His New Profession (1914) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
An oddly enjoyable comedy full of violence & naughty behavior
wmorrow5911 August 2002
If you've seen any of the comedies Charlie Chaplin made at Keystone during his first year in the movies you know that they're usually very fast-paced, sometimes chaotic (even when the print is in decent shape), and generally full of slapstick violence. Furthermore, Charlie himself is not the lovable Little Tramp of later days, but a more ruthless figure, often drunk and combative. Where the ladies are concerned he's playful but not exactly warm-hearted. Sometimes Charlie is an out-and-out villain, as in Mabel at the Wheel and Tillie's Punctured Romance, and in one Keystone, The Property Man, he's a bully who torments his elderly assistant.

In His New Profession, a one-reel comedy, Charlie is a scamp who hangs around at a seaside park reading The Police Gazette, an illustrated weekly full of sin and scandal that was the National Enquirer of its day. A young gent who is stuck pushing his wheelchair-bound uncle around the pier persuades Charlie to take on the job for a while, so he can go off with his girlfriend. Through devious means Charlie uses the old man to raise a little cash to buy himself beer, but when the nephew returns the situation quickly deteriorates into a brawl involving the police. In this film Charlie is more selfish and amoral than villainous; when a passing lady drops her handbag he almost pockets it, but quickly returns it when challenged. His strategy to earn himself beer money is rather amusing. Compared to other, more crazed Keystone shorts the knockabout violence in this one builds gradually, the way Laurel & Hardy would handle escalating hostilities in their best comedies later on. Still, the tone here is pretty raw. Charlie sits on eggs and wipes off the residue on the grass, a beggar pretends to be crippled, and the uncle's bandaged foot gets clobbered repeatedly -- of course. Refined it ain't, but nonetheless it's more enjoyable than some of the other Keystones. It's well paced, and despite the low comedy stuff the atmosphere is light-hearted. It's just a day at the seashore with the old gang.

A couple of notes on the cast: the dapper young man first seen pushing his uncle's wheelchair (and who comes to regret entrusting Charlie with this job) is played by a very young Charley Chase, who went on to a starring career of his own in the '20s and '30s. And during the sequence in the saloon you'll have to look fast to catch a glimpse of Roscoe Arbuckle as the bartender. This cameo role is so brief, and is presented so casually, one suspects an inside joke.
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining enough, but doesn't stand out from the rest.
Anonymous_Maxine21 April 2007
In His New Profession, Chaplin again reverts into drunken slapstick, what I think is his weakest effect, although I am sure it was very popular back in 1914. A man in a park is clearly very annoyed at having to care for his uncle, who is confined to a wheelchair, so he asks the Tramp to "push him around for a bit," while he goes off chasing some girl. He does, but soon passes a bar and wants to go inside and get a drink. When the uncle won't give him a dime on account, he steals money from a sleeping homeless man's tin cup, then places his cardboard sign on the uncle and heads for the bar, where Fatty Arbuckle is almost completely unnoticed as the bartender.

There are several moderately effective gags, but it seems that the film is trying to present more story than it can carry. There is a lot going on in the story, but very little of it is clear, and as is so common in these early films, it soon resorts to a lot of pushing and kicking. You can't really expect a whole lot more than that from these early comedies, but as it is, there is not much to make this one stand out from the rest of Chaplin's early work.

Even Chaplin himself begins and ends the film with a yawn!!!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
a few cute moments and that's all
planktonrules23 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I've seen quite a few Chaplin shorts from early in his career and I've noticed that his early stuff (done for Keystone Studios) is pretty dreadful stuff. Unlike his wonderful full-length films from the 20s and 30s, the films from 1914-1915 are incredibly poorly made--having no script but only vague instructions from the director. In most cases, the films had almost no plot and degenerated to people punching and kicking each other.

This short features Chaplin and has an appearance by Fatty Arbuckle as well. This and a few small laughs are really about all the film has to offer. Charlie is asked to watch a guy's uncle (who's in a wheelchair) as the guy chases a cute girl. Charlie agrees but later gets distracted by a nearby bar. At this point, he puts a sign on the guy saying he's an invalid and gave him a tin cup--all so Charlie would have enough $ to buy a drink! Funny but awful!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Naughty profession
TheLittleSongbird31 May 2018
Am a big fan of Charlie Chaplin, have been for over a decade now. Many films and shorts of his are very good to masterpiece, and like many others consider him a comedy genius and one of film's most important and influential directors.

