Aladdin and the Wonderful Lamp (1917) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"Mini" Version Of The Tale
FerdinandVonGalitzien16 October 2009
The common people have always liked old stories about fantastic places where the most bizarre events can happen, the weirder, the better. Such unfortunates especially enjoy those tales that involve incredible hidden treasures or the chance to be a millionaire instantly and without effort; such fantasies provide a little hope to their miserable lives.

Well, logically, aristocrats are not very fond of those stories overall because they have always enjoyed riches and privileges so they are not much impressed by classic literature such as "Aladdin And The Wonderful Lamp", an oeuvre that was adapted for the screen by the duo of Herr Chester und Sidney Franklin in the silent year of 1917.

The film captures and enhances the spirit of the literary text, showing wonderful and luxurious décors and customs besides careful and fascinating special effects, striking for an early silent film production. It illustrates the fascination that the East always had for Westerners and that means a lot of clichés, natürlich!.

The film has a curious aspect; having in mind that this is a classic story that can be enjoyed by elders and youngsters, the principal characters of the film were played by children, those dangerous people that fortunately soften their cruel attitudes once they grow up. This gives the film a special charm and originality.

Those small performers are supported by adult actors but the little over actors play their roles quite well, focusing their efforts on exaggerating attitudes, feelings and behaviours that suit the exotic, fantastic and typical Eastern atmosphere of the film. Of course the original literary text is abridged ( if the directors hadn't done that and, having in mind that the story of Aladdin is included in the literary masterpiece "Thousand And One Arabian Nights", well, the film would have had an excessive running time ) but the essence and the magic of the original story are there in this "mini" version of the tale.

In spite of the fact that aristocrats see the film with indifference due to already having luxury and excess in their Schloss ( in the aristocratic case, the genie of the lamp would be the one that would have to ask for wishes… ) or because the slaves ( servants nowadays ) do whatever their masters ask without complaint, the film can still be enjoyed very much by people of any age, a beautiful film full of magical atmosphere and adventure in what is a naïve, skillful, concise and excellent adaptation of a classic text of the world literature.

And now, if you'll allow me, I must temporarily take my leave because this German Count must ask the genie of the lamp to do the Schloss housework.

Herr Graf Ferdinand Von Galitzien http://ferdinandvongalitzien.blogspot.com/
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Little more than a curiosity!
JohnHowardReid17 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Directed by Sidney Franklin and Chester M. Franklin, with a scenario by Bernard McConville "based on "The Arabian Nights". this is a rather disappointing film when compared to its predecessor, "The Safety Curtain".

"Aladdin and the Wonderful Lamp" was obviously produced solely for the matinee trade. It's present day interest has little more going for it than simply as a curiosity.

The special effects are disappointingly ugly and/or meager. The production budget was very obviously extremely limited.

And as for the players, neither Francis Carpenter as Aladdin nor Bud Messinger as the wizard impress.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A nice fairy tale...
Jaap_Zuurkool29 October 2001
In this wonderful 'slapstick' the main characters are all under the age of ten. I think their performance is very good. It has nice special effects and of course a nice story. I saw the German/French version on 'Arte' which was OK despite of the alteration of the introduction and credit titles.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Gertrude Messinger is a Darling!!
kidboots28 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Chester and Sidney Franklin had a special affinity with children and their children's pictures, "The Rivals" and "Let Katie Do It" won praise from D.W. Griffith who then commissioned them to write and direct a series of pictures designed to appeal to children. In the very early days films could be seen by everyone and because of the short running time (1 or 2 reels) it was easy for children to sit through the films without being bored or fidgety. But suddenly stories became not only longer but more adult and at times risqué in content so studios looked into putting together units that concentrated on films specifically designed for children. The Franklins were then approached by Winfield Sheenan on behalf of the Fox studios to work on a group of fantasy fairy tales of a scope and breadth never before thought of.

"Aladdin and the Wonderful Lamp" was a witty exuberant adventure story that walked a fine line between satire and social parody. The children enter so much into the spirit of things, wildly gesticulating and with such expressive faces (especially little Francis) obviously learned from watching emotive actresses such as Theda Bara, Norma Talmadge etc.

"Fie upon your love - you little pig with a moustache" says the Princess (Virgina Lee Corbin) who then declares she will never marry. That is before she sees Aladdin (Francis Carpenter) who retrieves her shoe - "and you can even put it on my little foot"!! The evil Prince (actually played by a little girl, Violet Radcliffe, who plays the part with all the gusto and sneers and gestures at her disposal. She always seemed to play the villain's parts but she died quite young, in her teens), manages to lure Aladdin into the cave to fetch the lamp but when he won't hand it over, the prince traps him in the cave.

The movie was so lavishly mounted with vast sets, elaborate costumes, even some trick photography - when Aladdin is racing to the palace a wall is no obstacle, he simply flies over it. In another part the evil prince is presenting his matrimonial claim to the palace - Aladdin, with his lamp, turns him into a fish peddler and his gifts become flapping fish!! Most adorable scene involves the Princess's little slave Yasmini (Gertrude Messinger, her brother Buddy plays Omar, the prince's equally bad henchman - at one time he pretends to be blind to lure the unsuspecting Aladdin into their tent and a pretty realistic fight takes place). Anyway Yasmini entertains with a harem dance - words can't describe it, wiggling hips, wiggling arms, little flying feet - one of the adult attendants gets the giggles and doubles over with laughter - definitely not in the script!!!

Every fairy tale has to have a giant or a genie and Elmo Lincoln (who soon became the first movie Tarzan) played the gigantic genie who appeared and disappeared in a puff of smoke. Francis Carpenter's career petered out in the early 1920s, Virginia Lee Corbin went on to flapper roles ("Bare Knees" etc) but also died young, in her early 30s and Gertrude Messinger appeared in a couple of Penrod films in the early 1920s but then went on to uncredited bits.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Hidden Gem
EnemyPavement17 June 2018
I've seen many silent films in the past; but not a one so amusingly adorable as Aladdin and the Wonderful Lamp.

First thing you must know is that children portray the lead characters of the story. This is an artistic choice most famously found in Alan Parker's 1976 musical Bugsy Malone. But it seems that Chester and Sidney Franklin beat Parker to the punch almost 60 years prior. Sure it's silly a tad bit crude; however we are drawn to the delightfulness that is the child-acting of adult characters. This brings out a playful, innocent quality to the film that Bugsy Malone fails to capture.

Once again, the film is One-hundred years old and with age comes stress. This film is choppy, not only since editing wasn't even close to being perfected in 1917, but also because film preservation isn't exactly the easiest thing to accomplish. We should be thankful that a great film like this is even available to us. Many films from the same year are long lost or likely destroyed.

To my understanding, the film holds a much stronger resemblance to the original folk-tale than Disney's 1992 animated feature. I can appreciate both adaptations; though, I must weigh in favor of the Franklin bros. as my little way of raging against the machine (i.e. Disney) and since Aladdin is not one of Disney's strongest renaissance era films. I find that a lot of the blunders in Disney's Aladdin go unnoticed. And perhaps my claiming that the Franklin brothers' 1917 hidden gem is better than Disney's mainstream hit just might lure you into watching it yourself.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed