | |
| Ted Billings | ... | Peasant (uncredited) | |
| Nino Cochise | ... | Extra (uncredited) | |
| Ann Doran | ... | Page to Richard (uncredited) | |
| Robert Florey | ... | Taxpaying peasant (uncredited) | |
| Dale Fuller | ... | Peasant (uncredited) | |
| Rita Gilman | ... | Bit part (uncredited) | |
| Ruth Hiatt | ... | Bit part (uncredited) | |
| Virginia Moon | ... | Bit part (uncredited) | |
| Gene Roth | ... | Bit part (uncredited) | |
| Charles Stevens | ... | Prince John's Aide (uncredited) | |
Directed by | |||
| Allan Dwan | |||
Writing credits | ||
| Douglas Fairbanks | (story) (as Elton Thomas) | |
| Kenneth Davenport | uncredited and | |
| Edward Knoblock | uncredited | |
| Allan Dwan | uncredited | |
| Lotta Woods | uncredited | |
Produced by | |||
| Douglas Fairbanks | .... | producer | |
Original Music by | |||
| John Scott | (2007) | ||
Cinematography by | |||
| Arthur Edeson | |||
| Charles Richardson | (uncredited) | ||
Film Editing by | |||
| William Nolan | |||
Art Direction by | |||
| Wilfred Buckland | (supervising art director) | ||
| Edward M. Langley | |||
| Irvin J. Martin | |||
Costume Design by | |||
| Mitchell Leisen | (as Leisen) | ||
Art Department | |||
| Anton Grot | .... | assistant art director (uncredited) | |
| William Cameron Menzies | .... | assistant art director (uncredited) | |
| Lloyd Wright | .... | set designer (uncredited) | |
Stunts | |||
| Fred Cavens | .... | fencing stunts | |
| David Sharpe | .... | stunts (uncredited) | |
| Richard Talmadge | .... | stunts (uncredited) | |
Other crew | |||
| Robert Fairbanks | .... | technical director | |
| Arthur Woods | .... | research director | |
| Lotta Woods | .... | scenario editor | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| The Adventures of Robin Hood | Ivanhoe | Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves | Robin and Marian | Robin Hood |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| IMDb Adventure section | IMDb USA section | Add this title to MyMovies |
The Douglas Fairbanks version of "Robin Hood" is still good entertainment despite showing its age at times. The role gives Fairbanks a perfect chance to display his energy and charisma, and he is helped by lavish sets and scenery that recreate the world of medieval England. Wallace Beery as King Richard also is a nice complement to Fairbanks. Later versions, such as the Errol Flynn version which is still the best of all the Robin Hood movies, had many resources available to them that this one didn't, but this older version works well and is more enjoyable than most of the more recent movies based on the legend.
The story and characters are familiar from many other books and movies. But it includes some interesting scenes that cover or add parts of the legend that are not in a lot of other versions - for example, about the first half of this movie takes place before any of the events in the Flynn movie. It makes it interesting to watch even if you've already seen plenty of other "Robin Hoods", and amongst other things it gives Beery as Richard a lot more screen time. It is acted in the somewhat exaggerated style of many of the silent melodramas of the era, but in this case that tone, while perhaps providing an occasional unintentional chuckle, fits rather well with the subject matter. It's also worth paying attention to the grand sets that were constructed for the film. They were apparently rather renowned in their day, and they still do a good job of evoking the right background. Overall, it was a very good film for its time and one worth watching today.