He did do better than 'His New Profession', still made very early on in his career where he was still finding his feet and not fully formed what he became famous for. Can understand why the Keystone period suffered from not being as best remembered or highly remembered than his later efforts, but they are mainly decent and important in their own right. 'His New Profession' is a long way from a career high, but has a lot of nice things about it and is to me one of the better efforts in the 1914 Keystone batch.

'His New Profession' is not as hilarious, charming or touching as his later work and some other shorts in the same period. The story is flimsy and the production values not as audacious. Occasionally, things feel a little scrappy and confused.

For someone who was still relatively new to the film industry and had literally just moved on from their stage background, 'His New Profession' is not bad at all, pretty good actually.

While not audacious, the film hardly looks ugly, is more than competently directed and is appealingly played. Chaplin looks comfortable, with shades of his distinctive style here, and shows his stage expertise while opening it up that it doesn't become stagy or repetitive shtick. Fatty Arbuckle's cameo is worth looking out for.

Although the humour, charm and emotion was done even better and became more refined later, 'His New Profession' is still very amusing, cute and hard to dislike. It moves quickly and doesn't feel too long or short.

To conclude, decent. 7/10 Bethany Cox
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
New eccentric comedy
deickemeyer18 February 2019
Chas. Chaplain entertains the observer in this number with a lot of new eccentric comedy. The plot is only sufficient to hang a number of amusing antics on. Some of the situations are very funny and this will please admirers of slapstick fun. - The Moving Picture World, September 26, 1914
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Anti Hero Tramp!
georgewilliamnoble20 October 2020
This 16 minute flick is no where near his very best or indeed his keystone best but the film from a historical points out why Chaplin and his tramp became the greatest success in popular entertainment up to that time. Chaplin quickly mastered the new medium and here he circumvents normal morals by playing to the popular crowd which at the time was very the poor, the working class and the exploited so the little tramps cruelty seemed then to be not just funny but clever in a way that simply does play to modern manners. Chaplin was still learning his trade when this short was put to celluloid way back in 1914 but even then he knew what cinema and entertainment was all about. Today 100 and more years on it is clear that Chaplin was not only an artist but a genius and a pioneer and innovator of deserved legendary status.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not his best profession
Horst_In_Translation11 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
"His New Profession" is an American black-and-white silent short film from 1914, so this one is already over a century old and in the original it ran for 16 minutes, but I found versions that were down to 11 minutes with more frames per second then I guess. The director here is the legendary Charlie Chaplin and he also plays a central character, a man who is supposed to take care of a nother man in a wheelchair, but really cares more about drinks and girls. But then again the other characters are not anymore reliable like the "crippled" fraud or those people just leaving the wheelchair guy with a stranger early on or the main antagonist. The only one you can actually feel sorry for for what he has to go through is the guy in the wheelchair, especially the fear he must have when almost crashing down in the water repeatedly. Chaplin has big names like Chase and Arbuckle with him here, even if they aren't playing exactly the guys with the most screen time, but still this was just a mediocre not too funny little film I'd say. Not one of Chaplin's best and I'm not surprised it is nowhere near his most known (short) films. Only for the biggest CC fans and everybody else can skip the watch here. Not recommended.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not one of Chaplin's best
Leofwine_draca5 September 2016
I saw this Charlie Chaplin short under the title THE GOOD FOR NOTHING. It's very similar in tone to IN THE PARK, consisting of Chaplin and a few others goofing around in the great outdoors, although the setting this time around is a pier. I didn't like it as much as IN THE PARK, as the gag rate isn't as consistent, and much of the humour is lowbrow and repetitive.

Chaplin plays an idler who is tasked with looking after an invalid by fellow comedian Charley Chase. The guy is in a wheelchair so all manner of pain-focused gags arise from that situation. There are some very funny bits here, especially those involving the wheelchair being pushed around, although Chaplin doesn't seem quite on form and he has little of those character quirks I've seen elsewhere. Watch out for Fatty Arbuckle's cameo as the exasperated bartender.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
an all right short film
andynortonuk25 May 2003
I didn't know that Charlie Chaplin made so many films in 1914. So I struggled a lot to find this short film The Good For Nothing, mainly because I did not know that it was actually known as His New Profession. To be honest I found this short comedy quite violent, with all the comic fighting at the pier and in the bar. But then I have not seen another Chaplin short before, so I might have been not expecting it.

The gags are amusing, but can be a bit repetitive, like Charlie's cane keeps hitting the Uncle's cast. Also, because of this, I found the first time when Charlie falling over into the food on the pavement quite amusing, but the second time a little less amusing. But some jokes can be not completed for that extra unexpected humour. An example of this is when the Uncle, in his wheelchair, gets pushed along the pier, and, like you would expect, to fall into the sea, while in fact he stops at the edge for that bit of unexpected humour, a bit of a surprise to me when the gag was repeated for the second time. Chaplin's direction really made the extremely simple plot seem like 16 minutes of traditional slapstick, repetitive gags, unexpected humour and more comic fights than you could shake a cane at! I was surprised that Minta Durfee, whose potrayal of the Woman was satisfactory, had an ongoing film career until her death in 1975! While Chaplin, whose portrayal of Charlie was very good and very important to the flow of the film, career went on until 1967, 10 years before his actual death! I do have pity though for Fritz Schade, whose protrayal of the Uncle really made the character come alive, didn't make another film after 1917, and died in 1926, and the young age of 46. It's a shame because he would have had a tremendous career in comedy films, with a role like that! Personally I would not recommend this short as an introduction Chaplin's unique work, just because of all that fighting might not a common convention of his work. Overall, it was an all right short film.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Chaplin On A Pier
CitizenCaine29 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The Good For Nothing, the alternate film title for this film, would be more apt for this Chaplin effort. Charlie ends up pushing a man around in a wheelchair as a favor to none other than Charley Chase, early in his career, who needs to shed his uncle in favor of making time with a girl. Chaplin runs into trouble with the uncle in no time flat. He manipulates the uncle into getting him some money to drink with in rather cruel fashion, but it's still funny nonetheless. Chaplin has run-ins with a beggar, a girl, and of course the police before it's over. This film has several sight gags, including Chaplin trying to make time with the girl on a bench and seeing the uncle in his wheelchair nearly roll off the pier into the water; a third roll down the pier into the water would have been funnier though. ** of 4 stars.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
His New Profession review
JoeytheBrit28 June 2020
An early Chaplin comedy from his days at Keystone, which means he's more aggressive than he was in later years. This early version of the Little Tramp thinks nothing of kicking the occupant of a wheelchair in the chest and stealing from a beggar. There are a few mild laughs - which is more than you can say for many of Chaplin's efforts for Keystone - but he's still far from the finished article.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What Mattered Was Slapstick
JamesHitchcock8 November 2019
In 1914 Charlie Chaplin made no fewer than 36 silent comedy shorts. "The Good for Nothing", also known as "His New Profession", is one of them, released in late August just after the outbreak of World War I. Europe may have had more serious matters on its mind, but in America what mattered was slapstick.

Here Charlie is hired by a man to wheel his elderly, wheelchair-bound uncle around a seaside park. Dissatisfied with the amount he is being paid, however, he puts a beggar's sign and tin on the wheelchair while the old man is asleep. Further complications ensure, involving a real beggar and those two stock comic figures from Chaplin comedies, a pretty girl and a policeman. When the uncle's wheelchair rolls on to the pier we think we know what is coming. Or is it?

We are lucky that so many of Chaplin's films have survived, given that many films from the 1910s are now lost, although today some of them are of little more than historical interest. What strikes the modern viewer is how cruel some of them are. "The Good for Nothing" is not quite as bad in this respect as something like "In the Park", but even so it struck me as trying to get laughs at the expense of the elderly and disabled. The uncle is not treated as a human being in his own right, more like an item of property on whom virtually any indignity can be inflicted provided that it helps to get laughs.

Motion Picture News described the film as "a laugh throughout", which suggests that both audiences and critics in 1914 were more easily pleased than modern ones. This was, however, a period during which both Chaplin, and the cinema in general, were on an upward learning curve and needed to work out what worked and what didn't. And, although films like this one may seem a bit crude by modern standards, and indeed by the standards of any period alter than about 1930, the general consensus at the time seemed to be that they did work. They just don't make very interesting watching 100 years on.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed